[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 16 KB, 305x340, 1252551282924.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1535412 No.1535412[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Why are addition and multiplication commutative, but not exponentiation?

>> No.1535430

> assuming real numbers
Hey, wats a matrix???

>> No.1535435

5 ^ 2 = 5 * 5
2 ^ 5 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2

>> No.1535459

>>1535412
Because if it was, you'd be here asking why they are all commutative

>> No.1535473

>>1535412
Because God says so.

>> No.1535480

Wait until you find out it isn't distributive, either!

>> No.1535582

I think we need to fix this. Let's redefine exponentiation.

x^y = ((x+y)/2) ^ ((x+y)/2)

This matches normal exponentiation for x = y, and I think it will always lie between the (old-version) values of x^y and y^x, at least for positive numbers.

>> No.1535664

>>1535582
Oops, never mind, that won't work.

This thread is now about finding a real-valued function f(x, y) such that for all real x and y,
1. f(x, x) = x^x
2. f(x, y) lies between x^y and y^x

>> No.1535694

>>1535664
<span class="math"> f(x,y) = \frac{1}{2}(x^y + y^x) [/spoiler]

>> No.1535733

2+2=niggers.

hurr

>> No.1535749
File: 613 KB, 2320x839, 1276712536748.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1535749

>> No.1535767

deleting this thread, see
>>1535719

>> No.1535774
File: 513 KB, 500x502, 1270941873368.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1535774

TI-89
they rox