How much has carbon capture technology progressed in the past five years?

File: 64 KB, 700x941, 1602340567269.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Nov 20 20:34:58 2022 No.15001874 [Reply] [Original]

How much has carbon capture technology progressed in the past five years?

>>	Anonymous Sun Nov 20 20:36:13 2022 No.15001878 ~43

>>	Anonymous Sun Nov 20 20:39:30 2022 No.15001885 >>15001878 Ooh that's not bad

>>	Anonymous Sun Nov 20 20:40:51 2022 No.15001886 >>15001885 hectoliter

>>	Anonymous Mon Nov 21 02:06:29 2022 No.15002633 >>15001874 A lot, judging by how fat people are getting in the world.

Anonymous Mon Nov 21 20:41:20 2022 No.15004279

>>15001874
Probably not far enough to compete with algae, grass, and trees. Also what do you do with captured carbon waste? Last I heard it was forever chemicals that needed to be used in order to collect atmospheric CO2 and methane. You pretty much have to bury it and then you have a totally new environmental problem on your hands.
Meanwhile a fucking tree does it all in a more environmentally beneficial way.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math