/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.14944293]

Past:
>ice age, let's just chill in the caves lol
>warm age, let's fap out in the fields lol

Now:
>OH NO 1.5C WARMING OH NO HOW WILL WE EVER GET THROUGH THIS OH MY GOD THE WORLD IS ENDING AAAAAAAAAAA SAVE ME BLACK SCIENCE MAN AAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.14944300]

>>14944293
yeah

[Anonymous No.14944305]

>>14944293
Millions died in the previous climate changes dunce

[Anonymous No.14944316]

>>14944305
darwinism suggest we sgould let them die.

[Anonymous No.14944342]

>>14944305
to save billions (who will also die in the next climate change)

[Anonymous No.14944367]

>>14944293
The problem is that we're not sea birds. We can't simply travel inland and settle, you're talking about the loss of millions of homes around the world. Who's going to buy a house that's flooded? Who's going to pay for new houses inland? Not to mention people who's lives depend on water runoff from glacial meltwater which they won't have anymore as the glaciers disappear. These people will show up in your backyard because you made their lands unlivable.

This doesn't even begin to address the problems of food production. "lol, let's just plant crops closer to the poles!" This fails on several levels. Not all soil is the same. You are asking farmers to move from fertile lands with high production to lower quality soils that won't grow as much. Based on our estimates in the next 50 years we will no longer be able to feed everyone. This will affect you or your children directly.

Also an increase in atmospheric CO2 shows that plants make more sugars and less vitamins which makes all foods less healthy. While you may eat the same quantity of food as you did before you aren't getting the same quality of nutrition. This is already affecting us and has been proven multiple times as already occurring.

All to make a few billionaires more wealthy by tricking you to buy more coal and oil.

[Anonymous No.14944369]

>>14944367
“CO2 is so beneficial […] it would be crazy to try to reduce it,” Dyson said. “Man-made climate change is, on the whole, good.”
- Freeman Dyson (the person who invented climate models)

[Anonymous No.14944371]

lol who fucking cares, everyone is going to die eventually, just get it over with
I'll live out the rest of my life and then die. NOT my problem.

[Anonymous No.14944378]

>>14944369
Here, a simple youtube video for you explaining what's wrong with your statement. Hope it helps!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFA7Sui8w_g

[Anonymous No.14944381]

>>14944378
>here's 12 minutes of climate propaganda
Shove it up your ass

[Anonymous No.14944382]

>>14944378
Here's one for you

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX1z_6pvM-Q

[Anonymous No.14944386]

>>14944382
>Patrick Moore
Nope. You've got to be joking citing Moore. He's a charlatan and has been proven again and again that he's wrong but he just won't shut the fuck up.

[Anonymous No.14944390]

>>14944381
Okay, here it is from Harvard University then. Eventually you'll run out of excuses

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/climate-change-less-nutritious-food

[Anonymous No.14944392]

>>14944386
I watched the entire presentation and see absolutely nothing wrong with anything he's said.

If anything, we're ensuring long-term survival by pumping CO2 into the atmosphere.

[Anonymous No.14944394]

>>14944390
I hope there's some part of you that realizes just how retarded arguments of authority are.

[Anonymous No.14944440]

>1.5C IS A LOT

[Anonymous No.14944455]

>>14944305
They died for a good cause tho

[Anonymous No.14944457]

>>14944367
>We can't simply travel inland and settle
Oh sweaty we absolutely can. Ever heard about legs? You are not a plant

[Anonymous No.14944555]

>>14944316
>Darwinism
>Darwinism suggests
>Darwinism suggests we should
Retard

[Anonymous No.14944602]

>>14944555
is Darwin wrong?

[Anonymous No.14944629]

>>14944555
My mom says you are stupid

[Anonymous No.14944689]

>>14944293
You're ignoring two key things:

1. We were already in a "warm age" for 10,000 years. Current warming is on top of the warming that already occurred.

2. Current warming is about 25 times faster than the rapid warming 10,000 years ago. They aren't even close to similar.

[Anonymous No.14944773]

>>14944293
The science is settled, chud. Get back to your pod and reduce your carbon footprint so that China and India can have their turn at global hegemony. Imagine the earthly paradise that awaits us!

[Anonymous No.14944774]

>>14944390
>greenhouses used to create the most nutritious food we know how to make are bad because carbon actually
Harvard has really fallen off.

[Anonymous No.14944778]

>>14944689
>2. Current warming is about 25 times faster than the rapid warming 10,000 years ago. They aren't even close to similar.
This can't be determined with the data we have available. The current warming peak looks exactly like the one from before the last ice age, with the exception of a very short-duration spike which can't be captured on historical climate proxies. For all we know this is a natural process that kickstarts the decline into the next ice age, but it happens too quickly to be caught on the "record" in climate proxies.

[Anonymous No.14944854]

>>14944392
>I watched the entire presentation and see absolutely nothing wrong with anything he's said.

[Anonymous No.14944856]

>>14944778
>This can't be determined with the data we have available.
Sure it can. Pic related.

>The current warming peak looks exactly like the one from before the last ice age
You mean the last glacial period? No it doesn't. Interglacial warming ended 10,000 years ago. That's the peak that looks similar. The current peak isn't similar in timing or in magnitude. It's the exact opposite of the interglacial-glacial cycle.

>with the exception of a very short-duration spike which can't be captured on historical climate proxies.
Why would we need proxies to capture it when we can measure it directly?

>For all we know this is a natural process that kickstarts the decline into the next ice age
You're confusing your lack of knowledge with what climatologists know. We know what causes interglacials and their timing (Milankovich cycles). We know what causes current warming: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020GL091585

They are not the same.

>but it happens too quickly to be caught on the "record" in climate proxies.
No, the ice core record has very good resolution. Ice cores can't tell us about recent temperature changes because it takes a long time for the ice to form, not because the changes are too fast.

[Anonymous No.14944861]

>>14944293
This! Praise Jesus Christ and say "the devil aint gon get the best o me!" Yeehaw!

[Anonymous No.14944869]

>>14944392
The very first argument he makes is wrong. He says that it's one of the coolest periods in Earth's history so it can't be getting too hot. He fails to mention that humans evolved in and have always lived in this cold period called an ice age, so of course deviating from that temperature range can be incredibly harmful to us. Humans history is a negligible part of Earth's history, so why should we care about the what the climate was like for the majority of Earth's history? We're humans, not rocks. The rest of his drivel is equally misleading.

[Anonymous No.14944873]

>>14944440
1.5C in a hundred years is a lot. It usually takes thousands of years.

[Anonymous No.14944882]

>>14944386
better credentials than your pet talking head

[Anonymous No.14944885]

>>14944602
He was a freemason so probably

[Anonymous No.14944891]

>>14944882
>b-but he's my authority!
Cool.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XIpTqbLR5Y

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovKw6YjqSfM

[Anonymous No.14944907]

So what was the whole climategate thing? why were they caught deliberately fudging the numbers?

[Anonymous No.14944915]

>>14944856
>Why would we need proxies to capture it when we can measure it directly?
You would need a proxy to determine it's not natural. These spikes might be totally normal. Contrary to your babbling, ice cores do lack the resolution to provide data on short periods like our temporary warming.

[Anonymous No.14944919]

>>14944891
potholer is a hack who has been proven to be a liar in nearly every one of his videos. using him as a source shows us just how intellectually dishonest you are.

[Anonymous No.14944923]

>>14944907
Because the Medieval Warm Period and Roman Warm Period disprove the cult's belief that modern-day warming is unprecedented, since they were hotter and longer than the modern warm period and occurred during a time of low population and low industrialization with no exploitation of fossil fuels.

[Anonymous No.14944931]

>>14944919
One example?

[Anonymous No.14944936]

>>14944919
>potholer is a hack who has been proven to be a liar in nearly every one of his videos.

I see. Your favourite corporate lobbyist was obliterated, so you've ignored all of my arguments and started making shit up.

[Anonymous No.14944942]

>>14944931
He made several videos lying about scientific concepts in response to Tony Heller, who showed where he had lied and made up fake "science" by providing cited sources, and then when he was politely asked for a live debate to address his lies he scurried away. He did the same to Stephen Crowder, and even though I think Crowder is a gay retard Potholer still lied about him and ran off when confronted.

[Anonymous No.14944943]

>>14944936
I'm not the person you're arguing with, just another anon who is tired of people like you. Your ideology is losing and in 20 years we won't even remember global warming.

[Anonymous No.14944944]

>>14944923
>Because the Medieval Warm Period and Roman Warm Period disprove the cult's belief that modern-day warming is unprecedented
Does it?

>since they were hotter and longer than the modern warm period
Were they?

Hint: no

[Anonymous No.14944945]

>>14944942
>He made several videos lying about scientific concepts in response to Tony Heller
Can you give one example though? With actual details? I don't think you can.

[Anonymous No.14944967]

>>14944873
>1.5C in a hundred years is a lot. It usually takes thousands of years

[Anonymous No.14945038]

>>14944967

[Anonymous No.14945080]

>>14944944
That's the data that was manipulated as per the instructions passed out in the climategate emails.

[Anonymous No.14945083]

>>14944945
You can read or watch Tony Heller's responses to Potholer where he BTFOs him completely. It's nearly an hour worth of videos picking apart Potholer's lies.

[Anonymous No.14945105]

>>14945083
I already did. Tony lost and had no arguments left, so he demanded a live debate as if a live debate is preferable to an online one in which you can present well thought out arguments and data. Can you provide a single example of Potholer lying? No, you can't.

[Anonymous No.14945106]

>>14945080
Proof?

[Anonymous No.14945110]

>>14945106
The climategate emails. I already told you.

[Anonymous No.14945119]

>>14944293
Chillout ese! If humans cannot stand warm weather and more crops and plants growing, then they will go extinct.

[Anonymous No.14945121]

>>14945105
lol what a bad liar. just admit you lost and leave. it's not like your warmist religion will last that long anyway, so converting more people to it doesn't help.

[Anonymous No.14945127]

>>14945110
Which email do you think shows that? I bet you don't even understand what they're talking about.

[Anonymous No.14945128]

>>14945121
So you can't provide a single example of Potholer lying? Even though Tony supposedly did all the work for you? Why did you lie?

[Anonymous No.14945148]

>>14945128
You didn't watch the videos or read any of his critiques, you just spouted some BS and claimed victory hoping I wouldn't call you out. If you were really interested you would follow my citations and realize your mistakes.

[Anonymous No.14945161]

>>14945127
Senate testimony about the climate scientists responsible for the fraud:
archive (dot) ph/mfoR5

>I had another interesting experience around the time my paper in Science was published. I received an astonishing email from a major researcher in the area of climate change. He said, "We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period."

>The Medieval Warm Period (MWP) was a time of unusually warm weather that began around 1000 AD and persisted until a cold period known as the "Little Ice Age" took hold in the 14th century. Warmer climate brought a remarkable flowering of prosperity, knowledge, and art to Europe during the High Middle Ages.

>The existence of the MWP had been recognized in the scientific literature for decades. But now it was a major embarrassment to those maintaining that the 20th century warming was truly anomalous. It had to be "gotten rid of."

The person he discusses is assumed to be Jonathan Overpeck, who famously said that he wanted to "deal a mortal blow" to the MWP in the Climategate emails. He was one of the most strident proponents of fabricating the data to make it appear as if past warming events didn't exist, because he wanted to prevent "The sceptics and uninformed" from citing valid research that contradicted their claims. He instructed his fellows "No need to go into details on any but the MWP, but good to mention the others in the same dismissive effort."

From the email dated Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:45:38

To settle your concerns, here's some scientific proof that the MWP was global, and warmer than today, using oceanic climate proxies:
(4chan hates doi links) 0.1126/science.1240837

[Anonymous No.14945183]

>>14944293
All you need to know about "Climate Change" in a convenient meme.

[Anonymous No.14945184]

>>14945183
It is just a money-transfer scam by the rich elite who have wormed their way into governments. Parasites.

[Anonymous No.14945186]

>>14945183
Somehow modern society is much less affected by climate and yet much more obsessed with minor cycles. Did you know there was a global warming hysteria in the 1900s too?

[Anonymous No.14945190]

>>14945148
>You didn't watch the videos or read any of his critiques
But I did, I remember the back and forth clearly. Instead of lying more, why don't you try to defend your previous lies? It should be trivial for you to provide a single example of Potholer lying. But you won't provide a single substantive argument, because you know you have no clue what you're talking about.

[Anonymous No.14945194]

>>14945186
>Somehow modern society is much less affected by climate and yet much more obsessed with minor cycles.
Because people have it easy with tons of free time off to sit around and think of shit to worry about.

200+ years ago or further back, people didn't worry about nonsense, but about getting enough food or not being killed and eaten by others.

Modern society is becoming neurotic. It will collapse soon.

[Anonymous No.14945197]

>>14945190
>But I did, I remember the back and forth clearly.
Explain some of the points of the videos then, instead of deflecting.

[Anonymous No.14945201]

>>14945194
I think it also has a lot to do with the loss of agrarian society. Farmer's almanacs have a much more incisive view on the climate and local weather patterns and trends than any climate soientist will, because they've been updated for (in some cases) over 1000 years of empirical observations.

There's a good reason why rural people don't buy into the hysteria. They read better sources and know more about nature's cycles.

[Anonymous No.14945203]

>>14944367
>This will affect you or your children directly.

wrong
I'm not gonna have kids cause I see no future that will bring them prosperity

[Anonymous No.14945205]

>>14945203
That's a losing mindset, anon, and it's the entire reason the climate crisis exists. Propaganda like this sort of thing is meant to convince you not to have kids.

[Anonymous No.14945223]

>>14945205
>losing mindset
not really. If I don't have the income to provide for a child, a house to provide the proper space for a child to roam, the time to raise the child, and the economy's going to shit, I'm not having children.

it ain't propaganda, cause I don't think "climate change" is as lurch a monster as the media portrays
it's the way the whole of society is moving and my personal lifestyle that would not accommodate a child but would in fact harm them in the long run

[Anonymous No.14945232]

>>14945161
>The person he discusses is assumed to be Jonathan Overpeck, who famously said that he wanted to "deal a mortal blow" to the MWP in the Climategate emails.
Why are you lying? The actual quote is “I'm not the only one who would like to deal a mortal blow to the misuse of supposed warm period terms and myths in the literature.” The MWP was not a period of global warming. It was a period of warming primarily in the North Atlantic region. The global average temperature actually decreased globally during it. So you're mad that a scientist didn't want it to be misrepresented?

>He was one of the most strident proponents of fabricating the data
What data was fabricated? You were supposed to provide period but all you've done is fabricate something no one said.

>To settle your concerns, here's some scientific proof that the MWP was global, and warmer than today, using oceanic climate proxies:
You mean this?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24179224/
You screwed up the DOI. And you're misrepresenting it. It agrees that surface temperature changes were small. Ocean heat content is not surface temperature.

[Anonymous No.14945235]

>>14945197
>Explain some of the points of the videos then
I will, as soon as you give an example or admit you lied.

[Anonymous No.14945239]

>>14945197
LOL, your post is a deflection from providing proof of your claim. Nice protection.

[Anonymous No.14945244]

>>14945201
>Farmer's almanacs have a much more incisive view on the climate and local weather patterns and trends than any climate soientist will

[Anonymous No.14945571]

>>14945232
>The global average temperature actually decreased globally during it.
If you're going to lie like this, why bother posting? Just leave the thread and let your cult wither and die like it should.

[Anonymous No.14945574]

>>14945244
When your life depends on knowing long-term and short-term trends in your geographical area, you keep a much better eye on what are natural cycles and what are exceptions. This is a cycle.

[Anonymous No.14945678]

>>14945571
I'm not lying, the data proves it:

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/No-evidence-for-globally-coherent-warm-and-cold-the-Neukom-Steiger/52318c47b5282a58cc9e7c56c0994831be9e998f

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5505119/

You will neither refute any of this or present any data to support your claim. You're the only one who's lying.

[Anonymous No.14945692]

>>14945574
It doesn't matter what your life depends on if you don't have a scientific methodology for data collection and analysis. You don't even understand what we're discussing. The global climate is not in your geographical area. It doesn't matter how many excuses you make for why you need to ignore the data. This is not a cycle, it's completely against the natural cycle in both timing and magnitude. And we already know what causes it: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020GL091585

[Anonymous No.14945738]

>>14945184
climate disruption is an intentional geoengineering agenda the miollions of flights dumping shit into the atmosphere over almost every inhabited strip of the planet doesn't happen by accident

[Anonymous No.14945740]

>>14945738
OK schizo

[Anonymous No.14945870]

>>14945468
c'mon, the Loch Ness monster deserves some vacation, too!

[Anonymous No.14946042]

>>14944602
natural selection does not have a 'preference,' it just is. if the whole world over become inhospitable to life besides niche tiny little rodents and lizards, then the rest will die. you probably cling onto some mysterious feeling of anthropocentrism, however it is nothing but a sometimes-useful belief system that just so happened to get us this far into industrialization, at the rest of the world's peril.

[Anonymous No.14947452]

>>14945574
>When your life depends on knowing long-term and short-term trends in your geographical area
Farmers depend on a lot of things they can't control. They put seed in the ground and pray, simple as

[Anonymous No.14947496]

>>14944305
>>14944342

[Anonymous No.14947566]

>>14945571
It doesnt matter, chill bro.

[Anonymous No.14947574]

>>14944305
myocardium right?

[Anonymous No.14947588]

>>14944367
>Think about the poor dead browns bro it' s all your fault
Die kike

[Anonymous No.14947596]

>>14947574
Summer Vagina

[Anonymous No.14947808]

>>14945201
>I think it also has a lot to do with the loss of agrarian society. Farmer's almanacs have a much more incisive view on the climate and local weather patterns and trends than any climate soientist will, because they've been updated for (in some cases) over 1000 years of empirical observations.
>There's a good reason why rural people don't buy into the hysteria. They read better sources and know more about nature's cycles.
Excellent points anon. That would certainly explain the disconnect with reality that urban people have.

[Anonymous No.14947810]

>>14947452
>They put seed in the ground and pray, simple as
Michael Bloomberg, is that you? kek

[Anonymous No.14948272]

>>14944440
2/3 of the planet is covered with oceans
and the oceans are much cooler
https://youtu.be/Mc_4Z1oiXhY?t=14m30s

[Anonymous No.14948357]

>>14948272
Is he wearing a leather jacket?

[Anonymous No.14948408]

>>14948357
found the faggot

[Anonymous No.14948612]

>>14944915
>You would need a proxy to determine it's not natural.
No, we determined that by direct observation: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020GL091585

You're just ignoring the evidence I gave you instead of responding to it.

>These spikes might be totally normal.
Massive CO2 emissions from fossil fuels are not normal.

>ice cores do lack the resolution to provide data on short periods like our temporary warming.
Wrong. Temperature reconstructions using multiple proxies have high enough resolution to detect similar spikes:

https://tamino.wordpress.com/2013/04/03/smearing-climate-data/

[Anonymous No.14948659]

>>14948612
You are wrong about everything

[Anonymous No.14948703]

>>14948659
Not an argument, try again.

[Anonymous No.14948822]

>>14948612
>No, we determined that by direct observation
You directly observed the climate during the last glacial cycle? I didn't know we had time travel.

[Anonymous No.14949390]

>>14948822
Climatologists directly observed that the cause of the increased radiative forcing is CO2 emissions. Why do you continue to avoid the evidence?

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020GL091585

[Anonymous No.14949449]

>>14949390
They don't even factor cloud cover albedo into their models. I think they're retarded and they have no idea how the climate works, so they can't determine anything like that.

[Anonymous No.14949457]

>>14949449
>They don't even factor cloud cover albedo into their models.
Why are you lying?

>I think they're retarded and they have no idea how the climate works, so they can't determine anything like that.
Nice projection.

[Anonymous No.14951153]

>>14949457
>Graph source: my asshole.
https://phys.org/news/2020-09-clouds-piece-climate-puzzle.html

[Anonymous No.14951176]

>>14944293
CliMatE chAnGe is just neurotic religion, same as how people for thousands of years would pray and flog themselves and fast before the winter solstice, hoping to "bring back the sun".

[Anonymous No.14951327]

>>14944293
Default human behavior is to do nothing. Doesn't really matter since we'll probably get AGI in the next few decades and it'll all be over then.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSXIetP5iak

[Anonymous No.14951333]

Humanity is a tropical species. Life is comfortable for us in the warm regions of the world and harsh for us in the cold regions. The more ice melts and the more the world heats the better for our species.

[Anonymous No.14951341]

>>14951153
>>Graph source: my asshole.
Another lie. The source is AR6.

[Anonymous No.14951343]

>>14951333
The sad part is that warming periods like this are always followed by an abrupt freeze. We need to enjoy the prosperity the warmth will give us while we can, instead of squandering it and artificially cooling the world.

[Anonymous No.14951350]

>>14951176
The climate is observably warming. Why are you denying basic scientific facts on the science board?

[Anonymous No.14952782]

>SAVE ME BLACK S O Y E N C E MAN AAAAAAAAA
lmaooo!!!

[Anonymous No.14953128]

>>14944367
>Based on our estimates in the next 50 years we will no longer be able to feed everyone
We already can't feed everyone and nobody gives a shit. Currently over 50% of the world population can't afford a healthy diet.
These statistics take Africa and SEA into account not developed countries.

[Anonymous No.14953132]

>>14944367
>All to make a few billionaires more wealthy by tricking you to buy more coal and oil.
Muh oil barons. Get a grip lol. The world is owned by finance and the small clique of people who control financial institutions, and finance implicitly supports the green agenda and depopulation.

[Anonymous No.14953206]

>>14944293
Dumb fuck take on poorly made out caricatures and hand-me down contrarian buzzword bullshit.

But hey, just keep zooming it up zoomshit.

[Anonymous No.14953716]

>>14953128
>Currently over 50% of the world population can't afford a healthy diet
and it is going to get worse.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19131626/

[Anonymous No.14955247]

>>14944293
Histrionics is how governments and their billionaire controllers get people to lap up propaganda.

[Anonymous No.14955772]

>>14951333
You don't only need tropic temperatures to get a tropic climate, you also need tropic precipitation.
You won't get that through climate change.

[Anonymous No.14956967]

[Anonymous No.14957035]

>>14951350
>The climate is observably warming. Why are you denying basic scientific facts on the science board?
HAHAHAHHAAHA No credible data says any such thing.

The uncredible data is akin to measuring temperature just in the morning and saying "Omagherd! It keeps getting hotter! By noon it will be scorching and won't stop unless we pray to the sun god to stop the heating! Must sacrifice! Flog yourself!"

[Anonymous No.14957037]

>>14944367
>All to make a few billionaires more wealthy by tricking you to buy more coal and oil.
Might want to check out what else Jews do and control.

[Anonymous No.14957041]

>>14944293
.... based

[Anonymous No.14957042]

>>14944390
>Harvard University
Completely illegitimate source of scientific information. They are a business, and in the business of making money via fraud and scams.

Harvard was behind the Wuhan Laboratory creation/leak of Covid-19.

Harvard is completely discredited these days and forever will bear a tainted reputation.

[Anonymous No.14957049]

>>14953716
>nlm.nih.gov
KEK! only .gov idiots still quote that source.
The covid-scam exposed it as being complete shit and full of shitbags.

[Anonymous No.14957055]

>>14955772
>you also need tropic precipitation.
>You won't get that through climate change.
Warmer it gets, the more it rains. The more it rains, the less it heats up, and stays static around 80F.
Is called "the tropics", you know, where most of humanity lives and originated from.

[Anonymous No.14957123]

>climatologists
not real science eat a dick lol

[Anonymous No.14957158]

>>14944316
darwinism is an explanation for natural phenomena not a moral doctrine
hot take: everyone who has ever died for lack of evolved traits morally "should" have been saved, and nature was in the moral wrong

[Anonymous No.14957183]

>>14957049
Point out a single error in the paper. Oh wait, you can't.

[Anonymous No.14957193]

>>14951350
Lol. Humans have such a limited perspective of everything. Modern humans more than most. Modern humans are the most absolutely lied to and propagandized cattle in all of history.

[Anonymous No.14957202]

>>14957193
Yep.
And coral reefs are being destroyed by the "crown of thorns" starfish, that Chinese fishing ships and international shipping container ships are spreading.
Anyone who lives near reefs knows this fact.

[Anonymous No.14957206]

>>14957183
>Point out a single error in the paper.
The entire fraudulent paper is an error. They have no credibility and are corrupted by big corporate interests.

[Anonymous No.14957208]

>>14957193
>poses as a counter to depopulation agenda
>demands depopulation
Yeah, sure, how about we do it with your ethnicity first?

[Anonymous No.14957232]

>>14957206
So you have no other issues other than the fact that the article's available on PubMed?

[Anonymous No.14957300]

>>14957208
I'm not posing as anything. I'm stating the objective truth. Humans are insanely overpopulated, but they're also lying with every waking breath about everything. The two are not opposites.

[Anonymous No.14957307]

>>14957232
nih.gov
keep up moron.

[Anonymous No.14957337]

>>14957307
Okay, so you have a problem with *.nih.gov.
Your whining is unjustified, because the article actually comes from the Science magazine. Thanks for playing.

[Anonymous No.14957534]

>>14957337
>it's from the Science magazine! Reeeeeeeeeeeee!
oh well in that case... sounds soooooooooo credible. "The Science Magazine!" KEK!

If the government shills it via the NIH, then it is lies, garbage, and shit. Same as your brains and reasoning skills.

[Anonymous No.14958178]

>>14957534
>more schizobabble
Just to confirm: you cannot point out a single error in the paper, can you?

[Anonymous No.14960118]

>>14958178
Just to confirm, you cannot point out a single fact in the "paper". KEK!

[Anonymous No.14960170]

>>14957193
So you're not going to respond to anything I actually said. Thanks for admitting I'm right.

[Anonymous No.14960173]

>>14957158
>Nature is morally wrong
Litterbugs are the real hero's.

[Anonymous No.14960174]

>>14960170
>I'm right.
>I stroke my own ego since nobody else will.
The mating call of the midtwit. kek

[Anonymous No.14960175]

>>14957035
>No credible data says any such thing.
I already gave you credible data. Even prominent "skeptics" endorsed Berkeley Earth's analysis.

>The uncredible data
Proof?

[Anonymous No.14960179]

>>14960175
>gave you credible data
Not that anon, but there has been no credible data in this thread yet supporting any of your assertations. Ever stopped to think perhaps the entire theory is flawed?

[Anonymous No.14960180]

>>14960170
Such as?

[Anonymous No.14960182]

>>14960174
See >>14960170

[Anonymous No.14960186]

>>14960175
>Berkeley
LMAO!

[Anonymous No.14960198]

>>14960179
>Not that anon, but there has been no credible data in this thread yet supporting any of your assertations.
Why are you lying? I've posted plenty of credible data. You won't name a single thing wrong with any of it.

>>14951350
>>14949457
>>14949390
>>14945678
>>14944944
>>14944856

>Ever stopped to think perhaps the entire theory is flawed?
Of course, every time I read one of these threads I'm forced to consider whether the theory is flawed. Unfortunately every single argument against it I've read is hopelessly stupid and easily refuted. What's yours?

[Anonymous No.14960202]

>>14960180
The post you tried to respond to but failed.

[Anonymous No.14960204]

>>14960186
Not an argument. Thanks for admitting I'm right.

[Anonymous No.14960213]

>>14960202
With "arguments" like this, how could you ever be wrong?

State what is making your pussy itch clearly instead of trying to be a smug NPC.

[Anonymous No.14960427]

>>14946042
Ok cool fanfic brainbro but you're responding to a guy saying we should let people die if they are weak and can't handle the temp change. That is natural selection at work, it's blind but if you can't meet the cut off for something then the ones that can will and then spread their genes. Anthropocentrism has nothing to do with it, suggesting there are no humans or other animals really aside from a couple of outliers that can survive is asanine and you should feel bad.

[Anonymous No.14960527]

>>14960118
>a single fact
"Experimental and crop-based models for major grains in these regions show direct yield losses in the range of 2.5 to 16% for every 1C increase in seasonal temperature."

This wasn't very hard, was it. Since you've failed to provide a single error yourself, I'm going to assume that the paper's trustworthy.

[Anonymous No.14960529]

>>14960213
Why are you throwing a tantrum over going back a few posts in the conversation?

[Anonymous No.14960922]

>>14960529
>I'M NOT SEETHING
>YOU'RE THE SEETHE!
Bro you're not even stating an opinion. All you're doing is spazzing literally every post.

[Anonymous No.14960961]

>>14960922
I did state an opinion. You've done nothing but avoid it and pretend it doesn't exist, even though you only have to go back a few posts in the conversation, before you started deflecting to see it. LOL

>>14951350

[Anonymous No.14961102]

>>14944367
Luckily I live in the first world where all these problems can be mitigated by our money and technology. The rest of the world can go fuck itself

[Anonymous No.14961109]

>>14944371
I don't know about you but I need to have sex before I die first.

[Anonymous No.14961118]

>>14961102
>the rest of the world will immigrate next to me
fixed

[Anonymous No.14961333]

>>14961118
kek

[Anonymous No.14961382]

>>14960961
Ah, so you're retarded. Now zoom out. You clearly didn't fucking read the infographic. As your "question" (histrionic screeching) was pretty obviously answered there.

[Anonymous No.14962002]

>>14961382
>Now zoom out.
Why? Humans haven't even existed for most of that graph.

>You clearly didn't fucking read the infographic.
What infographic?

[Anonymous No.14962022]

>>14962002
Why would I care about that?

>What infographic?
You have the fucking nerve to throw a tantrum for 4 posts about someone not reading your nonsense when you didn't even read the thing you're throwing a hissy fit about? Jesus christ, deliver us from blue board cretins.

[Anonymous No.14962036]

>>14961382
Fuck! The world is way too cold according to past temperatures and science.

No wonder the globalists want to prevent it warming up, because it will make the entire planet a garden of eden again.

[Anonymous No.14962039]

>>14960198
>>>14951350
>>>14949457
>>>14949390
>>>14945678
>>>14944944
>>>14944856
nice grouping of all the big corporate big oil garbage posts by the leftist .gov shill.

Climate Change = HOAX by big oil and government to keep temperatures cold so we keep spending more money on staying warm.

FUCK THE FASCIST RICH DEMOCRATS!

[Anonymous No.14962050]

>>14962036
It objectively is. A tropical planet supports more life than one trapped in an ice age. The globaldipshits don't really want to prevent anything. Like everything in this house of cards, it's just yet another scam to get more money + control the population more. Literally every single thing the demons running this planet into hell do is for those two things: milk the population of money while tightening the leash/noose.

[Anonymous No.14962059]

>>14962050
>The globaldipshits don't really want to prevent anything. Like everything in this house of cards, it's just yet another scam to get more money + control the population more. Literally every single thing the demons running this planet into hell do is for those two things: milk the population of money while tightening the leash/noose.
A fucking Men dude, Amen. And a billion+ people are getting really pissed about it.

[Anonymous No.14962073]

>>14962059
It won't be long now.

[Anonymous No.14962088]

>>14962073
Tuning up muh banjo and firing up the grill

[Anonymous No.14962097]

>>14962088
I'm bringing the tambourine.

[Anonymous No.14962108]

>>14962097
Fuck yeah! Gwanna be a real hootenanny and human BBQ fest!

[Anonymous No.14962527]

>>14944367
>The problem is that we're not sea birds. We can't simply travel inland and settle, you're talking about the loss of millions of homes around the world
Already happened. They're all dead now.
>Who's going to pay for new houses inland?
>Not to mention people who's lives depend on water runoff from glacial meltwater which they won't have anymore as the glaciers disappear.
No one. Besides, they're not going to make it inland. They'll make it until their gas tanks are empty after many of them are idling in traffic jams. Then they'll leave their cars and make it maybe 25-30 km at most destroying the countryside around them before succumbing to hunger and thirst. The most effictive thing is actually to create blockades to limit the damage these people will do.
>These people will show up in your backyard because you made their lands unlivable.
The problem with that rhetoric is that they won't make it there.
>you made their lands unlivable.
Lol. This is even worse. In developed countries, the majority of people, hence the majority of electricity, gas, etc. users tend to live in coastal cities. Given the popularly believed hypothesis on climate change they caused their own destruction. It does you no good to start to blame other people. And no, we are not in this together. We never were. Now fuck off.