/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15358035]

He's never done any research or experiments. All of his papers are just analysis of other people's experiments.

[Anonymous No.15358110]

>>15358035
>All of his papers are just analysis of other people's experiments.
I mean technically that's still a valid paper. 99% of all PhD's papers are derivative and won't amount to much. He's not the exception he's the rule.

[Anonymous No.15358129]

I'm so fucking tired of /pol/tards thinking this nigger is an actual scientist, he's a fucking communicator who engages with laymen. They're too retarded to tell the difference and use him as a strawman against astrophysics

[Anonymous No.15358154]

>>15358035
And coincidently he now analyses papers and presents them to the public! Almost like he did in his PhD!

[Anonymous No.15358173]

>>15358129
I mean he kinda talks a lot of shit to be fair.

[Anonymous No.15358741]

The Faint-End Slopes of Galaxy Luminosity Functions in the COSMOS Field
C. T. Liu et al., 2008, Astrophysical Journal Letters, v.672, p.198
COSMOS: Hubble Space Telescope Observations
N. Scoville et al., 2007, Astrophysical Journal Supplement, v.172, p.38
The Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS): Overview
N. Scoville et al., 2007, Astrophysical Journal Supplement, v.172, p.1
Optical light curves of the Type IA supernovae SN 1990N and 1991T
P. Lira et al., 1998, Astronomical Journal, v.115, p.234
(See also Erratum: 1998, Astronomical Journal, v.116, p.1006)
BVRI Light Curves For 29 Type Ia Supernovae
M. Hamuy et al., 1996, Astronomical Journal, v.112, p.2408
The Type Ia Supernova 1989B in NGC3627 (M66)
L. A. Wells et al., 1994, Astronomical Journal, v.108, p.2233
The Expanding Photosphere Method Applied to SN1992am at cz = 14600 km/s
B. P. Schmidt et al., 1994, Astronomical Journal, v.107, p.1444
On the Possibility of a Major Impact on Uranus in the Past Century
Neil D. Tyson et al, 1993, Astronomy & Astrophysics (Research Notes), v.275, p.630
An Exposure Guide for Taking Twilight Flatfields with Large Format CCDs
Neil D. Tyson & Roy R. Gal, 1993, Astronomical Journal, v.105, p.1206
Radial Velocity Distribution and Line Strengths of 33 Carbon Stars in the Galactic Bulge
Neil D. Tyson & R. Michael Rich, 1991, Astrophysical Journal, v.367, p.547
On the possibility of Gas-Rich Dwarf Galaxies in the Lyman-alpha Forest
Neil D. Tyson, 1988, Astrophysical Journal (Letters), v.329, p.L57
Bursting Dwarf Galaxies: Implications for Luminosity Function, Space Density, and Cosmological Mass Density
Neil D. Tyson & John M. Scalo, 1988, Astrophysical Journal, v.329, p.618
uvby Photometry of Blue Stragglers in NGC 7789
Bruce A. Twarog & Neil D. Tyson, 1985, Astronomical Journal, v.90, p.1247

[Anonymous No.15358744]

>>15358035
>All of his papers are just analysis of other people's experiments.
Albert Einstein? Niels Bohr?

[Anonymous No.15359019]

>>15358035
>>15358744
All of them puppets. This world is a psyop, particle physics is a meme.