[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 222 KB, 1125x592, C9A31FA5-4548-4807-9CA1-5D3DFD9CD613.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15220795 No.15220795 [Reply] [Original]

Why wouldn't men have evolved to have bigger penises if women prefer a size almost an inch longer than average?

>> No.15220799

>>15220795
Because they would then prefer penises longer than the new average. None of this matters. Populations of "men" who obsess over what women want to this degree are genetic dead enders regardless of their penis size.

>> No.15220804

>>15220795
women's wants don't matter

>> No.15220806

>>15220799
>Because they would then prefer penises longer than the new average
Would they? They prefer around 6.5 inches in studies (pic rel), and the average is around 5.5. I'm larger than 6.5 so I'm not the type of guy you're complaining about. Just asking an earnest question

>> No.15220809
File: 78 KB, 331x327, 56A7E0AD-2468-4EA8-8C0E-03CFF8C4FE53.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15220809

>6.4 inches
>almost an inch longer

lmao 5.4 is not average, cope

>> No.15220817

>>15220809
5.4 is average though anon, anywhere from 5-6 is average. What would I be coping for?

>> No.15220830

>>15220806
>Would they?
Obviously, you retarded troglodyte, as evidenced by the fact that humans already have enormous dicks compared to all other apes and yet you are still starting this thread.

>> No.15220831

>>15220795
because those studies are full of shit, 6.5 is the average

>> No.15220835

>>15220817
5.4 is global average only because the chinks and the poos have a billion tiny dicks.

>> No.15220844

>>15220835
Western average is like 5.7 lmao, definitely below 6.

>> No.15220845

>>15220795
I mean, we did?

Compared to other animals, in terms of size ratio humans are quite exceptionally hung for no good reason except sexual pressure.

>> No.15220853

>>15220844
by race
black: 7 inches
white: 6.5 inches
native american: 6 inches
east asians, south asians, southeast asians, middle eastern: 3.5 inches

trust me

>> No.15220858

>>15220853
This dude knows his dicks

>> No.15220865

>>15220853
Source? You like sucking em?

>> No.15220870

>>15220865
physiognomy, porn observation, ratio between confidence and simping level

>> No.15220888

For all of history until this last generation or so, it simply did not matter what women wanted.

>> No.15220890

>>15220870
>porn
Nice source

>> No.15220897

>>15220795
If that were true, the world would be full of ethiopian niggers.
Fuck off with this shit you fucking degenerate.
AND.STOP.WATCHING.INTERRACIAL.PORN. you fucking spastic.

>> No.15220923

>>15220897
When did I bring up race?

>> No.15220944

>>15220923
>When did I bring up race?
When you mentioned the size of your wang, dicklet.

>> No.15220962

>>15220795
Just because you want something doesn't mean your going to get it. This is amplified if you live in small communities where you are a second class citizen

>> No.15220966

>>15220795
0.1-0.2 inches? Why would anyone have a preference between these values?

>> No.15221056

>>15220870
>physiogomy
Pseudoscience
>porn
Biased samples

>> No.15221080

>>15220795
How do they obtain this data? Do the women themselves take a measuring tape to each dick that they're taking in, do an excel spreadsheet on the stats of each fuck, and pull averages of data from that? If you had 1000 women, had them measure each partner, then had them collect information about each session (with a minimum of 10 per partner), you might be able to aggregate enough data. Otherwise, this is a retarded study that's meant to make men feel inadequate and hate women more.

>> No.15221118

>>15220897
mutt’s law

>> No.15221156

>>15221056
Physiognomy is real, anon

>> No.15221262

>>15221156
Physiogomy assumes that use of brain areas acts like muscles and that specific brain areas get stronger with certain behaviors. However, no experiments were able to verify this and the discovery of Wernicke's and Broca's area discredited this theory of brain locations as both sides handled different parts of speech production and went against theory of physiogony

>> No.15221307

>>15221080
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558040/

>> No.15221316

>>15220795
why wouldn't women have evolved smaller pussies?

>> No.15221437

>>15220966
No single person would, but when taken in aggregate women do.

>> No.15221444

>>15220795
>evolved to have bigger penises if women prefer
penises are for other things than fucking (adult) women, anon. They've also gotta fit into pants and not get injured when you walk into something or sit down

Also: female's preference in mates didn't matter until like, 1650. Think about the average birth age and """age of consent""" before that lmao

>> No.15221466

>>15221444
I have a little more than women's supposed preference and I have 0 issues with any of that, it's not very large when flaccid.

>> No.15221475

>>15221466
try walking around naked for a few millenia.

>> No.15221481

>>15221475
I don't think I could do anything for a few millenia, and humans have been wearing clothes for that long. Why would I have less issues with my dick than a guy 2000 years ago?

>> No.15221563

>>15221481
>Why would I have less issues with my dick than a guy 2000 years ago?
why 2000? not 20k? human schlongs predate that.

>fewer* encounters with carnivores's teeth and claws at dick-height
>fewer* fights with other humans wherein the weakest exposed parts are the dick and eyes
>most sex with women age ~15

>> No.15221564

>>15220853
probably accurate

>> No.15221566

>>15221563
>most sex with women age ~15
technically, guess I just have to trust that you differ from ancient man on this particular one

>> No.15221570
File: 9 KB, 256x256, F82CF2AD-190B-44F8-B45C-20532CF213D2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15221570

>>15220795
Why wouldn’t men have evolved to donate their sperm to sperm banks?

>> No.15221614
File: 377 KB, 951x1576, Stpeart.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15221614

>>15221307
15 of the 75 participants out of the study hadn't even had intercourse. The models used were picrel.
>Second, women generally rate male nudes as less attractive than heterosexual men rate female nudes [57], so making the penis model more realistic might have provoked negative responses.
How many erect penises actually look like this? There's features to them, they're not just smooth shafts. The study just comes out as extremely stunted.

>> No.15221852

>>15220795
Because despite their claims, the universe does not revolve around women's wants and desires.

>> No.15221874
File: 695 KB, 1200x900, image_2023-02-22_044721725.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15221874

>>15220795
men wearing loincloths meant women could no longer sexually select for dicks.

>> No.15221905
File: 35 KB, 720x291, i laff.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15221905

ITT: latently homosexual males who have ruined their perception by watching too much porno project their own big dick fetishes onto women, inadvertently exposing their autogynephilac fantasy life for all to see and laugh at.

>> No.15221914

>>15221905
>tiny-dicked zoomer projecting his porn obsession on other people while desperately coping with his sexual inadequacy

>> No.15222762

>>15220795
Fisherian runaway?

>> No.15222807

>>15220795
Because women might day that they would have preferred a longer, thicker penis after the fact, but the truth is that first they will choose a stronger, fitter and socially superior male, then after reproducing elucubrate about penis size preferencw.

>> No.15222826

>>15220853
kek this dude has been zogged beyond repair

>> No.15222860

I see porn has corrupted men and their worries about penis size

Stop watching porn and get a girlfriend sissy boy

>> No.15223015

>>15220806
>I'm not the type of guy you're complaining about.
You are some weird incel type though

>> No.15223109

>>15220795
Women like money to settle down with. They have preferences about physical stats but they must have resources to raise children. So they will tolerate less than ideal bodies if those bodies have access to resources. Or to put more crudely, reproduction doesn't require the woman to be pleased with the interaction. It merely requires the necessary resources to complete the transaction. You think a hooker cares that much about a small dick paying customer? She got the money. She's got what she wants.

>> No.15223143

>>15220795
Same reason most women have evolved to have ugly faces when men prefer cute and beautiful girls.

>> No.15223153

>>15220795
Because they'll still fuck you if your dick is small so there's no pressure on it to adapt

>> No.15223442

>>15222860
The study cited has nothing to do with porn, women prefer 6-7 inches. That's just the truth

>> No.15223461

>>15221316
Because men fuck women indiscriminately

>> No.15223495

How do people reconcile equality and things such as "BBC" without acknowledging that some groups of people are better at certain things than others?

>> No.15223674

>>15220795
Were these women getting an fMRI while looking at dick picks? Or were they self-reported?
Were the men measured by a doctor or did they self-report?
I really hope it wasn't the later for either.

>> No.15223821

>>15223674
Women picked from 3d models