/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15154576]

Is there any wrong with this logic?

[Anonymous No.15154581]

>>15154576
hey that's what I said except survival rate was higher than 99.8% based on the data I got from the hospital I worked in

[Anonymous No.15154583]

>>15154576
>any wrong
good morning rakesh

[Anonymous No.15154584]

>>15154576
Pretty sure you're not 99.8% protected against Covid considering there have been over 100 million confirmed cases in the US alone.

[Anonymous No.15154586]

>>15154576
The argument is unsound because it depends on the false assumption that covid exists.

[Anonymous No.15154591]

>>15154584
Define confirmed case.

[Anonymous No.15154601]

>>15154576
You might be, but your boomer neighbor isn't.

[Anonymous No.15154602]

>>15154576
>t. plague rat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Mallon

[Anonymous No.15154603]

>>15154581
>survival rate was higher than 99.8%
They're not talking about survival rate. They're referencing Pfizer's own reported absolute risk reduction for infection. lol. Factor in the fact that you'll probably get nothing harsher than a minor cold even if you do get infected, and you might as well change that figure to 100% unless you're a fat old boomer.

[Anonymous No.15154606]

>>15154591
Wait a second.... Is Covid even real?!

[Anonymous No.15154611]

>>15154576
>i have no idea how high school level probability works

[Anonymous No.15154778]

>>15154576
anti-semetic

[Anonymous No.15154911]

>>15154576
Yes.
1. False equivalence of action. Not taking the vaccine does not PROTECT you against covid.

2. False equivalence of consequence. The side effects of the vaccine are benign. The effects of covid are not, and result in lost work for weeks, long term disabilities, and death.

This is like saying, "If I don't wear my seat belt I am 100% protected from the side effects of wearing a seat belt, but 99% protected from the effects of a car crash."
Wearing a seat belt or not does not change your odds of getting into an accident, and wearing a seat belt does not risk your life.

[Anonymous No.15154997]

guys, if a vaccinated girl wants to suck my cock for that unvaccinated cum, should I let her?

[Anonymous No.15155007]

>>15154911
Wrong.

[Anonymous No.15155029]

People who got the vaccine are cattle and I hope that their herders are benevolent.

[Anonymous No.15155055]

>>15154911
>the seat belt analogy

[Anonymous No.15155066]

>>15154911
I got the covid. 1 day fever and back on my feet again. Its just a god damn flu. Invent a vaccine that works for the immune retarded 0.2% and stop ruining the lifes of 99.8 % majority.

[Anonymous No.15155067]

>Is there any wrong with this logic?

Yep the first part is logical while the second is a completely false statistic.

[Anonymous No.15155072]

>>15154603
sup /pol/tard do you ever lie awake hoping karma isn't real?

[Anonymous No.15155075]

>>15154911
you are too fucking stupid even for this board go away

[Anonymous No.15155078]

>>15154911
not taking the vaccine is protective for covid compared to taking the vaccine

[Anonymous No.15155082]

>>15155078
especially if you like your immune response in the long term

[Anonymous No.15155086]

>>15154576
If I don't wear a seatbelt I am 100% protected against feeling uncomfortable and 99.8% protected against a deadly car crash.
That's a good deal

[Anonymous No.15155095]

>>15155086
if you inject the seatbelt you will be 99.9% protected from a car accident

[Anonymous No.15155112]

>>15155072
Another /pol/tard, but yes, on occasion, I lie awake desperately wishing karma was real and that Jews were not exempt from it. Then again, seeing how they have been treated over last 3 millennia, one could assume karma is indeed real, and a big karmic payoff is coming soon ;^)

[Anonymous No.15155115]

>>15154576
nothing wrong with this statement
It made sense to get teh vax back when they started at the very beginning - when the somewhat dangerous variants were still around and the vaccine actually worked for the variant you could conceivably catch
now it's just silly way to get heath problems to "own the right"

[Anonymous No.15155131]

>>15155115
>it made sense to get the vaccine when we didn't know shit about it
>now that we know its causing side effects(like any new medical development in the history of humankind) its just silly
what the fuck is wrong with people like you can you explain yourself?

[Anonymous No.15155145]

>>15155115
Only if you're old, fat, work in hospitals or a genetic weak link.

[Anonymous No.15155232]

>unvaxxed = protected against vaxx damage
Sorry chud, but this has been fact checked. Vaxx shedding is happening and it's dangerous. Every time you're near a vaxxie you're breathing in airborne prions.

[Anonymous No.15155236]

Place vaxx in your titles so I can filter your stupid fucking antivax posts, thanks in advance! :)

[Anonymous No.15155244]

>>15155232
noooo don't fuck with my heckin' alpha-helical conformation

[Anonymous No.15155250]

>>15154576
Well it's pretty much all wrong.
That 99.8% has nothing to do with protection for one thing. It's about mortality, and the number is wrong and means nothing of course.

But dumb antivaxxers somehow still think that the vax can give you more side effects than Covid itself, because of course some spike proteins floating inside you is worse than billions of virions covered in them and making copies of themselves while constantly spreading.

[Anonymous No.15155252]

>>15154576
the part where it says youre 99.8% protected against covid and the part where this is supposed to be meaningful in any way

>>15154602
nobody even claims anymore that the vaccines protect against infection

[Anonymous No.15155265]

>>15154576
ITT people who can't do expected value

[Anonymous No.15155284]

>>15154576
Jabbed are dying off at an accelerated rate.
I don't see the point wasting time arguing with corpses, especially since they try to project their fuckups on me (which is how they got into shit in the first place)

[Anonymous No.15155305]

>>15155284
if that's true, you wouldn't be fabricating articles

[Anonymous No.15155340]

>>15155284
>To be published: June 6, 2023
uh

[Anonymous No.15155423]

>>15154911
>The side effects of the vaccine are benign.

[Anonymous No.15155425]

>>15154576
absolutely nothing. Only NPCs will disagree

[Anonymous No.15155435]

>>15154911
I'm you'd have no issue timestamping your vaxxcard to show us you're up-to-date on your boosters. Yeah?

[Anonymous No.15155447]

>>15154576
Yes. Twice as many Republicans died once vaccines became available. Those people died because of misinformation by idiots like you.

https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/once-covid-vaccines-were-introduced-more-republicans-died-than-democrats

[Anonymous No.15155454]

>>15155447
Did you even read that?

[Anonymous No.15155504]

>>15154576
Yes. Right choice not to get jabbed (because the vax doesn't really do anything to stop infection) but flawed reasoning on COVID protection.
Immediate death isn't the only outcome of a viral infection. In theory, your organs could take a beating that result in death months down the track.
But the main problem is that you can't translate a 99.8% survival chance for a group into an individual survival chance. You individually may have some gene, shitty immune system, comorbidity, or whatever that makes your individual survival chance lower.

[Anonymous No.15155527]

>>15155447
That would be meaningful if we could trust health officials and their data, but they've shown themselves to be undeserving of our trust.

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/commentary-8-things-us-pandemic-communicators-still-get-wrong

[Anonymous No.15155532]

>>15155527
>With COVID, the politicization watershed moment may have been the antiracism protests that followed the murder of George Floyd. Public health professionals who had condemned anti-lockdown demonstrations as horribly dangerous super-spreader events found ways to embrace anti-racism demonstrations as somehow not really dangerous at all. Some said racism was a public health crisis and so antiracism demonstrations were public health achievements, even in the middle of vaccine-less surges. I think that's the moment when the public health profession got identified by many on the right as a left-leaning enterprise they shouldn't trust.

[Anonymous No.15155549]

>>15154576
Your are 0 protected against covid but 99.8% likely to develop a sufficient immune response against it to keep you alive

[Anonymous No.15155595]

https://kirstenmortensen.com/munchausen-syndrome-by-proxy-on-a-societal-scale/

One should always resist societal medicalization. Its promoters are mentally ill.

[Anonymous No.15156125]

>>15154584
>Pretty sure you're not 99.8% protected against Covid
That's average survival rate. 99.9% if you are under 60.

[Anonymous No.15156129]

>>15154911
>The side effects of the vaccine are benign.

[Anonymous No.15156130]

>>15154581
Of the people that died of COVID at your hospital, how many of them were executed with ventilators?

[Anonymous No.15156132]

>>15155284
>I don't see the point wasting time arguing with corpses,
10+ million worldwide and counting.
How many died from the China Virus? Around -2 million?

[Anonymous No.15156878]

>>15154581
>hey that's what I said except survival rate was higher than 99.8% based on the data
The odds of dying in a vehicle crash in your lifetime is 1 in 101.
https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/all-injuries/preventable-death-overview/odds-of-dying/
The odds of me surviving from COVID with my age and health profile was slightly higher than 99.998%j, or odds of death 1 in 75k-110k range.
It was always a no brainer I wasn't going to inject myself with experimental crooked pharmaceutical industry drugs over that.
For another reference, 100 children die every year walking to school via getting struck by a vehicle. There are 49 million school children in USA. 30% walk to school. That works out to 1 in 150k odds of a child dying if they walk to school instead of being driven there.
I have no reason to mitigate the dangers of COVID and I never did.

[Anonymous No.15156912]

>>15156125
"surviving" is not enough. Some survivors had permanent lung damage back in 2019.