/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15135614]

ITT: blessed Science & Math images

kicking it off with: THE ATOM

[Anonymous No.15135621]

>>15135614
People don't seriously fall for this stuff, do they?

[Anonymous No.15135638]

>>15135621
Fall for what.

[Anonymous No.15135642]

>>15135638
Schizo pictures like that.

[Anonymous No.15135644]

>>15135642
What makes you say it's schizo?

[Anonymous No.15135647]

>>15135644
Atomic science is moving towards a densest-packing model of the atom where it has a discrete structure, not a giant fuzzy ball.

[Anonymous No.15135656]

>>15135647
The only schizo is you. If you had any type of integrity you'd have tracked down where OP image came from and noticed it came from Brookhaven National Lab. You're a pseud. Kys.

[Anonymous No.15135676]

>>15135656
You become irrationally upset when I point out something you disagree with but don't understand. How can I be the mentally ill one in this conversation?

[Anonymous No.15135690]

>>15135676
You seem upset.

[Anonymous No.15135694]

[Anonymous No.15135782]

>>15135647
KNEEL DOWN BEFORE PROBABILISTIC NON-DETERMINISTIC VISUALS BITCH!

[Anonymous No.15135841]

>>15135621
Standard anti science retard first comment

[Anonymous No.15135856]

>>15135841
When are we launching the Inquisition, to get rid of "anti science retards" Father?

[Anonymous No.15135891]

>>15135614

[Anonymous No.15135906]

>>15135614

[Anonymous No.15135908]

Artistix expressionix

[Anonymous No.15135920]

>>15135891

[Anonymous No.15135925]

>>15135614
Aren't the lines and lobes in all these images merely a representation of where electrons are likely to be?

And really an atom looks exactly the same as we have always visualised it. A dense ball orbited by electrons. Only under normal circumstances the electrons orbit haphazardly and very, very quickly so they kind of take up all of the "space" represented by the lobes.

Can you force the electrons to orbit on a plane? What conditions would be necessary? What would be the effect?

[Anonymous No.15136085]

>>15135856
You misunderstand

[Anonymous No.15136107]

>>15135656
Its an useles CGI pile of pixels, this isnt 1930 and no one is impressed by atomic orbitals.

[Anonymous No.15136390]

>>15135891
Delicious starlami

[Anonymous No.15136580]

>>15135925
sorta, they are a probability, but remember that elections aren't doing the ball or infinitesimal point partical thing when bound in a quantum system like an atom. so if it had to collapse then the weighting of probably in the lobes does give you that, however they are in 3D wave form, where nodes are the zeros or what would be the x intercept in 1d wave.

this one nigga called pauli with his exclusion principle and some other rules are what we currently believe to be the most real explanation.

because electrons in orbitals overlap in a way that is energetically stable and gives each electron a unique set of quantum numbers then its all good.

Like imagine that a single electron is spread out in a non well-defined way.
but an interaction must occur where the electron necessary takes on partical behavior for that interaction, then the probability of its location is the square of its wave function for that orbital.

[Anonymous No.15136611]

>>15135614
Why does everything that you can't see with your own eyes, look like a computer graphic? Do we live in a simulation, after all?

[Anonymous No.15136713]

Well, that's going to make atheists look silly.

[Anonymous No.15136716]

Why is it surrounded by a polygon split into slices?