Why is it what it is and what does it mean?

[Anonymous No.14883865]

pic related.

[Anonymous No.14883868]

>>14883865
Means that you need to take your meds schizo.

[Anonymous No.14883875]

>>14883868
its the fine structure constant you retarded spaz

[Anonymous No.14883905]

>>14883875
su fucking schizo

[Anonymous No.14883960]

The velocity of an electron in the lowest orbital is 137 times slower than the speed of light;

And what forces the electron in this orbit is, that the electron is somehow attracted to (whatever positive charge actually physically is and how it works) nucleus, but not so much to crash into it

So it is said positive is attracted to negative, like an anvil is attracted to the surface of the earth, but at the end of this latter attraction is stability and rest.

Why do, or do they, electrons orbit nucleus, and not attracted straight stick like glue,or anvil to earth. I geuss fractional negative charge quark/s always shoot photons at electrons.

Or, electron is geometrically attracted into nucleus space, like moon is attracted to earths space;

Moon is attracted to earths core, like the anvil.

[Anonymous No.14884017]

>>14883865
137 turns out to have neat mathematical properties so maybe it's just convenient for running a simulation

[frenanon No.14886052]

>>14883960
>(whatever positive charge actually physically is and how it works)
I imagine it's like if you stood at the North Pole and looked at the ground, it would look like it's spinning the opposite direction compared to standing at the South Pole and looking at the ground.

>Why do, or do they, electrons orbit nucleus, and not attracted straight stick like glue,or anvil to earth. I geuss fractional negative charge quark/s always shoot photons at electrons.
Maybe their angular momentum is significantly greater than their linear momentum?

>Moon is attracted to earths core,
For all we know, the moon is actually ''attracted'' to the edge of the atmosphere.

[Anonymous No.14886065]

>>14883960
The wavefunction of an electron can actually be inside the nucleus. So it possible for an electron to be inside a proton and then turn that proton into a neutron.

[Anonymous No.14886081]

>>14883865

[Anonymous No.14886151]

>>14883865
0.007299270072992700729927007299270072992700729927007299270072992700729927007299270072992700729927007299270072992700729927007299270072992700729927007299270072992700729927007299270072992700729927...

[Anonymous No.14886155]

So this is /sci/'s new meme number after -1/12 and 0.999...

[Anonymous No.14886286]

gee i wonder who's been posting all these threads
>picrel

[Anonymous No.14886299]

>>14886155
>So this is /sci/'s new meme number after -1/12 and 0.999...
I don't think so

[Anonymous No.14886305]

>>14883865
It's the 0x5F3759DF of our universe's rendering engine.

[Anonymous No.14886343]

>>14883960
How has anyone managed to measure the velocity of an orbiting electron? When they act more like clouds of uncertainty than particles, and you can't slow down or freeze time to study an atom

[Anonymous No.14886725]

>>14886343
>How has anyone managed to measure the velocity of an orbiting electron? When they act more like clouds of uncertainty than particles, and you can't slow down or freeze time to study an atom
Maybe related to the amount of energy and force it imparts when you stick something in its orbit;
And pulling it out with magnets maybe

[Anonymous No.14886737]

>>14883865
We're just in that part of the multiverse where it's that particular value.

[Anonymous No.14887927]

If you had a pure negative and pure positive charge and introduced them would they tightly stick together surface touching surface?

[Anonymous No.14887934]

>>14886737
Shut the fuck up worthless talentless trash

[Anonymous No.14887942]

>>14883875
>>14883865
Its not the fine structure constant, that would be approximately 1/137.036

[Anonymous No.14887965]

>>14887934
The multiverse is real, get over it retard

[Anonymous No.14889365]

>>14883960
Velocity of electron is measured partly by the energy of it's impact? But also it's mass.

Light is said to have no mass, so pure energy impacts, a number of pure velocity;

Different Light collides into a detector with different forces of impact

Different energies.

Electron impacts detector with different energies.