/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15312720]

/sci/ meme thread

[Anonymous No.15312729]

[Anonymous No.15312732]

[Anonymous No.15312736]

[Anonymous No.15312739]

[Anonymous No.15312741]

[Anonymous No.15312748]

[Anonymous No.15312752]

[Anonymous No.15312753]

The AI behind your self driving vehicle

[Anonymous No.15312760]

[Anonymous No.15312775]

[Anonymous No.15312797]

[Anonymous No.15312817]

[Anonymous No.15312917]

[Anonymous No.15313008]

[Anonymous No.15313115]

[Anonymous No.15313175]

what ever happened to the monkeypox epidemic? it just disappeared off the radar without a trace

[Anonymous No.15313195]

>>15313175
Turns out only fags spread it, so we went back to not caring

[Anonymous No.15313303]

>>15312753
is that an ai robot or a real irl person?

[Anonymous No.15313306]

>>15312720
Yeah, please, say no more because you've already over explained enough that have no insights and state trivial conditions that must be true for a wavefunction in general

[Anonymous No.15314270]

[Anonymous No.15314366]

>>15312739
the concept of living organism is totally different of the person concept, you fucking dumb nigger. At least use a pic less retarded.

[Anonymous No.15314375]

>>15314366
>reeeeee i hate humans
but also
>hey human do me a favor
mentally ill level of entitlement

[Anonymous No.15314383]

>>15314366

(not the person who send the image in >>15312739)
What's the difference, pray tell?
Lol why are you living in "concepts"? It is what is is! Concepts? What is this? Sociology?
Talking about concepts is unscientific bro, we need concrete evidence like numbers.

[Anonymous No.15314402]

>>15312720
Wait a minute. It's been a while since I did QM.

Shouldn't it be that the normalization condition be on the integral of Ψ2?

[Anonymous No.15314404]

>>15312720
Wait a minute. It's been a while since I did QM.

Shouldn't it be that the normalization condition be on the integral of Ψ^2?

[Anonymous No.15314405]

>>15313303
Autonomous services such as Waymo have people on standby for when the system shits the bed.

[Anonymous No.15314407]

Why is it that society still has female-only scholarships but forbids male-only scholarships even though women are now a majority in college attendance?

[Anonymous No.15314409]

>>15312753
Even this still has the potential to greatly multiply the productivity of a cab driver.

[Anonymous No.15314460]

>>15312760
where'd you get that video of me?

[Anonymous No.15314539]

>>15314407
pretty good political cartoon desu

[Anonymous No.15314665]

>>15314375
It's a dumb meme though. If we swap the order then the pro-life person would have to be a radical pacifist, never killing animals, bacteria, etc.

[Anonymous No.15314670]

>>15314407
>forbids male-only scholarships
is this actually true, or just rightwing rhetoric bending the uncommon into the impossible.

[Anonymous No.15314708]

>>15314407
you know exactly why, you just can't articulate it

[Anonymous No.15314720]

Imagine still being this mad about having to get a shot.

[Anonymous No.15314756]

[Anonymous No.15314935]

>>15313175
>>15313195
They started to spread it to kids so all communication regarding it had to be shut down to protect the fags.

[Anonymous No.15314982]

tekashi 6ix9ine puts his analytic math and science ability on full display

[Anonymous No.15314994]

>>15314982
the scientific method prides itself on replicability
if scientists can repeat the experiment using the same equipment, then i will happily believe the figures

[Anonymous No.15314996]

>>15312739
>it's not an actual life yet
Strawman, the argument is that it is not actual human yet, nobody is trying to assign human rights to bacteria on mars, if they find it, they will cage it and study it, its not a mater of life, but of humanity and personhood with the fetus.

[Anonymous No.15315011]

>>15314996
you're not an actual human, novelty bacteria is more worthwhile than you are

[Anonymous No.15315018]

>>15314720
If Biden and his cronies told you to shoot yourself up with bleach, you probably would.

[Anonymous No.15315022]

>>15315011
Cry harder Copey McCopeface.

[Anonymous No.15315025]

[Anonymous No.15315031]

>>15312752
kek

[Anonymous No.15315047]

>>15315022
>I am and uninvited, unwanted interloper from reddit and I have come to 4chan to spam the science board with my political rhetoric
Why?

[Anonymous No.15315050]

>>15315047
You are confusing me with >>15312739, cry in their general direction for introducing politics to the thread, cry baby.

[Anonymous No.15315060]

>wanted to post some cool math memes
>thread is filled with some unfunny /pol/ shit
election tourists strike again...

[Anonymous No.15315072]

>>15315060
Science is a function of politics the peer review step is 100% political.

[Anonymous No.15315074]

>>15315050
>redditier gets emotionally triggered by the soijak meme
predictable like clockwork

[Anonymous No.15315084]

>>15315074
I just stated facts, if you want an example of an emotionally driven response filled with fallacies and personal attacks instead of logic or reason see
>>15315011
>>15315047

[Anonymous No.15315143]

>>15312739
Wait life was found on mars?

[Anonymous No.15315229]

[Anonymous No.15315290]

[Anonymous No.15315330]

>>15312720
This wave function is not normalizable.

[Anonymous No.15315376]

[Anonymous No.15315463]

>>15315376
The GNU toolset has been running on computers since the 80s you retard. I have the GNU compiler version 1.x on a Amiga Fish-Disk as well as for the Atari ST.

[Anonymous No.15315503]

>>15314670
it's unironically true, you also can't set up scholarships that specifically target whites, but can set up scholarships that specifically target other races.
>source - my grandfather was a chemistry prof, the son of poor coal miners from WV. after he passed our family wanted to use a part of his estate to set up a scholarship at his U targeting boys from poor white working class families and were denied because we were told it conflicted with their policies on diversity, equity, and inclusion. we ended up just having to tracking down individual students on our own and offering the money as private donations.

[Anonymous No.15315607]

>>15315229
>8 months of job searching entry level jobs with bio bachelors/chemistry minor
>Roughly 240 applications
>2 interviews

[Anonymous No.15316082]

>>15314670
It's 100% true. Try to find a scholarship that excludes females.

In fact, someone tried to do it a few years back and it was shut down.

[Anonymous No.15316088]

>>15315011
It's curious that you assign a greater humanity to an undeveloped fetus than someone engaging in discussion with you.

Almost as if your entire value system is contradictory.

[Anonymous No.15316089]

>>15315503
>scholarship at his U
I don't think this means you couldn't just do it privately, and award it however you wanted in cash.

[Anonymous No.15316092]

>>15316089
nvm I didn't read your last sentence at all apparently.

Would this be illegal if someone could prove you're deciding with gender or race as a factor? Or does private spending (and paying tax on it) mean they can all eat shit.

[Anonymous No.15316103]

>>15316092
Yes, I believe the laws aren't so bad yet that they can forbid you from giving gifts to white males.

Nevertheless, this is still creating a major obstacle in helping young white men that simply does not exist for anyone else.

[Anonymous No.15316123]

>>15316103
>a major obstacle in helping young white men that simply does not exist for anyone else.
Presumably its SUPPOSED TO BE calibrated to cancel out with other factors. I have no doubt you're right in net though.

[Anonymous No.15316145]

>>15315330
Kek

[Anonymous No.15316174]

>>15316123
>We're going to end discrimination by institutionalizing discrimination.

>We are going to enforce equality by handicapping the fit

What is the purpose of this but to drag everyone down?

How is this 'calibrated' when females are a majority of college students and still have tons of scholarships that men simply cannot apply for?

It's just blatant discrimination because the people who preach 'equality' really want domination.

[Anonymous No.15316189]

>>15316174
>What is the purpose of this but to drag everyone down?
I'm not arguing with you, one of the big ideas is that the relationship between someone's commercial value/outcome vs. opportunity is nonlinear. So by making the female's education 25% easier we are helping more than reducing the male's 30% or whatever, to hit some maxima.

Is any of that supported by solid experimental evidence though? almost certainly not, just anecdote and opinion.

[Anonymous No.15316254]

>>15316189
>So by making the female's education 25% easier we are helping more than reducing the male's 30% or whatever

Except Men contribute more per capita than women ever do.

Women get an education and then decide they want to have a child, or don't actually want a high stress demanding workload.

So by prioritizing women we're doing the exact opposite.

This IS backed by facts and data. Only men are net contributors to taxes. Women use more social services than they pay into.

[Anonymous No.15316263]

>>15312775
Is that real?

[Anonymous No.15316449]

>>15315607
>less than 1 hour to apply for rail crew job
>1 online exam
>1 interview
>20 weeks of paid training
>pays more than entry level bio job
>must be 18 & able to pass a drug screening
>future job title: engineer

[Anonymous No.15316916]

>>15314720
>Imagine being this mad about being forced to waive any liability rights with respect to the safety of a prototypical injection

[Anonymous No.15317090]

>>15316449
You even get to make a funny in ohio every once in a while

[Anonymous No.15317154]

[Anonymous No.15317194]

the great thing about the /sci/ meme thread is that only about 4 posters on the board have a high enough iq to appreciate humor and the rest is midwit rabble which can only get angry at jokes they don't understand

[Anonymous No.15317507]

>>15312720

[Anonymous No.15317629]

[Anonymous No.15317639]

[Anonymous No.15317640]

>>15316089
Making helping white people systematically hard is still wrong. It's literally illegal but every time it goes to the Supreme Court they just say they'll let it continue for another decade or two just for good measure

[Anonymous No.15317642]

>>15317194
Well shalom to that "far right extremist"