[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 235 KB, 528x438, 1653441806765.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15122546 No.15122546 [Reply] [Original]

define time

>> No.15122547

an interval between events. next question

>> No.15122550

kind of like newsweek

>> No.15122553

>>15122547
so are all events instantaneous? If so, then how can events of different time lengths be compared? If not, then what do we call an interval between different points in an event?

>> No.15122585

A measurable unit separating events.

>> No.15122588

>>15122546
Yay! I love Define Time! I define OP as a faggot.

>> No.15122593

Time exists in order that everything doesn’t happen all at once, and space exists so that it doesn’t all happen to you. -- Ray Cummings

>> No.15122599

Time in its most basic form is a result a universe being causal. If each event is caused by a preceding event, that linear sequence is time itself.

The idea of "right now" or "the flow of time" is an illusion of consciousness and only exists to aid in your survival as a biological entity.

>> No.15122601

>>15122599
Define cause

>> No.15122611

>>15122599
Reality is nonlocal chud

>> No.15122613

>>15122611
>locality
>causality
pick one

>> No.15122619

>>15122613
Neither. Get with the times boomer.

>> No.15122880

>>15122546
measurement of rates of relative motions of matter

>> No.15122887
File: 49 KB, 601x508, 325234.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15122887

>>15122546
>define time
The appropriate definition depends on the context. There is no need to rigorously define it outside of a specific context and no point in trying to.

>> No.15122905

Time is the advancement of entropy within a system.

>> No.15122908

>>15122905
>advancement of entropy
What does that mean?

>> No.15123003

time is transcendental, you can't define it

>> No.15123006

>>15122546
>>15122880
hot mother bitch
big bob fack eat pusi

>> No.15123017
File: 19 KB, 450x280, 68747470733a2f2f636f6d7075746572736369656e636577696b692e6f72672f696d616765732f632f63362f44697265637465645f67726170682e706e67.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15123017

>>15122546
I take the arrows from this graph, copy them onto a blank piece of paper and demand to know what the arrows are.

>> No.15123019

>>15123006
post dic

>> No.15123030

>>15122553
Huh?

>> No.15123037

>>15123030
how can the different points of an event be timed in accordance to each other if you can't measure the distance between the beginning of one even and the end of another?

>> No.15123141

>>15122547
define event without recurring to time and you win

>> No.15123155

>>15122599
>is a result a universe being causal
which it isnt

>> No.15123157

I love how non of you midwits have yet used the term of change in space-time

>> No.15123158

>>15122599
>consciousness is le heckin' illusion
>muh "events" coming in a neat sequence and "causing" each other is objective reality, though
Are these "people" truly human? Do their lives really warrant any moral consideration? Do they really deserve rights?

>> No.15123163

>>15123157
are you retarded by any chance?

>> No.15123174

>>15123158
ouch, how embarassing. Down syndrome level of reading comprehension while trying to mock stupid people

>> No.15123177

>>15123174
Hush, subhuman. There's nothing illusory about the sensation of gradual change. Your "causality", on the other hand, is a simplistic monke brain model that has nothing to do with objectivity.

>> No.15123190

Measure of happenings. If something happens, time advances. The problem is to find happenings to measure even intervals of time. Probably not possible and the vague and patchful theory of relativy proofs it.

>> No.15123193

>>15123190
Time is just the rate of happenings per happening. :^)

>> No.15123235

>>15123177
I'm not even the anon who posted it, it's just funny how you misread the point. It appears you tried again and still got it wrong, because he neither said that conscioussness nor that the sensation of change is illusory.
Anyway, if causality is bs how does this non-illusory sensation of gradual change come about, and what changes and why? Objective answer please

>> No.15123242

>>15123163
>No argument presented
>Proceeding to call names
Kill yourself talentless worthless tranny

>> No.15123249

>>15123141
something that happens

>> No.15123254
File: 67 KB, 640x445, DSkILzyUQAAG2Tq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15123254

>>15122546
the measurement of the sun

>> No.15123260

>>15122546
Our time cycle is based on the measurement of our sun, some planets have multiple suns so their days are are longer than ours. The time cycle of a planet is based on the distance of its star or sun(s).

>> No.15123270

>>15122613
I don't see why these have to be mutually exclusive

>> No.15123275

>>15123157
Define space-time

>> No.15123281

>>15123275
A mathematical model of space equipped with spacetime topology which describes reality.

>> No.15124322

>>15122546
define existence first

>> No.15124329

>>15122546
Ayo we bussin senpai

>> No.15124364

>>15123141
Isn't it just a single point in spacetime?

>> No.15124373

>>15122546
Rate of enthropy and measurement of causality

>> No.15124379

>>15124364
>spacetime
includes time so circular

>> No.15124429

>>15122546
It's a conceptual framework in order to understand things. It isn't a thing in-of itself.

>> No.15124594

>>15122546
Light enters your retina, your optic nerve signals electrical impulses to neurons, you perceive each moment as a short 'snapshot' depending on your reaction time (normal is 250-300ms) Each moment passes by, comparable to a 'snapshot' or 'picture' (as if it were a camera) and thus the important moments are stored and encoded into long term memory. Depending on your CNS responses and the situation you find yourself in, you may also experience time dilation or distortion. In a life or death situation, time dilation often occurs, your time perception would likely slow down massively to warn you of danger. You could compare time as measure of change, and measure of change as entropy. Compare entropy to chaos, or an increase in chaotic signaling across the brain (speaking from the brain as a computer metaphor)

Overall this is how we perceive time. It is an embodied process and from a non-linear point of view, zoomed out, you may even notice how your decisions played a part in reaching the present. Counterfactuals I'm not very familiar with however, this is pretty much it. Correct me if I'm wrong
Also, cognitive biases developed along with heuristics like rosy retrospection to optimize present decisions. And prevent rumination about all of this

>> No.15124604

And keep in mind, moments are strictly estimations. They are relative to the observer. Time is not global, it is a biological process

It is also dependent on your circadian rhythms and dopamine signaling. This is why dopamine or circadian-rhythm disordered patients, like Parkinson's or Alzheimers perceive time differently. Parkinson's is a movement disorder and time intervals are underestimated IIRC

>> No.15124635

>>15122546
What a clock measures

>> No.15124660

>>15122619
kek