Meta: Why do /pol/ and /x/ tards come here?

File: 136 KB, 546x700, 1675294674081137.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Meta: Why do /pol/ and /x/ tards come here? Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:33:56 2023 No.15247171 [Reply] [Original]

>they're not genuinely interested in STEM topics
>they don't work in STEM
>they are not studying towards working in STEM
>they don't have STEM hobbies
Why do they come here?
It seems the only thing that motivates and interests them is "owning" some strawman of a "basedentist" by spreading all and any form of information that they identify or misconstrue to work towards those goals.
Half the posters on this board now reject basic laws of physics and deny grounded scientific theories like evolution.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:34:34 2023 No.15247174 >>15247171 >basedentist" "s-o-y-entist"*

bodhi Sat Mar 4 03:39:42 2023 No.15247184

>>15247171
>grounded theory
flat earth was a grounded theory once too. if you don't like having your religious beliefs (yes a theory is just belief not a law hack) being questioned than maybe you should think about turning your interests to something other than science. you can leave, no one will miss you, I promise

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:41:27 2023 No.15247186 Because outside of the math thread, this is a shit board filled with underages and retards who don't know what they're talking about. If it were a board like /n/ or /toy/ that had passionate, knowledgeable posters, the retards would be driven out.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:41:54 2023 No.15247188 >>15247171 It sounds like you're the contrarian here anon. Maybe you should go to another board if you don't enjoy people discussing scientific topics in a critical light.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:42:39 2023 No.15247189 >>15247184 shut up retard.

Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:42:51 2023 No.15247190

>>15247184
>flat earth was a grounded theory once too
No it wasn't. The belief in a flat earth was based in religious dogma and not scientific evidence.
A scientific theory is by definition the opposite of a religious belief. You are only proving my point, you're so desperate to push your contrarian political views that you pull down well established, evidence based, theories to do so. You are fucking cancer. Fuck off to /pol/.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:43:16 2023 No.15247194 File: 58 KB, 211x300, 00639A04-D3C5-4E1F-8241-8639FC48D79F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Bro evolution isn’t proved it’s pseudoscience like most of biology. Popsci has melted the brains of the sheep

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:43:59 2023 No.15247195 >>15247188 Pulling bullshit out of your ass and promoting garbage from the internet is not being critical. You're a contrarian parrot.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:44:45 2023 No.15247199 >>15247195 I've never done that. I think you're just projecting and getting extremely mad that your political views aren't being supported.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:45:25 2023 No.15247201 >>15247199 I don't post my political views here because this is not a political board, unlike you. What's your degree and what field do you work in?

Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:45:51 2023 No.15247202
File: 188 KB, 1440x900, 65.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>Hey guys, I'm bored and feel a bit like a loser tonight, how about I make a thread about someone I can feel superiority over and you all just agree with me so I can feel like I'm not a complete loser.
You probably shouldn't make your failures in life so obvious.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:47:25 2023 No.15247205 >>15247202 >don't call me out on my bullshit, meanie

bodhi Sat Mar 4 03:47:39 2023 No.15247206

>>15247189
look at this intellectual retort from a top mind who is in daily pain because of "bad threads" here. If everyone could just contribute like they do to make the board better!

stfu stupid nigger and keep crying, it makes my day every time I see one of these threads and no you are one step closer to sodoku

Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:48:07 2023 No.15247208

>>15247201
>I don't post my political views here because this is not a political board, unlike you.
This thread was created because you believe that people discussing science in ways you dislike is political. I can intuit using logic that your political views are related to some topic you were offended about on /sci/, and that you wish you were able to ban the people who offended you with wrongthink.
>What's your degree and what field do you work in?
If I told you, you would call me a liar. So I will simply not indulge you.

>>	bodhi Sat Mar 4 03:49:29 2023 No.15247210 >>15247206 *know >>15247190 HAHAHAH https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4QfHdcMeEc

Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:50:40 2023 No.15247213

>>15247208
>This thread was created because you believe that people discussing science in ways you dislike is political.
You can pretend to be obtuse but you know exactly what I am talking about.
>If I told you, you would call me a liar. So I will simply not indulge you.
You can post your diploma.

Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:51:48 2023 No.15247214

>>15247213
>You can pretend to be obtuse but you know exactly what I am talking about.
I can probably even guess the thread that triggered you by your posting style.
>You can post your diploma.
I could. But I'm not interested in doxing myself to win an argument with a crank.

>>	bodhi Sat Mar 4 03:52:57 2023 No.15247217 >>15247213 How about some dick pics for you instead? I know a little faggot like you would love that. You are probably touching yourself right now thinking about it already

Anonymous Sat Mar 4 03:55:58 2023 No.15247223
File: 76 KB, 1200x800, everyone is like me.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15247171
>they're not genuinely interested in STEM topics
but also
>i'm posting a meta thread because i have nothing to say about science
right, its them who have no interest in science and not you, sure. i totally believe you

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:00:26 2023 No.15247232 >>15247214 Nobody asked you to dox yourself, idiot.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:02:19 2023 No.15247234 >>15247232 Well I guess you'll be able to live without my diploma then. I'm glad you're willing to concede on that.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:04:12 2023 No.15247240 >>15247234 Im afraid inCan't do that chief

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:05:31 2023 No.15247242 >>15247234 You can explain what you do and from that I can deduce if you're full of shit with follow up questions.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:05:54 2023 No.15247243 >>15247171 you're far too transparent in starting meta threads on every single board only to whine about /pol/, your pay is docked

Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:06:39 2023 No.15247245

>>15247242
How about I ask your qualifications instead? Will you post your diploma and specialty so /sci/ can independently verify if your thread is worth caring about or not?
The last time something like this was posted, it was by a RN which was extremely embarrassing.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:07:57 2023 No.15247248 >>15247245 I asked you first since you mentioned it. Don't change the subject matter.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:08:15 2023 No.15247250 >>15247245 Post certificate of participation from jewish affirmative action institution.

Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:09:10 2023 No.15247251

>>15247248
>I asked you first since you mentioned it.
That's not particularly relevant. You're the one who's making allegations, and I already told you I'm not interested in doxing myself for your amusement. You, however, seem quite thrilled to post that sort of information so you can go ahead and prove your superiority to me by doing so.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:10:12 2023 No.15247254 >>15247250 kek

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:11:05 2023 No.15247257 >>15247251 Nobody is asking you to dox yourself. Use your brain.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:12:28 2023 No.15247258 >>15247257 Then neither of us will post our diplomas and you will continue to be a nonscientist complaining about being politically BTFO. Thank you for conceding.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:14:16 2023 No.15247262 >>15247258 I work in aerospace. Feel free to ask me anything related to it. What about you?

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:14:37 2023 No.15247263 >>15247262 >I work in aerospace. Post your diploma.

Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:18:41 2023 No.15247270
File: 1.56 MB, 938x1024, newfags.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15247174
imagine being such a newfag that you get caught up by the site's most notorious worldfilter
imagine being an unwanted, uninvited, noncontributing newfag and then trying to demand that everyone else need to change their ways in order to fulfill your desires.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:25:29 2023 No.15247279 >>15247263 No, I don't want to dox myself.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:27:08 2023 No.15247283 >>15247171 90% of this board is pseudo intellectualism and baseless crackpot theories. /x/ and /pol/ fit right in with the rest of us retards.

Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:30:58 2023 No.15247293

/sfg/, /mg/, /med/, /sqt/, and /scg/ are the only good threads here. The /x/ and /pol/ fags don't go into them because they can't derail them. They get quickly exposed as pseuds and clowns. They only have free reign in outer /sci/. I know for 100% certainty that people in those threads have degrees and industry/research experience.

Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:34:48 2023 No.15247302
File: 177 KB, 745x997, soyence articles.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15247283
>90% of this board is pseudo intellectualism and baseless crackpot theories.
thats probably the same fraction as in the replication crisis journals. also you left outright shilling off your list of unwanted content, thats another problem /sci/ shares with the journals

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:38:25 2023 No.15247311 >>15247302 >replication crisis journal Which journal? Which field?

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:47:44 2023 No.15247320 >>15247311 Nature.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:49:37 2023 No.15247323 >>15247320 post it

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:50:45 2023 No.15247326 >>15247323 What the journal Nature?

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:53:42 2023 No.15247329 >>15247326 Yeah post an article about the "replication crisis" in nature. Now don't try to conflate this with the social sciences.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:55:53 2023 No.15247333 >>15247311 Try this one on for size. Lancet and NEJM publishing outright fraud without retraction until the shitstorm hit them. https://www.science.org/content/article/many-scientists-citing-two-scandalous-covid-19-papers-ignore-their-retractions

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:56:55 2023 No.15247334 >>15247329 Here you go. https://www.science.org/content/article/something-seriously-wrong-room-temperature-superconductivity-study-retracted

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 04:59:52 2023 No.15247338 >>15247333 What is this pop sci news article saying (in your opinion)? >>15247334 That's not Nature. You're posting a news article, pop-sci, not a science journal. Why did you say "nature" (scientific journal) and then post pop-sci?

Anonymous Sat Mar 4 05:00:56 2023 No.15247340
File: 45 KB, 320x320, twilight-zone-1959___if_i_ignore_it.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15247329
>the replication crisis isn't affecting everyone else's discipline, but not mine
go to https://retractionwatch.com, find any discipline that hasn't contributed content to the site

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 05:01:11 2023 No.15247341 >>15247338 Science is a journal. WTF are you smoking? These are articles from the print version of Science, the journal, about prominent replication failures in mainstream journals like Nature, Lancet, and NEJM.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 05:02:08 2023 No.15247343 >>15247341 It's pop sci website

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 05:03:12 2023 No.15247346 File: 10 KB, 250x201, cringe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15247343

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 05:04:01 2023 No.15247348 >>15247340 Some studies not being replicated is only a good sign. If all papers were correct I'd be very distrustful. Bullshit, honest or faked, is going to get published. Nothing wrong with that. It's part of the process.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 05:05:07 2023 No.15247353 >>15247346 Post a paper from nature like you claimed in your initial post before you moved the goal posts and posted pop sci.

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 05:06:01 2023 No.15247355 >>15247353 Huh? I said Nature was a journal hit by the replication crisis. Are you saying you've been misunderstanding the conversation this entire time?

>>	Anonymous Sat Mar 4 05:19:27 2023 No.15247370 >>15247355 Still waiting

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math