/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15053193]

> she's a 10 but superdeterminist

Welp.

[Anonymous No.15053203]

>>15053193
prove or disprove it one way or the other. I'll wait.

[Anonymous No.15053204]

>>15053203
He can't. It's already been superdetermined

[Anonymous No.15053206]

>>15053203
>insecure godsperg so rattled he can't even understand the tone of op's post

[Anonymous No.15053209]

[Anonymous No.15053245]

>>15053206
>>insecure godsperg so rattled he can't even understand the tone of op's post
free will is ultimately a part of the gospel. Determinism is heretical. If anything a true believer must believe in free will. God gives us a will to choose the right way. this is central to all religious belief. I just don't think it belongs in physics, until it can be proven one way or the other.

[RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA No.15053264]

>>15053209
>I warned you, sis...I warned them all.

[Anonymous No.15053265]

>>15053245
determitoddlers have already been btfod by bell's inequality

[RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA No.15053276]

>>15053245
>I just don't think it belongs in physics,

>Your feelings have no bearing on physical reality whatsoever, and as such they exist independent from matter and physics itself.

This is you, you are the relogious nutjob and the Theology crowd is the logical, coherent, physics based thinkers.

CLOWN WORLD.

[Anonymous No.15053316]

>>15053265
>determitoddlers have already been btfod by bell's inequality
I don't think you understand Bells inequality. Bells inequality proves events can be random if one presupposes that humans have free will. Bells inequality leads to an interpretation of reality that falls apart if you don't think humans choose their ways independent of anything else.

[Anonymous No.15053318]

>>15053276
>This is you, you are the relogious nutjob
free will is the believers dogma.

[Anonymous No.15053333]

reject edutainment

[Anonymous No.15053357]

>>15053209
She could have made a paragraph about how inflation is generally linked to futa and/or stomach deformation, and also more rarely vore.

[Anonymous No.15053385]

>>15053193
She's not even a 4...

[Anonymous No.15053387]

>>15053193
>she's a 10 but superdeterminist
damn now she's a 10 squared

[Anonymous No.15053388]

>>15053385
Donno man she looks somewhat good for being 46 years old.

[Anonymous No.15053393]

>>15053385
>>15053388
Not even a 3.

[Anonymous No.15053578]

>>15053316
>Bells inequality proves events can be random if one presupposes that humans have free will.
Actually this is misleading. I realized I played too much into your retarded pops I narrative. Bells inequality says that if humans have free will that causality isn't real. The whole EPR paradox has everything to do with wave function collapse and it's consequences for causality and little to do with randomness.

[RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA No.15053729]

>>15053318
>God gives us a will to choose the right way. this is central to all religious belief.
Followed by;
>I just don't think it belongs in physics

Prove to me the standard model is true, I will hold up my GR Bible and say "Nay, ye heretical agent of Satan!"

Its the notion of divorcing the spirit/soul from Physics thats toxic modernity. As if your You is seperate from reality and this concept wont poison the rest of your vision of reality....

[RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA No.15053741]

>>15053333
Four 3s
>reject edutainment

I will fight God AND Satan to the ends of time over this. I wish to ENJOY my studies, Im an adult now...I get to Choose!
)^:<

[Anonymous No.15053796]

>>15053741
the point is that those aren't studies, you can compare it with knowing what sum does but not being able to do it. You know that if you have 2 apples and add one you get 3 but you dont know the sense of "+" and "="

[Anonymous No.15053810]

>>15053209
she's so based

[Anonymous No.15053812]

>>15053388
>>15053385
>>15053393
She's a babe

[Anonymous No.15053832]

>>15053203
I was determined to believe it's untrue

[Anonymous No.15053835]

>>15053729
Can you make an argument? What is your thesis? I don't take your point at all.

[Anonymous No.15053843]

>>15053832
>I was determined to believe it's untrue
What's true? Why can't anyone here make a point?

[RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA No.15053925]

>>15053796
>the point is that those aren't studies

You have no fucking clue how many people with PhDs Ive interacted eith in my life and for them to be utterly ignorant in their own fields.

DOCTORS. Medical doctors Ive corrected on medical knowledge, and YOU, MFing some doofus of 4chan, thinks theyre smart?!


Christ!! Ive seen a professor straight up talking out of his ass, Princeton I think, and you....A Mortal Human, questions ME?!


HAVE AT YOU!

[RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA No.15053934]

>>15053835
>Can you make an argument?
Yeah, conceptually seperating reality as seperate from reality is ANTI-SCIENTIFIC.

>All of this is science, except for this portion, we do not question for its beyond theory.

> I don't take your point at all.
I know, youre on the side of fake science and lies (to yourself).

Good day, sir.

[Anonymous No.15053935]

>>15053193
she's so hot, where do I meet women like her

[Anonymous No.15053939]

>>15053934
>>All of this is science, except for this portion, we do not question for its beyond theory.
It's not falsifiable as far as we know therefore it is categorically not part of the epistemological process called science

[RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA No.15053956]

>>15053939
Sorry, I held my GR Bible next to your QM theory and it doesnt add up.

Falsified. Sorry...

[Anonymous No.15053982]

>>15053956
Science is just an epistemology guy. You can read Bacon for more info. If it's not a falsifiable hypothesis it just isn't science. That doesn't make it true or false, just something else. Do humans have free will? I don't know. I don't think about it too much, but i do know it's an article of faith either way so a hypothesis based on it is discarded when it's submitted as science.

[RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA No.15053996]

>>15053982
>Science is just an epistemology guy.

Yeah, and my GR ruler doesnt align with your QM metrics.

Sorry, you just dont understand what Im saying and kesp posting back your arguments (now realizing its about determinism and free will as you didnt conprehend my previous post, its all over your head.)

Welp....good day, sir.

[Anonymous No.15054003]

>>15053996
>you just dont understand what Im saying
I know. I've mentioned that and asked for clarification already.

[RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA No.15054037]

>>15054003
I SAID GOOD DAY, SIR!

[Anonymous No.15054089]

>>15053193
She's a failed physicists who is now resorting to low iq youtubers in order to shill her retarded hypothesis.

[Anonymous No.15054093]

>>15053318
If determinism holds true, what is the original cause for the creation of the universe?

[Anonymous No.15054099]

>>15054089
>She's a failed physicists
Can you cite me your papers or interviews? I'm eager to learn from a more accomplished Phsycist.
:^)

[Anonymous No.15054104]

>>15054099
I'm not a physicists, Mrs. Hosenfeller.

[Anonymous No.15054202]

>>15054104
>fräulein
First correction; I am Swiss...

[Anonymous No.15054213]

>>15053209
holy shit i fucking hate modern academia

[Anonymous No.15054333]

>>15053209
lol

[Anonymous No.15054334]

>>15053193
That's a man

[Anonymous No.15055488]

>>15053209
>>15053388

[Anonymous No.15055593]

>>15055488
>she
>her

[Anonymous No.15055836]

cute!

[Anonymous No.15056059]

>>15053209