/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15246946]

What happens when a majority of people no longer consider credentials to be a sign of legitimate expertise?

[Anonymous No.15246953]

>>15246946
A new source of legitimacy emerges, usually from a parallel institution that can gain the trust the original one lost.

[Anonymous No.15246956]

>>15246946
Then you get legitimacy from results, not just your diploma

[Anonymous No.15246959]

egg producing and non egg producing is a binary

[Anonymous No.15246961]

>>15246946
Who are these "people" calling gender into question?

[Anonymous No.15246963]

>>15246946
>What happens when a majority of people no longer consider credentials to be a sign of legitimate expertise?
They start learning for themselves rather than believing the "experts" and government talking heads.

[Anonymous No.15246967]

>>15246946
Calling women "egg layers" is misogynistic!

Also, excluding men who identify as women by saying they cannot lay eggs is probably racist! Reeee!

[Anonymous No.15246990]

>>15246959
/thread

[Anonymous No.15247014]

>>15246959
delete this chud

[Anonymous No.15247926]

>>15246959
The Gnostic Hermetics are trying to do Dialectical Alchemy. They'll just mix the polar opposites of each binary over and over until somehow they're no longer binary. They're as clueless as the underpants gnomes from South Park.

[Anonymous No.15247945]

>>15246946
That isn't wrong terminology, it's sill but not wrong

[Anonymous No.15247979]

>>15246946
Diploma mill customers will have to start demonstrating their expertise through competence, not muh credentials

[Anonymous No.15247992]

>>15246946
americans are mentally ill

[Anonymous No.15248015]

ho boy another clickbait article quoting a literally who

[Anonymous No.15248026]

>>15246946
you will never produce any eggs
you will forever be a sperm producer warped into a crude mockery of an egg producer

[Anonymous No.15248127]

>>15247945
No, it's wrong.

[Anonymous No.15248251]

>>15246946
>man = featherless biped
>woman = egg producing

After many centuries philosophers still can't define what a man or woman is ....... but why is it every time we try we end up describing a chicken?

[Anonymous No.15248376]

>>15246946
Egg-producing is literally the same thing as female

[Anonymous No.15248418]

>>15248251
Wuz we dinosaurs too?

[Anonymous No.15249633]

>>15248251

[Anonymous No.15249634]

>>15246946
Based. Now I can call any sow i want a "Breeder".

[Anonymous No.15249637]

>>15248418
>>15249633

We'z ruled da Errf!

[Anonymous No.15249643]

>>15246959
Transphobe hush

[Anonymous No.15249649]

>>15247945
Egg producing is correct and also happens to be the definition of female

[Anonymous No.15249748]

>>15246959
That's why cumdumpster is a more appropriate term.
/b/ was right all along.

[Anonymous No.15249961]

>>15246959
This. There is nothing scientific about the current retarded woke war against the meaning of words, it's just semantics not the real world.

[Anonymous No.15249962]

>>15247945
It's an overcomplication of language for the sake of ideology.

[Anonymous No.15249973]

>>15246946
>scientists
>experts
How yo spot bullshit woke manipulation 101

[Anonymous No.15249988]

>>15249973
Anytime I see or hear the goycattle buzzwords “experts” or “scientists” I immediately know it’s bullshit.
Get pavlov’d you low IQ apes

[Anonymous No.15250039]

>>15246946
>What happens when a majority of people no longer consider credentials to be a sign of legitimate expertise?
>when
We already passed that point quite a while ago

[Anonymous No.15250290]

>>15246946
>Use 'egg-producing' not 'female', say eggsperts in call to phase out eggsclusionary language

egg

[Anonymous No.15251176]

>>15246946
nobody wants to go to a black doctor, not even blacks. so credentials are not a considered sign of legitimate expertise by the general public.
the loud vocal minority of people who have credentials which they didn't earn are the only people who think that credentials matter.

[Anonymous No.15253289]

egg producing and non egg producing is a binary

[Anonymous No.15253315]

>>15253289
Why was the other post deleted?

[Anonymous No.15253930]

I’ve had it with these egg making mammals on this Monday to Friday forum.

[Anonymous No.15256489]

>>15246946
>memorize this new woke jargon which will be superseded by something even more fake and gay as soon as we can think it up
why bother?

[Anonymous No.15256537]

>>15248251
>BEHOLD! A WOMAN!

[Anonymous No.15256550]

>>15246946
You either produce eggs or you don't.

[Anonymous No.15257744]

>>15253315

[Anonymous No.15257755]

>>15246946
When one priest caste is discredited, a new priest caste will soon fill the void.

[Anonymous No.15257756]

>>15248251
Diogenes was the ultimate Sigma Male.

[Anonymous No.15257757]

>>15249988
This. If somebody calls themself a "Geologist" or a "Microbiologist" then I'll hear them out. But if they call themselves a generic "scientist" or "expert", then I know they're trying to bullshit me by insinuating a much broader credibility than they have any right to.

[HoB No.15257763]

>>15246953
Fpbp

[Anonymous No.15257797]

>>15246946
Dehumanizing

[Anonymous No.15257802]

>>15257757
Thats fairly naïve, If somebody calls themself a "Geologist" or a "Microbiologist" then you should first ascertain if they earned their qualification or if they're an affirmative action beneficiary. If they appear to be white and male then you still need to make sure that they aren't jewish, homosexual or otherwise mentally ill, onlly once those hurdles are crossed may you hear them out. to do otherwise irresponsible

[Anonymous No.15257813]

>>15257802
I am more interested in what they say than who they say they are. Claiming to be a geologist doesn't give you much of any credibility in my eyes, but neither does it confer a lack of credibility. But if somebody calls themself a "scientist", I know bullshit is coming out of their mouth.

[Anonymous No.15258145]

>>15246963
>They start learning for themselves
Poorly.

[Cult of Passion No.15258151]

>>15257757
Yurp, if they hint at being any kind of scientist I will know I can at the very least understand the basic of their job, if they hide it theyre hiding the truth.

>"I'm a scientist."
>Is a sociologist specializing in political science or some shit.....

[Anonymous No.15258202]

>>15246946
I honestly think, that there are man, woman and that third thing, which would make bad name of 'man' collective, that are not man because of that.

[Anonymous No.15258307]

>>15246946
I would say people will start to think for themselves and stop outsourcing their thinking to "authority" figures, but we know that isn't gonna happen.

[Anonymous No.15259405]

>>15257744
kek

[Anonymous No.15260365]

>>15249988

[Anonymous No.15261781]

>>15246946
>stop saying female and male
>instead say egg producing and... non-egg producing?
>surely this will phase out binary language
do they know what the word binary means?

[Anonymous No.15261968]

>>15246953
Bullshit don't propagate the church build your own