/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15201834]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIFjkYhNXkE

Black Holes invert space and time below the event horizon.

Timelike separation becomes spacelike.
Spacelike separation becomes timelike.

The theory suggest that this is not just an inversion of terms but a geometric inversion in the truest sense.

The theory proposes that the Schwarzschild is the exact solution and mathematical alterations to 'fix' the interior are wrong.

The theory proposes that these are elementary conclusions given that one follows every concept of the Schwarzchild to their logical ends.

I walk around every day thinking 'this is probably how 'dark matter' works. This is how the Big bang happened. This is why galaxies stick together in clusters.'

I am not a bot and this is the only place I can freely post my theory.

If you want things to change, you have to make some noise.

-Malcolm X

[Anonymous No.15201884]

>>15201834
>I am not a bot and this is the only place I can freely post my theory.
which other places have you tried ?

[Anonymous No.15201885]

why the spam?

[Anonymous No.15201887]

>>15201884
...also you say this is the only place, but you link to a youtube video of the theory

[Anonymous No.15202259]

>>15201884

Literally universities.

Every time I get so far they stop talking to me without telling me that I'm wrong.

Either I'm not worth their time, or the theory is too much for them to handle.

Either way, who cares? I'd just rather be here among the weebs and holocaust deniers and cosplay drama queens, gun nuts, horny-woke and crackpots of 4chan. I just have to be public about it and this is the best place for me. Anywhere else wouldn't be strange enough for me.

[Anonymous No.15203718]

SSSB

[Anonymous No.15204247]

>>15202259
I think writing a paper and publishing it on Arxiv or similar would be the appropriate avenue to formally propose a theory. You could even write a book about it or something if you wanted to try to get more attention. Or make a website about it. Seeing how you've been posting the same theory here for almost 7 years now and you've made no progress it doesn't seem like whatever you want to happen is going to happen

[sage No.15204263]

>>15201834
SC-FI slide thread

[Anonymous No.15205598]

>>15204247

I've put horrible publications on paper archives already and basically just to mark pissing territory on the theory.

You know what I really want? Just to see the rest of the math.

I'm not good at calculus and don't trust myself to do the math even if I was.

I put the theory here on 4chan because it's fresh meat for researchers. I just need one researcher to write a paper that says basically: Abstract: there was a crackpot on 4chan who presented a blackhole theory with some preliminary math that looks like (pic related). If the theory is followed to its' logical conclusions the results would be...(Rest of the paper)

[Anonymous No.15205607]

>>15205598

The one qualm I always had with this draft is the idea that the event horizon singularity is "real."

Real, it may be but it is just a coordinate singularity that can be removed from the metric via the Einstein-Rosen. I don't care if the Kretschmann invariant has no physical singularity at the event horizon.

I have no problem with the event horizon being a coordinate singularity because the coordinate is time it will exclude massive particles, not the metric itself. That will not occur until the origin singularity because, again, according to the theory we are talking about hyper-pseudospherical geometry and pseudospheres are about having a coordinate singularity perimeter and physical singularity origin.

[Anonymous No.15206240]

>>15201834
>schwarzchild
>black child
>back hole
What an odd coincidence

[Anonymous No.15206245]

>>15201834
>timelike
>spacelike
What if those aren't the only two likes? What if there's a third ___like that only becomes apparent under the extreme conditions past the horizon?

[Anonymous No.15206353]

>>15206245

Well, the third known description is lightlike or null.

The event horizon is a null and lightlike surface.

[Anonymous No.15206447]

>>15201834
what is it about black holes that makes them the number one most popular popsci topic of discussion amongst the brainlet soience fangoys?
is it the comic bookish aspects of the spectacular, unrealistic and completely non disprovable conjectures which go along with the topic that make black holes so popular amongst the scientist posers and wannabes?

[Anonymous No.15208125]

>>15206447

I wouldn't have bothered with Black Holes if the evidence ever pointed in a different direction.

[Anonymous No.15208614]

>>15206240
It's actually "Schwarzschild," black shield, not black child.

[Anonymous No.15210398]

>>15208614

Crazy that Asymptotic darkness serves as kind of a 'black shield' around a black hole.