[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 125 KB, 1280x989, george_orwell3-FslAnigWcAEuN9a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15345754 No.15345754 [Reply] [Original]

Hi /sci/, /pol/ bro here.
I'm finally ready to take the red pill on climate change. After years of not giving a fuck I recently read the official narrative and to me it sounds convincing. Anthropogenic emissions are causing global warming. Therefore, we urgently need to stop the emissions. I've seen refutations of common counterarguments, too. Is there any scientific loophole left to argue that climate change is either natural or that it's self-regulating and nothing to worry about?

>> No.15345762
File: 37 KB, 500x692, 1636204945969.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15345762

>>15345754
Checkmate, poltard.

B^)

>> No.15345776

>>15345754
Bruh, you don't think that the word "opposite" can be applied to random animals, do you? Like, if you think that two furry mammals that are both kept as pets, both hunt prey, both have litters of offspring, and are similar in a million other ways are "opposite" then what does that word mean to you? Are you the kind of moron that thinks sky is the opposite of ground, or that drought is the opposite of flood?