/sfg/ - Space Flight General: Laika's Anniversary Edition

[Anonymous No.14958636]

Previous: >>14955205

65th Anniversary of Laika's flight

[Anonymous No.14958637]

>>14958636
poor doggo rip in peace

[Anonymous No.14958643]

F

[Anonymous No.14958645]

>>14958636
FTS Archive
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KCJBL632oieD1r6JOh_5Eg9NTcf_-hH8?usp=share_link


Article from 12.7.1979, when Skylab reentered and before the docking ring piece was discovered in Australia near Kargoorlie.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KEf0G0dAAte1Nh5L3-a7kZpSJZfnywxX?usp=share_link

[Anonymous No.14958674]

>>14958636
>russiaboo thread

[Anonymous No.14958680]

These scams are getting better. They have ~200,000 fake accounts to subscribe

[Anonymous No.14958684]

>>14958680
Muskrat said he wanted vine 2.0. Hopefully he can just buy out Youtube instead, so he can purge these pajeet channels, make the platform great again, and spam the platform with SpaceX propaganda.
Seriously it's fucking annoying searching the platform for launch streams, so many garbage channels.

[Anonymous No.14958693]

These scams are getting better. They have ~200 billion dollars for no actual launches.

[Anonymous No.14958697]

is anyone else worried that the liberal crowd in Washington is going to hamper SpaceX's starship efforts once they win majority in the election? Look at the AOC thing.

[Anonymous No.14958723]

>>14958684
Zero chance he ever buys youtube. It's way too unprofitable and with no plausible way to reach profitability.

[Anonymous No.14958732]

>>14958697
What?

[Anonymous No.14958735]

>>14958636
fuck you op
stop simping for russia

[Anonymous No.14958737]

SPEHS

[Anonymous No.14958738]

>>14958636
reminder that every soviet space achievement was actually ukrainian

[Anonymous No.14958741]

>>14958636
Dont listen to the newfag trolls/haters OP

[Anonymous No.14958742]

>>14958697
I would have to be worried that they're going to win the election

[Anonymous No.14958744]

BOING
https://twitter.com/jeff_foust/status/1588186625045151744
>NASA says the crewed test flight of Boeing’s CST-100 Starliner has slipped from February to April

[Anonymous No.14958753]

>>14958744
>Finally, I would say, from talking to sources that the April date is not particularly firm. It's possible, but far from certain. A summer launch is probably more likely. (cue the humidity jokes)
Ecks-dee

[Anonymous No.14958762]

>>14958742
>Anonymous 11/03/20(Thu)11:17:37
>I would have to be worried that they're going to win the election

[Anonymous No.14958764]

can /sci/ build a rocket engine like reddit can?

https://www.reddit.com/r/rocketry/comments/wsulvr/first_firing_of_my_diy_electric_pump_fed/

[Anonymous No.14958769]

>>14958764
We have an anon on that already and he's posted numerous updates.
>>14958753
>first real Starliner mission pushed to 2024
Why even bother at this point, it's been over.

[Anonymous No.14958772]

>>14958753
>from talking to sources
alright onions goy

[Anonymous No.14958774]

>>14958764
that guy is dead now

[Anonymous No.14958775]

>>14958772
According to anonymous sources, Eric Burger has the best sources.

[Anonymous No.14958783]

>>14958772
According to anonymous sources, Eric Burger has an 8 incher

[Anonymous No.14958786]

>>14958723
They should just copy twitch. Fixed.

[Anonymous No.14958787]

>>14958769
Frog to suborbit fucking when

[Anonymous No.14958798]

>>14958769
oh cool what should i search for in the archives ?

[Anonymous No.14958801]

>>14958697
Considering the governor race in OREGON is toe to toe right now, I would not worry about them winning a majority in anything.

[Anonymous No.14958805]

>>14958764
I wonder how he acquired the sensors, and what program he used to extract the data from them and display it the way he did.

[Anonymous No.14958809]

>>14958798
Krystal. I wish I was joking. God help you.

[Anonymous No.14958810]

>>14958753
At this rate ISS will fall down to Earth first before Starliner launches crew.

[Anonymous No.14958816]

>>14958810
Well that'll make rendezvous a lot easier at least

[Anonymous No.14958822]

>>14958805
Judging from the language of the program (chink), he probably just went to Shenzhen and bought all the shit he needed there. It's a warehouse city where you can buy LITERALLY anything. Want to buy rocket components, and a corpse to put into said rocket as a dummy payload? Take a train to Shenzhen.

[Anonymous No.14958829]

>>14958741
Sh-she's big!

[Anonymous No.14958834]

>>14958816
kek

[Anonymous No.14958865]

>Wake up
>Thunderfaggot appears in my YouTube recommendations
>Day ruined

Time to go back to sleep I guess.

[Anonymous No.14958872]

Thoughts?

[Anonymous No.14958875]

>>14958872
Sounds like a nightmare if they plan on bringing live monkeys up there. They are annoying faggots on Earth, I can't imagine how absolutely insane they would act in zero-g.

[Anonymous No.14958880]

>>14958872
1) I hope US congress demands a gorrila sex experiment in space because they cannot allow China to one-up the almighty USA.
2) Simultaneously, I wish said monkeys find a way, even in their enclosure, to depressurize the entire Chinese space station, so we can have the headline, "Chinese Tiangong Space Station destroyed by monkey sex"

[Anonymous No.14958882]

>>14958865
Click "don't show me this channel"

[Anonymous No.14958889]

>>14958872
It's cool that someone is finally doing experiments to try get some clarity on making babies in space but surely starting off with mice would be the smarter move?

[Anonymous No.14958900]

>>14958872
To add to >>14958880
Fucking finally.

[Anonymous No.14958902]

Also, other then this, is there any other interesting experiments or projects do you think the chinese space station can do that hasn't already been done on the ISS? It's interesting to see how the station has literally just finished and they're already proposing this kind of radical experiments. I think they want to 1up the ISS or that they already have tons of data already on the standard microgravity experiments and want to jump boldly into new areas of science that hasn't been done before.

[Anonymous No.14958907]

>>14958902
Human breeding.

[Anonymous No.14958912]

>>14958907
After the monkeys

[Anonymous No.14958925]

New CZ-9 has dropped

[Anonymous No.14958928]

>>14958889
>>14958872
If the monkies don't naturally have sex, they must artificially inseminate, the point of the experiment isn't if space makes monkies horny but if conception to succesful pregnancy works in space.

[Anonymous No.14958930]

>>14958925
They can't seem to find a stable configuration for that launch vehicle.

[Anonymous No.14958931]

>>14958930
As far as I remember, this design isn't exactly new. I remember seeing reusable, single-stick configurations some time ago.

[Anonymous No.14958934]

>>14958925
>chink knock-off Starship

L M A O

At least this should scare Congress enough into not trying to cockblock Starship progress

[Anonymous No.14958935]

>>14958872
this is why the chinese will win

[Anonymous No.14958938]

>>14958935
okay Zhang

[Anonymous No.14958939]

>>14958872
Idk that's kewl I guess. We'll let them do the sketchy shit (just like Laika in the OP) and utilize it for dick-swinging purposes later I guess.

Elon is going to conceive a child in space, basically.

[Anonymous No.14958940]

>>14958930
Huh, kinda like Elon Musk

[Anonymous No.14958945]

>>14958925
So far this design has outlasted the others. Does the Chink menace understand that Superheavy lift will bankrupt them without a company like SpaceX running the operation? Otherwise they are just making a chinese SLS, albeit marginally better

[Anonymous No.14958947]

>>14958940
Starship is quite stable by comparison. I've seen LM9 as a 12 meter, two stage core with four strap on boosters, single-diameter with strap ons, single diameter with no strap ons, reusable, expendable... it goes on and on.

[Anonymous No.14958963]

>>14958872
absolutely barbaric but also based

[Anonymous No.14958964]

Behold, the final configuration of the "Superheavy" rocket family!

[Anonymous No.14958977]

>>14958872
Wait till PETA gets wind of this

[Anonymous No.14958987]

[Anonymous No.14958988]

chink copium is very high is this thread

[Anonymous No.14958989]

[Anonymous No.14958999]

Sicneurucifically, it’s not really possible to colonize Mars because of the radiation.

[Anonymous No.14959000]

>>14958999
Just cover the sun

[Anonymous No.14959002]

>>14958697
What’s SpaceX got to do with the age of consent

[Anonymous No.14959005]

>>14958934
That's clearly not a Starship. It's a Superheavy with a conventional second stage.

[Anonymous No.14959008]

How can we destroy JPL monopoly on Mars?

[Anonymous No.14959010]

>>14958999
There are dozens of different solutions for this, a few of them from easier to hardest being rock shielding, radiation proof tarp material tents/paraterraforming, living in lava tubes, artificial magnetosphere generator at Mars sun L1, and if you really want to go to an unnecessary extreme, genetic engineering.

[Anonymous No.14959014]

>>14958999
You're a fucking idiot because organisms can be modified at the genetic level (yes, even adult organisms) to metabolize ionizing radiation. Alternatively, the radiation shielding for transit to and habitation of a colony would be trivial.
Let me re-iterate the first point: You are so dim that you should be reading about spaceflight in newspapers, not coming up with semantics to comment on what you think is or isn't possible.

[Anonymous No.14959017]

>>14958977
God no, the monkies will be safer in orbit than in PETA’s hands

[Anonymous No.14959020]

>>14958872
Thank god someone’s studying mammal reproduction in space. So retarded how long it took

[Anonymous No.14959023]

>>14959014
>organisms can be modified at the genetic level (yes, even adult organisms) to metabolize ionizing radiation
You should stop reading comic books.

[Anonymous No.14959026]

>>14959017
why?

[Anonymous No.14959035]

>>14959023
I'm a geneticist, you brainlet. Existing multicellular organisms can tolerate extreme radiation in a manner of ways- "metabolism" is just an umbrella term for all the possible variations of this process. These mechanisms have already been catalogued. Transfection of the exact mechanism to humans, that prevents damage to cells, is not difficult, given that the funding and resources are available to refine a protocol for said transfection to adults.

Oh wait, why am I explaining this to a retard online? At least somebody will find this helpful...

[Anonymous No.14959038]

>>14959035
I'm CEO of NASA your a retard lul

[Anonymous No.14959043]

>>14958875
Monkeys are based and funne

[Anonymous No.14959045]

>>14959023
>photosynthesis is fake

[Anonymous No.14959046]

>>14959008
JPL forced NASA to launch Voyager for the grand tour orbital alignment when everyone else were being faggots

[Anonymous No.14959047]

>>14959035
I'm an actual geneticist. You're full of shit. Transfecting caco2's isn't full transfection of a developed organism. And ionizing radiation isn't metabolized.

[Anonymous No.14959052]

>>14959046
That was almost fifty years ago. Today they are faggots.

[Anonymous No.14959055]

>>14959052
How so?

[Anonymous No.14959056]

>>14958875
>not trying cats first

[Anonymous No.14959061]

>>14959047
>Transfecting caco2's
That's not what I was talking about at all, try to read the implication.
>And ionizing radiation isn't metabolized.
no shit, I just threw it out as an umbrella term because I can't be fucked to list out orphan mechanisms developed by multicellular organisms to resist radiation.

[Anonymous No.14959062]

>>14959047
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiotrophic_fungus

[Anonymous No.14959063]

>>14959055
not sending picrel to Uranus or a centaur for starters

[Anonymous No.14959065]

>>14959063
Y tho

[Anonymous No.14959077]

>>14959008
:(

[Anonymous No.14959082]

>>14959055
MOAR ROVERS

[Anonymous No.14959087]

>>14959077
Can't you download it?

[Anonymous No.14959097]

>>14959055
1. Killed Opportunity
2. Killed Red Dragon
3. Pic related

[Anonymous No.14959102]

full stack cryo

[Anonymous No.14959105]

>>14959087
the .pdf in the post obviously, but I typed in the link in the .pdf and got what I posted. I'll look elsewhere and post a webm if I find it.

[Anonymous No.14959108]

>>14959002
The Artemis accords don't have a provision for that on the moon. And the only law on Mars is the law of the jungle.

[Anonymous No.14959109]

>>14959105
Here it is
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20120003264

[Anonymous No.14959113]

>>14958774
nice

[Anonymous No.14959117]

>>14958805
>>14958822
He said he wrote the software himself in C++ with Qt running on FreeBSD and MacOS

[Anonymous No.14959122]

>>14959109
I was looking for the video referenced, the paper in the post appears old, and they were doing these experiments after pathfinder in the 70's. I did find this, but it's a different team and much newer.

[Anonymous No.14959125]

>>14959122
>pathfinder
>70's
wow maybe I should finish waking up before I post

[Anonymous No.14959126]

>>14959122
It's ridiculous that this technology hasn't been applied yet. If they put it on Insight, it could work for decades.

[Anonymous No.14959127]

>>14958872
As a man of principles I refuse to make a joke about the advent of an African space program.

[Anonymous No.14959128]

>>14959102
I don't care until they do a full cryotest. Which I can't remember if that slide said they were going to do or not.

[Anonymous No.14959142]

>>14958570
Why do you mean by "space flight and astronomy the only part of science that managed to gain a good reputation"?
I always hear normies complaining it is a waste of money (no matter if it is a government or private investment), there is the whole "billions for space, pennies for the poor" crowd, then there is the "DART is gonna send an asteroid to Earth" retards, and finally the "space is fake and invented by the illuminati reptilian jews" schizos.
I think Paleontology has a better public reputation than space stuff (except for creationism retards of course)

[Anonymous No.14959157]

Every time with these fags it's "Elon gives an update"

[Anonymous No.14959180]

>>14959097
>Killed Red Dragon
By not submitting someone else's proposal?

[Anonymous No.14959181]

>>14959122
more info on this?

[Anonymous No.14959188]

>SLS to begin rollout in 8 hours time
Rollback when?

[Anonymous No.14959201]

>>14959180
By telling SpaceX is they messed with the Mars mission gravy train JPL's friends in congress would bury SpaceX's ability to get any government contracts in the future. This was a half decade before SpaceX won their share of the NSSL contracts so something like that would have been a lot easier to pull off that it would be now.

[Anonymous No.14959202]

>>14959188
9 hours time

[Anonymous No.14959209]

[Anonymous No.14959212]

[Anonymous No.14959256]

https://spacenews.com/virgin-galactic-picks-suppliers-for-future-spaceplanes/
Spaceplane bros we're eating good
>Virgin Galactic announced Nov. 2 that it reached agreements with Bell Textron and Qarbon Aerospace to produce major subassemblies of its Delta class of suborbital spaceplanes, which Virgin will assemble. The companies did not disclose the value of the contracts.

Textron has a spaceflight division?

[Anonymous No.14959263]

>>14959188
Expendable river rocks aren't going to crush themselves

[Anonymous No.14959265]

>>14959256
THERE'S NO MARKET

JUST STOP

[Anonymous No.14959269]

>I briefly dreamed I was watching Musk and some other guy talking in an interview about Mars
>behind them there was a poster similar to picrel
Is this a revelation, bros?

[Anonymous No.14959270]

>>14959256
>outsourcing
cringe

[Anonymous No.14959274]

>>14959269
I prefer A Princess of Mars

[Anonymous No.14959276]

>>14958636
after disclosure, we'll get to outer space in no time

[Anonymous No.14959277]

>>14959276
>the blueprints for a UFO
Why do retards think UFO is a synonym for flying saucer?

[Anonymous No.14959280]

>>14959276
>>>/x/

[Anonymous No.14959284]

>>14959274
i wish berger would write space fiction

[Anonymous No.14959285]

>>14959284
He basically already does

[Anonymous No.14959287]

>>14959269
Who allowed this character to be put in a real Tv show

[Anonymous No.14959288]

>>14959274
Cool but I like hot cartoon chicks and I want a hot Martian wife

[Anonymous No.14959290]

>>14959287
What's the matter, TV should have always been horny

[Anonymous No.14959291]

>>14959274
Read the series during high school
Good times

[Anonymous No.14959296]

>>14959188
The adults are back
https://youtu.be/ELQekXg-0AQ

[Anonymous No.14959315]

>>14959256
Getting flashbacks to this

[Anonymous No.14959318]

is there something like a gas generator cycle but with oxygen added to the GG exhaust after it's passed the turbine making the GG exhaust stoichiometric, and then it expands through a separate nozzle

[Anonymous No.14959332]

Reminder that all UFOs are the result of stuff like pic related.

[Anonymous No.14959336]

>>14959332
Prove it

[Anonymous No.14959341]

Oh shit, the details are coming out
https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-to-discuss-psyche-independent-review-board-results
>NASA will host a community townhall at 12 p.m. EDT on Friday, Nov. 4, followed by a media teleconference at 1 p.m. to discuss the findings and recommendations of a report by the Psyche mission independent review board.

>The board, initiated by NASA and the agency’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California in July 2022, examined the causes of the Psyche mission missing its planned launch opportunity this year.

[Anonymous No.14959348]

>>14959341
cancelled

[Anonymous No.14959359]

>>14959336
*proves it*
what now fagboy?

[Anonymous No.14959365]

>>14958872
based
it's atrocious this haven't been put to test decades ago already

[Anonymous No.14959381]

>>14958889
there have been mouse gestation experiments done on the ISS

[Anonymous No.14959387]

>>14959181
it was on youtube when I searched for electrodynamic dust shield

[Anonymous No.14959409]

[Anonymous No.14959414]

>>14959409
Fucking crazy how SpaceX built the world’s first kilometer height crane just for Starship

[Anonymous No.14959416]

>>14959409
Why are claws still missing?

[Anonymous No.14959418]

>>14959416
If I remember right, it was due to them changing where the refueling was to be done

Don't quote me on this

[Anonymous No.14959421]

At Zhuhai airshow

[Anonymous No.14959432]

>>14959421

[Anonymous No.14959438]

Consider the Kino. Ponder the Cinema. Contextualize the Filmography

[Anonymous No.14959441]

>>14959421
Is that to scale with the other rockets? Would that make it like 11 or 12m in diameter?

[Anonymous No.14959446]

>>14959421
>>14959432
Your mom's dildo, now available on Aliexpress

[Anonymous No.14959447]

>>14959421
>>14959432
already been posted, chink.

[Anonymous No.14959448]

>>14959318
yeah it's called closed cycle and you just combine it with your main engine

[Anonymous No.14959477]

>>14959209
>NUKE MARS shirt
kek

[Anonymous No.14959478]

>>14959477

[Anonymous No.14959480]

Happy birthday to Tory Bruno!

[Anonymous No.14959485]

>>14959480
Is Jeff giving him engines for his birthday?

[Anonymous No.14959487]

>>14959381
>mouse gestation experiments done on the ISS
link them

[Anonymous No.14959488]

>>14959485
He already got his engines.

[Anonymous No.14959489]

>>14959438
Now imagine each of those side boosters is the size of a Falcon 9 and you can fit an entire Buran as the payload.

[Anonymous No.14959493]

>>14958872
How do we convince the chinks to build a spin habitat and test mammal gestation in lower-g environments

[Anonymous No.14959499]

>>14958697
if you read politico or fivethirtyeight, you would see that trannies are currently on suicide watch

[Anonymous No.14959506]

>>14959448
how does closed cycle compare to GG in terms of everything

[Anonymous No.14959510]

Is this a good idea?

[Anonymous No.14959511]

>>14959506
Closed cycle is an umbrella term for everything that doesn't dump half burned propellant out the side. Expander, staged combustion, etc. are all variants of closed cycle. So the RS-25, RD-180, RL-10, and Raptor are all closed cycle.

[Anonymous No.14959518]

>>14959510
Only if Elon fires every single manager and keeps it for the IP. Boing!'s recent troubles stem from difficulties ingesting McDonnell-Douglas's awful leadership layers.

[Anonymous No.14959519]

>>14959209
my beautiful girl is in there

[Anonymous No.14959520]

>>14959511
how does this one compare to GG

[Anonymous No.14959521]

>>14958636
dog_module.jpg

[Anonymous No.14959524]

>>14959421
>>14959432
This mogs starship...

[Anonymous No.14959527]

>>14959510
Hahahaha no

At best SpaceX might buy a spinoff of Boeing's space stuff, like Aurora or something, but the value proposition is sorely lacking. What does Aurora have that he doesn't already?

[Anonymous No.14959528]

>>14959126
>>14959122
Guys... No need to worry about dust on solar panels, self replicating jetpack wearing Tesla bots will be on Mars within 7 years equipped with duster hand attatchment (some assembly required, batteries are included)

[Anonymous No.14959529]

>>14959519
There are no cute gorls in that picture, though.

[Anonymous No.14959530]

>>14959487
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2610337/

[Anonymous No.14959531]

look at that old bastard

[Anonymous No.14959534]

Will there ever be a spaceflight company that's as kino as SpaceX?

[Anonymous No.14959537]

>>14959531
what did he mean by this?

[Anonymous No.14959538]

>>14959531
lmao tory tryna get her deets, Woah there cowboy! simmer down!!

[Anonymous No.14959542]

>>14959534
You never know, China might collapse overnight and in the ensuing oligarchical looting their space corporations might get consolidated into one very motivated not-ICBM-producing civilian institution

[Anonymous No.14959543]

>>14959534
ARCA

[Anonymous No.14959552]

>>14958697
>once they win majority in the election
They have a majority already, and Republicans are slated to take over both houses of Congress this election (House is almost guaranteed, Senate is closer but Republicans are favored and trending positively). Midterms almost always favor the non-presidential party so it's not really a surprise.

[Anonymous No.14959561]

If democrats win, Musk will literally die in prison

[Anonymous No.14959563]

>>14959552
It doesn't help that Biden has worse favoribility rating than Trump. It doesn't help that he alienated and made an enemy out of Musk.

Extremists Democrats and their ideological purity test put a wrong target on their crosshair and now its biting them hard

[Anonymous No.14959565]

Spaceflight?

[Anonymous No.14959567]

>>14959565
faggot

[Anonymous No.14959568]

Isn't Boeing like a really big company. How could SpaceX possibly afford them

[Anonymous No.14959570]

GEORDIE'S LOST HIS LIGGY

[Anonymous No.14959571]

>>14959520
That's FRSC like the RS-25.

[Anonymous No.14959574]

>>14959432
New Grenn

[Anonymous No.14959576]

>>14959534
Rocket Lab I hope

[Anonymous No.14959583]

>>14959571
but RS-25 has two turbines

[Anonymous No.14959585]

I wonder what amazing payload will be sent to Mars during the next transfer window

[Anonymous No.14959591]

>>14959585
Probably a plant

[Anonymous No.14959592]

>>14959585
90,000 twitter users names on a microthin wafer

[Anonymous No.14959593]

>>14959568
SpaceX is valued higher right now, albeit not by a truly massive margin. They'd have to raise a lot of money from investors, which would be doable, but the whole thing would also be an absolutely massive legal shitfest (especially if it becomes a hostile takeover) and probably get stopped by the US government over nebulous security/anti-trust/Elon concerns

[Anonymous No.14959597]

https://youtu.be/MxH_czsZLrU

[Anonymous No.14959599]

>>14959585
Starlink constellation if Starship launches to Mars

[Anonymous No.14959607]

Falcon Heavy is a money-pit

[Anonymous No.14959614]

>>14959597
>Rocket Scientists
There's rocket engineers and there's not rocket engineers. There's no rocket scientists.

[Anonymous No.14959616]

>>14959607
and starship will be worse

[Anonymous No.14959617]

If you can use lasers to propel a spacecraft by shooting lasers at it why can't you use lasers to propel a spacecraft by shooting lasers from it?

[Anonymous No.14959618]

>>14959585
Insight II (that will be $4 billion please!)

[Anonymous No.14959624]

speaking of Insight we need a lunar seismological network. Make 6 identical small landers with RHUs so they can survive the night. Launch on F9 and deliver with CLPS. Total cost $1 billion

[Anonymous No.14959632]

also on the moon there is no wind so the external noise to the seismometers is practically zero. All the asteroid impacts also make for very interesting seismological events

[Anonymous No.14959642]

>>14959624
I guess Artemis astronauts are going set up that anyway

[Anonymous No.14959645]

>>14959614
then why is it called rocket science?

[Anonymous No.14959647]

Greatest tits in spaceflight?

[Anonymous No.14959648]

>>14959624
MESUR style networks on the Moon and the closest planets to us would be kino

[Anonymous No.14959651]

https://twitter.com/RocketLab/status/1588283008787697666
>Less than 24 hours to launch of Catch Me If You Can and our attempt to catch Electron in the sky with a helicopter.
>Set your alarms. Launch window opens:
>NZDT | 06:15, Nov 05
>UTC | 17:15, Nov 04
>ET | 13:15, Nov 04
>PT | 10:15, Nov 04
>CET | 18:15, Nov 04

[Anonymous No.14959652]

>>14959645
Because confusion.

[Anonymous No.14959655]

>>14959647
the tits of the average /sfg/ anon

[Anonymous No.14959656]

no news on JWST. It's as if the telescope isn't even doing anything. I though by now we'd have many discoveries

[Anonymous No.14959661]

>>14959642
we need new lunar mortars

[Anonymous No.14959666]

>>14959656
JWST observations are pretty much constant you retard
https://twitter.com/JWSTObservation
Plus, some of the space channels I watch are posting Webb shit almost every week

[Anonymous No.14959668]

>>14959661
I hope they will livestream everything they do

[Anonymous No.14959670]

why aren't they writing papers about all the observations

[Anonymous No.14959673]

CZ-5B reentry predictions are begining to narrow. Estimated reentry at 7:20 AM EST +/- 3 hours. Place your bets.

[Anonymous No.14959674]

>>14959668
I'm hoping they will step into the shadow of the HLS and photograph the stars to shut up the Apollo hoax faggots

[Anonymous No.14959680]

>>14959673
hoping for populated area

[Anonymous No.14959689]

>>14959670
Most observations have an exclusivity period. Those who requested and have the year of exclusive access are definitely doing their research right now.

[Anonymous No.14959691]

>>14959673
>>14959680
It will crash straight into the new WTC.

[Anonymous No.14959696]

>>14959689
>exclusive access to scientific info
what a load of horse shit, why wouldn't it get open sourced immediately?
astroonomers are the ultimate earther

[Anonymous No.14959698]

>>14959673
>>14959691
Update has the predicted landing point moving towards the US coast.

[Anonymous No.14959700]

>>14959674
just tweet it to Elon Musk and he will add a gopro to do this

[Anonymous No.14959702]

[Anonymous No.14959703]

>>14959700
NOAA bans videos from space thats not sanctioned

[Anonymous No.14959704]

4K 60fps moon landing or riot

[Anonymous No.14959708]

>>14959703
NOAA and astronomyfags will bend the knee to geologychads who just want to explore
Soon…

[Anonymous No.14959711]

>>14959704
it will only be broadcasted on nasa’s stuttering youtube channel at 720p. sorry

[Anonymous No.14959714]

>>14959674
I know there is a bloated photo from apollo with a star but I can't find it
>>14959696
You can't wait a year? This shit takes time, and there is also the early release science anyway.

[Anonymous No.14959729]

>>14959698
How long until it slams DC?

[Anonymous No.14959734]

>>14959714
>You can't wait a year?
I can wait indefinitely, I'm a useless pizza delivery man
I just can't think of a good reason why scientific data like Webb's should be in a walled garden for ANY amount of time, it's an artificial scarcity

[Anonymous No.14959738]

>>14959530
>10 day spaceflight
yawn

[Anonymous No.14959746]

>>14959734
I too hate copyright laws and all the bullshit but that's how our world works anyway.

[Anonymous No.14959763]

>>14959738
They also did experiments on the space shuttle with frog egg fertilization

[Anonymous No.14959766]

>>14959689
isn't there some early release program

[Anonymous No.14959767]

>>14959696
>what a load of horse shit, why wouldn't it get open sourced immediately?
The idea is that the scientist who actually made/requested the observation gets first crack at analyzing it and publishing a paper about it. This is to incentivize people actually making observations instead of lurking and sniping other people's because of how academic career progression works ("publish or perish"). Given that this is a one year static period rather than the eternal horseshit of modern copyright law it seems reasonable.

[Anonymous No.14959768]

>>14959766
said it here >>14959714

[Anonymous No.14959770]

>>14959763
did the eggs fertilize successfully

[Anonymous No.14959771]

>>14959763
stop the presses

[Anonymous No.14959773]

>>14958872
they haven't even bred insects so far. I wonder why

[Anonymous No.14959775]

>>14959768
does the early release include exoplanets

[Anonymous No.14959776]

>>14959773
one egg per hive policy

[Anonymous No.14959778]

>>14959775
Yep, go in the link and check out the entries with zero Exclusive Access Period:
https://www.stsci.edu/jwst/science-execution/approved-programs/cycle-1-go

[Anonymous No.14959781]

>>14959773
>"Testing our apparatuses under less consequential activities to ensure their efficacy before using them for more dangerous tests?"
>"Nah, it'll be fine, just send the chimps up."

[Anonymous No.14959786]

>>14959778
I've read that page several times, and there are numerous exoplanet proposals, however not a single jwst paper that I know of has so far been written about exoplanets. So I can only assume no data from the more than 50 exoplanet programs has been released

[Anonymous No.14959792]

>>14959786
I don't know about the exoplanets schedules specifically, but most high-profile researches usually release most if not all papers (often by different authors, groups and institutions that have access) at the same time and it's not unheard of for them to take their time, so you'll have to wait with whatever filters through in public announcements and processed available data

[Anonymous No.14959793]

>>14959786
Again, I don't think this is a matter of just getting the data and shitting out an article out of it, it takes time. And some observations are spread through months.

[Anonymous No.14959795]

Not a single person bothered to check available exoplanet data and bothered to write a quick article about it. Seems rather unlikely

[Anonymous No.14959798]

>>14959770
Yep. The only problem was that some of the larva didn’t properly understand up and down once they landed on the surface, but this normalized over time.

[Anonymous No.14959799]

[Anonymous No.14959830]

[Anonymous No.14959840]

>>14959799

[Anonymous No.14959854]

Why did the last FH launch have a separate thread instead of being discussed here?

[Anonymous No.14959856]

>>14959854
>being this new

[Anonymous No.14959858]

>>14959854
Big event vs "normal" launch event

Same will happen with Starship orbital launch and SLS launch.

[Anonymous No.14959862]

>>14959858
DART was a big event and didn't have a proper thread (or if it did it was barely used)

[Anonymous No.14959864]

>>14959858
>and SLS launch.
Every scrubed SLS attempt so far has been just the main /sfg/ thread

[Anonymous No.14959866]

>>14959781
There is a real risk in handling chimps in space, sexually, (I should know) but it seems always keeping them in a Russian nesting doll only accessed by robot, robot arms, science lab gloves through wall arms, would be easy solution.

They could act extra eratic being scared and consfused by space, jump off a wall and rip astronaut face off and yank wires out the wall, so maybe cages in cages in cages

[Anonymous No.14959867]

>>14959866
Would a bonobo be a better option?

[Anonymous No.14959873]

>>14959858
we hadnt had launch threads in so long i forgot to join this one

[Anonymous No.14959874]

>>14959867
Fuck if I care, bring all the monkeys, just do it absolutely smartly and carefully duh, obviously it's awesome and I look forward to the results but obviously it would be annoying and embaressing if some shit got fucked up up there because of monkies

[Anonymous No.14959883]

Why the fuck does youtube keeps showing me these scams, even when I report them.

[Anonymous No.14959884]

>>14959874
If the US did it and some disaster happened, it would be a shitfest of a PR disaster, but the PR game is in easy mode when you control the media like China.

[Anonymous No.14959896]

>>14959883
because it's not a scam. scan the QR code

[Anonymous No.14959901]

>>14959896
Wow, it worked! It sent me to a page where it says the real launch date of Starship orbitial, and I got a free Starship trip ticket as long as I don't tell anyone the date. Y'all should get it before it runs out!

[Anonymous No.14959908]

>>14959773
>>14959776

[Anonymous No.14959909]

>>14959901
Really?? I was just joking

[Anonymous No.14959917]

>>14958735
>fuck you op
>stop simping for russia

[Anonymous No.14959919]

>>14958829
no anon...she is wide

[Anonymous No.14959938]

>>14959883
YT algorithm knows you like SpaceX
YT algorithm interprets this video as a popular SpaceX video
YT does not give a shit about stopping scams

[Anonymous No.14959960]

uhhh what the fuck is "Starshield"??
about halfway down the page
https://boards.greenhouse.io/embed/job_board?for=spacex

[Anonymous No.14959966]

>>14959960
Cybersecurity for starlink

[Anonymous No.14959970]

>>14959960
>>14959966
Look at all the Starshield postings that require a TS. Goddamn that's a lot.

[Anonymous No.14959979]

something about Nutron just seems stupid

[Anonymous No.14959980]

>>14959979
They're falling for the snowman upper stage meme.

[Anonymous No.14959985]

>>14959980
The whole thing looks like a second stage with a kick stage in the fairing. the legs are gay, wasted mass. the whole shape just screams expensive, and even moreso since it's carbon fiber. to me it looks like it'll cost more than F9 and deliver less

[Anonymous No.14959987]

https://www.eusst.eu/newsroom/eu-sst-monitors-reentry-object-cz5b/
America is safe this time. Window is about 5-8.5 hours from now.

[Anonymous No.14959988]

>>14959979
>>14959980
>>14959985
don't care, it will look cool

[Anonymous No.14959992]

>>14959988
im like you, i watch this every day
https://youtu.be/7kwAPr5G6WA
i see it and i invest $10 EVERY DAY

[Anonymous No.14959999]

>>14959992
>i see it and i invest $10 EVERY DAY
this but when I watch beck eat his hat

[Anonymous No.14960005]

>>14959987
>bottom tip of Florida
so you're telling me there's still a chance

[Anonymous No.14960007]

>>14959979
They didn't have the right ambition. Should've gone at least Falcon 9 sized. Right now it's too small for most megaconstellations, GTO sats, capsules, and space station parts.

[Anonymous No.14960013]

>>14959999
checked

[Anonymous No.14960015]

>>14958809
Honestly, I kind of regret naming it that now. The Krystal posting thing was a lot more popular back then and naming the engine after her kind of like how Rocket Labs names engines after scientists seemed really funny at the time.

[Anonymous No.14960020]

>>14960015
Never too late to change the name

[Anonymous No.14960023]

https://youtu.be/jo5Ql4gxjYU
G E T
T H E
FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK
I N
H E R E

[Anonymous No.14960026]

>>14958809
>>14960015
god imagine the smell of the plumes

[Anonymous No.14960027]

>>14960015
make a new engine and call it the Anime Schizo Mk1

[Anonymous No.14960029]

>>14960023
Will SLS partake in No Launch November?

[Anonymous No.14960033]

>>14960029

[Anonymous No.14960034]

>>14960023
Even the most optimistic SLS fans said another one wouldn't roll out for years, and here we are witnessing an SLS roll out mere months later. SLSchads stay winning.

[Anonymous No.14960038]

[Anonymous No.14960039]

>>14960034
I call them SLS Heroes, because they are saving human spaceflight

[Anonymous No.14960040]

>>14958872
So 2 of the taikonauts are going to do it?

[Anonymous No.14960041]

>>14959209
Jessie <3

[Anonymous No.14960042]

>>14960038
same energy

[Anonymous No.14960053]

>>14960039
I call them SLSistas because it is more inclusive and equitive

[Anonymous No.14960054]

http://www.parabolicarc.com/2022/11/03/elon-musk-drinks-your-milkshake-the-impact-of-spacex-rideshare-missions-on-the-small-launch-market/
elon musk SpaceX is killing the small launch market (and that's a bad thing). Why you ask? allow me to provide a metaphor from hollywood movies.

[Anonymous No.14960055]

>>14960054
404

[Anonymous No.14960058]

So exactly whose idea was it to put wheels on the fucking whole tower and roll it around?

[Anonymous No.14960060]

>>14960058
It made sense for the Saturn V.

[Anonymous No.14960062]

>>14960055
oh it's an http link not https.
https://web.archive.org/web/20221104034221/http://www.parabolicarc.com/2022/11/03/elon-musk-drinks-your-milkshake-the-impact-of-spacex-rideshare-missions-on-the-small-launch-market/

[Anonymous No.14960067]

>>14960060
Shuttle didnt have a mobile tower, I thought SLS was all about reusing legacy shuttle crap

[Anonymous No.14960070]

>>14960038
Is this the 3rd or 4th time this rocket has been rolled out? I have actually lost count.

[Anonymous No.14960073]

>>14959703
>NOAA bans videos from space thats not sanctioned
That glows extremely hard.

[Anonymous No.14960074]

>crawler takes 7-8 hours
>needs to take break because it overheats
bruh

[Anonymous No.14960079]

>>14960054
>parabolicarc
SpaceX skeptic site LMAO

Always one to paint SpaceX in negative light, Always.

[Anonymous No.14960084]

>>14959703
Pictures of EARTH from space

If by chance you are trying to photograph the moon or the stars they don't care

[Anonymous No.14960089]

>>14960023
>>14960038
>yfw it will scrub and have to rollback again for repairs and booster refit

[Anonymous No.14960091]

So did they get the FTS waiver again?

[Anonymous No.14960093]

>>14960054
wonder why they dont compare to star wars. it's more accessible franchise. elon is the dark side, simple, understandable

[Anonymous No.14960095]

>>14960079
maybe it's the same writer. what other crap did they write?

[Anonymous No.14960096]

>>14960093
Because it wouldn't make any sense.

[Anonymous No.14960103]

>>14960096
cubesats are the force. elon musk is the evil emperor, harness the force to do evil. rocket lab boeing and ula are the jedi, the forces of good. but they are the underdogs, scambling to survive against dark musk. the jedi cannot get enough force to stop evil. we need Ray (female US president) to bring balance

[Anonymous No.14960105]

>>14960091
maybe they just swapped out the batteries

[Anonymous No.14960108]

>>14960103
If that didn't physically pain you to write, you should find a way to make up for it.

[Anonymous No.14960113]

>>14959867
Why don’t we bring bonobos on all space species so we can fuck them

[Anonymous No.14960116]

>Be Homo sapiens
>Living in a civilization in the year of our lord AD 2022 finna bouta be 2023
>Still don't have spacecraft with Delta-V's in the tens of thousands of km/sec that can take off and land multiple times on Earth
>Still don't have a large percentage, if the the majority of the human population living off world
>Still haven't even begun serious plans at sending out colonist ships to interstellar destinations
>Still don't even have colonies on other celestial bodies throughout the solar system

Bruh

[Anonymous No.14960119]

>>14959209
Only two niggers. This doesn't meet diversity requirements.

[Anonymous No.14960122]

>>14960116
>haven't had a successful BioDome yet

[Anonymous No.14960127]

>>14960108
I regret nothing

[Anonymous No.14960134]

>>14960116
Our ancestors will have wet dreams of experiencing the Muskian age. They can simulate it, but you are living it. There is glory awaiting us

[Anonymous No.14960139]

>>14960122
I'm sure the sequel will be successful.

[Anonymous No.14960143]

>>14960054
haha

[Anonymous No.14960153]

>>14958872
It's going to be shit and piss floating everywhere

[Anonymous No.14960155]

>>14960153
And with that China's Mir clone will be complete

[Anonymous No.14960159]

>>14958872
I can't wait for the automated docking failure on the telescope that nearly destroys the station

[Anonymous No.14960161]

>>14960054
Why does there need to be a small launch market? If rockets from SpaceX, ULA, Blue Origin, Northrop Grumman, Rocket Lab etc are being launched on a regular basis into the type of orbits needed by smallsats why not just hitch a ride with them?

[Anonymous No.14960168]

>>14960143
HELLO! DO NOT REDEEEEMMM

[Anonymous No.14960169]

>>14960161
how is that equitable?

[Anonymous No.14960172]

>>14959209
blue collar spics are the lifeblood of SpaceX

[Anonymous No.14960176]

>>14960089
Big River Rock wins again.

[Anonymous No.14960178]

>>14960053
May I suggest the equally progressive and word-reclaiming alternative of SLutS?

[Anonymous No.14960185]

>>14960023
What is it about NSF and hiring old women to do their bidding, taking pictures and steaming video for hours and hours at awfully inconvenient times?

[Anonymous No.14960191]

do u think amazon Kupiter will launch on f9?

[Anonymous No.14960193]

[Anonymous No.14960195]

>>14960193

[Anonymous No.14960197]

Have monkeys been on 0 g suborbit flight?

[Anonymous No.14960201]

>>14960191
Maybe couple. They want a cheap Starship. They won't get it. Starship is reserved for SpaceX and NASA.

[Anonymous No.14960209]

>>14960193
lmao of all the unrealistic apocalypses I've read about, this one is the silliest

"not touching you" is really not going to work as a defense against retaliatory strikes

[Anonymous No.14960210]

>>14960197
Anon..... Did you not do the required reading for this general?

[Anonymous No.14960216]

>>14960193
>>14960195
I wish we would get a CoaDE 2 that featured an entire solar system with fleets and a shit ton of infrastructure that you can create, capture and destroy that directly feeds into the creation of fleets. With even more customization of ships. They could even go batshit crazy and give us ICF fusion torch drive rockets for us to play with that would completely change the game.

[Anonymous No.14960217]

>>14959531
definitely getting some chub but i'd still pump her full of cum

[Anonymous No.14960226]

>>14959209
what would spacex do without mexicans?

[Anonymous No.14960235]

>>14960226
Flop.

[Anonymous No.14960242]

>>14960169
rocket lab is traded on the public equity markets

[Anonymous No.14960243]

>>14960161
operational flexibility

rideshares leave with or without you

[Anonymous No.14960244]

>>14960143
these people can vote

[Anonymous No.14960251]

>>14960242
ugggghh >:( you know what I meant >>>:(((

[Anonymous No.14960252]

>be a rocket company for 20+ years
>don’t put so much as a single kg into orbit
>lose lunar lander competition to company that goes to space routinely
>sue
LMAO don’t ever forget

[Anonymous No.14960253]

>>14960252
I hope BO crashes and burns
Space hotels for the rich is retarded

[Anonymous No.14960259]

>>14960252
Also dont forget the personal letter begging from bezos, and lobbying congress for 10 billion and failing every attempt. and preemtively celebrating their inevitable win. and crying on the zoom call when they lost.

[Anonymous No.14960261]

>>14960259
>crying on the zoom call when they lost
what

[Anonymous No.14960268]

>>14960261
anon relayed the tale during that legendary thread, and berger later confirmed in an article. to our knowledge it was not recorded

[Anonymous No.14960272]

>>14960261
There was a call involving hundreds of engineers and management staff from throughout the National Team, and there were actual tears shed during it because they legitimately believed that they had the HLS contract in the bag.

[Anonymous No.14960274]

>>14960259
kek

[Anonymous No.14960277]

https://twitter.com/RocketLab/status/1588398450122821632
>The complete guide to how we plan on catching a rocket falling from space with a helicopter. Check out the mission info kit ahead of lift-off: (link to .pdf is on the tweet)

[Anonymous No.14960281]

>>14960277
is this really worth it?

[Anonymous No.14960282]

>>14960281
imo no

[Anonymous No.14960283]

>>14960281
of course. why wouldn't it?

[Anonymous No.14960287]

>>14960283
i dont understand how electron reuse is practical or profitable considering how low their flight rate is and how they wont even use this reuse method on Neutron

[Anonymous No.14960288]

>>14959617
You can but it will be less efficient.

[Anonymous No.14960289]

>>14960283
>>14960287
The helicopter flight costs maybe 10k$. Less than a single battery out of that 9 engine power pack.

[Anonymous No.14960294]

>>14959617
You can but the point usually is to not have to propel your power source.

[Anonymous No.14960307]

>>14960217
Skinny skeletons are disgusting. Chubby women are the only attractive ones

[Anonymous No.14960310]

[Anonymous No.14960313]

>>14960310
Boeing stock will literally moon if this thing actually has a successful flight

[Anonymous No.14960321]

>>14960261
>>14960272
>IT WAS HER TIME! But for space
Fucking based.

[Anonymous No.14960323]

>>14960313
I literally dumped my SpaceX stock and put it all into Boeing after reading your post

[Anonymous No.14960332]

>>14960313
I just fucked my mom’s ass after reading your post

[Anonymous No.14960339]

>>14960313
More like their funding with taxpayer money will moon

[Anonymous No.14960340]

>>14960339
and the stock price will rise in anticipation of more contracts.

[Anonymous No.14960342]

>>14960313
After reading your post, I took my trash barrel out (shirtless) it's almost midnight and i almost forgot, and my neighbor was just happening to take out his trash too. I got nervous, I looked at the ground and pretended not to notice. it was a little chilly out and no doubt my own neighbor could see my nipples. God why does this always happen

[Anonymous No.14960345]

>>14960342
Ain’t no sense in being ashamed of the natural human form

[Anonymous No.14960348]

>>14960313
SLS will literally go to the moon

[Anonymous No.14960351]

>>14960345
Yeah but why couldnt he take his trash out earlier? or later?? I am a creature of the night and I cannot abide prying eyes

[Anonymous No.14960356]

>>14960351
Use advanced stealth techniques to evade detection in the future, like digging a subterranean tunnel from the inside of your house to the trashcan

[Anonymous No.14960359]

>>14960356
I'm not so sure I can afford to dig that much, but I am definitely considering burning trash in my backyard from here on out. It's fine because it's winter

[Anonymous No.14960375]

>>14960027
is this an actual anime that I can force the boyz to watch with me

[Anonymous No.14960378]

so who's hype for this Chinese booster stage to hit Tel Aviv

[Anonymous No.14960379]

>>14960375
Yes
https://myanimelist.net/anime/1942/Rocket_Girls

[Anonymous No.14960387]

>>14959256
>Spaceplane
It's a glorified atmosphere skipper, not a "spaceplane".

[Anonymous No.14960405]

CHINA!

[Anonymous No.14960429]

GAMBATTE BOOSTER CHAN https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RB8XVO6FGz8

[Anonymous No.14960430]

>>14960405
the italy boot is gonna kick that shit into sardinia's nutsack

[Anonymous No.14960434]

>>14959256
>>>>>suborbital

[Anonymous No.14960444]

Space is hard

[Anonymous No.14960452]

>>14960405
>Spain had to shut down their airports
Lmao

[Anonymous No.14960461]

>>14960429
Did it skip?? Altitude 170km

[Anonymous No.14960468]

over Spain now

[Anonymous No.14960469]

>>14960429
>>14960461
literal scam stream. they're not tracking shit. all those numbers are entirely fictitious

[Anonymous No.14960475]

>>14960469
Kek. I got it from /pol/

[Anonymous No.14960487]

>>14959786
>>14959798
>however not a single jwst paper that I know of has so far been written about exoplanets.
Well then you haven't been paying attention.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.14990
https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.00620
https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.11692
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01459
It is a brand new telescope, with multiple modes relevant to exoplanets all of which have to be understood before the data can be maximally exploited. It is not a matter of taking a screenshot of the raw spectrum and putting it on the arXiv. Most of the exoplanet observations being done now are transit spectroscopy, where precision is everything. You might think you could just publish a shitty quick analysis and then a better one later, but this is pointless. Writing two papers takes even longer. And it can hurt people proposing for new observations in Cycle 2, as the committee will see your shitty paper which failed to reach expected sensitivity.
And who would this help, you people didn't even notice these papers which gained significant media attention.
>>14959670
That program consists of 19 observations of 7 different planets, it's not even 50% observed.

[Anonymous No.14960503]

Spain closed the airspace of the debris track, now it's back to normal.

[Anonymous No.14960526]

Booster chan visiting SLS on the pad

[Anonymous No.14960534]

>>14960526
I swear if this debris hits anywhere near KSC it will be a sign that god truly hates SLS.

[Anonymous No.14960539]

Real time tracking:

https://www.n2yo.com/?s=54217&live=1

[Anonymous No.14960549]

>>14960539
How do you know it's real time tracking and not just based on some recent orbital parameters?

[Anonymous No.14960553]

>>14960549
It isn't realtime. The ground track is fine but when it deorbits is absolutely not shown by this.

[Anonymous No.14960563]

Booster chan never made it to florida
https://twitter.com/US_SpaceCom/status/1588479612610289664

[Anonymous No.14960567]

>>14960563
bummer

[Anonymous No.14960576]

>>14960563
>For details on the uncontrolled reentry’s impact location, we once again refer you to the #PRC.
:)

[Anonymous No.14960579]

>>14960563
>south-central Pacific Ocean
no kino vids :(

[Anonymous No.14960601]

Middle Kingdom drops booster into Point Nemo yet gwailos are seething, why?

[Anonymous No.14960614]

>>14960601
Maybe the US shot it down

[Anonymous No.14960619]

>>14960614
that's not how this works

[Anonymous No.14960625]

>>14960619
>implying there isnt anti gravity guns onboard US destroyers

[Anonymous No.14960647]

do you think its possible to go diy orbital with electric pump fed hydrogen peroxide monoprop?
https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1117581

[Anonymous No.14960654]

>>14960647
No

[Anonymous No.14960666]

>>14960619
That's how it works in Star Wars.

[Anonymous No.14960689]

wow i guess this is pervy jurvey's father.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ksXcPmB6zk

[Anonymous No.14960712]

>>14960625
they just glow it down

[Anonymous No.14960754]

first for caseed handfeed

[Anonymous No.14960757]

409th for isaac arthur

[Anonymous No.14960760]

>>14960754
although it seems rather idealistic to have it actually be transparent. putting weight on top reduces your anchor forces so i'd expect regolith and solar panels on top.
micrometeorites would otherwise punch holes way too often, but i haven't done the math so maybe that's not true.

[Anonymous No.14960771]

>>14960563
Euros got it wrong. Reentered later than the estimate. 10:01 UTC vs. 8:50 UTC +/- 36 min.

https://twitter.com/US_SpaceCom/status/1588502881631887361
>#USSPACECOM can confirm a second atmospheric reentry correlated with the #PRC’s Long March 5B #CZ5B as it exited the #USSPACECOM Area of Responsibility over the Northeast Pacific Ocean region at 4:06am MDT/10:06 UTC on Nov. 4.
Also apparently a little bit made it further.

[Anonymous No.14960788]

a few minutes later and it would've gotten florida
we were so close

[Anonymous No.14960804]

>>14960526
KSC is east of Orlando.

[Anonymous No.14960805]

>>14960788
it's a pity

[Anonymous No.14960807]

SOVL

[Anonymous No.14960810]

>>14960503
pretty interesting. we're seeing spaceflight having an increasingly noticeable impact on the daily lives of the average person.

[Anonymous No.14960815]

>December deadline? ... One of the big questions about the rocket concerns the lifetime of its massive solid rocket boosters, which have now been stacked for nearly two years. NASA's Cliff Lanham, who oversees ground systems, said NASA's initial analysis found that the rocket boosters provided by Northrop Grumman had a lifetime of one year. However, a subsequent analysis of their health cleared one through December 9, 2022, the other through December 14. NASA could probably extend their life further with additional analysis, Free adds. But this will be a source of concern if the Artemis I mission has to be delayed again.
how long until NASA *has* to replace SLS's side boosters?

[Anonymous No.14960816]

https://youtu.be/PVTwEn9GdsA

[Anonymous No.14960828]

>>14960815
Reminder that it only needs to use boosters because the “main” engine is hydrolox and can’t lift itself
Genius design

[Anonymous No.14960834]

https://spacenews.com/virgin-galactic-delays-introduction-of-second-suborbital-spaceship/
I hope this steaming pile of shit dies soon

[Anonymous No.14960840]

>>14960828
it probably looked really cool on the overhead projector presentation slides in 1971.

[Anonymous No.14960857]

>>14960828
>>14960840
Literally an oversized Titan 3 with hydrologgs

[Anonymous No.14960879]

>>14960815
I was warnin' about the boosters a year ago and y'all called me crazy, well who's crazy now

[Anonymous No.14960885]

>>14960857
Well they were looking for the next best thing, and the basic idea is kinda elegant.

I mean, they were looking at configurations that replaced the 1st stage with solids and then used a hydralox stage that would ignite in-flight.

[Anonymous No.14960952]

[Anonymous No.14960986]

>>14960952

[Anonymous No.14961012]

one hour to rocket lab

[Anonymous No.14961013]

>>14960815
>how long until NASA *has* to replace SLS's side boosters?
Never. We'll just keep analyzing them again and again, extending their life further and further, until we finally manage a full countdown and RUD.

[Anonymous No.14961037]

>>14960986
saturn 1B doesnt have a flame trench??? what about deluge?? von braun is delusional

[Anonymous No.14961050]

AAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.14961060]

GET BACK TO WORK ON STARSHIP YOU JERK
THERE IS NOTHING AT THE BARON CONFERENCE THAT WILL HELP YOU

[Anonymous No.14961066]

>>14961060
Jesus is working on Stage 0, don't worry.

[Anonymous No.14961092]

>>14961050
>>14960277
I'm excited to see it work, I hope they get it this time.

[Anonymous No.14961107]

>>14960277
That helicopter pilot is ballsy as hell, I'd buy that guy a beer if he makes it

I wonder how they control the hook or if it's literally just midair fishing with a helicopter

[Anonymous No.14961126]

[Anonymous No.14961127]

>>14959645
uppity rocket plumbers

[Anonymous No.14961136]

>>14960816
Live now

[Anonymous No.14961138]

>rocketlab pioneering a new method of first stage recovery for small launch vehicles
>no one gives a shit
lol

[Anonymous No.14961139]

>>14960487
Thanks for this, I was getting tired of that anon

[Anonymous No.14961140]

>>14960379
>Japanese rocket tech is not quite powerful enough to launch an adult male into orbit
Finally, an anime premise that logically requires cute little girls to be combined with the main topic!

[Anonymous No.14961141]

https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/psyche_irb_report_and_response_nov_2022.pdf

Psyche IRB report is out, let's see who they're going to pin this one on

>JPL had coof burnout and couldn't remotely monitor work Maxar was doing
>Maxar fucked up
>Maxar fucked up because no one called them on their fucking up due to remote work oversight limitations

OOF.wav

[Anonymous No.14961142]

>>14961138
Hey there's 3500 people watching, that's almost as much as a low-level youtuber gets regularly

[Anonymous No.14961145]

>>14961141
>remote work oversight
What a bunch of retard

[Anonymous No.14961147]

>>14961141
I can't imagine how sending everybody home to work in their PJs slowed progress so much, inconceivable

[Anonymous No.14961149]

>>14961141
>VERITAS gets delayed three years to 2031 to pay for the Psyche fuckup

VENUS BROS WE'RE GETTING ROBBED

[Anonymous No.14961151]

>>14961138
Objects (film rolls) falling from space have been captured by airplanes decades ago.

[Anonymous No.14961153]

[Anonymous No.14961184]

>>14960857
More like a scaled up Delta IV

[Anonymous No.14961187]

[Anonymous No.14961189]

>>14961184
I know they are significantly different but if you accept the RS-68 as being even somewhat similar to the SSME then this is almost the exact same rocket as SLS

[Anonymous No.14961192]

>>14961187
That's a fat weld line, did they have to repair this one?

[Anonymous No.14961196]

This guy has a gay lisp

[Anonymous No.14961198]

>>14961149
Hopefully they will merge in with ESA's EnVision, sending both is redundant. It's stupid that three selections got swept up in the bullshit about phosphine, only for the result to be widely disregarded months later.

[Anonymous No.14961202]

why is the control room so dark and sovlless

[Anonymous No.14961204]

Ready for imminent heli fail.

[Anonymous No.14961206]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBNkHR8QfqU

Clear live

[Anonymous No.14961207]

[Anonymous No.14961209]

go go go

[Anonymous No.14961211]

Max Qute

[Anonymous No.14961212]

Max Qute

[Anonymous No.14961213]

its time to catch

[Anonymous No.14961214]

KINO

[Anonymous No.14961217]

good luck

[Anonymous No.14961218]

>re-entering edge-on
balls of steel

[Anonymous No.14961222]

nothing better than throwing rocket batteries in the ocean

[Anonymous No.14961223]

Jesus, are they so embarrassed about their previous fuckups that they operate with a 2 minute delay on their stream?

[Anonymous No.14961225]

uuuh ooohhhh

[Anonymous No.14961226]

>cameras several seconds behind

[Anonymous No.14961227]

DROGUE OUT
LETS GOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.14961234]

>>14961226
>several seconds
Close to a minute if not more.

[Anonymous No.14961235]

>damage controlling on missing the catch
uh oh

[Anonymous No.14961237]

>>14961235
ITS STILL A SUCCESS IF WE FAIL

[Anonymous No.14961238]

200th raptor engines made so far

[Anonymous No.14961239]

looks like he spotted something, he's moving

[Anonymous No.14961245]

should've catched it minutes ago

[Anonymous No.14961246]

hmmmm

[Anonymous No.14961252]

They're just showing looped video from the helicopter now, aren't they?

[Anonymous No.14961253]

it's with the fishes

[Anonymous No.14961254]

Aw come on

[Anonymous No.14961255]

Hahahaha

[Anonymous No.14961256]

>ocean splashdown BACKUP
ahahahhahaha

[Anonymous No.14961257]

A v22 osprey would have catched it

[Anonymous No.14961258]

haha

[Anonymous No.14961259]

lmfao
yeah this program is a waste

[Anonymous No.14961260]

Oof, I think they missed the landing zone and couldn't get to the rocket in time

[Anonymous No.14961261]

hahaha

[Anonymous No.14961263]

i mean if you knew the math, you would've known they missed it after no info of it being catched for minutes now

[Anonymous No.14961264]

wasn’t even on camera. bros…

[Anonymous No.14961265]

I'd just like to take a money and express my absolute disdain for Estronaut's music.

[Anonymous No.14961266]

Missed it

[Anonymous No.14961267]

[Anonymous No.14961268]

>>14961253
Joining ASTRA payloads

[Anonymous No.14961269]

>>14961257
>>14961257
I don't understand why they don't just do the exact thing the glowies did back in the day?

[Anonymous No.14961270]

new failland

[Anonymous No.14961272]

Ria-chan....they're damage controlling...

[Anonymous No.14961273]

>>14961263
You pseudo retards are so fucking embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.14961276]

>>14961267
>>>/a/

[Anonymous No.14961278]

>>14961263
>you would've known they missed it after no info of it being catched for minutes now
I knew it wouldn't be caught at the moment of launch announcement. Get on my level.

[Anonymous No.14961279]

(you)

[Anonymous No.14961282]

(me)

[Anonymous No.14961284]

>>14961149
WHAT THE FUCK

[Anonymous No.14961288]

>>14961284
Welcome to pork projects operating under limited budgets.

[Anonymous No.14961292]

>>14961288
“Limited,” I think the problem is that there are dozens of bloat projects skimming off billions for no fucking reason other than greed

[Anonymous No.14961294]

>It's just 22t. bruh
This keeps happening.

[Anonymous No.14961297]

>>14961292
NASA gets 20 odd billions a year, the budget is indeed limited and will slide timeframes thanks to mismanaged pork.

[Anonymous No.14961304]

>>14961297
20 billion a YEAR is enough for a moon program and enough leftover for TWO missions to every planet from Mercury to Uranus in the same decade. It shouldn’t cost >$1 bil for a “off the shelf” seismometer on mars or $12 bil for a rocket

[Anonymous No.14961307]

>>14961304
>It shouldn’t
But it does and it always will.

[Anonymous No.14961309]

[Anonymous No.14961315]

the mission name takes on a new light now

[Anonymous No.14961326]

[Anonymous No.14961338]

https://twitter.com/RocketLab/status/1588596203528519680
>After a great launch, we can confirm the primary mission is on track! Unfortunately no helicopter catch attempt today due to telemetry loss from Electron’s 1st stage during re-entry. As standard procedure, we pull the helicopter from the recovery zone if this happens
>telemetry loss

[Anonymous No.14961354]

>>14961338
beyond embarrassing

[Anonymous No.14961357]

>>14961338
Same problem they had on their first ever launch of Electron.

I love you Pete, but get your shit together.

[Anonymous No.14961359]

>>14960226
pay slightly more for labor?

[Anonymous No.14961361]

>>14961269
Because the glowies were just snagging little film cans, how can I explain to zoomers, they were the size of a Funko Pop.

[Anonymous No.14961363]

>>14961357
How many times have they tried so far? If this is only the second then I'm willing to forgive it.

[Anonymous No.14961371]

>>14961363
Second catch attempt, but not the second recovery attempt, and each attempt has been spaced several launches apart.

[Anonymous No.14961373]

>>14961092
the last one was a pussy and dropped it on purpose

[Anonymous No.14961376]

>>14961361
They just said on the stream that the empty electron only weighs 1 ton. It's not hard.

[Anonymous No.14961379]

>>14961371
>each attempt has been spaced several launches apart
I thought that was because they were going through their expendable rocket inventory that was left or something

[Anonymous No.14961381]

>>14961373
>the loads were different than expected so the attempt was aborted for the safety of our pilots
>telemetry was lost so the attempt was aborted for the safety of our pilots
Doesn't particularly inspire confidence in the safety of a manned recovery system

[Anonymous No.14961383]

>>14961376
That's like seven Americans, anon.
And then what will they do when they make a larger rocket?

[Anonymous No.14961387]

[Anonymous No.14961388]

>>14961338
At least they tried. Musker is crying about advertisers pulling from his deadweight site.

[Anonymous No.14961391]

:3

[Anonymous No.14961392]

Just put a starlink dish on electron
Problem solved

[Anonymous No.14961396]

>>14960244
not in this country

[Anonymous No.14961405]

>>14960287
Check their last investors update presentation. They forecast a 40% cost reduction if they can reuse Electron.

>>14961363
Only second attempt yes, but losing the stage to a telemetry issue is something that should have been fixed on previous practice catches. Perfecting the catch itself and vehicle reuse is hard enough.

[Anonymous No.14961408]

https://youtu.be/KQBVOQ79G2s
OH YEAH

[Anonymous No.14961412]

>>14961408
cool but when will it launch?

[Anonymous No.14961415]

>>14961412
Did you not scan the QR code?

[Anonymous No.14961416]

>>14961412
Target is early December.

[Anonymous No.14961432]

New Starbase Kino https://youtu.be/KQBVOQ79G2s

[Anonymous No.14961433]

>>14961412
NASA says next month.

[Anonymous No.14961435]

>>14961433
SpaceX told NASA, meaning Elon told NASA. Meaning fat chance

[Anonymous No.14961436]

>>14961435
That means NASA believes Elon.

[Anonymous No.14961441]

>>14961436
And I believe we need a new thread

[Anonymous No.14961448]

cosmic is anti-Weierstrass Begriffsschrift-ism, pistolstarted is anti-Hamilton, nevermind notification concerned.

[Anonymous No.14961451]

Page 10, staging...
>>14961449
>>14961449
>>14961449
>>14961449

[Anonymous No.14961495]

>>14961432
the mini AirStream RV park was cute

[Anonymous No.14961583]

>>14961192
they all look like that

[Anonymous No.14961685]

>>14961266
>>14961259
>>14961260
They need 4 helicopters to hold 4 corners of a giant inflatable bag, and have them position it as they are being updated with the coordinates of the rocket fall, and they let go a second before the rocket hits the fabric, it gets wrapped in it and the pressurr of the impact and falling down inflates the material, so now the rocket splashes into ocean wrapped in a floating bag