is universe computable?

[Anonymous No.14828761]

[Anonymous No.14828763]

Compute my balls

[Anonymous No.14828772]

>>14828763
>null pointer exception

[Anonymous No.14828796]

I feel a profound sense of disgust that a fat disgusting piece of lard like Alonzo amounted to anything in math and sciences. It feels like an insult to me personally; I feel nauseous when looking at him.

[Anonymous No.14828805]

>>14828761
Physics implies computation but computation doesn't imply physics.

[Anonymous No.14828818]

>>14828805
>Physics implies computation

[Anonymous No.14828821]

>>14828818
The universe isn't computable

[Anonymous No.14828975]

>>14828761
Is it? I don't know dude, it seems to me that there are way too many unexplained phenomena to make that assertion. If we do live in a simulation, than it's likely some thing built it, and if that's true, a "creator" or "creators" exist. Is science being mogged by prophets from thousands of years ago? I mean, they did argue without a doubt that something called god made the whole thing.

[Anonymous No.14829148]

>>14828761
not it isn't, the computer is inside the universe so that ruins it, makes it fundamentally impossible and this can all be proved analytically, it was done ages ago by the greeks

[Anonymous No.14829182]

>>14828761
>Is universe computable
Hello again Alex. I see that your English is still giving you problems...

[Anonymous No.14829751]

>>14828761
The universe may be finite and computable.

https://b-ok.cc/book/2722003/13a41d

[Anonymous No.14829827]

Only certain subsets of the universe.

[Anonymous No.14829832]

>>14828796
>fat disgusting piece of lard
you saying anything about his personality or are you just reaching here to make fun of some overweight guy

[Anonymous No.14829840]

>>14829148
I'm not claiming the world is a computable program, but this is retarded. There is a universality to Turing machines. You can run a Turing machine on another Turing machine. You can run a computer using other computers. This is a mundane fact given that programming languages are themselves a representation of a Turing machine - your OS is a machine that runs on an electrical machine on the user's behalf, and the languages it runs are all machines that run on the OS.

[Anonymous No.14830616]

>>14828761
Yes, but not necessarily in your preferred way.

[Nivea Corporation No.14830624]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulexite
Ulexity, also known as Television Stone, is made of optical fibers.

[Anonymous No.14830680]

>>14828761
No.

[Anonymous No.14831843]

>>14828796
okay, now your meds

[frenanon No.14832021]

>>14828761
>destroy universe
>nothing left to compute
>It's not Turing incomplete at least
I mean, we don't even know what the weather will be like in a month.

[Anonymous No.14832145]

>>14829832
AHAHAHAHAHAHA
found the fatty
Post body, retard

[Anonymous No.14832615]

>>14828761
Here's a good start with regard to related info. This one is from the perspective of a bottoms up, microcausal simulation, which is not the most efficient with regard to processing power needed. Still of interest though if you want to pursue this subject.

The Physical World as a Virtual Reality
https://brianwhitworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Quantum-Realism-Part1.pdf

[Anonymous No.14832618]

>>14828761
Yes obviously, just not from within the universe. It's exactly like how no human brain can ever fully 100% understand itself, as there's simply more information needed to describe the brain and its mechanisms than can be stored in the brain.

[Anonymous No.14832636]

>>14832618
>Yes obviously, just not from within the universe
Right. The computer can not be in the virtual space that it computers. It must be non-local with respect to the virtual spacetime. And the consciousnesses which are interfacing with the reality through immersion are also not 'in' the spacetime. We are just given this perspective in a sort of first person shooter type scenerio.
>>14828761
Another good link OP

Universe creation on a computer
https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0511116.pdf

[Anonymous No.14832646]

>>14828761
Here is another whitworth one about time and space

Simulating Space and Time
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1011.5499.pdf

[Anonymous No.14832655]

>>14828761
Another one

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.1847.pdf
Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.1847.pdf

[Anonymous No.14832658]

>>14828761
Here's another one. This one is from a very famous guy in the AI world, Jurgen Schmidhuber. It assumes that minds are also simulated, which is false, and it is from a many worlds perspective, which is false, but the paper is still very interesting.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/9904050.pdf

[Anonymous No.14832677]

>>14828761
This is a classic

The structure of the world from pure numbers
http://www.math.tulane.edu/~tipler/theoryofeverything.pdf

[Anonymous No.14832693]

>>14828761
This is the most important one. It is a paper describing experiments currently underway to test the virtual reality conjecture.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.00058.pdf

Here is an example of one of the experiments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72qVppAoCc8