[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 225 KB, 600x800, style1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15167887 No.15167887 [Reply] [Original]

How does /sci/ explain the incredible architecture of ancient civilizations?

>> No.15167899

modern tools are nice but math and lots and lots of manhours can make most things

>> No.15167912
File: 286 KB, 1200x572, teo-moon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15167912

>>15167899
How many manhours do you need to build THIS?

>> No.15167916

>>15167887
easy, they weren't as retarded as modern people like for example you

>> No.15167917

>>15167912
probably a lot

>> No.15167921
File: 339 KB, 1024x683, teo-stones.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15167921

>>15167912

>> No.15167929

>>15167887
They were smarter than us

>> No.15167930
File: 260 KB, 1000x718, tiahuanaco-21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15167930

They were bored I guess.

>> No.15167933
File: 285 KB, 1000x667, tiahuanaco-22.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15167933

>>15167930

>> No.15167935

>>15167917
At least 3 hours, that's for sure.

Each one of those stones weights more than 5 big macs.

>> No.15167936
File: 190 KB, 880x720, Puma-Punku-10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15167936

>>15167933

>> No.15167940
File: 190 KB, 1000x525, PP-H.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15167940

>>15167936

>> No.15167944
File: 387 KB, 1200x712, punkuholes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15167944

>>15167940
How did they do this?

>> No.15167955

>>15167944
South American indian legends say one day "beings from the sky" came down and built an entire city in 3 days. The city also had a glass pyramid. Then one day an earthquake destroyed the pyramid, so they just left.

In short, it was probably nephilim and fallen angels.

>> No.15167975
File: 191 KB, 1000x580, mapi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15167975

Machu Picchu is amazing

>> No.15167979
File: 239 KB, 1000x750, machu-picchu-terraces.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15167979

>>15167975

>> No.15167982
File: 340 KB, 1200x735, Temple-of-the-Three-Windows.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15167982

>>15167979
look at the precision of the blocks

>> No.15167985
File: 387 KB, 1175x800, suntemple.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15167985

>>15167982

>> No.15167988
File: 133 KB, 800x533, tomb-machu-picchu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15167988

>>15167985
they just loved stuffing stones wherever they could. too much time on their hand I guess.

>> No.15167992
File: 325 KB, 1000x598, moontemple.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15167992

>>15167988

>> No.15167995
File: 202 KB, 700x471, masonry.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15167995

>>15167992
primitive methods.

>> No.15168015

>>15167995
water and thousands of years.

>> No.15168079

>>15168015
You answered the wrong question.

The question you answered is:
why/how did we forget?

>water and thousands of years.
About one comet's worth of water, and about 14 thousand years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Younger_Dryas

>> No.15168081
File: 153 KB, 1000x667, Ollantaytambo02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168081

another stone complex

>> No.15168084
File: 429 KB, 1202x800, Ollantaytambo03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168084

>>15168081

>> No.15168086
File: 225 KB, 1000x558, Ollantaytambo04.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168086

>>15168084
primitive methods again

>> No.15168088
File: 186 KB, 660x740, Ollantaytambo05.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168088

>>15168086

>> No.15168091
File: 263 KB, 1067x800, Ollantaytambo06.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168091

>>15168088
???

>> No.15168094
File: 177 KB, 1000x545, Ollantaytambo08.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168094

>>15168091

>> No.15168369

>>15167887
>Stone Age people were experts at working with stone after thousands of years of practice/refinement
Yup, what a mystery.

>> No.15168431

Moving big stones isnt very difficult if you have a bunch of people. Typically done by rolling them on a bunch of logs and pushing or pulling. Smothing stones isnt hard. Pretty sure this is done with sand and water? Not sure the exact common method. Carving is done with stone chisels and hitting the rocks. Now have a couple thousand people and have them all work on it. Doing all this stuff.

>> No.15168432

>>15167887
>incredible architecture of ancient civilizations?
Wow! They could stack rocks!
OMG!
KANGS!

>> No.15168576

>>15168091
>>15168088
Thanks for dumping these, very interesting, although you'd have more success on /his/

>> No.15168677

>>15167944
Anon has never seen a spindle drill or bat dung concrete before.

>> No.15168684

>>15167887
Kino watching material
https://youtu.be/j9w-i5oZqaQ

>> No.15168702

>>15167887
https://odysee.com/@musicam-geometria-utebantur:6/pyramid-power-rap:4

Geopoly

>> No.15168703

Effects resulting from long term changes in planet size and gravity strength along with large scale interplanetary electrical discharges.
S.W. Carey, Expanding Earth Theory
https://youtu.be/Othb0xsvZb4

>> No.15168749

>>15168086
"Primitive" doesn't mean stupid, or necessarily even unsophisticated.

>> No.15168767
File: 137 KB, 1024x676, GHDY51EAAVT0GBFI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168767

>>15167887
Architecture? All I see are natural rock formations.

>> No.15168770

>>15167887
It was obviously built by aliens

>> No.15168771

>>15168767
Here's a natural rock formation in Pennsylvania. Notice how natural and very naturally formed it is.

>> No.15168774
File: 184 KB, 1280x720, boxcar_rocks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168774

>>15168771
Fuck, forgot the pic.

>> No.15168775
File: 335 KB, 1280x720, natural_wall.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168775

>>15168774
Here's a naturally formed wall in Montana. Clearly the natural work of glaciers.

>> No.15168777

These pyramids were built by the Predators for their Alien hunts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C15Ycikk0fc

>> No.15168798
File: 1.09 MB, 1029x766, turbine.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168798

>> No.15168811

>>15168798
you don't actually think that's a turbine, do you?

>> No.15168816

>>15168798
It's made from stone, which means it's actually a fossilized turbine made by dino civilization.

>> No.15168818
File: 122 KB, 800x529, gornaya_shoria.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168818

>>15168767

>> No.15168821

>>15168818
That's not real.

>> No.15168822

>>15168821
It's real. It's a favorite of the regional Russian hiking group so you can find a lot of pictures of it.

>> No.15168828

>>15167887
Fitting stones is extremely easy, we (by we i mean I) can do the same with moving parts.

>> No.15168829

>>15167912
You could just make it so people do monthly/yearly pilgrimages to your sacred site and bring a rock or two with them. If its a multigenerational effort it would inevitably occur. Pyramids are really just layer by layer, maybe each layer took decades to build.

>> No.15168831

>>15167940
Hhhhhhhnnnngggg

>> No.15168834
File: 2.28 MB, 1920x1080, montana_megaliths.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168834

>>15167887
What are they hiding from us?

>> No.15168837 [DELETED] 

>>15168831
>t. vax'd

>> No.15168838

>>15168829
These civilizations were short lived, they didn't do things that took many generations. Almost all cities had to be abandoned because farmlands get depleted when doing grain agriculture. An exception to this was Egyptian civilization thanks to the Nile bringing more than water.

>> No.15168839

>>15168834
A global society that was wiped out during the Great Flood.

>> No.15168844
File: 1.29 MB, 1374x767, gears.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168844

>>15168811

>> No.15168845

>>15168844
that "gear" wouldn't work. you have zero mechanical sense.

>> No.15168851
File: 1.20 MB, 1261x767, gear.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168851

>>15168845

>> No.15168853

>>15168851
another decorative carving, not a machine.

>> No.15168854

>>15167912
you get like six villagers clanking hammers around the perimeter and it goes up in 90 seconds according to age of empires 2

>> No.15168859

>>15168834
https://ugetube.com/watch/ending-the-kali-yuga-return-of-the-brahman_dJjmIzXeVkuJCDT.html

>> No.15168863

>>15167887
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5kU0sND9Ww

>> No.15168864
File: 533 KB, 1200x1495, tree_stump.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168864

>>15168816
The ancient Earth must have been a sight to behold.

>> No.15168876
File: 1.75 MB, 1920x1080, yangshan_quarry.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168876

>>15168829
Those ancient civilizations sure needed a lot of stone.

>> No.15168884

Go back to /x/

>> No.15168889
File: 1.18 MB, 649x937, bring_a_rock_or_two.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168889

>>15168829
>bring a rock or two with them

>> No.15168897

>>15167887
Slaves and men of high vision and virtue

>> No.15168901

>>15168889
check out a jewtube channel called megolithomaniaUK
https://www.youtube.com/user/MegalithomaniaUK

YW

>> No.15168905

>>15168884
Go back to somewhere that cares about your down votes.

>> No.15168914

>>15167887
there is a reason minecraft is so popular, there have always been a subset of humans obsessed with putting stone blocks ontop of other stone blocks, put enough of the most dedicated block-stacking autists together and they make stuff like this, it really isn't rocket science

>> No.15168921

>>15168897
What is the high vision and how do rock piles contribute to fulfilling such visions?

>> No.15168925

>>15167887
watch "ancient aliens debunked" on youtube; the guy shows you things you've never heard of before and it all makes sense

what has never been explained is how all these various ANCIENT places around the world all have the same or very very similar construction

>> No.15168930

>>15168921
Not that anon, but as far as I can tell, it sounds like being able to see things that can't be actually seen like stacking rocks in particular ways to manipulate acoustic geometry for things like echo chambers, whispering galleries, and amphitheaters.

>> No.15168932

>>15168925
Piles of rock are common?

>> No.15168933

>>15168921
Making something that will last and cause wonder for all the ages, an art form that represents your triumph over the physical plane while you were still alive, it worked didn't it, you're here talking about it still and subtly seething.

They created something of spectacle and wonder, thousnds of years later and modern humans like yourself who consider themselves all wise and all knowing still ponder how it was done, contrast this against yourself, a nobody faggot who has accomplished nothing but scoffs at "piled rocks" on a vietnamese cartoon imageboard.

>> No.15168935

>>15167887
Authoritarianism and Slavery.

>> No.15168943

>>15168933
>still ponder how it was done
Stacking rocks is trivial to do now, its more like wondering how street lamps were lit without electricity, its so unnecessarily complex compared to modern tech that it makes modern people take pause in contemplating the complexity underlying simple process that have become effortless with modern tech.

>> No.15168949
File: 389 KB, 1080x1306, Screenshot_20230201_021215_Chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15168949

>>15167887
>How does /sci/ explain the incredible architecture of ancient civilizations?

Videos like pic related shows you that alot of it comes down time, planning and skill of craftsman vs scale of man power.

Two men are able to carve/sculpt underground homes and build over ground homes around a hundred days or so.

>> No.15168957

>>15168925
That's no joke. You won't get answers on /sci/, though.

>> No.15168966

>>15168933
I have accomplished things. I am an engineer, i have designed and built machines that work and they are far more impressive than any pile of rocks.
As to how to pile and shape rocks: Hammer, chisel, ropes and pulleys. Not hard at all and large scale slavery isnt impressive at all, you seem upset that other people are not sharing in your infantile admiration of big rock

>> No.15168967

>>15168949
Its not two men, its like 12 and they have a bulldozer and funding so they can work all day without worrying about paying for life expenses

>> No.15168969

>>15168925
>>15168957
Well, I've heard theories that there was a global maritime culture in the ice age. That could explain them all having the same building knowledge, as well as shit like blonde mummies all over the world and legends of blonde-bearded blue-eyed people teaching their ancestors things. It's entirely possible.

>> No.15168976

>>15168967
>they can work all day without worrying about paying for life expensnes

Which would be no different than soldiers working for the government. There are certain services that require a 24/7 work lifestyle and be constantly on call.

For jobs like that you wouldn't worry about life "expenses" because your life effectively belongs to the State.

>> No.15168977

>>15168949
>Two men are able to carve/sculpt underground homes and build over ground homes around a hundred days or so.
/sci/ "deboonkers" are unironically midwit enough to fall for these scams lmao. These guys are literally making concrete castings in the jungle. An expose was done on them and someone actually went to the land they use and saw their power tools and excavators.

>> No.15168979

>>15168976
You missed the part where this is done with massive power diggers and concrete. It's not really primitive, it's all made up for gullible people like you.

>> No.15168982

>>15168977
>>15168979
So where's link to the article or video exposing them as frauds?

>> No.15168986

>>15168982
Try this one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvk63LADbFc

>> No.15169037
File: 494 KB, 1280x1109, 1280px-Lalibela,_san_giorgio,_esterno_24.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15169037

>>15168986
So about 30% of the construction is actually done by hand while 70% is machine aided? Based on the video it also seems to point to a time discrepancy. With the videos saying 100 days vs the emails citing 3 day construction period.

So my question to this video would be what's the actual feasible time scale and man power necessary to do those constructions without machines? Because while they cite the Primitive Technology Australian channel as legitimate in methodology/time. The constructions the other channels from South East Asia are doing which apparently "fake" are emulating the rock cut architecture akin to the Temples of India or Churches of Ethopia which aren't products of modern technology and machinery.

>> No.15169049

>>15167899
True, too bad historians are bad at math and don't know shit about logistics, leading to absurd claims and ridiculous chronologies.

>> No.15169053

>>15168969
makes more sense than the mainstream view anyway
is that from hancock?

>> No.15169080

>>15169053
He is probably the biggest name attached to the idea, yes. Randall's atlantis theory is pretty good, imo; it certainly gives us a source for the maritime culture.

>> No.15169241
File: 161 KB, 800x469, Hatunrumiyoc1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15169241

primitive masonry in the middle of a city

>> No.15169243
File: 105 KB, 660x500, Hatunrumiyoc2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15169243

>>15169241

>> No.15169246
File: 150 KB, 660x370, stone12.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15169246

>>15169243
this stone has 12 angles, everything fits perfectly

>> No.15169252
File: 363 KB, 1800x578, Sacsayhuaman-28.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15169252

>>15169246
site near the city

>> No.15169258
File: 353 KB, 1280x638, Sacsayhuaman-27.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15169258

>>15169252

>> No.15169261
File: 269 KB, 1200x800, Sacsayhuaman-30.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15169261

>>15169258

>> No.15169263
File: 186 KB, 1000x617, Sacsayhuaman-29.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15169263

>>15169261

>> No.15169265

>>15169241
B-but, it's sup-p-posed to be really hard! The aliens did it! The aliens did it!

>> No.15169268
File: 99 KB, 660x345, superstones.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15169268

>>15169263
they fucking loved making jigsaw from heavy ass stones

>> No.15169271

>>15167887
ancient whites

>> No.15169407

>>15167887
>ancient architecture
How do you think science and math got started my dude?
What the fuck

>> No.15169430

>>15167944
By grinding with some hard cylindrical object and some extra abrasive

>> No.15169439
File: 281 KB, 828x714, 1669913454053.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15169439

>>15167887
i.. cant.... so... it must be....... aliens............

>> No.15169441

>>15167988
damn that's fucking cool!

>> No.15169444

laser cutters and antigravity lifters

>> No.15169445
File: 61 KB, 575x500, TIMESAND___2SameSNEED.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15169445

>>15169444

>> No.15169452 [DELETED] 
File: 277 KB, 879x485, jwst-april2021.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15169452

>>15167985
funny how you can see the quality of the stonework decline as the tower rises. you can see how their society was decaying over time because of their leadership's unwise economic decision making.
>lets waste all the excess resources trying to reach god
familiar tale, a very low iq one, up there with chicken little

>> No.15169482
File: 635 KB, 2048x1536, Hünengrab_bei_Drosa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15169482

>>15167887
it's a lot of work an needs manpoer but it's not rocket science

why do yout think it's called "stone age"

>> No.15169514

>>15167887
https://youtu.be/WAyQQRNoQaE

>> No.15169597

>>15169452
or a later culture tried to ape them

>> No.15169827

>>15169452
The Incas discovered the original site in ruins thousands of years later, then built on top of it using their comparatively shitty construction techniques, which involved using stones small enough for people to actually carry.

>> No.15169832

>>15169514
The tube drills were what clinched it for me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFuf-gBuuno

>> No.15169846

>>15169832
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9w-i5oZqaQ
@26:00, watch for a minute

>> No.15169848

>>15167887
Humans have an instinctive desire for order and beauty. However, eventually we got to the point where order and beauty were too easy. We wanted change for the sake of change, and now we can't stop ourselves from constantly making things worse just to be different.

>> No.15169887

>>15169846
I watched. The video I linked addresses the tube drill deboonking in detail.

Just a question, have you ever done any manual labor like cutting through a tree branch with a handsaw?

>> No.15169895

>>15169887
yes

>> No.15169910

>>15169895
Ok, and in your opinion it would still be no problem to cut if you replace the steel saw blade with a blade made of copper/bronze of about 1/4 the hardness, and replace the the tree branch with solid rock?

Do you think you could cut through a tree branch with a wooden saw? Because supposedly the saw they were using to cut with was either equal or lesser hardness than the material they were cutting.

>> No.15169915

>>15169846
Your deboonking has been debunked way too many times for anyone pushing it to be taken seriously.

>> No.15169917

>>15169910
its not comparable
I have no idea how hard it is to cut through stone (and there are different kinds of stone) with sand and a copper implement, neither do you

>>15169915
ok, you guys are just shilling then

>> No.15169921

>>15169917
shilling what?

>> No.15169948

>>15169846

Hey anon, watch from 22 minutes in >>15169832

>> No.15169958

>>15169948
its horseshit
they show guys literally doing it with copper and sand
also
>australian accent
blegh

>> No.15169963

>>15169958
Why can't your soft copper drillls and sand explain the spiral grooves in granite cores?

>> No.15169968

>>15169963
I don't know that they can't

>> No.15169971

>>15169968
Do you know anything?

>> No.15169972

>>15167912
That was something like 150 years
>>15167930
People actually don't know how that site looked. What you see today is just what some archeologists in the 80's is mostly put together from the stones found in the side. It was in shambles for a long even at the time of the Inca.

>> No.15169988

>>15169971
I know I'm wasting my time on 4chan, but I'm starving for things to read and the world is shit at the moment.

>> No.15170005

>>15169988
Ok, so why not explore the mystery of the spiral cut grooves in granite?
You could read Christopher Dunn's work?

>> No.15170012

>>15170005
doesnt seem like a mystery to me
show me a video of them using the copper tubes with sand and see what kind of grooves, if any, that makes and then we'll see

>> No.15170016

>>15170012
You literally posted a video with the pbs guys doing just that? Do you not even watch your sources?

>> No.15170024

>>15170016
no, I didnt
they were using copper saws with sand, they only showed a picture of the tube set-up

>> No.15170027

>>15170016
Deboonkers just get a sheet of links and dogma to shill. Familiarity with the concept isn't a job requirement.

>> No.15170042

>>15170024
If you know so little about the videoss you are posting then why the hell are you posting them?

>> No.15170048

>>15170042
I just told you what's in the video, are you retarded?

>> No.15170054
File: 144 KB, 618x597, b57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170054

>it has smooth edges
>cannot be explained by science
>evidence of aliens

>> No.15170055
File: 48 KB, 389x292, 1675279444657.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170055

>>15167887
Why are so many /x/ schizos on this board?

>> No.15170060

>>15170048
But you posted that video specifically referencing te PBS experiment were they spent two days using a copper saw and tube drill I assumed you must actually be familiar with the topic?

>> No.15170066

>>15170055
Why do you label people questioning the outlandish official explanations for ancient artefacts as /x/?

>> No.15170065

>>15170054
Nobody even mentioned aliens lmao. This is done by people. Ancient, fairly advanced people but still people.

>> No.15170073

>>15170066
why are they outlandish?
sure you can argue that archaeology's grip on pre-history is shaky, but that doesn't mean your hypotheticals about ancient advanced civilizations that use alien toys is in any way scientific

>> No.15170077

>>15170073
>alien toys
There's that thought-terminating cliche again. Why is it that only shills argue that people believe it was aliens?

>> No.15170082

>>15170077
Because even mainstream alt-prehistory people like Hancock argue that Egyptians somehow used mind-levitating powers to lift rocks into the air.

>> No.15170083

>>15170082
Who here is arguing that? Give me a quick survey.

>> No.15170092
File: 168 KB, 800x600, Dunn core 7 spiral groove.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170092

>>15170073
Anon I'm just asking for an explanation for these spiral grooves cut into granite? If the only explanation the mainstream can put out is how it must be made by copper drills with sand as an abrasive then I'm afraid the only reaction is that this explanation is outlandish.

>> No.15170093

>>15170082
>mainstream alt-prehistory people
>the most credible of the crackpots
holy shit my sides

>> No.15170134

>>15169514
Copper chisels and abrasive rubbing, no fucking way

>> No.15170135

>>15169832
Good vid, thanks anon, learnt something on /sci/ for once.
https://www.gizapower.com/petrie.html

>> No.15170145

Breeding giants is consider a violation of
- the Code of Hammurabi
- the Book of Thoth
however it is clear that if you breed giants and use various simple methods based on rock cutting using water and acoustic vibration, you can cut and lift rocks precisely
we could literally make a video game about it
it wouldn't be all that complicated, possibly even a decent simulation of electromagnetic effects
there is a guy on yt who cuts circular holes in rocks using metal, water, and acoustic vibration
it's the
>getting giant beasts of burden to lift the rocks
that is immoral and destabilizing

>> No.15170157
File: 28 KB, 968x126, nephilim.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170157

>>15170145

>> No.15170173

>>15170082
I don think theres any mistery, just a lot of labor and pulleys, i like the idea of canals with floaters and gates you use to lift objects on boats by filling them with water to raise them.
Im still intrigues by these tubes with spiral grooves

>> No.15170192

>>15168949
Videos like that one are usually faked. They use a lot of modern machinery.

>> No.15170207

>>15170145
>that is immoral and destabilizing
For you.

>> No.15170216

>>15170173
>just a lot of labor and pulleys,
Mainstream archaeology doesn't believe they'd invented the wheel at that time, so no pulleys. Supposedly, everything was piled on sleds and pushed/pulled up wooden ramps. Never mind that each stone was about 2.5 tons, with the stones above the King's chamber each weighing over 70 tons. Essentially, we are told to believe that the pyramids were constructed by cavepeople with no technology other than rocks and clay.

>> No.15170222

don't you love how the aliens are always brought up only by people trying to ridicule the others

>> No.15170224

>>15170157
I always found the term "giants" to be a rather dishonest translation of a Hebrew word literally meaning "fallen ones".

>> No.15170251

>>15170224
It's a reference to the Septuagint which translated it into γίγαντες which is Giants.

>> No.15170262

>>15170251
In particular, the Septuagint translation is chosen over the modern Hebrew because the Septuagint was written by practicing Jews 2,300 years ago who were bilingual. It reflects the ancient understanding of the word.

>> No.15170335

>>15170262
>because the Septuagint was written by practicing Jews 2,300 years ago who were bilingual
Allegedly. However, if you look into the history of the Septuigant, you'll find out that by the time of Origen there were many copies with a variety of errors and even different versions with their own passages. Origen of Alexandria had to reconcile these and referred to the Hebrew at his time (Isaiah in the Masoretic texts are nearly identical to the Dead Sea Scrolls). Later Lucian also came across similar problems. One of which is that the Septuagint claims Methuselah lived 14 years after the flood when the only Noah, his wife, his three sons, and their wives were the only ones to survive; a problem not in the Hebrew at the time. There were severe problems with the Septuagint and everyone knew it, preferring Hebrew unless they needed a quick translation into Greek or could read Hebrew.

>> No.15170339

>>15170262
>jews
There's your answer. They were literally enslaved. Who knows what kind of Jew magic they used to lift those blocks.

>> No.15170356

>>15170339
>They were literally enslaved
never happened

>> No.15170369
File: 230 KB, 1200x669, Baalbek-050.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170369

the Temple of Bacchus in Lebanon. they say it was built in the 1st century.

>> No.15170372
File: 167 KB, 1170x578, Baalbek-042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170372

>>15170369
it looks like giants have built it

>> No.15170374
File: 116 KB, 640x427, Baalbek-036.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170374

>>15170372
300 tons

>> No.15170378
File: 147 KB, 870x463, Baalbek-pregnant-007.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170378

>>15170374
a 1000-ton block, some 800 metres away from the temple

>> No.15170379

>>15170369
>>15170372
Concrete and casted.

>> No.15170382
File: 169 KB, 1000x533, Baalbek-pregnant-009.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170382

>>15170378
another one

>> No.15170383

>>15170339
>>15170356
>enslaves
Hebrews were ruled by Egypt in Cnaan when Cnaan was controlled by Egypt, it isnt like they lived in proper Egypt.

>> No.15170385

>>15170379
Impossible. Blocks have been found attached to the rock they were quarried from.

>> No.15170391

>>15170378
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateran_Obelisk#:~:text=The%20Lateran%20Obelisk%20is%20the,tonnes%20(330%20short%20tons).
These stones are in the same weight class as Egyptian obelisks. Some were shipped to Europe.

>> No.15170393
File: 279 KB, 1000x700, Baalbek-wall-001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170393

>>15170382
behind that man is a layer consisting of blocks weighing 350 ton each. on top of it is a layer of three 800-ton blocks.

>> No.15170408

>>15170393
Really goes to show how cringe modern humans are. I mean no amount of money can buy you a handyman that isn't some retarded nigger or redback that can barely finish drywall or lay tile. My teenage nephew could probably do that shit better in just a few days. Anyway, it's no surprise we can't even lift some fucking stones and stack them like lego.

>> No.15170409
File: 887 KB, 618x892, obelisk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170409

>>15170393
Obelisks are moved just fine with ropes, ramps and boats, same weight class

>> No.15170417

>>15170408
>Anyway, it's no surprise we can't even lift some fucking stones and stack them like lego.
Bridges are often made by lifting heavy pilons and hammering them into the soil. These are precast and can weigh thousands of tons

>> No.15170419
File: 526 KB, 1200x1600, 1200px-The_Western_Stone_by_David_Shankbone.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170419

>>15170393
The foundation stones of the Western wall in Jerusalem are enormous as well. The Western wall was built on top of the ruins of a much more ancient structure.

>> No.15170426

>>15170419
I can't believe that jewish scholars spend hours hip thrusting at this thing.

>> No.15170427

>>15170417
What? Not they're not. That's completely wrong. Bridge footings in the modern era are made either by building a coffer dam and pouring directly onto bedrock or by building a coffer dam and pounding hundreds of metal pylons into the ground and casting the footing on top of it. Concrete is not suited for that kind of force.

>> No.15170430
File: 237 KB, 1000x625, aw01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170430

a temple in the city of Angkor, Cambodia

>> No.15170433
File: 124 KB, 660x442, aw03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170433

>>15170430

>> No.15170436
File: 227 KB, 1000x667, aw05.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170436

>>15170433

>> No.15170437
File: 75 KB, 1054x593, Precast-Concrete-Cap-Beam-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170437

>>15170427
>Concrete is not suited for that kind of force.
Sure they can and the point is that they are heavy, the road sections that go on top are also heavy. These weights compare with these ancient stones at baalbek and for sure with the egyptian obelisk weights, so we can lift that kind of weight

>> No.15170438

I want to see
>1
single demonstration of a 1000+ ton stone moved with ropes and wood fixtures

>> No.15170439
File: 155 KB, 660x702, aw08.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170439

>>15170436
inside

>> No.15170442
File: 213 KB, 1000x584, Baphuon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170442

>>15170439
there's like 50 temples in that area

>> No.15170446
File: 216 KB, 1000x575, Bayon01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170446

>>15170442
another one. they say it took them like 30 years to build all of that.

>> No.15170447

>>15170437
You are an actual drooling mongoloid if you think you can use a piledriver to pound concrete pillars to bedrock without fracturing them. Let alone thinking that footings use 1000-ton pilings for stability.

Yes, we can move large loads with modern technology like pulleys and the internal combustion engine. Yes, the largest cranes and winches in the world can lift 1000+ tons. Archaeologists do not claim ancient civilizations had these methods. They claim they did not even invent the pulley until thousands of years later, so referring to them as proof that they could do it is ridiculous at best.

>> No.15170449
File: 236 KB, 1632x1224, EQqOLpRWsAACHJ5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170449

This is the strongest crane. Its fixed, it can lift over 20.000 tons.

>> No.15170451
File: 97 KB, 660x371, Bayon02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170451

>>15170446
this one has faces

>> No.15170453

>>15170446
You know what's quite interesting? Those temples have murals featuring the plumeria, which is a flower from South America. No other flowering tree of a similar shape grows in Southeast Asia.

>> No.15170454
File: 117 KB, 660x400, ta-keo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170454

>>15170451
another one

>> No.15170457
File: 245 KB, 1000x640, Preah-Khan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170457

>>15170454
another one

>>15170453
that's very interesting, do you have a picture?

>> No.15170458

>>15170447
I dont know if it was you but some anon i respinded too said we cant lift that kind of weight today, and muttered something about rednecks and niggers.
Also, you can absolutely drive concrete pylons as long as you stick to the force limits, dont make me post pictures

>> No.15170460
File: 177 KB, 660x630, Ta-Prohm02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170460

>>15170457
this one is occupied by treants

>> No.15170465

>>15170458
>dont know if it was you
thats the point

>> No.15170466
File: 106 KB, 660x428, Ta-Prohm03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170466

>>15170460

>> No.15170469

>>15167887
A frog scientist, Joseph Davidovits, made a pretty solid case of how stone momuments such as the pyramids could have been made from a mixture of naturally occurring substances such as limestone, clay, sand, gravel etc mixed with water and left in simple wood molds to create "geopolymers"

>> No.15170471
File: 94 KB, 660x440, stego.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170471

>>15170466
but weren't dinosaurs discovered in the 19th century?

>> No.15170472

With modern techniques we're only able to fit two stones with straight lines between them.
I've tried to find masons to build a polygonal stone wall with naturally flowing perfect seams and no mortar and no one is able to do it. It's straight lines or nothing.
THAT's the reality of what we are capable of.

>> No.15170474
File: 1.98 MB, 2647x3003, Kamboja_Panataran_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170474

>>15170457
>that's very interesting, do you have a picture?
Not off-hand, though I do have a similar one from Indonesia.

>> No.15170476

>>15170469
Source

>> No.15170477

>>15170469
He's been disproven by the composition of the stones. We know exactly where they were quarried.

>> No.15170479

>>15170477
sad

>> No.15170481

>>15169263
>Sacsayhuamán
>The complex was built by the Inca in the 15th century
lol

>> No.15170484

The entire quarry was a massive pit of casted stone.

>> No.15170485

>>15170477
They do look as if they were melted or something though. It's impossible that they were crafted to fit so perfectly.

>> No.15170487

>>15170477
Link? Sounds interesting. I still think his geopolymer idea must have some potential viability given how simple the method is.

>> No.15170490
File: 262 KB, 1000x675, puka-pukara-01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170490

>>15170481
this is how the Inca built. they were obviously trying to mimic the much older ancient style.

>> No.15170489

>>15170485
Many of the Egyptian stones have evidence of exposure to extreme heat but only on one of their outside surfaces, implying that they were subject to those intense heats long after construction was completed.

>> No.15170491
File: 438 KB, 1280x1707, Oxford_cathedral_09.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170491

How did they do it bros? Must have been aliens

>> No.15170492

>>15170491
Why is it that you keep talking about aliens? Nobody here is except you.

>> No.15170493
File: 181 KB, 800x533, Pisac01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170493

>>15170490

>> No.15170497

>>15170485
>>15170469
Geopolymers are a fancy name for a cement based on sodium carbonate, however limestone is based on calcium carbonate so "completely different chemical element".

>> No.15170499
File: 166 KB, 1000x458, Pisac02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170499

>>15170493
here are the two styles in one site, one can easily see the difference

>> No.15170500

>>15170492
Rather than spamming pictures, why don't you tell us all what your hypothesis is

>> No.15170502

>>15167887
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KbSFphHCZY

>> No.15170504

>>15170491
My thoughts exactly. You see the same shit in the field of software. Programmers are so helpless these days. Got told to use nodejs at work. Never used it before. Tried it. Thought it was gay and slow. Wrote my own HTTP server by hand in C in a couple days. No dependencies outside of the kernel.

>> No.15170505

>>15170500
Stop poisoning the well

>> No.15170507

>>15170500
I'm not that anon, but my hypothesis is that over 12,000 years ago a society capable of ironworking and the creation of pulleys and other complex mechanisms existed and was relatively widespread across the world. If I had to put them on a spectrum I'd say they had a minimum level of sophistication around that of the Romans, with a maximum of the early to mid Industrial Revolution.

>> No.15170508

>>15170491
How many tons are each block?

>> No.15170515

>>15170507
They travelled around the world but didn't bother to do their own colombian exchange?

>> No.15170519

Why are there hieroglyphs in australia?

>> No.15170521

>>15170515
They did. Some of the plants died out during the cataclysmic events of the Younger Dryas period but many certainly lived on until recent memory. Consider the plumeria and its symbolism in prehistorical South Asian Buddhism, despite originating in South America and not being "introduced" to the region until the Spanish arrived.

>> No.15170530

>>15170521
Didn't fancy taking crops or livestock like every other migratory people in history? Just one dubious record of flowers.

>> No.15170535 [DELETED] 

>>15170502
TLTW they treated the joints acid mine water

>> No.15170541

>>15170530
Of course they did. One only needs to look at the global prevalence of dogs, hogs, and chickens for more examples. You're really not making a good case for yourself with this kind of ignorance.

>> No.15170543

>>15170502
TLTW they treated the joints with acid mine water

>> No.15170551

>>15170541
Yes, around the old world, and we have a fairly good idea of the timeline of their spread. But weirdly we don't find turkeys or potatoes or corn in the old world until the columbian exchange, and we don't find sheep and pigs and wheat in the new world until the columbian exchange.

At best there is tentative and fairly inconclusive genetic evidence that chickens may have arrived in south america via contact with pacific islanders but we're still talking AD, not 12k years ago.

>> No.15170564

>>15170551
There are boar-sized tayassuids, a suid cousin, in the new world. The new world also has its own shearable animals and food crops adapted to the climate and importation of old world specimens such as sheep is logically unnecessary and even counterproductive.

You're free to believe whatever you want absent any proof of your claims, but you have nothing to back your argument up but ignorance of the facts. Playing dumb to get a "gotcha" just isn't possible from your position.

>> No.15170576

>>15170543
Any info on this?

>> No.15170582

>>15170576
watch the video, the creator linked a paper

>> No.15170595

>>15170564
>Although they resemble pigs at first glance, the peccary (Tyassuidae) and pig (Suidae) families diverged about 37 million years ago
Might have to put the timeline of your imaginary civilisation back a bit there m8

My "position" is that there is no evidence of Hancock mongs' civilisation and that there is a massive lack of evidence of what you would expect to see were it real.

>> No.15170598

>>15170595
Your position is quite baseless then I'm afraid. It's embarrassing to see you flail around like this. All you have is disingenuous accusations of belief in aliens and ignorant assumptions about things we already have ample proof for.

>> No.15170602

>>15168079
no the question i answered is why the stones are so smooth at the connections, it's water and time causing that

>> No.15170605

>>15170598
You've presented no proof of any pre-columbian exchange of species whatsoever.

>> No.15170610

>>15170605
None that satisfied your deficient curiosity, but you know the old saying about throwing pearls before swine.

>> No.15170616

>>15169037
is that all a single rock? holy fuck

>> No.15170617

>>15170610
Feel free to post what you think is the most convincing evidence of pre-columbian species exchange

>> No.15170623

>>15170616
at first glance, it appears to be carved into the bedrock

>> No.15170624

>>15169268
i would give so much to be able to watch primitive grugs stacking these huge fucks while thinking to themselfs ahah that will show these future soi bois whos the real man

>> No.15170627

>>15170617
Widespread religious and artistic use of the plumeria in a region where it is thought to have never existed, even millions of years ago, is the strongest biological proof. At least if you're not counting the precolumbian skeletons with European genetic ancestry. Humans do count as a species after all.

>> No.15170635

>>15170627
I looked for plumeria evidence when you posted it at first, I could find nothing that suggests anything pre-columbian, any papers on this? or the skeletons?

>> No.15170642

>>15170635
A photograph of one of the temple carvings is posted in this thread. It can all be found quite easily.

>> No.15170644
File: 144 KB, 1x1, 5b9f2833fa4f3850d48584831ffa40bf.pdf [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170644

>>15170082
>mind-levitating powers

I think it's acoustic levitation. You can also use acoustics to cut stone, with combined with a soft copper blade and some abrasive sand. If you produce a tone that resonates with your saw, you essentially create a vibro saw like that which is commonly used in modern day construction, but powered by sound/instruments.

The man who built coral castle was reported by peeping toms to "sing to the stone" before he moved them.

>> No.15170657

>>15170642
Which post? Having actually bothered to do some research it turns out there is a native Asian plant (Magnolia champaca) which looks similar, so much so that name for the plumeria in local languages derives from it.

>> No.15170693

>>15170657
and it turns out thats the plant mentioned in hindu and buddhist scripture so thats that cleared up.

>> No.15170744

they obviously had power tools. see the long cuts on egyptian stones that veer off for a while before correcting. you dont chisel that long of a cut incorrectly before adjusting. only happens if you have something cut really fast.

>> No.15170750

>>15170744
There are also lathe tooling marks on the granite pots and bowls found in the deepest strata of Egyptian sites. Thorough engineering analysis showed that it could only have been produced on a mechanical lathe with steel tooling.

>> No.15170823

So when are you niggers going to find a real demonstration (or make one yourself) of how to build these nigger huts since you all are so intimate with niggerology?

>> No.15170926

>>15167887
200 years and people will be confused how we built mega cities

>> No.15170978
File: 2.38 MB, 5014x3422, Temple_area,_Mosque_of_Omar_(i.e.,_Dome_of_the_Rock),_etc._Rock_Moriah,_from_the_south_LOC_matpc.23162.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170978

>>15170426
There's also this giant slab of rock underneath the Al Aqsa mosque, which the Arabs built on what was originally the location of the Ark of the Covenant.

>> No.15170982
File: 270 KB, 993x1194, 5856334.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15170982

We are watching

>> No.15171011

>>15169246
Yeah it fits "perfect" because each block had its upper surface recarved after being laid in order to accept the next block. These things weren't ordered in from china and assembled on site lmao, custom fit with no regard for consistency is easy.

>> No.15171016

>>15170092
Step 1: verify that the groove is actually a spiral and some guy isn't just winging thread around a scratched core.

>> No.15171021

>>15170449
Damn, over twenty tonnes???

>> No.15171041

>>15170823
Still waiting on you niggers to give real evidence.

>> No.15171045

>>15170978
You obviously didn't watch Indiana Jones.

>> No.15171197

>>15168966
C'mon mate, as an engineer it has to be at least somewhat impressive to make those things with chisels, hammers, ropes, pulleys and manpower AND having them last so long because stone.

>> No.15171210

>>15171197
no man, his ego has been triggered
theres nothing you can say to make him reasonable

>> No.15171258
File: 2.61 MB, 1385x848, Screenshot 2022-10-10 at 23-59-48 inca stone wall 1 thousand results found on Yandex Images.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15171258

>> No.15171266

>>15170982
google gives no results

>> No.15171322

>>15170391
>Some were shipped to Europe.
Impossible, aliens must have done it

>> No.15171598
File: 77 KB, 1280x720, 0838B190-D604-477D-B7FE-6DAC4A238B45.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15171598

>>15167887
You mean you can't stock some rocks, Anon?

>> No.15171650

>>15171041
Guess you niggers aren't as smart as you claim. Too bad. We can now dispose of all your theories since you can't even nigger rig something to show.

>> No.15171709

>>15170216
Never forget, stone cannot be carbon dated, and oldest human homosapien found is 900,000 years old. I think it is far more likely our history is not as linear as we think. If we got rocked by an asteroid right now all evidence of our civilization would be gone in just a few thousand years. Even sooner with mega tsunamis.
And there's evidence of mega tsunamis occurred in the past all over the world.

Humanity needs to get its shit together or else we're fucked and there will be no trace left of our civilization either in 6000-12000 years.

"It's like we're arguing what radio to put on while we're parked in the middle of the train tracks."

>> No.15171713

>>15171709
This. Iron tools are quick to rust and disappear. Wood rots. Who's to say the pyramid builders didn't have these things?

>> No.15171716

>>15171197
Im sorry but im just not impressed by it (the stone piles).
>>15171210
You are injured and projecting. Seek help.
>>15171322
First to Rome and later to London

>> No.15171765

>>15168889
That's one very small person

>> No.15171873

>>15171716
Anglos never built or moved anything without alien help.

>> No.15171880
File: 159 KB, 447x380, PART_1674822780311_1674808254220606.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15171880

>>15171873

>> No.15171906
File: 117 KB, 552x504, xx.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15171906

>>15168088
Does anyone have an explanation for these little nubs?

They're all over the world on ancient monuments and seem to be some sort of construction leftover

Almost like it's from casting

>> No.15171918

>>15171906
That's a guide for ropes, Anon. You are correct aboit the casting. Even the Romans and Greeks had concrete.

>> No.15171999

>>15171880
Sweety, you can't just "move things", Zeno proved this thousands of years ago. Moving things can only be done with alien technology that exist beyond the bounds of human philosophy and science.

>> No.15172002

>>15171906
>>15171918
They were for interfacing with the wood frame construction that rotted/burned/etc away a long time ago.

>> No.15172015

>>15167887
Epistemologically, the scientific method cannot explain events which have taken place in the past. Instead you need to apply the deductive method.

>> No.15172038

>>15172015
Epistemologically, nothing exists outside my own mind as I perceive it.

>> No.15172120

>>15171021
That's technically true

>> No.15172123

>>15171713
Radioactive waste? ceramics?

>> No.15172334
File: 120 KB, 152x652, 1650933557808.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15172334

>>15171713
We have ancient egyptian iron artifacts that survived thousands of years with virtually no degredation. Pic related, it's a meteroric iron dagger owned by King Tut. It's more than three thousand years old, Iron can last a very long time if you keep it dry with relatively low humidity (Egypt).

What's notable is how unique this particular dagger is, there wasn't lots of iron in that tomb, pretty much just this dagger. So while they had iron back then, it obviously wasn't very common. No metallurgical industry of their own, nor any ancient iron artifacts from previous ages. They had nothing even coming close to the later iron age civilizations.

>> No.15172383

>>15172334
Expanding on this, it is perfectly reasonable to suppose that some elite Ancient Egyptian stone masons sometimes had access to very valuable meteoric iron tools when working with particularly hard stones. There's no evidence for this, but that doesn't mean it wasn't so.

But also, so what? To find evidence of such a thing would be interesting, but it wouldn't exactly rewrite the general course of history.

>> No.15172407

>>15172383
iron isnt even that hard to get. The vast reach of the egyptian empire absolutely had access to iron and used it regularly for their industrial endevours

>> No.15172424

>>15171918
>guide for ropes
Lol. You're don't going to do anything with ropes given nubs like that.
>concrete
Out of Andesite? Carving hard stones (hardness of 7 or great) with only the stone age tech found through more recent South American cultures is already a problem. The same problem exists with a concrete of Andesite. That being said, there are a lot of problems in making concrete out of Andesite as it is un-ideal due to its high silica content in the modern era.
>Romans and Greeks
The iron age Romans just mined volcanic sand, lime, and gypsum (very soft) for this application.
>>15171906
>casting
Casted how? Concrete is already a big no-no. Melting is an even greater problem since Andesite has an extremely high melting temperature.

>> No.15172428
File: 610 KB, 1878x1252, minecraft-iron-ore.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15172428

>>15172407
>iron is not hard to get

>> No.15172432
File: 132 KB, 645x1023, 1670913594164.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15172432

>>15172407
There's no evidence that the ancient Egyptians had iron smelting, but that dagger is very suggestive of a mature meteoric iron industry. Meteoric iron is difficult to work with, even for modern experienced blacksmiths, but whoever made that dagger did an exceptionally good job. Obviously they had a lot of practice, that's not the sort of knife you just invent out of the blue one day.

Here is another Ancient Egyptian knife, the Gebel el-Arak knife. This one is about 5500 years old, already ancient by King Tut's day. It's flint napped, stone age technology. But just look at the craftmanship of this knife! This is an elite tier artifact, great practiced skill went into the manufacture of this stone knife. Egypt and the whole Mediterranean region had very sophisticated ancient cultures in which people could become true masters of very specialized crafts. This is the context you must remember when evaluating the deeply impressive structures they somehow managed to create. They weren't dumb pygmy stone-age tribesmen like you see on TV today. They had relatively simple materials to work with, but they were very smart and very capable.

>> No.15172453 [DELETED] 
File: 172 KB, 613x448, this is what an 85 iq post looks like.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15172453

>>15172432

>> No.15172465
File: 3.37 MB, 2317x3621, 75yl8f1wnlfa1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15172465

>>15172453

>> No.15173426

>>15167940
BAH GAWD IT'S TWO TRIPLE H'S, OR SEXTUPLE H

>> No.15173617

>>15169246
junichiro, you have been tasked to sort boulders for optimal fit for five years while the lord rapes your sisters, and if you fail your lot will be put to the sword

>> No.15173674
File: 1.45 MB, 1540x2310, Peru_-_Cusco_Sacred_Valley_&_Incan_Ruins_135_-_Tipón_water_channeling_(7100943169).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15173674

Inca fluid dynamics.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/QYfsRIHXKHQ

>> No.15173703

Ancient man monkey brain want pussy.
Ancient man get pussy by making fancy building.