/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.14878654]

Science is freaking amazing!

[Anonymous No.14878659]

>>14878654
Why they pollute the space?

[Anonymous No.14878660]

>>14878654
Yeah bro Science isn't real, you're computer and phone and car run off of Magic

[Anonymous No.14878715]

>>14878660
Mechanisms > Electronics

[the chair nerd No.14878720]

>>14878654
They even hired Taliban experts to pilot the damn thing

[Anonymous No.14878725]

>crash billion dollar space craft
>pretend you did it on purpose
A-amazing hah hah.. ..

[Anonymous No.14878980]

>>14878660
you're trying to sound smart but all modern technology is based on satanic sorceries

[Anonymous No.14878983]

>>14878980
That's a good thing

[Anonymous No.14879021]

>>14878725
WE GAAN

[Anonymous No.14879042]

>>14878654
So was it just to see if they could hit in the first place or to see if they could alter the trajectory?
Did they alter it that much if so?
Looks like a asphalt potato kinda neat

[Anonymous No.14879047]

>>14879042
It is to see how much it moves by and if astorid nukes are worth investing in.

[Anonymous No.14879185]

>>14879042
The latter, and they don’t know yet it's the next step in the mission, they'll observe it over the coming weeks. It's expected to be a very small change in trajectory.

[Anonymous No.14879202]

>>14879047
>astorid nukes
aren't asteroids pretty soft due to low gravity?
nuking one would be like using a grenade to "gently push" a spoonful of mashed potatoes

[Anonymous No.14879214]

>>14878654
>>14879042
>>14879185
>>14879202
It’s just a waste of money. It’s completely obvious to anyone that if you introduce energy into a system in space, then it will change its trajectory by an amount relative to its size/energy.
They should’ve gone all out and nuked an asteroid.

[Anonymous No.14879239]

>>14879214
saying its possible to kick an asteroid and having a tested-to-work system that is ready to kick an asteroid are two very different things

[Anonymous No.14879260]

>>14878654
This is fake. No camera can auto-focus itself so quickly to get high-resolution images of the asteroid. The spacecraft was speeding 24,000 km/h apparently.

More like it's a blender animation.

[Anonymous No.14879471]

>>14879260
Christcucks cope

[Anonymous No.14879832]

>>14878654
Are there any third party impact images yet?

[Anonymous No.14879887]

>>14879214
oops, turns out asteroids are less consolidated than you expected and absorb the energy of the impact, good thing you didn't test in advance, now everyone is dead

[Anonymous No.14879891]

>>14879260
No focus is necessary, just focus to infinity and you'll get decent images of anything that's more than a few meters away.

[Anonymous No.14879936]

>>14879887
If an asteroid was heading towards earth, we would have to send several nukes at it on a regularly scheduled basis in order to destroy it (so that the fragments would burn up in the atmosphere) or move it off course so that it misses the earth.

NASA should be focusing on asteroid mining and helping establish a space economy that generates revenue.

[Anonymous No.14879951]

>>14878980
garbage bait.

[Anonymous No.14880015]

>>14879260
it looks absolutely retarded to me too. i hate this gay ass earth man this is bullshit

[Anonymous No.14880016]

>>14878654

[Anonymous No.14880032]

i hate being a schizo weirdo but this seems liek absolute nonsense. a god damn scam to fool the unbelievably retarded population of earth into believing humans are capable of anything. or is this real? could this be real? i dont even know if i can be convinced honestly this just seems retarded

[Anonymous No.14880153]

Now coming in: trolls that say space is not real. the absolute state of this board.

[Anonymous No.14880168]

>>14880153
nou

[Anonymous No.14880223]

LOOK AT THOSE GIGANTIC FUCKING TITS

[Anonymous No.14880286]

>>14878654
It's nice. I don't really like the kamikaze method but I guess those spacecrafts are way less expensive than the ones that would be used in the other considered methods.

[Anonymous No.14880306]

>>14879260
Besides, what kind of weird camera is that? This spacecraft travelled with around 6 kilometers per second.

If I were looking to the sky and see a plane 10km above me, it's super super tiny. If I launch myself to the plane, after 1.5 seconds or 9 of 10km the plane will still look tiny. 100m before the crash, the plane will be large enough to see any details.

And this spacecraft could do that from thousands of kilometres away? Really? Travelling towards the system, fairly good details along with Didymos, then suddenly you see the whole surface of the tiny moon then it takes another 10 seconds of impact instead of 1 or less? Looks fishy to me.

[Anonymous No.14880314]

>>14880286
I think it's more about being less time intensive. It takes way more time to train a group of astronauts to do a "Armageddon" style solution than send a bunch of satellites to change trajectory.

[Anonymous No.14881548]

>>14880306
>And this spacecraft could do that from thousands of kilometres away?
Maybe the lack of atmosphere?

[Anonymous No.14881578]

>>14878659
Where the hell else should we pollute?

[Anonymous No.14883355]

>>14880306
it's bigger than a plane, retard

[Anonymous No.14883367]

>>14880306
>>14880448

[Anonymous No.14883381]

>>14883355
Yeah. Twice the diameter of a plane.

[Anonymous No.14883599]

>>14878980
bugmen cant cope

[Anonymous No.14884886]

>>14878660
Neither run off astronomy

Isn't it curious how billions of dollars are wasted on space and astronomy but don't on studying this actual planet? Who of you even heard what is happening with the magnetic field?

[Anonymous No.14885029]

>>14880306
Just because you don't know what focal length is doesn't mean it's fishy.

[Anonymous No.14885035]

>>14883599
>>14885029
yes, we get it, you fuckin' love sòyence...

[Anonymous No.14885043]

>>14879936
>space economy
this niga watched too much cowboy bebop!

[Anonymous No.14885047]

>>14879936
>nukes
nukes are fake you retard...

[Anonymous No.14885069]

>>14885035
yes, we get it, you're a contrarian retard

[Anonymous No.14885080]

>>14885069
he's a lincucks user too...

[Anonymous No.14885088]

>>14878654
It's all so tiresome.
Truly. I can't take it anymore, bros.

[Anonymous No.14887862]

bump

[Anonymous No.14887937]

>>14887862
lmao that space shit is so fucking boring and worthless that even OP can't come up with a legitimate reply to vainly bump his tedious, unwanted space shit thread with.
we would have a far better board if empty bumps of vanity threads weren't permitted, good posters do not resort to those types of manipulative tactics.