Who's in the wrong?

[Anonymous No.15005581]

Should scientists be held accountable for their comments?

[Anonymous No.15005592]

you

[Anonymous No.15005593]

>>15005581
Sorry but women should have been kept out of science and off the Internet.

[Anonymous No.15005596]

>>15005593
I'd take Sabine over that delusional cuck Mandlbaur any day

[Anonymous No.15005597]

>>15005581
what's her ethnicity?

[Anonymous No.15005600]

>>15005581
>If one person's "speech" makes others afraid to speak up
who decides who is allowed to be "afraid" and who isn't allowed? can i be afraid of trannies and remove them from the media?

[Anonymous No.15005601]

>>15005596
Oh so you think speech that hurts another person's feelings should be illegal?

[Anonymous No.15005602]

>>15005601
If that person is you John, then yes

[Anonymous No.15005604]

>>15005597
She's Jewish. How is that relavent?

[Anonymous No.15005605]

>>15005604
oh wow, it's not relevant but it's an interesting coincidence, how does she decide who is allowed to be afraid and use their fear to police speech?

[Anonymous No.15005608]

>>15005597
>>15005604
How do we even know she’s real?
She didn’t pay the $8 for the checkmark.

[Anonymous No.15005610]

If they don’t have a twitter checkmark next to their name they literally don’t matter.

[Anonymous No.15005611]

>>15005600
Holy crap we have a transphobe in the comments. This is terrifying. Someone call the speech police.

[Anonymous No.15005614]

>>15005581
>Twitter thread
>ethics aka /his/ not /sci/
>vague statement/question

[Anonymous No.15005616]

>>15005611
aaaaahh, this scares me, please censor government

[Anonymous No.15005620]

>John has resorted to whinging about twatter arguments after getting abused every day for posting his "paper"

[Anonymous No.15005651]

>>15005581
How would she know about his story because he approached her to review his paper and she said no? It sounds like he's assuming she said no because of what others were saying about him. She might have had another reason like just being too busy etc. The people online antagonizing other people for fun are the dickheads no doubt, but at the same time him bringing it up like that and then calling that lady out didn't really seem appropriate

[Anonymous No.15005681]

>>15005593
>>15005597
>>15005600
>>15005601
>>15005605
>>15005604
>>15005608
>>15005610
>>15005611
>>15005614
>>15005616
>>15005651
I hate newfags so much. Go back to >>>/pol/, twitter or wherever you come from

[Anonymous No.15005688]

>>15005681
how many "Go back to >>>/pol/" shitposting you need to do to actually make them to go?

[Anonymous No.15005696]

>>15005688
>>15005681
>>15005593
>>15005597
>>15005600
>>15005601
>>15005605
>>15005604
>>15005608
>>15005610
>>15005611
>>15005614
>>15005616
>>15005651
you fags haven't added anything noteworthy to the thread. Deleting it now since such discussions are literally impossible on nu-/sci/

[Anonymous No.15005700]

>>15005581
This is why technocracy is a horrific idea.

>>15005600
Of course not, only the Good People are allowed such protections. If the Bad People lose their jobs or are targeted with mob harassment or get their head bashed in with a bike lock for giving their political opinions or spreading hate facts then that's just well-deserved consequences :^)

[Anonymous No.15005703]

>>15005696
>towerposter hallucinating that his janny application was approved

[Anonymous No.15005707]

>>15005703
I'm OP, fuckface. Forgot that the delete option doesn't work anymore

[Anonymous No.15005708]

>>15005581
Is that the real Mandlbaur?

[Anonymous No.15005709]

>>15005707
seethe harder newfriend

[Anonymous No.15005711]

>>15005707
>aks for discussion
>doesnt like the resulting discussion
>SHUT IT DOWN
lmaoing at your life bud

[Anonymous No.15005713]

>>15005709
>>15005711
none of you faggots were on /sci/ in 2011. It's ever since COVID that this place is full of your kind. We are done here.

[Anonymous No.15005714]

>>15005713
Who's "we"?

[Anonymous No.15005716]

>>15005581
>Who's in the wrong?
Hossenfelder.
>If one person's "speech" makes others afraid to speak up, then that's where legal regulations become necessary.
Fuck enlightenment philosophy and the enlightenment understanding of freedom.

[Anonymous No.15005718]

>>15005714
inclusive third-person plural, ESL-kun

[Anonymous No.15005724]

>>15005718
Inclusive of whomst, schizo-kun?

[Anonymous No.15005726]

>>15005716
>Fuck free speech
why its always trannies and autocrats that are terrified of criticism?

[Anonymous No.15005728]

>>15005713
take ur meds schizo

[Anonymous No.15005731]

>>15005724
https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Clusivity

[Anonymous No.15005733]

>>15005726
Ideologies that openly conflict with plain objective reality need to fall back on censorship to stop their power from rapidly eroding. Many such cases.

[Anonymous No.15005736]

>>15005731
You said 'we' are done when clearly you were only speaking for yourself. Are you the queen by chance?

[Anonymous No.15005738]

>>15005733
>stop their power from rapidly eroding
It will do the exact opposite if you prove its existence by attacking it as if it reveals something you are trying to hide.

[Anonymous No.15005740]

>>15005726
Why is it that most of this board is functionally illiterate?

[Anonymous No.15005739]

>>15005736
I used 'we' as in 'me, you, and possibly others'. I know for a fact you are done.

[Anonymous No.15005746]

>>15005739
But I just got here.

[Anonymous No.15005750]

>>15005740
And why do you keep posting tranime?

[Anonymous No.15005754]

>>15005740
When you condition yourself to strawmanning posts you don't like, you'll gradually get better at it and soon only see the strawman you constructed in these posts.

[Anonymous No.15005764]

>>15005713
answer the question retard, who decides who is allowed to be afraid and censor people according to their fear, and who isn't allowed?

[Anonymous No.15005784]

>>15005713
OP truly is an absolute faggot

[Anonymous No.15005802]

Free speech doesnt exist.
If he doesnt allow nazis and isis members on twitter that means free speech is limited.
He will allow discusions about trannies and thats pretty much it.

[Anonymous No.15005811]

>>15005802
it allow both way before the musk thing

[Anonymous No.15005813]

>>15005811
would be interesting to try Azov-maxxing in your own country and check if it is allowed or not

[Anonymous No.15005817]

>>15005813
i don't understand the point of this question

[Anonymous No.15005823]

>>15005593
>Women should be kept off the internet.
>1/5-1/4th of all internet search queries, a good proxy for what the internet is used for, is for pictures and videos of women's vags and buttholes.
>It's harder to track total data volume due to all the automated shit going on, but even including that, women's naughty bits account for at least 5% of total traffic and as much as 30% of all data exchange that isn't automated.
>This material is overwhelmingly accessed by men. The idea that there is "no women on the internet" is bolstered by much higher data use for men, primarily to get vagoo and butthole pictures.
>Videos and images focusing on dude's dongs and buttholes make up a small bit meaningful share of the traffic mentioned above, but are also largely accessed by men.
>In conclusion, the internet is a global system requiring a massive amount of infrastructure and energy production. The largest single use of this system is for men to get sensory data related to women's naughty bits.
>Therefore, the internet exists because of women. We would probably all be stuck using copper phone lines and getting 90s' internet speeds if the demand for vagoo pics didn't exist.
>This isn't even getting into all the non-porn lewds
>If AI is created to immediate first major commercial use will to make fuck bots.
>A new form of life will likely be spawned due to the human drive to fuck, appropriately enough

[Anonymous No.15005826]

>>15005593
this

[Anonymous No.15005835]

>>15005823
>Earth's atmospheric composition and temperature is being meaningfully changed by human's drive to fuck.
>New silicone based life born from the desire to fuck.
>The Self's desire to be reflected in the Other (love/reproduction) is advancing history on a geological scale.
>May one day lead to life/synthetic life moving between the stars so that it can continue to see its Self reflected in Being.
>More and more of the mass energy of the universe becomes part of self-aware systems, Being coming to know Its Self as Being.
>This inexorable drive is driven on by natural selection, which in turn is the result of the opposition between initial order and the inexorable drive towards higher entropy.
>GFWH was right about everything.
>YFW you attain Absolute Knowing— attain the Gnosis.

[Anonymous No.15005838]

>>15005581
>Scientist who is supposed to be absolutely 100% objective crying about feelings on twitter

No matter how much a woman trains, reads, learns, and climbs the ranks of academia she will always be a woman and thus inferior and illogical.

[Anonymous No.15005870]

>>15005817
it's not a question, more of a comment really

[Anonymous No.15005877]

>>15005601
>I've got... The entire sprectrum...

I wuz diagnosed with
... The entire spectrum

Its... rainbows..

[Anonymous No.15005884]

>>15005581
Free speech is free speech. End of discussion.

Now, if we want to discuss legislation to specifically have MandleBoer be sodomized with a rusty pipe on a daily basis, that’s fine.

[Anonymous No.15005895]

>>15005581
Her entire post makes me afraid to speak up. Can we take legal action against her post?

[Anonymous No.15006072]

>>15005605
That example is dog shit lmao

[Anonymous No.15006082]

>>15006072
t. brainlet

[Anonymous No.15006144]

>>15005581

[Anonymous No.15006254]

>>15005802
Incitement to violence has always been illegal.

Why can't dumbfuck Americans understand the simple nuance between saying. "Jews are slimy thieves" and "We should kill all the Jews". The former is frowned upon, but legal, the latter is illegal. Hence why ISIS is banned.

[Anonymous No.15006375]

>>15006254
Even "We should kill all jews" wouldn't hold up in court because it doesn't express an immediate threat. It's just an opinion.

[Anonymous No.15006398]

>>15005581
She deserves to be harassed by Mandlbaur if this is a real screenshot.

[Anonymous No.15006440]

>>15006375
Even the common "shouting fire in a crowded theater" misconception is protected speech. In fact it's Supreme Court ruled protected speech, making it a strong defense.

[Anonymous No.15006452]

>>15005581
depends on your field, in medicine it is way more irresponsible to just spew out information you haven't fuly verified
purely politically i am an anarchist when it comes to speech, however i do consider it irresponsible to spew nonsense if you know better and evil if you do it for malicious reasons, yet i don't think you should be punished for it, unless you give direct advice to someone irl if you are in a position in authority
-> a doctor irl to a patient saying something knowingly harmful for personal reasons
>should be punished for obvious malepractice
-> a doctor beign a retard online on twitter telling people how to make mustard gas
>don't give a shit, only cattle take twitter as gospel

[Anonymous No.15006456]

>>15006452
DESU this is why doctors need to be jailed and have their licenses revoked for forcing patients to take the vax.

[Anonymous No.15006458]

>>15006144
I'm not reading that gay blog post

[Anonymous No.15006490]

>>15006456
ok, not going into the vax debate
however in principle i find it interesting to talk about unknowing malepracte
for example the thalidomide scandal
the doctors prescribing these pills usually have had good intentions and no knowledge of the horrible side effects, yet the results were catastrophic
in that scenario i wouldn't revoke the licenses of the doctors simply prescribing pills with, at the time, no known problems
the scientists bringing those pills on the market on the other hand...i am not sure about. since they obviously failed quality control, however outside influences might have led to the bad testing, in which case the company is to blame. however however the scientists didn't object, despite maybe knowing about lacking sufficient testing, in which case they should also loose their positions
i don't know what happened exactly during the thalidomide scandal, be it scientists orcorporate dogs or whatever, this was just as an example

[Anonymous No.15006498]

>>15005581
This presents an interesting solution to the problem of wokefags and schizos... just put them all together with each other so everyone else can go about their business.

[Anonymous No.15006703]

>>15005581
>If one person's "speech" makes others afraid to speak up, then that's where legal regulations become necessary.
"Sabine, this statement makes me afraid to speak up, so I will be pursuing legal action against you."

[Anonymous No.15006709]

>>15005877
What a truly asinine image. In Plato's world of the 'Cave' the prisoners are chained to a wall watching shadows, whereas in the Matrix-Cave, Cypher will get to eat well prepared chateaubriand and become a famous actor or whatever.
Those in the platonic cave would not likely kill to return to being chained up staring at a wall due to the novelty and fantasy of the world outside, whereas the world outside for Cypher is a horrific struggle and an objective downgrade to living inside the Matrix-Cave.

[Anonymous No.15006747]

>>15005738
You would think that, but most people cannot think logically about abstract ideas. They can put the square peg in the square hole but they cannot put two pieces of information together in their minds the way we can. They will just assume there is no connection unless the manipulation becomes so egregious that the jew involved might as well be holding up a sign that says "We're lying to you, goy!".

[Anonymous No.15006864]

>>15006703
Her statement is why scientists deserve to be bullied hard from primary school to grad school. Even professors need to be shoved into lockers and subjected to atomic wedgies if this is how they think.

[Anonymous No.15007036]

>>15005581
>personal insults on social media should be punishable by law
Someone ask her if it was okay for Galileo to be sentenced to house arrest because he called the Pope a simpleton. Is this really her account? How could someone like her who has spent most of her career shitting on fake scientists be against free speech on these grounds? Insane.

[Anonymous No.15007064]

>>15005581
btfo of sabine
MandlBRAWN
'imple as

[Anonymous No.15007065]

>>15005596
>that delusional cuck
Thats illegal speech, youre under arrest (you fucking retard....).
>I'll take security over freedom any da-ACK MY FREEDOMS!!!

[Anonymous No.15007070]

>>15006254
>Hence why ISIS is banned
Im so glad I got to see all of their kino videos during their haydays. Was really interesting to see. You guys will never know the feeling of being able to view cult insider media on obscure websites in foreign languages.

KINO. Absolute kino.

[Anonymous No.15007074]

>>15005581
>german has nazi opinions
I'm shocked

[Anonymous No.15007079]

>>15007065
Angular momentum is conserved

[Anonymous No.15007103]

>>15007079
He presents a simple physics problem, I cannot understand why a forum of "scientists" are unable to dicredit him without resorting to strawmanning or name calling.

Curious...the insane are the rational and the sane are utterly deluded by a faux reality.

[Anonymous No.15007118]

>>15007103
he discredits himself, my dude. you might as well be asking us to discredit flat earth retards and ufologists.

[Anonymous No.15007129]

>>15007118
>asking us to discredit flat earth retards and ufologists
Tons of threads, seen tons of infographics, videos, classes.

>he did himself
POST SCIENCE.

Christ....you did the very thing I posted people do as a discredit. YOU DISCREDITED YOURSELF, RETARD.

[Anonymous No.15007140]

>>15007103
>he
I've tried to explain why your reasoning is flawed in multiple threads, John. You simply don't listen and start spouting obscenities.

[Anonymous No.15007145]

>>15007140
He does have a unfied field theory, he doesnt invest mathematics, he has one problem the public cannot solve.

I have dozens of problems universities cannot solve, and Ive seen professors fail too many times at simple shit (cough*Veritasium*COUGH-MF).

Your PhD holds a negative value to me....so....DEFINE REALITY SO I CAN HUMILIATE YOU.

NOW, RETARD.

[Anonymous No.15007149]

>>15007145
Do you think Veritasium is a professor? He's just some youtuber lol
I seriously doubt you can "define reality" or even understand the basics of QFT since you can't perform a basic classical calculation about the conservation of angular momentum without shitting your pants

[Anonymous No.15007164]

>>15005581
Her speech is making me feel afraid to speak up. Who can I call to get her taken off the internet?

[Anonymous No.15007165]

>>15005581
>free speech doesn't mean free speech
>science

https://www.bitchute.com/video/SXmb2fNP1p0d/

[Anonymous No.15007166]

>>15007149
>Do you think Veritasium is a professor?
He beat a Physics Professor at Phsyics.

I will not read the rest of your disingenuous post.

Mandlbaur broke you retards.

GO TO CLASS, YOU HAVE LEARNED NOTHING.

[Anonymous No.15007175]

>>15005802
Wasn't ISIS allowed on Twitter before?

[Anonymous No.15007180]

>>15007129
John, isn't it bed time in Zimbabwe?

[Anonymous No.15007191]

>>15007180
>no u r
He is more of a physicist than people with PhDs. You will never be a real physicist, mathematician, biologist, doctor, human.

Deal with it.

[Anonymous No.15007196]

>>15007191
John, stop pretending to be someone else, we all know that it's you.

[Anonymous No.15007198]

>>15007103
>dicredit him
There is no discrediting, just proving him wrong time and time again.
He consistently presents an inability and steadfast unwillingness to learn.

[Anonymous No.15007201]

>>15007065
>you fucking retard
And you just landed yourself a reservation for the chair. Zap! Zap!

[Anonymous No.15007205]

>>15007198
>>15007196
Great job posting science. Just keep saying "duuuh, everyone knows the sun revolves around the earff".

>Daaaah of course we smart and he dumb, daaah no fuk u dood, daaah no I won.

*clap.......clap......clap*
Keep crediting him, keep embarrassing yourselves...

[Anonymous No.15007211]

>>15007205
>Keep crediting him, keep embarrassing yourselves
The fuck are you on about? ESL?
He is self-contradictory. His own explanations and examples disprove his claims.

[Anonymous No.15007219]

>>15007211
>no u r
>no I am
t.

[Anonymous No.15007223]

>>15007205
His error is that he believes that reducing the diameter of the spinning system requires no change in the energy of the system.

[Anonymous No.15007228]

>>15007219
at least you admit it is duck season.

[Anonymous No.15007248]

>>15007223
Finally.

I believed the same thing but Ive barely seen his problem and its kind of out of my wheel house. I spent more time talking to him as a person and not reviewing his work.

Spent a thread together, Im not here to discredit people in fields Im not familiar with.

Having said that....this sounds as about as compliicated as a thread about solving a math problem.

What gives? Why not just solve it? People look at it and say "No." but why cant it be susinctly solved?

The fact Veritasium broke the intuitive insticts of a physics professor means even (You) (or I) can have incorrect assumptions about the most basic concepts of phsyics.

[Anonymous No.15007254]

>>15007248
>What gives? Why not just solve it? People look at it and say "No." but why cant it be susinctly solved?
>The fact Veritasium broke the intuitive insticts of a physics professor means even (You) (or I) can have incorrect assumptions about the most basic concepts of phsyics.
I'm not sure what you mean by "why not just solve it?" Mandlbaur is mentally ill and his brain is unable to comprehend that he's wrong about anything. Many people have explained why he's wrong with diagrams and calculations, including me explaining closed vs. open systems, but it washes over him like water on a raincoat.

[Anonymous No.15007271]

>>15007248
>Why not just solve it?
It is from his fucking college physics 101 textbook. He posted the pages.
It is explained and solved in the textbook. Others have solved it for him. He uses as examples a professor who proves the textbook is correct.
>>People look at it and say "No." but why cant it be susinctly solved?
Many do say "No." and not only that but many others do in fact succinctly solve it.

[Anonymous No.15007284]

>>15005581
hmm, slampiggy sabine and this cuck make me glad i deactivated twatter

[Anonymous No.15007285]

>>15007254
>Mandlbaur is mentally ill and his brain is unable to comprehend that he's wrong about anything.
>no u r
Diogenese was talking about people like you. He was mocking you in front of you in a way so inverted you couldnt see it. You dismiss bevause to aknowledge is to self admit what you yourself are....

You thought you were the viewer...but you are the viewed...

>explained why he's wrong with diagrams and calculations
>CNN has made the science VERY clear...
Now you see how they see you.
>closed vs. open systems
You must have BTFO of all of acedemia discrediting every university on its "Dark Matter Theory", huh?

You see Diogenese as a homeless moron but he sees you as a delusional faux human.

[Anonymous No.15007293]

>>15007271
>It is from his fucking college physics 101 textbook
This was "your guy's" explanation to my advanced number theory lectures, a "arithmatic 101 perspective" that was so amature, so pedestrian, it was insulting to be challanged by.
>literally a "duuuuh, of course the sun revolves around da earth" response, thats astronomy 101 shit my fellow bronze age peon

You people are midwits, even the ones "working" on their PhDs, Ive been so disappointed by the intelligence of you guys.........

[Anonymous No.15007297]

>>15007285
Was it fun arguing with Sabine Hossfelder on Twitter?

[Anonymous No.15007303]

>>15007293
>This was "your guy's" explanation to my advanced number theory lectures, a "arithmatic 101 perspective" that was so amature, so pedestrian, it was insulting to be challanged by.
The fuck are you on about? Your replies themselves are insulting.
Green texting that which as not posted does you no favors.
Again, his own examples prove him wrong, those performed by others and ones he purportedly executed himself.

[Anonymous No.15007307]

>>15007297
>*munch-munch* So...*smacks lips*...like, fuck you.

Brilliant minds here....

[Anonymous No.15007311]

>>15007303
>Green texting that which as not posted does you no favors.
>paraphrasing is classic use of meme arrows

GTFO NEWFAG. YOU WILL NEVER BE A PHYSICIST.

[Anonymous No.15007316]

>>15007307
I really am curious. Did you have fun arguing with her in this tweet chain? >>15005581
It seems like you were really going at it.

[Anonymous No.15007317]

>>15007303
>Again, his own examples prove him wrong
You operate using false definions of physics and refuse to measure outside of said definitions. Hence anyone that points to "outside the system" physics is called schizo and anyone that agrees with your false reality is called smart.

LAZY.

[Anonymous No.15007320]

>>15007311
You are not paraphrasing.
Strawman is the correct word.

I never claimed to be a physicist nor made any claim of wanting to be one.

[Anonymous No.15007322]

>>15007317
Take your meds, Mandelbrot.

[Anonymous No.15007327]

>>15007316
>disengage when btfo

I WON.

[Anonymous No.15007332]

>>15007327
Well since I know it's you now, Mandible, I might as well actually ask you about something I care about. It's not like you'll ever actually do the math right so it's a lost cause to keep helping you on that.

[Anonymous No.15007333]

>>15007320
WRONG. Holding new information to old information as discrediting source IS bad science. It prevents discoveries bevause new MUST adhere to old.

That IS saying "everyone knows the sun revolves around the earth because all the schools teach that and "every NPC retard" agrees with that".

BAD SCIENCE.

YOU FAIL.

[Anonymous No.15007335]

>>15007317
Nope.
He post an example that he says proves him correct.
You watch the video and pay attention to what is said and shown. The demonstration clearly shows him to be incorrect.
So, who exactly is "operate using false definions of physics and refuse to measure outside of said definitions."
He and everyone else is using the same source for discussion. The measurements used are the same.
He doesn't point "outside the system".
Clearly, you have not seen any of his COAM threads.

[Anonymous No.15007345]

>>15007335
The guy you're arguing with is Mandlbaur. He admitted it here >>15007293

[Anonymous No.15007346]

>>15007333
Damn, you went full dipshit.
Take a deep breath and hold it.
>>Holding new information to old information as discrediting source IS bad science.
Please try again, something is missing from the translation.
I will try a stab at this.
He doesn't provide any new fucking information.
>>the sun revolves around the earth
I don't recall ever being taught whether or not any hard science accompanied such teaching. Care to enlighten us?
Like you say, BAD SCIENCE.

YOU FAIL.

[Anonymous No.15007353]

>>15007345
I got that vibe many posts ago.
The replies are fairly tame so far, a rare treat.

[Anonymous No.15007358]

This is me (>>15007166). I took this picture in Afghanistan.

You are not real phsyicsts, youre school kids at best, counter-scientists at worst.

[Anonymous No.15007359]

>>15005713
I was 13 in 2011

[Anonymous No.15007382]

>>15007353
He just got a new set of schizo obsession words.

[Anonymous No.15007410]

>>He beat a Physics Professor at Phsyics.
I hope you realize that professors are people too. They are not all knowing nor infallible.

[Anonymous No.15007462]

>>15007410
Yet they defend "The Infallible Book" called "Science" and their Priests (Professors) as if they are (except now, with you, admit even the most honored giants in a field can be wrong for if one is wrong they can ALL be wrong.)

THAT is science. Double check and refute the giants. Tesla, Newton...fucking Archemedese. ALL of them should be your targets, ALL.

NOT to defend their "honor" (how dare you question him, everyone agrees he is right!)

[Anonymous No.15007465]

>>15007462
>NOT to defend their "honor" (how dare you question him, everyone agrees he is right!)
Exactly! Everyone should be questioning the giant Manboob, because his calculations are wrong.

[Anonymous No.15007470]

>>15007465
no u

[Anonymous No.15007473]

>>15007470
Yes! I completely agree! We have to question everything. That's why when Mandlbaur's (i.e. yours) math was proven to be based on a faulty understanding of the principles, he should have gone back to the drawing board.

[Anonymous No.15007474]

>>15007465
>because his calculations are wrong
Didnt Einstien, Hawking and Newton get refuted on things?

Your attacking the man, not the problem.

BAD SCIENCE.

[Anonymous No.15007478]

>>15007473
>he should have gone back to the drawing board
no u

[Anonymous No.15007482]

>>15007462
whaaaa...The "book" is by its very nature, fallible.

[Anonymous No.15007491]

>>15007474
>not the problem.
>his calculations are wrong
>Your attacking the man
You might want to proofread your replies before hitting the post button.

[Anonymous No.15007492]

>>15007482
Now that someone admits this;
Try to submit a paper that invalidates any number of fields a professor would be in.
Submit a paper that threatens academia's income. Make them choose between Science and money....

...and just like that. Your proven thesis gets dumped in the trash like a patent for a water car in a petro-dollar world...

[Anonymous No.15007495]

>>15007491
>>his calculations are wrong
no yours are
no ur illiterate
no u dum
no i win

[Anonymous No.15007517]

>>15007495
>no u
Zombie.

[Anonymous No.15007551]

>>15007517
>When you mirror someone and they mock its intelligence

Pottery, I lower my intelligence so any moron can understand and you think you scored a hit..lol....

[Anonymous No.15007555]

>>15007495
except they are in fact wrong, demonstrated using his own posts and his own examples.

[Anonymous No.15007560]

>>15007555
>My book says the sun revolves around the earth, it proves it every morning.

POT-TER-Y.

[Anonymous No.15007563]

>>15005581
>free speech doesn't mean everyone gets to say what they want

[Anonymous No.15007568]

>>15007560
again with the strawman.

[Anonymous No.15007570]

>>15007560
do you even read what you are replying to?

[Anonymous No.15007616]

>>15007570
He's a schizophrenic my nigga. He sees what he wants to see.

[Anonymous No.15007652]

>>15007616
Ah man, is this the equivalent of "don't poke the schizophrenic"?

[Anonymous No.15007658]

>>15007652
Mandlbaur is one of the less interesting schizos in the board, so yeah. If you poke him he just rants and insults people. With Maidfag and some of the others like Tooker (who thinks he's being imprisoned in Antarctica because the Coriolis effect isn't real) they actually say funny stuff.

[Anonymous No.15007675]

Just say youre right, dont show youre right.
>Be the authority you appeal to and hold all evidence against said authority; if it doesnt concur then dispose of it.

Checkmate.

[Anonymous No.15007684]

>>15007568
>>15007570
>WHEN YOU REPHRASE SOMEONE AND THEY THINK THEY WON.

RE-TAR-DED. DONT READ POSTS, JUST RESPOND LIKE YOU'VE WON.

DO IT AGAIN....AND AGAIN...AND AGAIN.

TRUTH WONT CHANGE FOR YOU.

[Anonymous No.15007734]

>>15007616
>He sees what he wants to see.
You see nothing. You know only what youre told, not what is.

>self evident=schizo image
Dont think for yourself, just go with what the herd agrees with. Literal 1984 reactionary...

[Anonymous No.15007739]

psst, looks like you are having a keyboard issue.

[Anonymous No.15007758]

>>15007739
If you cant understand the message then you get louder words.

>Hey your supposed to keep civil while I approach everything from a disingenuous perspective that ignores are valid counter points!!!

RESPECT IS FOR THE RESPECTABLE.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND OR ARE YOU RETARDED TOO?

[Anonymous No.15007759]

>>15007758
What valid counterpoints? You don't have an argument, Mandingo. Insisting that an experiment says something it objectively does not isn't an argument, it's a delusion.

[Anonymous No.15007774]

>>15007759
>You don't have an argument,
I didnt make one! I pointed out the hypocracy and invalid argument you were making as BAD SCIENCE.

GOOD JOB, YOU CHECKMATED YOURSELF BY CONTINUEING TO THINK YOUR OWN VIEWS ARE MINE.

SELF. OWNED. JESUS CHRIST DUDE....

[Anonymous No.15007783]

>>15007758
shit, you are hilariously dumb.
Being a member of Mensa hasn't done anything for you, has it?

[Anonymous No.15007787]

>>15007774
you are replying to more than one poster, you fucking imbecile.

[Anonymous No.15007793]

>>15007783
>no u dumb (pompus while ignorantly smirking)

>Dont prove youre right, just appeal to your own authority.
>(crosses arms and leans back in my chair)
Heh, checkmate...your opinions arent mine so this proves youre wrong.

[Anonymous No.15007797]

>>15007787
You are all equally retarded. It chabges nothing. Only one poster had the gall to be honest, they rest of you get caught lying through your teeth while calling yourselves "arbiters of truth".

If you see your own arguments being made at you as "fucking retarded" you yourselves see yourselves as retarded.

QUOTE MORE, PRETEND LESS.

[Anonymous No.15007799]

there are no scientists.. there are only traitors and cowards.

[Anonymous No.15007800]

>>15007793
his own posts prove his paper wrong, there is no appeal to authority there.
doesn't matter how many times you wave your hands, his posts still prove his own paper wrong.
you can strawman green text all you want, the link back to the post you reply to is all that is needed to show how dishonest and deceitful you are.
You are your own worst enemy.

[Anonymous No.15007806]

>>15007797
It changes plenty.
Not once have I stated or implied being a "arbiters of truth". I see no such posts.
you should take your own advice, QUOTE MORE, PRETEND LESS

[Anonymous No.15007807]

>>15007800
>his own posts prove his paper wrong
Almost everyone in this thread has made bad faith arguments (FUCKING-LYING.......LY-ING). The one that didnt should stop appealing to his own authority (DUDE TRUST ME BRO (JESUS YOU ARE FUCKING STUPID)).

When you find out a scientist falsified his findings do you then trust his next works?

NO, YOU DO NOT.

GOOD JOB. I DONT CARE IF YOURE "SOMEONE ELSE", YOUR COLLEGUES ARE DIRTBAGS AND CHARLATANS.

[Anonymous No.15007811]

>>15007806
>It changes plenty.
Prove it.

Screen shot your replies so I can destroy you.

>bro fuck u dood you's crazy
Pottery.

[Anonymous No.15007815]

>>15007774
>GOOD JOB, YOU CHECKMATED YOURSELF BY CONTINUEING TO THINK YOUR OWN VIEWS ARE MINE.
>SELF. OWNED. JESUS CHRIST DUDE....
Mandrill... You have to stop doing this to yourself.

[Anonymous No.15007819]

>>15007807
I can't make you read his treads, hell so many of them ended up getting deleted. Still, whether you personally read them or not doesn't change their contents nor their impact on his papers.
You are just all over the place.
This is not normal behavior.
Take a break.

[Anonymous No.15007821]

>>15007166
>>15007358
>>15007815
Refusing to acknowledge when youre wrong means you CANNOT BE A SCIENTIST BY DEFINITION.

YOU SEEK TO BE REAFFIRMATION, NOT TRUTH.

[Anonymous No.15007824]

>>15007821
I'm not wrong, so "admitting" I'm wrong would be a lie. Lying is a sin.

[Anonymous No.15007827]

>>15007819
>I can't make you read his treads,
You dont get, fucking retard.

HIS POINT ARE NOT BEING ARGUED.
(You hide behind what you can defend against, instead of your own words, like a child.)
YOUR BAD SCIENCE IS.
(Repeatedly ignires new information because it weakens your case, like a child.
THE POINT IS YOU RETARDS.
(See your own arguments, from the same perspective, repeated back to you amd EVEN YOU THINK YOUR OWN ARGUMENTS IS RETARDED.)

I DONT GIVE A FUCK HOW BAD HIS MATH IS.
(I think hes the guy that couldnt understand why google calculator was giving different values for 1,000 meters and a kilometer(how computers programs average infinite values.)

btfo.....so hard....its incalculable...

[Anonymous No.15007829]

>>15007824
>I'm not wrong,
Appealing to self authority.

>no u r
>no i am
Bravo...science is settled...

[Anonymous No.15007830]

>>15007811
won't do you any good, (You)s go away every time I close my browser.

[Anonymous No.15007841]

>>15007830
>haha I would make a timestamp pic but, haha, my camera is broken, haha trust me bro...

Lies on top of lies of top of lies....even when telling the truth you will no longer be believed.

>1 Corinthians 15:33
>Do not be misled: “Bad company corrupts good character.”
Associate with a different crown, my son.

[Anonymous No.15007843]

>>15007829
>Appealing to self authority.
haha what kind of cope is this

[Anonymous No.15007844]

>>15007827
>You hide behind what you can defend against, instead of your own words, like a child
I do use my own words. Those too I cannot make you read.
>(Repeatedly ignires new information because it weakens your case, like a child.
There is no new information.
>(See your own arguments, from the same perspective, repeated back to you amd EVEN YOU THINK YOUR OWN ARGUMENTS IS RETARDED.)
Do you really need to be reminded that a strawman is not paraphrasing.

[Anonymous No.15007855]

>>15007841
I never said anything about a camera.
I do enjoy how you keep digging in deeper and deeper.
A time stamped picture with only the last (You) would be of no help, not since you have already been shown unable to recognize different posters.

[Anonymous No.15007859]

>>15007844
>Do you really need to be reminded that a strawman is not paraphrasing.
>reacting to your emotions instead of the argument
Nuh-uh, I dont sound stupid, take that back!

I'm done here, you all got blown the fuck out and attacked everything except my points...but only lying bad faith "scoientists" would do that...

[Anonymous No.15007861]

>>15007855
>I never said anything about a camera.
An equivalent excuse about the screen as even with a broken screen the screenshot would work fine BUT YOU KNOW THAT HAHAH TRUST ME BRO HAHA

[Anonymous No.15007866]

>>15007859
bye-bye now!
Do stand under the portcullis while it is dropped.

[Anonymous No.15007873]

>>15007861
I'm thinking about a third of my replies sailed right over your head, 15007861 being a prime example.

[Anonymous No.15007876]

>>15005581

lubos motl already banged hossenfelder kek

why the fuck is she so uppity

[Anonymous No.15007880]

>>15007873
LMAO

>analogy
/əˈnalədʒi/
Learn to pronounce
See definitions in:
All
Philosophy
Logic
Linguistics
noun
a comparison between one thing and another, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
"an analogy between the workings of nature and those of human societies"
a correspondence or partial similarity.
"the syndrome is called deep dysgraphia because of its analogy to deep dyslexia"
a thing which is comparable to something else in significant respects.
"works of art were seen as an analogy for works of nature"

JUST HELPIN A BRO OUT.

[Anonymous No.15007889]

>>15007880
*my point*
your head

[Anonymous No.15007893]

>>15007889
>I never said anything about a camera.
You dont even understand the concept of ANALOGY.

IF YOU DO YOU ARE BAD FAITH.
EITHER WAY, YOU LOSE.

lmao............WEW.....

[Anonymous No.15007898]

>>15007893
*my point*
your head

do keep on posting, the shit you call a brain is leaking down your philtrum.
Every time you reply I can't lose.

[Anonymous No.15007900]

>>15007880
I've been meaning to ask but what is your preferred reply count for threads?
Are you busting a nut at 200 or did you raise your expectations?

[Anonymous No.15007907]

>>15007900
Nice dubs. I think he just posts until the evening and then forgets he even posted in the morning.

[Anonymous No.15008061]

>>15007898
>no u r
>no i am
ZERO CONTENT, PURE EGO DEFENCE.

>>15007900
1,000

>>15007907
When every idiot posts the same logic fallacies and ad hominems etc etc they become One, the Hivemind retard blob, and as such get treated as one.

"You are all equally retarded to me."
-Me

[Anonymous No.15008225]

>>15008061
insane faggot having a faggotgasm as usual

[Anonymous No.15008239]

>>15008225
STOP CRYING ABOUT FEELINGS AND POST SCIENCE.

YOU RETARDS POST WHINING.

>WAA, IM NOT DUMB, YOU ARE!

>WAA, FUCK YOU, SUCK MY DICK WHILE I DISRESPECT YOU!

YOU GET NO RESPECT BECAUSE (almost) NONE OF YOU POST COHERENT SCIENCE.

>BRO TRUST ME LOL

NECK.

[Anonymous No.15008241]

YOU ARE (almost) ALL RETARDED.

DEAL WITH IT, SUBHUMAN MAGGOTS.

[Anonymous No.15008341]

>Legit question, but the picture is pol bait
You brought this on yourself OP.
Anyone who attaches their name and credentials onto their account should be held accountable for their shit opinions on the internet.

[Anonymous No.15008422]

>>15005681
You're outnumbered.

[Anonymous No.15008480]

>>15005581
>personal insults should be punishable by law
God what an idiot

[Anonymous No.15008512]

>>15008341
>Legit question
Read; >>15008480
...

[Anonymous No.15008515]

>>15008239
Whining about whining.

[Anonymous No.15008524]

>>15008515
I'm stating facts AND solutions. The errors AND examples. You post baseless opinions.

POST SCIENCE OR DEBUNK POSTS.

[Anonymous No.15008532]

>>15005581
>people called me a knuckle head
>they need to go to prison because it makes me scared to speak
lmao, free speech must be indomitable, as it is a our godright and no matter shall oppress what god grants us.

[Anonymous No.15008536]

>>15008524
Mope, i've posted facts.
Your replies just continue to show you as the disingenuous and dishonest lying sack of shit you are.

[Anonymous No.15008577]

>>15008536
>no u lyin'
Pathetic.

YOU WILL NEVER BE A PHYSICIST.

[Anonymous No.15008584]

>>15008577
Broken record
Broken person

[Anonymous No.15008590]

>>15005713
Prove you're an oldfag. Who was /sci/'s third most popular tripfag?

[Anonymous No.15008599]

>>15008584
Ad hominem. Exampled here; >>15008061
You failed and will ALWAYS fail because YOU cannot act in good faith.

>Can only destroy, can never create.

I am a God compared to you because your emotions are your master.

[Anonymous No.15008604]

>>15008599
>good faith
That is rich coming from you.

[Anonymous No.15008636]

>>15008604
See; >>15007859

This board is filled with flat out anti-science, bad faith, outright lying-to-save-face, retards.

YOU HAVE NO MORAL COMPASS, YOU WILL NOT WIN THIS WAY.

[Anonymous No.15008641]

>>15008636
I hate science and think scientists should be bullied to never-before-seen levels, but what you're doing isn't science. I wouldn't even shove you into a locker, that's how far from science you are.

[Anonymous No.15008646]

>>15008636
You should read your own advice, would do you a world of good.

[Anonymous No.15008651]

>>15008641
>>15008646

GO TO BED; >>15007684

[Anonymous No.15008658]

>>15007684
>RE-TAR-DED. DONT READ POSTS, JUST RESPOND LIKE YOU'VE WON.
I agree, you're retarded for doing this.

[Anonymous No.15008685]

>>15008658
>no u r
*clap...clap...........clap*
Sabine would smoke chumps like you guys, thats why I like her.

I, on the other hand, caugh her in a fairly large mistake; >>15008094. She is a student compared to me but to you she is your master.

GO TO CLASS.

[Anonymous No.15008714]

>>15005716
I think enlightenment era thinkers would agree that freedom of speech no matter what is important. The American constitution and the bill of rights is basically a culmination of enlightenment ideas.

[Anonymous No.15008947]

>>15008714
it's also separatist protestantism which is why so many people originally sacrificed everything to scrape by in shitty settlements

[Anonymous No.15008966]

>>15005581
Can we just admit that the enlightenment failed to propagate itself, and self described "liberals" were just self appointed intellectuals waiting for the next ideology to come along that would raise their importance in society?

[Anonymous No.15008992]

>John thread

[Anonymous No.15008999]

>>15005581
I want to beat John Mandltard with a pipe spinning at 1000000RPM

[Anonymous No.15009073]

>>15007223
fucking finally, something that isn't a substance-less jab

i don't even know who this retard is or what he believes but it took WAY too fucking long for someone to actually engage with the idea - almost like most of the "debunkers" are just repeating a "he's wrong" diatribe they half remember hearing from someone else

as for the idea itself, what does he imply a spinning system can do? i would think one could still have the total energy be conserved if one treated the distance from the axis of rotation as a sort of potential rotational inertia that decreases asymptotically to zero as the radius increases (presumably you'd use simplistic rotation equations to determine what the curve of that asymptote is)

>>15007248
>even (You) (or I) can have incorrect assumptions
thank god, someone sane. my intuition for the veritasium thing was work taking advantage of an energy gradient between the moving air and stationary ground - the treadmill experiment simply moved the ground instead of the air. most importantly, that was my intuition from an engineering perspective, not a physics perspective. i think the problem with that scenario (and perhaps this one, given comments about closed/open systems earlier) can miss the energy at play because it's intuitively making the same assumptions that the equations it's experienced with make to be discrete from each other. another win for the experimentalists >:)

[Anonymous No.15009079]

>>15009073
I've explained this (that shortening the string requires external forces or equivalent) to John in maybe three different threads. He does not care. He does not want to understand.

[Anonymous No.15009080]

>>15009073
>i don't even know who this retard is or what he believes but it took WAY too fucking long for someone to actually engage with the idea - almost like most of the "debunkers" are just repeating a "he's wrong" diatribe they half remember hearing from someone else
NTA. I've not only done so repeatedly, I worked through the equations in latex showing exactly where he fucked up. Quoting the very book with screenshot of exactly where, in the book, it shows said energy in the system. Multiple people have done this exact thing. This is ongoing. His narcissism literally will not allow him to acknowledge he is making a mistake no matter how thorough, clear, simple, or direct, the explanation of his dumbassery is.

Since he refuses to account for the energy used to pull the string in the diagram, something the diagram itself indicates, he makes absurd claims that would require superman pull the string in the string-ball example. He has had this explained to him by dozens upon dozens of people. His brain completely shuts off every single time.

Basically, you're coming at this apparently new or new-er criticizing people for just eating popcorn and mocking him. Not realizing people just eventually have to give up on someone whose narcissistic delusions are completely impenetrable to fact. At some point you just stop bothering.

[Anonymous No.15009083]

>>15009079
You and me both. The thing is, once you understand THAT is what narcissism looks like, you begin to understand exactly what the fuck is wrong on most of the internet. Why discourse online is so fucked up compared to most of the time in real life. Because narcissists get booted out of social groups quite often, they have to live online, and in the low-IQ cases you get your Mandlbauers and flat earthers and antivaxxers. People who simply, flatly, CAN'T be wrong and who will adopt any rhetorical device including outright nonsense to maintain their delusion of being right.

[Anonymous No.15009168]

>>15009079
>>15009080
that's disappointing, but not totally unexpected. surprised the explanation really is the string pulling - if he's only talking about the rotating motion of the string, he's literally created a singularity in his theory by shortening the string from the center

>>15009083
knowing how narcissism and psychopathy work has made me both realize that unreachable people really DO exist and that, more optimistically, they thankfully are quite uncommon

now if only we could figure out how to stop fucking failing them upwards

[Anonymous No.15009172]

>>15009083
I hate to derail this thread but I see that more in vaxoids than their opponents. Despite governments now coming out with quiet estimations of the safety profile, and even the FDA reinstating Ivermectin as a covid therapy, vaxoids are immunized against any information showing they made the wrong choice. It's a case of extreme buyer's remorse turning into stockholm syndrome brand loyalty. If other people made the right choice they have to be browbeaten for it until they're in the gutter with you.

[Anonymous No.15009178]

>>15009168
>they thankfully are quite uncommon
why do you think this?

[Anonymous No.15009186]

>>15009172
I'm not going to bother. You people create a mythos of bullshit and pretend the world is against you. Nothing you said is true. What is true is arguing with you idiots about it never changes your minds. This from someone who is all too happy to look at how many likeminded morons like you have died from covid as a result, and wishing it was a lot more. I still call it boomer remover, and good riddance.

[Anonymous No.15009190]

>>15009186
>This from someone who is all too happy to look at how many likeminded morons like you have died from covid as a result, and wishing it was a lot more. I still call it boomer remover, and good riddance.
See? This is the narcissism and brand loyalty I'm talking about. You're just Mandlbaur with gene therapy.

[Anonymous No.15009193]

>>15009190
Classic narcissistic projection at work. This is why I just enjoy your deaths instead. If you're too fragile to accept reality or admit you're a moron and too stupid to understand statistics, all I can do is laugh as people like you get the consequences. Even if you're too retarded to realize.

[Anonymous No.15009198]

>>15009193
This is no different from >>15008577 or >>15007285 and you can't see it.

[Anonymous No.15009199]

>>15009178
capitalism's difficulty in dealing with inherited wealth over time (especially consecutive generations of it) leads to them being over-represented in politics, corporate "leadership", and ESPECIALLY media personalities

most people you know are likely not psychopaths or narcissists

many of the people you know ABOUT probably ARE

>>15009172
i'd say in that case it's more of a personal defensive response; there was very little consideration and very significant dismissal of concerns, and with something personal like that it's going to have fairly sticky inertia in public discourse, since the "corrections" (realistically there aren't many - mostly in the "dismissed way too hard" category) aren't as motivating to spread as the original narrative was on both sides of the issue: "if you don't take vaccine you die/ if you take vaccine you die" vs "boosters don't do much and the best the vaccine can do is prevent severe infection/the vaccine isn't a death sentence and severe COVID does exist" - most rational people have just fucking moved on

[Anonymous No.15009203]

>>15009199
What publication lead you to conclude "boosters don't do much"? The data in europe as a whole, UK, USA, and Canada, all still show a very clear and very big difference in hospitalization.

This is not, and never has been, some issue of an ideology for me. I literally only care about the data, because I don't give a rats ass really about the "human life value" (there isn't one) in the denials. Which is why it's always triple funny for me when people weave narratives about hidden motives or "muh rights", especially when I couldn't care less about making anyone do anything. I don't care if people aren't vaccinated, but I do care when they're full of shit. The fact that is impossible for antivaxxers to comprehend says a lot about them.

[Anonymous No.15009205]

>>15009199
>i'd say in that case it's more of a personal defensive response; there was very little consideration and very significant dismissal of concerns, and with something personal like that it's going to have fairly sticky inertia in public discourse, since the "corrections" (realistically there aren't many - mostly in the "dismissed way too hard" category) aren't as motivating to spread as the original narrative was on both sides of the issue: "if you don't take vaccine you die/ if you take vaccine you die" vs "boosters don't do much and the best the vaccine can do is prevent severe infection/the vaccine isn't a death sentence and severe COVID does exist" - most rational people have just fucking moved on
I definitely agree with this, but unfortunately the level of denial and bizarre government protocols make it impossible to get rid of the topic entirely. Even though covid is over the government recently added the old version of the shots to the childhood vaccine schedule, meaning they will be required to attend schooling despite still failing to produce any safety profile for children for a disease that almost no children even get sick from.

[Anonymous No.15009574]

>>15009198
Wrong. Because both of those are stating facts. Truth doesnt rearffirm your false reality, it destroys it. Stop acting like the greatest names in Physics or Mathematics would be here sucking your ignorant dick because "dood dont disprove me my feefees hurt".

DEAL WITH IT.

[Anonymous No.15009950]

>>15006709
midwit

[Anonymous No.15009988]

>>15005581
>personal insults on social media should be punishable by law

[Anonymous No.15009992]

>>15005581
wtf do people think free speech is
>I don't agree with free speech but I need to be seen to support it so I will just define it as something else

[Anonymous No.15010009]

>>15009203
the last i read was boosters are effective (i.e. an improvement) for about 3 months, after which it returns to the baseline long-term protection of the vaccine. it was a little while ago so that could be outdated - the general impression i got was the science didn't justify mandatory consecutive booster shots, especially in the context of even the mundane side effects.

[Anonymous No.15010015]

>>15009205
yeah if public discourse is sticky, legal processes are gelatinous and regulation is a fucking tectonic plate

some things just move too slowly to respond adequately to changes in human understanding

[Anonymous No.15010059]

>>15010015
>meteor heading towards earth
>Sorry, sir, law says we cant do the thing to save everyone's life...

No, they can change in seconds, but why waste a good chance to push thriugh evil laws and propaganda campaigns on the bluepilled retards?

Now theyre so deep in a lie that the truth is a threat to their cosnscious mind to which their subconscious will fight to the death to protect.

[Anonymous No.15010376]

>>15005593
>Sorry but women should have been kept out of science and off the Internet.
My mom is smarter than you. My sisters are smarter than you. Our genetics are superior to yours, which is why my entire extended family is smarter than you.

[Anonymous No.15010423]

>>15005581
fuck this bitch for calling her retardation "european"

[Anonymous No.15010438]

>>15005707

[Anonymous No.15010519]

>>15005581
>>You're a retard.
>HELP HELP! I'M AFRAID TO SPEAK NOW
lmao what a cowardly faggot

[Anonymous No.15010522]

>>15005651
Why are you trying to find the logic in his claim, when you already know he's an illogical schizo retard?

[Anonymous No.15010525]

>>15006254
>"We should kill all the Jews"
Dumb eurofag, this is legal to say in America because it lacks imminence. What you can't say is
>"See that jew right there? Let's kill him!"

[Anonymous No.15010529]

>>15006440
>>Even the common "shouting fire in a crowded theater" misconception is protected speech.
Yeah no kidding. There was never even a real "shouted fire in a theater" court case, that expression is just a euphemism for protesting the draft.

[Anonymous No.15010660]

>>15010059
This. The laws changed pretty fucking fast to make you get the shot, but suddenly when it's proven fatal it's all "Sorry bureaucratic inertia :((("

[Anonymous No.15010752]

>>15005581
We should fund more large colliders just to spite her.

[Anonymous No.15010760]

>>15006144
Most overrated web "comic" of all time.

[Anonymous No.15010789]

>>15010760
The XKCD author is a lolcow all by himself.

[Anonymous No.15011226]

>>15010423
it is a very german thing to do

[Anonymous No.15011856]

>>15011226
Da. Virst ve take the vord. Then ve take the idëuh.

[Anonymous No.15012307]

>>15011226
retard alert

[Anonymous No.15012952]

>>15010376
Uh huh, and I'm sure when they're on their death beds they'll recount the time they enjoyed being intelligent

[Anonymous No.15013000]

>>15005581
Can you share the link to original post? I can not find it.

[Anonymous No.15013228]

>>15013000
Damn, you went there.
Mandlb sets a bar that is almost as low as one could go but you dove to a new low.

[Anonymous No.15013368]

>>15005596
Reminds me of Bob "Pay attention to meeee" Malone

[Anonymous No.15013373]

>>15013368
giga cope

[Anonymous No.15013876]

>>15005581
Everyone should be held accountable for their comments.
>whaddo you mean "everyone"?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74BzSTQCl_c&t=9s

[Anonymous No.15013880]

>>15005681
>>15005696
this level of autism is impressive, even at 4chan

[Anonymous No.15013956]

>>15012307
that is a very german reply

[Anonymous No.15013960]

>>15013880
Okay, ESL faggot

[Anonymous No.15015402]

>>15007070
>during their haydays
as opposed to strawdays?

[Anonymous No.15015407]

>>15007196
>we all know that it's you
actually we don't. he is so simple that lots of trolls start successfully imitating him at the drop of a hat. he does yell at them like crazy, but I've been in threads where the trolls were yelling at each other in likewise fashion. training an AI to imitate him would also not be very hard, it just need to repeat "12000 rpm falsifies CAM" and the like.

[Anonymous No.15016297]

>>15012952
They’ll at least have the option, retard.

[Anonymous No.15017416]

>>15006709
did you know that there is a fucking fireball above you that blinds you if you look at it for too long? i'm not even joking.

[Anonymous No.15017616]

>>15015402
I sometimes write words phonetically and read dyslexically but Im a mathematical and physics savant.

What price would you pay to invent base systems, numbers, equations, and write papers on genetics and psychology for a hobby?

Are you willing to lose your mind...but gain a soul?

[Anonymous No.15017681]

>>15005593
Why apologize?

[Anonymous No.15017683]

what a knucklehead

[Anonymous No.15017699]

>>15005707
I see why you think policing free speech that upsets someone could be a good idea.

[Anonymous No.15017907]

>>15013960
what-everrr, illiteratus