/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.15011094]

Why is it biologically impossible for a (cis) woman to simultaneously hot and smart?

In other words, why did we evolve to rate low IQ phenotypes more attractive than high IQ phenotypes?

[Anonymous No.15011098]

>>15011094
Prove that IQ is controlled by the same gene(s) as appearance

[Anonymous No.15011754]

>>15011098
It is a well known, established fact, scientifically proven and confirmed countless times by independent fact checkers, that big boobs correlate with low IQ.

[Anonymous No.15011772]

It's not that attractive women are unintelligent it's that they never bother heavily using their intelligence because their looks are enough to get through life.

[Anonymous No.15011785]

>>15011094
Intelligence is rare, beauty is rare, both are gonna be doubly rare. Also >>15011772

[Anonymous No.15011845]

>>15011094
good topic. i wouldn't put cis in any parenthesis, only (((gay))).

[Anonymous No.15011852]

>>15011094
It's not, and we didn't.
>>15011772
This, completely. It's that their intelligence isn't the first, most noticeable thing.

[Anonymous No.15012869]

>>15011785
>beauty is rare
Only male beauty is rare. A female literally only needs to exist and immediately has an army of thousands of simps who see her as beautiful.

[Anonymous No.15012885]

>>15012869
Everyone knows ugly women are ugly, but the value of a working womb means that some men are willing to lie to ugly women to get access to reproduction.

[Anonymous No.15012891]

>>15011094
Either she's not hot or she's not smart. You're just a moronic, thirsty simp. Either youre unable to accurately gauge hotness or you're unable to accurately gauge intellect. In truth it's probably both; you're most likely a faggot and a dimwit.

[Anonymous No.15013079]

>>15012885
The bar for being considered attractive as a woman is much, much lower than it is for men.

[Anonymous No.15013171]

>>15011094
>biologically impossible for a (cis) woman to be smart?
FIFY