/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15183190]

>fails to understand the points being made by the guest
>proceeds to ask more irrelevant questions about it

[Anonymous No.15183199]

>>15183190
>native english speaker
>has a weird accent anyway
I think this dude is legit autistic. No idea why youtube wants to force him down everyones gullet

[Anonymous No.15183201]

>>15183199
>No idea why youtube wants to force him down everyones gullet
Nepotism.

[Anonymous No.15183202]

>>15183190
man, I wish someone else could make another podcast and can invite famous people in. Lex is only a little bit brighter than the average 4chan /sci/ undergrad with a tint of both narcissism and inferiority complex.

[Anonymous No.15183205]

>>15183190
>Hello I'm Lex Fridman, today I'm interviewing Donald Knuth,
>Computers can have orgasms?

[Anonymous No.15183218]

>>15183205
>Hello. I'm Lex Fridman and today I'm interviewing Donald.. Knuth. He's a famous computer scientist. So without further ado: Donald. Knuth-

[Anonymous No.15183234]

He is made for the masses
The masses cannot comprehend what goes on in academia anyway

[Anonymous No.15183292]

>>15183202
Joe rogan?

[Anonymous No.15183303]

>>15183292
Joe tends not to invite people outside his domain, but otherwise he checks all the boxes: charismatic, attentive if sometimes repugnant, asks meaningful questions.

[Anonymous No.15183344]

>>15183303
rogan is a good interviewer, he always seems to ask the right questions at the right time. leagues better than friedman or the weinsteins or the others who get pushed. though I only listen to his aliens-bigfoot-etc episodes

[Anonymous No.15183350]

>>15183190
>Lex, explain the new chatGPT
>"well anon, it uses a lot of data, and really its the data, and it has a lot of data"
Mossad's not sending their best

[Anonymous No.15183356]

>>15183190
Only a 23 on his h index

[Anonymous No.15183361]

>>15183356
Father and brother doing a bit of a mogging.

[Anonymous No.15183372]

>>15183344
>rogan is a good interviewer
Sure for "fun" topics he is also into like you said this is true.
But everytime a guest talks about something Rogan has little knowledge of(which are obviously many things) Rogan just tends to accept it as truth with 0 fact checking or pushback and most his audience will do the same which can be a problem.
I'm not even talking about any covid stuff, mostly just stuff I've seen on youtube before he switched to spotify.

[Anonymous No.15183449]

[Anonymous No.15183620]

>>15183190
Many top kino guests. His podcast is the only one I know with long format (2 ~ 4 hours) of talk with tech / science guests.

But man do I cringe with the host.
>Claims he's a hardcore programmer
>Does not know what a greedy algorithm is

>Reinforcement learning, guest mentions "exploration vs. exploitation" tradeoff
>*chuckles*

>Asks a midwit question
>interrupts the guest's reply anyways. "uuhhh, actshually uhhh"

The high quality guests + long format makes me tolerate the host's cringeness.
Long format makes it ideal to listen to during hours long drives. Better than radio and doesn't require as much focus on the content as audiobooks.

[Anonymous No.15183707]

>>15183372

[Anonymous No.15183851]

Very funny when he brings up Ayn Rand for no reason.

[Anonymous No.15183880]

Lex loves to ask his guests the most midwit romantic questions. I remember when he had Robin Hanson on and he asked him questions like, "what is the meaning of love" and "what is the meaning of life".

[Anonymous No.15183889]

To be fair, I think sometimes when he asks stupid questions, he is asking for the sake of the audience.

[Anonymous No.15183890]

>implying sneed isnt the best philosopher of bukowskian proportions since jaret

https://youtu.be/8YCjhDEd12w

[Anonymous No.15183894]

>>15183190
I agree that interviewing all these people like Elon Musk has taken a bit over his core competency of MIT research, which hew now sometimes doesn't have the time for.
I am not Lex Fridman btw.

[Anonymous No.15183921]

>>15183190
>>15183199
I wouldn't say autistic. He comes off as just a plain simpleton.
I get the impression that if his family wasn't all academics who fought tooth and nail to make him into one of them, he would be have been a car mechanic or the guy who puts up drywall for living.

[Anonymous No.15183964]

how can I add ghost modules to buildings so my bots can insert them when they get crafted?

[Anonymous No.15183966]

jew

[Anonymous No.15183981]

>>15183921
lol. id rather watch a skilled tradesman put up drywall.

[Anonymous No.15183993]

>>15183356
Still better than 99% of professional researchers on the planet tbf.

[Anonymous No.15184072]

>>15183880
He does ask those cringy questions, but he also asks questions in a way that really allows his guests to elaborate, and he asks good follow-up questions as well.

[Anonymous No.15184075]

>>15183880
>Robin Hanson
there is not an insignificant chance robin has planned his murder 20 years in the future

[Anonymous No.15184164]

>>15183372
Maybe stop being a lazy fuck and think for yourself instead of expecting Joe Rogan to gatekeep for you. I swear people like you would eat broken glass if a "fact checker" told you it was a good idea.

[Anonymous No.15184173]

>>15183190
This pseud was destroyed by both Nassim Taleb and TechLead

[Anonymous No.15184216]

Here's an example of Lex being a complete fucking retard.
Tim talks about RocketLab catching a rocket's parachute with a helicopter.
Lex has pic related face on.
https://youtu.be/5eK5A_43pkE?t=409

This technology has been used since the 1960s for fucks sake!
https://www.historynet.com/spy-intelligence-from-the-sky/

[Anonymous No.15184219]

>>15184216
Lex says "Wow, SpaceX is so innovative."
Then Tim contradicts him, says RocketLab was doing some shit before SpaceX, and SpaceX had to catch up.
https://youtu.be/5eK5A_43pkE?t=531

[Anonymous No.15184220]

>>15184219
Lex thinks it's "profound" to state that it's so cool how something "that big" (as a rocket) can get off the ground and into orbit, but the truth is the fucking opposite: you NEED a huge rocket to get into space.
If there was a SMALL craft that could reach the Moon, it would be an actual game changer for humanity.
We've had large rockets since the 1960s, over 60-years ago!
https://youtu.be/5eK5A_43pkE?t=763

[Anonymous No.15184226]

>>15184220
https://youtu.be/5eK5A_43pkE?t=847 [Embed]
Lex is asking Tim, who is a PHOTOGRAPHER by trade, about how complicated it is for SpaceX to land a rocket.
Lex is a dumb shit, he literally doesn't understand a single thing so far, and he doesn't seem to know ANY history about the Gemini program, Soviet program/Space Race, NASA, other rocket companies, etc.

[Anonymous No.15184269]

>>15184226
https://youtu.be/5eK5A_43pkE?t=939
Doesn't know/understand that the computers used for Apollo were literally core rope memory, i.e. they were coded BY HAND, and basically stitched together by former seamstresses who had to be 100% sure of what they were doing.
Idk, but if I had a guest on my podcast, I'd probably do a little bit of research first so I could ask better questions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_rope_memory

[Anonymous No.15184297]

Maybe I'm being unfair.
Are there any episodes of this guy that are actually worth watching?
To me, it seems like he is "controlled opposition" to someone like Joe Rogan. Someone higher up wanted to have more control over The Narrative, so they picked this guy, and built him up that way, which is how he was able to get so popular in such a short amount of time.
I'm highly skeptical of anyone who gets popular without much of a reason behind it.
For example, "Liver King" exploded out of nowhere, and I was instantly skeptical. Turns out, he's a plastic-surgery, steroid-using, trust-fund guy who had an entire PR team supporting him.

[Anonymous No.15184596]

>>15183190
Taleb pissed all over him. With such a recommendation I am never watching the guy.

[Anonymous No.15184622]

>>15184297
i think its more simplistic than that and he just had rich parents to propel his career (likely even bought off youtube to recommend his shit to everyone).
then he makes his videos very simplistic but still seem intellectual on the surface so people attracted to the 'idea' of intellectualism (redditors, edgy teens, and undergrads) watch it while still not communicating much.
check his most popular videos and its all reddit intellectualism like political moderates, space, lay metaphysics and finance.
it also helps to have any notable figure under the sun be a potential guest so lex just nods along and keeps the ball of conversation flowing about the surface of any given topic.
its also hip now to get all your knowledge from youtube or various internet video distributors instead of reading.
if it really was controlled opposition, its really retarded because all lex fridman really pushes for is 'both-sides' whataboutism and moderate libertarianism.

[Anonymous No.15184637]

>>15184622
Where does he advocate against CRT/leftist bullshit, or talk about being pro-free-markets?
Seems like he only has Jewish guests, so he's basically pushing the status quo of big party/big government politics in the US.
https://twitter.com/lexfridman/status/1600669648185446403
I've never heard him rebuke the national debt, government largess, government welfare, or government corruption.

[Anonymous No.15184639]

>dad is a bigwig at drexel, a private university that isn't even in the top 100
>gets his bs at drexel
>gets his ms at drexel
>gets his phd at drexel
>his "research" is all in machine learning/neural networks, a field filled with morons who dont understand math or how to program and just "import solution" everything from notebooks on kaggle
He's a complete pseud

[Anonymous No.15184642]

The annoying thing is he gets so many great guests and just asks the most inane and uninformed stuff. It's a total waste of potential, the best thing Lex could do for his show would be to hire someone who is actually good at interviewing.

>What do you think is the point of life?
Unironically heard him ask this one before, ffs

[Anonymous No.15184654]

What a douchebag.
>Wahhh! All humans are lonely!
>Everybody, we're all lost, a little or a lot. But we're all lost together.
>But it's okay! I have a solution! Waste time listening to my inane podcasts instead of working to better yourself, because there's no point, you're just going to be lonely anyways. Like & subscribe!
Will Normies ever realize they're the ones being duped by shit like this?

[Anonymous No.15184663]

>>15183620
>>Does not know what a greedy algorithm is
do you have a single fact to back that up

[Anonymous No.15184666]

>>15184164
I literally noticed that because I thought for myself.
I obviously don't fact check when I listen to a podcast, I just often noticed his guests making ridiculous claims and not even explaining them well.
I don't even really expect fact checking on a live podcast but I would at least expect some pushback and discussion for some of the very dubious claims and not him immediately accepting them as truth.

[Anonymous No.15184667]

>>15184637
he doesn't which is why i said moderate libertarianism (maybe faux would've been a better word). as in like your neighbor who has a gadsden flag but hasn't read any libertarian works. whose beliefs are just vaguely libertarian and not specific.
https://youtu.be/EMeIOtgRaLU?t=366 (with timestamp)

[Anonymous No.15184681]

His podcasts with Keller are painful to watch when literal freshman CS101 seems to be black magic for Friedman

[Anonymous No.15184702]

He asks pretty terrible questions but is somehow able to get good guests.

[Anonymous No.15184715]

>>15184072
Yep that seems to be the point of those questions as corny as they sound, so I never really minded them.

[Anonymous No.15184736]

>>15184072
Can you provide some examples? Seems like he changes the subject too often, and doesn't really understand the topics being discussed in order to ask proper follow-up questions.

[Anonymous No.15184778]

people seethe because he's not afraid to look like an idiot, he is making a product for a wide audience >>15183889. It's like it triggers something in terminally online, autistic people like >>15184216 that he's not trying to look like a genius in front of his audience I don't get it desu whenever I watch an episode I literally zone out whatever Lex says and focus on the guest

[Anonymous No.15184798]

>>15184778
>terminally online
>desu
>whenever I watch an episode
>>>/t/witter
>>>/y/outube
>>>/f/acebook

[Anonymous No.15184890]

>>15184639
Drexel is also the school that hosted the TEDx talk that Sam Hyde gave mocking the arrogant self importance of TED and TEDx speakers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmicRDpS5Gk

[Anonymous No.15185413]

>>15184778
>that he's not trying to look like a genius in front of his audience I don't get it desu whenever I watch an episode I literally zone out whatever Lex says and focus on the guest
>zone out
Yes, we're glad you agree that Lex is a midwit, and doesn't contribute anything of substance to any of the podcast episodes.

[Anonymous No.15185503]

>>15184663
The first interview with Vitalik. Vitalik mentions something about needing to be careful when assessing the optimality of greedy algorithm.
>*chuckles* greedy algorithms... *chuckles* I love how you phrased it.

[Anonymous No.15185511]

>>15183190
The interviews make a lot more sense if you assume he's just high the whole time

[Anonymous No.15185564]

>>15184798
you opened a Lex thread

[Anonymous No.15185585]

>>15185413
yeah but where is the expectation that he's NOT a midwit coming from? seems like projection from viewers cause somehow if you start a podcast you're supposed to be some authority, he contributes a ton by asking the "dumb" questions that most people would want to ask if they were in his position. The whole point is to get the guest to share their knowledge it's not some private debate or a test

[Anonymous No.15185587]

>>15185585
>the "dumb" questions that most people would want to ask
Do you think a piece of music can fall in love?

[Anonymous No.15185593]

>jewish mockingbird media shill

[Anonymous No.15185648]

>>15185585
No, very few people given the opportunity to talk to a preeminent scientist would start asking them about love unless they were a pre-teen girl. Lex is simply a tard and you apparently have the brain of an eight year old girl.

[Anonymous No.15186801]

>>15185648
Agreed.
Scientists are experts in their field, and that's what they should be asked about. Their answers in other unrelated fields would full into Dunning-Kruger territory.
If he want's to talk about "the meaning of life bro" or "how to find a soulmate", then have a Relationship Expert on, someone who has evidence of how couples meet and stay together without getting divorced.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBYexuYCEic
>https://www.vox.com/2018/12/3/18075794/marriage-divorce-happiness-relationships-james-sexton

[Anonymous No.15186823]

Kek

[Anonymous No.15186826]

>>15186823
Forgot to link to this thread too: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30480278

[Anonymous No.15186932]

He is pumped up by his jewish friends in big tech. Many such cases.

[Anonymous No.15186960]

>>15184736
That's also true - I've noticed his hubris getting the better of him especially recently.
In my opinion his best podcasts are the Jim Keller ones, so you can find an abundance of examples from those, e.g. here from 17:53 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nb2tebYAaOA he asks such a simple - almost dumb in a way - question which actually has quite an interesting answer.
Another example I randomly found is here from around 39:00, and he asks a follow up at 40:30 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUHkhB366tE where again it's this simple-minded question that yields an interesting answer because the guest is captivating.

[Anonymous No.15186974]

>>15183981
let's not pretend you have any other option, anon

[Anonymous No.15187098]

>>15186960
Idk, I disagree with you there.
Maybe it's because I know more about those topics, and I didn't learn anything new from either of those examples.
So like yeah, listening to someone like Lex Fridman is good if you're in high school, but you'd likely be better off reading books and watching lectures from professors, like this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eh4kIKoJ7Do&list=PLvZKjuKk9HvNqZHzEXnGtnvzMS5tX0BGe

[Anonymous No.15187158]

>>15186960
>I've noticed his hubris getting the better of him especially recently.
>In my opinion
nobody cares about your opinion, your hubris getting the better of you if you think so. enjoying your grandiose delusions, soience expert?

[Anonymous No.15187190]

>>15187158
I wonder if you've ever recognized irony.

[Anonymous No.15187196]

>>15187098
Yeah, that's fine, but sometimes people like listening to something without needn't to put much thought into it, so they choose podcasts. I'd try to argue that my examples weren't great and there surely are some instance with which you'd agree, but I don't think I can probably find them.

[Anonymous No.15187252]

>>15186801
his silly questions makeup a small % of the total questions asked across the multiple hour interview

[Anonymous No.15187322]

>>15187252
Anything greater than 0% is too much but nice moving of the goal posts from "it's something everyone wants to ask but are afraid say" to "well, he's only stupid part of the time". Not much of an endorsement.

[Anonymous No.15187344]

>>15187322
>from "it's something everyone wants to ask but are afraid say" to "well, he's only stupid part of the time".
It would fix the complaining if he actually phrased it like the former when he asked. Basically every interviewer has to ask the
>you just said something that requires background knowledge, could you explain what that is for the audience
question in basically every interview. That's how interviews work. Only Lex makes himself sound like he's on meds while he does it

[Anonymous No.15187355]

>jews shilling jewish shills

[Anonymous No.15187671]

>>15187355
>Irving Berlin was born Israel Beilin on May 11, 1888, one of eight children of Moses (1848–1901) and Lena Lipkin Beilin (1850–1922). The Berlins were one of hundreds of thousands of Jewish families who emigrated to the United States in the late 1800s and early 1900s, including George and Ira Gershwin, Al Jolson, Sophie Tucker, L. Wolfe Gilbert, Jack Yellen, Louis B. Mayer (of MGM), and the Warner brothers.

[Anonymous No.15187717]

you guys are being too negative about this. there are way worse content creators out there. you all have valid, small criticisms but in the end lex is still one of the good guys by far.

[Anonymous No.15187797]

>>15187717
I'm highly skeptical of people like Lex Fridman who get high profile guests that soon after starting.
He's a wolf in sheep's clothing as far as I'm concerned and based on the episodes/segments that I've watched so far.

[Anonymous No.15187923]

>>15187717
Nice gatekeeping attempt but this isn't /b/. Improve your skullduggery and try again.
>>15187797
One of his first ten interviews was with the CEO of a company with a market cap of over a trillion dollars. Not sure why anyone doesn't see his line up of guests, especially early on, as a huge tell.

[Anonymous No.15188081]

>>15183889
I hope his apparent stupidity and ignorance is just a persona he constructed to appear more relatable to his audience, otherwise he is inexcusable.

[Anonymous No.15188097]

>>15187797
>>15187923
Definitely astroturfed

[Anonymous No.15188143]

>>15184226
>>15184269

On top of this, he had a pretty dismal, child-like understanding of basic concepts in aviation, both civil and military. His interview with Dave Fravor was pretty painful to listen to.

[Anonymous No.15188175]

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=wZH_N7cAAAAJ&hl=en
Here's a list of all of Alex Fridman's academic papers.
As a researcher, the first thing I notice is that all of these are basically either extremely simple papers about a code that he created by himself or with friends, a thought-experiment about a certain topic, or a re-working of a previous paper into something "new".
I work in clinical trials, so the papers I read range from case studies, to clinical studies with hundreds/thousands or patients, to systematic reviews/meta-analyses that can take years and hundreds of people involved.
It's only recently that anyone has started to cite his papers, and it doesn't appear that he got any patents or licensing deals from them, or anything like that.
I'm not sure if this is "pseud" level, but it almost seems like it's an attempt to publish a lot of bullshit just to say that you've published a lot.

[Anonymous No.15188218]

>>15187797
Then watch this one. Should put those doubts to rest. https://youtu.be/bqeuFiAUU4o

[Anonymous No.15188233]

>>15188218
Wait so having a popular regime stooge on proves that he's not compromised?

[Anonymous No.15188503]

>>15184890
sam hyde is a mensa member after all

[Anonymous No.15188541]

>>15183218
MY SIDES!!!!
IN ORBIT

[Anonymous No.15188754]

why is this faggot being shilled here

[Anonymous No.15189034]

>>15187098
>gates
fookin noice mate

[Anonymous No.15189064]

>>15188218
>>15188233
Kek, Steve Bonnell is one of the dumbest (if not THE dumbest) political commentators I've ever heard of.
He both advocates for large government and "freedom", but doesn't understand that big government is completely stifling to free markets, competition, and creativity. He campaigned for Joe Biden, lmfao.
But this isn't /pol/, which is why I didn't bring up any political commentators and was only focusing on science, of which Lex Fridman is most definitely a midwit, and therefore his podcast isn't worth listening to.
So in conclusion, here's a pro-tip: if you're interesting in a person/subject that Lex covers, just watch lectures by those professors instead of his dumb podcasts.

[Anonymous No.15189075]

>>15183199
A dialect is just an API

[Anonymous No.15189118]

>>15183190
What bothers me is how narcissistic he is. Always talking about himself and how he spends at least a hour everyday learning new stuff and yada yada yada. It seems to me he's more interested in making people believe he's smart than anything else.

[Anonymous No.15189124]

>>15183199
member of the tribe

[Anonymous No.15189125]

>>15189118
>spends 1 hour a day learning new stuff
>spends 0 hours a week prepping for the interviews that he does professionally

[Anonymous No.15189126]

>>15189118
This becomes clear if you look at his publications; he seemingly wanted to publish as much as he could, knowing that most people would never read them, he could just use it to say "look how much I've published!"
>>15189125
kek, absolutely correct

[Anonymous No.15189151]

>>15189126
I think publishing is the ultimate midwits, idiots filter.
In fact degrees are not enough to succeed in that area

[Anonymous No.15189258]

>>15189151
Definitely.
If he had any good ideas, he would've patented them, started his own company, sold them to a larger company, or gotten a job at a larger tech firm.
I guess he figured there was more money in being a grifter.

[Anonymous No.15189794]

Guest: People like to eat food, especially tasty food
Lex: Fuck, fuck, fuck! That is so deep i would never think about it in this way. You are a genius. So let me get this straight, food is something people want and if it is tasty it is wanted even more right because of aliens and matrix!
Guest: Y-yeah i guess u get it lex, it is crazy isn't it
Lex: Maaan fuck fuck shit stack, how come not everyone is panicking over this novel information

[Anonymous No.15189840]

>>15183199
>No idea why youtube wants to force him down everyones gullet
Hes jewish

[Anonymous No.15189906]

>>15183190
can't stand this fucking retard

[Anonymous No.15189925]

>>15189794
>Maaan fuck fuck shit stack
kek

[Anonymous No.15191140]

>guest: we can't directly know if someone is a philosophical zombie or not.
>lex: BUT WHAT IF WE COULD USING AI OR SOMETHING
>guest: panpsychism states that anything could have some degree of consciousness
>lex: BUT PLANTS OR ROCKS CANT FEEL LOVE OR SOMETHING
this faggot has had hundreds of conversations about consciousness and the philosophy of mind and still can't comprehend even the most basic concepts. HES A FUCKING RETARD. how is he not called out for it?

[Anonymous No.15191147]

Why do people talk about this YouTube celebutard? Oh right. Because they are normies and tards.

[Anonymous No.15191273]

>>15183190
astroturfed kike, prove that that are barely only good for high iq language and pushed by nepotism at any chance.

[Anonymous No.15191388]

>>15189840

[Anonymous No.15191483]

>>15184216
Not knowing esoteric technology does not make him dumb
>>15184219
Irrelevant. He was interviewing him to learn
>>15184220
Irrelevant that big things are needed. It is still cool.
>>15184226
It says that Tim Dodd hosts an astronaut YouTube channel so he presumably would know a thing or two about it
>>15184269
No one outside of major autists knows that

I actually agree that Lex comes off as dumb at times but you clearly have such a surface level understanding of intelligence that I may as well tell a fish about the color chartreuse. Or you are an AI / pajeet, in which case I have been played

[Anonymous No.15191584]

>>15191483
Lex, you are cringe!

[Anonymous No.15191592]

>>15185585
>>yeah but where is the expectation that he's NOT a midwit coming from?
The way Lex promotes himself as a big wig "MIT Researcher"

[Anonymous No.15191600]

>>15188218
>if you think this guy's growth was inorganic, check out this other famous person he somehow got an interview with
??

[Anonymous No.15191659]

>>15183190
I just wish he didn't take himself so seriously, but I think he knows that now. He probably goes on here.

>>15183199
He is Russian I believe.

[Anonymous No.15191930]

>>15183199
he's not a native English speaker u tard, he moved to America when he was 11

[Anonymous No.15192002]

>jewish shills shilling jewish shills

[Anonymous No.15192990]

>>15191483
>I actually agree that Lex comes off as dumb at times but you clearly have such a surface level understanding of intelligence that I may as well tell a fish about the color chartreuse.
Hey Lex, you should let someone interview YOU to see if you know anything about anything interesting.

[Anonymous No.15193002]

>Who's your next guest Lex?
>She's a sex researcher!
>Oh like she has a PhD and publishes articles to peer-reviewed journals?
>Wut? Uh no, she asks biased questions on Twitter survey's and thinks they're scientific. And she's an OnlyFans thot/pretend escort.

[Anonymous No.15193079]

>>15183190
Anyone else notice that before the Ukraine war he was always "Russian", then suddenly after it started he became "half ukrainian, half russian"

lmao, dude is such a jewish scammer it's not even funny

[Anonymous No.15193099]

>>15193002
she's not a pretend-escort btw, she's an actual escort, doesn't wash between clients, holds orgies you can sign up for on google surveys she also conducts her 'research' with and she has b/g porn scenes.
idk wtf lex is thinking here, it's an insult to his other guests.

[Anonymous No.15193125]

I like Rogan more because he's dumb but asks the right questions
Lex is a retard who always draws the attention back to himself

[Anonymous No.15193156]

>>15193099
You're right, I looked it up.
She charges $3,000/hour, which is more than even well-known porn stars. Absolutely ridiculous prices.
And no way I'm giving someone like that all my info, that's like CIA-blackmail level of information required.

[Anonymous No.15193295]

>>15193156
>anon we have PROOF that you fuck $3000 an hour hookers that everyone else has jerked off to and fantasizes about
Guilty as charged, I hope it’s a front-page story

[Anonymous No.15193342]

>>15193295
I think most normal people would rather commit suicide than admit they got sloppy seconds after Big Yud.

[Anonymous No.15193394]

>>15193342
But no one here is normal.

[Anonymous No.15194506]

>>15191659
Ukrainian Jew

[Anonymous No.15194515]

ITT: people annoyed at Lex for not being all knowing in all subjects known to man.

[Anonymous No.15194545]

>>15191584
You will always be Arab Taleb
>>15192990
Lex regularly goes on Joe Rogan and Huberman you tard

[Anonymous No.15194817]

>>15193099
Lex thinks he'll get a discount.

[Anonymous No.15194827]

>>15183199
I don't think that's an accent. I think he's higher than a Chinese UFO.

[Anonymous No.15194840]

>>15194827
>>15183199
He's high on huge amounts of weed in all his interviews. That's why he thinks his inane bullshit questions are profound.

[Anonymous No.15194920]

>>15194515
Neither are seven year old girls, which is pretty much what Lex sounds like most of the time.
>>15194817
He claims to be a virgin but who knows, maybe that's also part of the image that has been manufactured for him and he's out having sex with whatever pink taco he can rent for an hour.

[Anonymous No.15195086]

What are the interviews he’s done that are actually worthwhile? Other than Kellerman.

[Anonymous No.15195529]

>>15194817
They might fuck on air. As part of the interview.

[Anonymous No.15195578]

>>15195529
Lex isn't that based. Instead he'll pay her thousands of dollars for a date and at the end she'll kiss his cheek and send him off.