Hyperphysics General

[Anonymous No.15202503]

Is Einstein's 3D+1T spacetime model correct?
Is it 4D+1T spacetime? 3D+2T space-time? InfinityD+InfinityT spacetime?
How can time pass in 1T if time doesn't pass in a monolithic update cycle?
What dimension does spacetime go into if it becomes bent by gravity?
>Hyperdimensional Geometry and the Nature of Physical Spacetime
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960077998002355
>How hyper-dimensional spacetime may explain individual identity
https://www.essentiafoundation.org/how-hyper-dimensional-spacetime-may-explain-individual-identity/reading/
>Hyperdimensional Physics
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_hyperphysics4.htm
>Casimir Effect
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect
>Quantum Entanglement
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement

[Anonymous No.15202520]

>Spacetime Gravity Wells
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime
>Time Dilation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation

[Anonymous No.15204050]

>>15202503
>Is Einstein's 3D+1T spacetime model correct?
yeah
>How can time pass in 1T if time doesn't pass in a monolithic update cycle?
What does monolithic update cycle mean?
>What dimension does spacetime go into if it becomes bent by gravity?
It's still 3D+1T

[Anonymous No.15204161]

>>15204050
time passes at different rates in different places

[Anonymous No.15204269]

>>15204161
it's still 1 dimension of time though, just different magnitudes

[Anonymous No.15204788]

>>15204161
It's more meaningful to say that objects move through time at different rates depending on their motion through space and the geometry of the space around them.

[Anonymous No.15204793]

>>15204161
no. objects always move at c in 4d through their local space and time, the former of which can be nonuniformly distributed. Moving faster (or same, in denser space) means less velocity in the time direction.

[Anonymous No.15204796]

>>15204793
>in denser space
in denser space than the observer, i guess, technically

[Anonymous No.15204799]

>>15202503
>Is it 4D+1T spacetime? 3D+2T space-time?
lots of good explorations of this kind of concept by based author here: https://www.gregegan.net/

[Anonymous No.15204885]

>>15202503
I wonder that hyperdimensional geometries project the human shape down into 3d.

He is my philosophic quam with 3D+1T > can we really enforce orthogonality with each of the unit vectors with t by making them anticommute? Namely this is okay,[math]e_1e_2 = -e_2e_1[/math] as they are both spatial and we can move in negative or positive [math]e_1[/math] , but can we really say [math]e_1t = -te_1[/math]? negative t only makes sense philosophically, we project the existence of time-like vectors simply by the virtue of memory, not by the physical ability to go back in time.

This schizo makes it quite salient in his occulted gigatomb in the introduction https://archive.org/details/ThreePapersOnQuaternions2006-2007/page/n3/mode/1up?view=theater&q=book

>Time cannot become spacelike, contrary to some interpretations of Einstein's relativity, since that would imply that the non- orientable measures could become orientable measures, by a mere continuous transformation, and then acquire all the additional special properties of an orientable measure, such as admitting handedness and permitting rotations.
We must modify the concept of "vector," therefore, to recognize these "three" properties, of magnitude, direction, and orientability.

pic related video section https://youtu.be/e7aIVSVc8cI?t=1230

[Anonymous No.15205234]

>>15202503
>Angelic screeching intensifies.
BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAM

[Anonymous No.15205557]

>>15204269
>it's still 1 dimension of time
The Time or the Imaginary Time? Ever consider a half dimension?

I have.