So now we're going to start marginalizing AI research as patent medicine/cocaine-fueled research.
It's voodoo didactics, easily exploitable by cult leaders, other nefarious actors
when these people say
>learning occurs
we have to apply a theory of teaching and learning or else say
>the use of the word "learning" is more of a colloquial reference to a family of algorithms based on statistics than a reference to real learning as it occurs in practice and theories of learning
so this is pseudolearning, something that appears to be the real thing but on closer inspection is not actually part of learning at all, rather some strange marketing campaign in statistics attempting to inject education philosophy language into their studies (most illogically, as it would frustrate communication)