/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.14797197]

Okay, so, I finally bit the bullet and took this test. I hadn't for a long time because I was deathly terrified that I was actually a low-iq brainlet autist who just had preternatural savant abilities. Is this test bullshit or should I hire a psychologist to give me a WAIS-IV?

[Anonymous No.14797213]

>>14797197
people always say internet tests are fake but the good ones are good
I'm scoring 130-137 and my mother about 100 and each people has his score, if they were fake it would be obvious

[Anonymous No.14797281]

>>14797197
142 isn't the end of the world, anon.
It's toward the higher end of the midwit range, and it offers some percentile cope.
You'll be okay.

[Anonymous No.14797288]

>>14797197
Get an actual psychologist proctored test. This online shit is fake.

[Anonymous No.14797295]

>>14797197
>Is this test bullshit or should I hire a psychologist to give me a WAIS-IV?
Why would you do that whether the online test is accurate or not? Knowing your IQ changes nothing.

[Anonymous No.14797311]

>>14797295
I disagree. It gives you a better idea of the potential you have and how far you can go down any given field. Somebody with an IQ of 95 is not going to make a good engineer.

[Anonymous No.14797320]

>>14797295
Like I said in the OP I literally just wanted to know whether I was retarded or not. Its a major fear of mine.
>>14797288
I know online tests are bullshit because theyre not being proctored but this one is somehwat correlated with real IQ tests, being somewhat deflationary compared to the WAIS actually

[Anonymous No.14797338]

>>14797281
>percentile cope
i know youre trolling but what is this even supposed to mean?

[Anonymous No.14797355]

>>14797311
>It gives you a better idea of the potential you have and how far you can go down any given field.
Assuming it's a reliable indicator of potential. Feynman did okay despite being a midwit. If you get filtered by high school algebra, then you're probably not going to make it in STEM.

[Anonymous No.14797367]

>>14797338
He views IQ as a competition, and attempting to make people feel bad about the fact that they're only more intelligent than 99.9% of other people (or whatever degree of precision applies) helps him cope with being foreveralone.

[Anonymous No.14797369]

>>14797338
Just through some basic deduction, I've surmised that it means that 142 doesn't quite cut it, but you can still cope by telling yourself you're a 1/400 rarity.

[Anonymous No.14797372]

>>14797197
>low spatial
Unfortunately, you’re still a midwit. See https://infoproc.blogspot.com/2022/02/annals-of-psychometry-wordcels-and.html?m=1

[Anonymous No.14797386]

>>14797213
Yeah, some are decent. Cambridge brain science used to have a good free one. Had 3 different categories, all of which I scored in the top 1% on. So I figured it was probably not very useful. Had a few friends try it out, and they scored about where I has estimated their IQs to be. The first time I had a midwit friend try it, I was actually very surprised to see that she scored around the 45th to 55th percentile. After that I tried it again but high as frick, and scored only in the 75th percentile (rather than 99th) on the most heavily memory loaded metric.

It's not like official IQ tests are perfect either, variation of say 10 points for the same individual is common. It's a ballpark, and anything beyond 130 is pretty much meaningless outside of very taxing fields.

[Anonymous No.14797453]

>>14797367
You view IQ as a competition too. It's just that you're proud of winning the paralympics.

[Anonymous No.14797458]

>>14797453
Tell us more about your highly superior IQ. How did you pay for it? Face? Height? Dick length? Autism?

[Anonymous No.14797468]

>>14797372
What's your full score?

[Anonymous No.14797470]

>>14797338
There are expected to be around 250,000 people in the world with an IQ of 160 ALONE, not even considering the expected total for people over 142.
The midwit percentile coper does something no self-respecting physical athlete does: takes pride in not even making the world top million. He prides himself on being smarter than some other midwits and brainlets, for which the world has an inexhaustible supply.

[Anonymous No.14797474]

>>14797458
>Tell us more about your highly superior IQ.
Poor reading comprehension always outs the midwit.

[Anonymous No.14797492]

>>14797474
Is this the part where you tell me that ackshually you can identify midwits despite being a dimwit yourself?

[Anonymous No.14797501]

>>14797492
Did you know a patzer in chess can often see when another patzer has committed a gross blunder?
I'm demoting you from midwit to brainlet.

[Anonymous No.14797532]

>>14797453
>Paralympics
"Tri-County Championship" would be a more apt comparison. Wouldn't give you that ableist insult you're looking for, of course, but if your ego really needs salving that badly, you could just throw a "retard" in the mix.
>>14797470
>takes pride
Why arbitrarily exclude the possibility of dispassionate discussion of IQ?

[Anonymous No.14797537]

>>14797453
>>14797532
Though a "retard" would compete in the Special Olympics, not the Paralympics. So I don't know, maybe try "cripple" or "gimpy" instead.

[Anonymous No.14797546]

>>14797532
>Why arbitrarily exclude the possibility of dispassionate discussion of IQ?
Do you know what the "coper" in "midwit percentile coper" means, retard?

[Anonymous No.14797557]

>>14797532
>ableist insult
you have to go back
>exclude muh dispassionate
lol, peak pseud
he/she is talking about copers, and copers by definition arent dispassionate
behold the power of libshit argumentation when deplatforming and dislike pile-ons arent available as crutches

[Anonymous No.14797699]

>>14797546
>>14797557
>muh copers
The conversation didn't start with "copers exist," it started with "this particular anon is coping." OP doesn't seem to be coping, if anything they seem pleasantly surprised. Now, as you certified geniuses have pointed out, my point about arbitrarily excluding dispassionate discussion would itself exclude coping. That's why the post was logically equivalent to "why assume it's a cope?" I do apologize if that was asking too much of you.

[Anonymous No.14797747]

Am I a midwit?

[Anonymous No.14797870]

>>14797747
unironically peak middlebrained

[Anonymous No.14797915]

>>14797699
What the fuck are you talking about, you retard?
The post you replied to (>>14797470) was a response to a post asking what percentile cope means (>>14797470), which in turn was a response to a post saying that a 142 OFFERS some percentile cope. Do you know the difference between "OFFERS some percentile cope" and "this particular anon IS coping," you retard?
You could just say "Sorry, I misread >>14797470" instead of trying to spin your way out of your retarded attempt at a gotcha.

[Anonymous No.14797920]

>>14797699
What the fuck are you talking about, you retard?
The post you replied to (>>14797470) was a response to a post asking what percentile cope means (>>14797338), which in turn was a response to a post (>>14797281
) saying that a 142 OFFERS some percentile cope. Do you know the difference between "OFFERS some percentile cope" and "this particular anon IS coping," you retard?
You could just say "Sorry, I misread >>14797470" instead of trying to spin your way out of your retarded attempt at a gotcha.

[Anonymous No.14797923]

>>14797915
>offers vs. is
Okay, fair point.

[Anonymous No.14797934]

>>14797923
Don't concede a point to me. Fight like a man, you asshole. Internet warfare is to the death.

[Anonymous No.14797938]

>>14797934
Good night, Anon.

[Anonymous No.14797946]

>>14797934
I'll fight you, bitch! What are we arguing about?

[Anonymous No.14797953]

>>14797501
whatever you are, you talk like a fedora tipping faggot

[Anonymous No.14797964]

>>14797953
fedoras don't use the word far-right term 'midwit', boy

[Anonymous No.14797973]

>>14797964
>fedoras don't use the word far-right term 'midwit', boy
-word
sorry for my moronspeak
anyway, point is that he's one of yours, not one of ours
*tip*

[Anonymous No.14797975]

>>14797197
everyone here trying to be smart talking about fucking test scores.

the real test of a man is what he's able to get done, and the quality of his reason. most of these people, despite being surprisingly high IQ, have nothing to show for it.

[Anonymous No.14798083]

>>14797975
How much you achieved is relative to you life situation and how you were raised. Some people had great parents, and they were able to graduate college at 18, then proceed to have successful career at 21. Others might have been less fortunate, despite being more genetically gifted.
IQ tells you your max potential while ignoring environment circumstances. People brushing off IQ are often pampered urbanite midwits that had rich and caring parents. They don't know how good they had it, and they think that they own their success thanks to purely their own will, and not environmental circumstances.

[Anonymous No.14798175]

>>14798083
what you do isn't a sum of your circumstances, it's what you do. circumstances can help and hinder a lot, but ultimately it's your decision, and therefore your merit.

nobody should be impressed with what the test says your 'potential' is. and i would agree that they shouldn't be impressed with your environmental circumstances, either. Just your acts and results.

[Anonymous No.14798233]

>>14797747
You're so mid, you couldn't even score one standart deviation above average.

[Anonymous No.14798238]

>>14797197
iq is cope for midwits that think a number justify all their stupid beliefs.

> inb4 low iq cope
I took the test two years ago and im 154 you mongol

[Anonymous No.14798260]

>>14797197
is there any hope for increasing verbal by reading? I got max memory and near max spacial but pretty average in verbal

[Anonymous No.14798262]

>>14798238
the test caps at 150

[Anonymous No.14798268]

>>14797197
>IQ is the new horoscope but for atheists

[Anonymous No.14798271]

>>14798262
The standford binet test that has a standard deviation of 16 and i scored 3.37SD from average so aprox. 154

[Anonymous No.14798273]

Hi, I am the anon who was creating that personal study of visual memory and verbal memory of anons and other individuals to assess valid scores through percentiles. Unfortunately, that study is not super helpful due to the way I controlled the study, i.e no control group, n verification of legitimate IQ scores outside of those I know personally, and no conclusive data on how the percentiles of these websites work, or how they arrived to their conclusions at calculating sd. With around a hundred participants, I still have some conclusive data that can help you out! Internet IQ tests are inconclusive and are only meant to serve egotistical function - yet we can remove a large portion of cheating, false positives, and snark by only allowing real data tests - not static tests like most online internet tests are. The suggestion is as follows:

>Using humanbenchmark.com complete all the following games as many times as you like, with as much time as you want. As you continue to progress you will see noticeable improvement, but eventually, you will plateau. Plateau scores of the following indicate 145IQ approximation, and these scores are tenable due to the people who helped and participated with me by cross referencing WAISIV, WISCIII, SB variations, and Cattell - All of which provided proof of actual assessment. Numbers in (brackets) indicate ideal recommended scores to assume 145+, minimum scores are before the (brackets), also acceptable.

Sequence Memory - 40 (50)
Visual Memory - 30 (35)
Chimp Test - 30 (35)
Aim Trainer n/a (300)
Typing (monkeytype test) - 140wpm (150wpm)
Verbal Memory - 200 (400)
Number Memory - 20 (25)
Reaction Time - 150 (130)

--

Scoring these results indicates high ability in the relevant subset. Score all of them or near all of them and it is likely you would score 145IQ 15sd weighted on any of the above officially administered tests. Hope this helps someone.

[Anonymous No.14798280]

>>14797197
Dont take iq so seriously
Pic related is what happens when you are so retarded that you think having high iq makes you have the correct opinion

[Anonymous No.14798308]

>>14797320
>I literally just wanted to know whether I was retarded or not.
Well, you're not, they might not be really precise, but surely you're not a retard. Now gtfo.

[Anonymous No.14798467]

>>14797197
How inaccurate do IQ tests become the more they are taken?

[Anonymous No.14798481]

>>14798273
I find the verbal memory test annoying as I always score highest on my first attempt but then my info vore brain starts storing words from the first test, overlapping into repeated dictions upon retakes.

[Anonymous No.14798614]

>>14798273
Question for high IQs:
do you struggle for example at level 15 of the chimp test? I feel like I could get to level 30, but that would take like 2 hours.

[Anonymous No.14798633]

>>14798614
Hi 40 takes approximately three hours average, it also just depends on the person and what strategies they use. 40 is a good score, indicative of maxed subset for sure, 30 and 35 are fine though! The difference is you only need to do it once, retries are absolutely fine for all tests. Disclaimer: hardware can affect peak scores

[Anonymous No.14798656]

>>14798481
Yes though it seems all tests are affected by first use clarity. Researching anticipation and release, it’s likely chemical. No need to rush scores all in one day, take time and be comfortable, repeating with frequency and enjoyment, not test anxiety, :p

[Anonymous No.14800212]

>>14797747
I got 125 memory, 97 verbal, and 144 spatial. I am about to graduate as a master of technology, with grades better than the average. You will do fine, anon.

[Anonymous No.14800223]

>>14800212
Are you good at vidyas?

[Anonymous No.14800243]

>>14800223
yes, always have been

[Anonymous No.14800251]

>>14800243
How about at RTS?

[Anonymous No.14800767]

I do okay I guess. Took this test a while ago.
I have a masters in math.
Not sure what other info is relevant to post alongside the results.

[Anonymous No.14800780]

>>14800767
Had some other stuff saved in the same folder. Pic is from one of those mensa online tests.
My ASVAB AFQT score was a 97, which also correlates at 1.89 z score with SD of 15.

I mean, seems like these tests are pretty accurate.

[Anonymous No.14800787]

>>14798273
Was this human benchmark test about 4 months ago? I think I started but got bored. Maybe it will help you to tie in what I had with my results in the two other images above.

[Anonymous No.14800859]

>>14797197
TFW when ADHD is the only thing cucking you.

[Anonymous No.14800861]

>>14800767
Well you've got a near perfect spatial score so there's that. Have you ever tried improving your vocabulary or memory?

[Anonymous No.14800864]

>>14800859
Maybe I should've tried a little harder on the green square section of the test. I kind of flippantly blew through it so maybe that deflated my spatial score.

[Anonymous No.14800931]

>>14798238
Ah, the old "my IQ is actually high" play. It's a good stand-by play for the seething IQlet raging about IQ tests.

[Anonymous No.14800949]

>>14800861
Nah, don't really care about that. I definitely peaked in terms of my own accomplishments. Focus these days is enjoying life and getting the kids set up for theirs. I just make sure to be enthusiastic with their schoolwork, get them active and stuff.

[Anonymous No.14800985]

>>14797747
verbal test is a bit pointless for ESLs. Spatial and memory results had been similar to another test I took a while back, though.

[Anonymous No.14801135]

>>14797372
A turbo midwit because this was one of the easiest spatial tests I've ever taken and everybody is getting 140+.

[Anonymous No.14802634]

>>14797213
So the test where you score way higher than the average is the good one?
Your actual score like most of humans is somewhere around 100. You're not a special snowflake.

[Anonymous No.14802684]

>>14802634
.t only scored 100 online and is deathly afraid of doing one irl because his superiority complex hinges on his self perceived intellect

[Anonymous No.14802992]

[Anonymous No.14803538]

>>14802992
I refuse to believe you didn't cheat on the verbal IQ section.

[Anonymous No.14805316]

Why yes I am an ESL, how on God's green Earth could you possibly tell?

[Anonymous No.14805340]

>>14803538
Lol. NTA, but how the fuck is anyone struggling with this shit? For the vocab, 90% of the answers were the simple words that any native speaker should know. The esoteric words were almost all red herring. For the anagrams, it was just pattern recognition? 4 consonants and 1 vowel? Probably not a word. A and E? Probably a word. You know there are exactly 9 matches so you can work on unscrambling the likely candidates first and then move to the next most likely tier if there's still time and you still don't have 9.

[Anonymous No.14805583]

>>14805316
>12 on mr
i dont understand how anyone scores anything less than 18 on that one. Sometimes this website convinces me that there exists literal subhumans out there

[Anonymous No.14805589]

>>14805583
>i dont understand how anyone scores anything less than 18 on that one
Probably because the maximum score is 17.

[Anonymous No.14805593]

>>14797213
What AI did this?

[Anonymous No.14805759]

>>14797288
Pretty sure that is just a myth. There are online IQ tests that you can pay for, and most of them are ran by psychologists...

[Anonymous No.14805770]

>>14797197
Bad news for you: high-IQ individuals are more likely to suffer from depression.

[Anonymous No.14805809]

>>14805770
OP here
I did actually suffer from psychotic depression until I did ketamine IV therapy a few years ago

[Anonymous No.14805813]

>>14805316
>Why yes I am an ESL, how on God's green Earth could you possibly tell?
holy fuck
dude, i'm honestly jealous of your verbal scores
you got any wordlists I could memorize to get my score up?
or do you think your score is just a consequence of higher general verbal fluency due to bilinguality?

[Anonymous No.14805928]

>>14805589
You're obviously not cheating properly.

[Anonymous No.14806055]

>>14798467
I would argue as single IQ test doesn't accurately determine how capable you are
But beyond a certain point
Does taking more IQ tests make you smarter or not?
If the answer is no and people significantly improve
Is the test good instrument to measure and compare intelligence?
If taking more tests and you get smarter, test scores go up
Is the test good instrument to measure and compare intelligence?

In reality I would say you can generally can compare intelligence + knowledge, these are inseparable in my opinion, but you can't really tell who is "better" with a difference of like 10 points. In school or work you are not only compared by one indicator, for example your average score of a course is often divided into classes, like out of 20, 14 to 17 is 5 points, 17 to 20 is 6 points and they insert in in a formula along with other parameters.

And in the end if you are like a 110 IQ you can still have more success than someone who is 160IQ as they are mostly non social creatures and have strange desires
Thinking big, working and consistency are the determining factors (and looks of course)

[Anonymous No.14806143]

>t. drunk low-dimensional topology phd

still got it

[Anonymous No.14806149]

>>14806143
The weighting for this test is dog shit. Apparently memory counts for far more than spatial intelligence.

[Anonymous No.14806157]

>>14806149
well, its pretty heavily correlated with the wais but slightly deflationary. you're not missing too many points from a real iq test

[Anonymous No.14806163]

>>14806149
it's just a game bro chill lol

[Anonymous No.14806164]

>>14797197
>>14802992
>>14805316
>>14806143
Wordcels.

>>14797372
>>14797747
>>14800767
>>14806149
Shape rotator chads.

>>14800859
Adhd Witten

[Anonymous No.14806165]

>>14806163
It's a dumb game! I'm going home!

[Anonymous No.14806171]

>>14806164
hey, i got a perfect shape rotation score. it was the green square test that fucked me up. and come on i scored between the 97th-98th percentile on the spatial test anyway

[Anonymous No.14806618]

>>14805583
>>14805813
>>14806164
En realidad onions trilingüe. Mi lengua materna es el español, el Inglés lo aprendí shitposteando y el Japonés lo aprendí gracias al anime y a mi ex-novia japonesa.

Actually, I'm trilingual. Spanish is my mother tongue, I learnt English by shitposting and I learnt Japanese by watching anime and fighting with my Japanese ex.

実はね、トライリンガルですよ。母語はスペイン語で、ネットで英語を習って、日本語はアニメと前カノのおかげで習ったんです。

Also, I'm a software dev. Honestly, I may have a gift for languages, but I always thought my spatial-mathematical IQ was higher than my verbal. Until I noticed that I can pick up languages fast and without any discernible accent.

You learn more English by reading in English, but also by talking and using the language every day. Context is king. Think about all the pajeets out there who know tons of words but they talk unnaturally. That's what happens when you learn (or memorize) words out of context. Learn and acquire difficult words in context by talking and arguing with people. Preferably bright people.

I don't think I'm particularly smart. My brain is actually just a regular normie brain sped up to x10 or so. I can do shit like calculus fast, but more complex math just bores me to death (I find it frustrating and thus not fun). On the other hand I can make anybody laugh in any of the languages I know, just from sheer speed of thought and language processing. In practice I just use this skill for slacking in my job, I get shit done 3 times as fast as everybody else so I can dawdle more.

[Anonymous No.14806623]

>>14806618
>En realidad onions trilingüe.

[Anonymous No.14806658]

>>14806623
newfags can't Spanish

> t. [math]\textrm{onions}[/math] el puto amo

[Anonymous No.14806841]

What iq test is this, i wanna give it a shot

[Anonymous No.14806908]

>>14797197
English isnt my first language.

[Anonymous No.14807078]

>>14797197
>Is this test bullshit or should I hire a psychologist to give me a WAIS-IV?
Why don't you just do something with your brain instead of taking these tests?

[Anonymous No.14807088]

>>14797311
>Somebody with an IQ of 95 is not going to make a good engineer.
They wouldn't even be interested in engineering in the first place

[Anonymous No.14807102]

>>14806841
open source psychometrics

[Anonymous No.14807490]

>>14806618
do you think if you tested yourself now against your younger monolingual self you would have higher general verbal fluency?
I feel like what little french im teaching myself is altering my perception of my mother tongue so I was wondering

[Anonymous No.14807499]

i did the test too
i have not heard like 90% of the words they gave me in the beginning, garbage test

[Anonymous No.14807501]

>>14807499
or maybe you just have a below average vocabulary

[Anonymous No.14807515]

>>14797197
>adjusted
In other words, if I don't study for IQ tests, and I take this test, it will underestimate my IQ?

[Anonymous No.14807516]

>>14807501
no i'm pretty sure they just made up words

[Anonymous No.14807521]

>>14807515
if you read further they link to a study where this online test specifically was compared to a real WAIS-III test and it was slightly deflationary, so yes.

[Anonymous No.14807631]

>>14805809
What the fuck is psychotic depression? Did the voices telling you to kys come from god?

[Anonymous No.14808172]

>>14807631
Why don't you just fucking google it retard?

[Anonymous No.14808412]

You probably aren't high IQ if you don't already know you're high IQ (ie, if you weren't thoroughly tested as a child)

[Anonymous No.14808857]

Hey, IQlets, instead of doing Internet FSIQ tests of dubious quality, go do the WAIS-IV under clinical conditions.
If you score under 150 on the WAIS-IV (I'm being quite generous -- it tests up to 160), you can do your part for /sci/ by taking your /pol/nigger or woketard ass off the board.
Thanks.

[Anonymous No.14808858]

>>14808857
I got a 120 on the wais iv a year ago at age 21 when i tested for aspergers, what can i do in science realistically? Can i even become an engineer?

[Anonymous No.14808869]

>>14808858
You sound like a nice person, so I feel like giving you some encouragement, but unfortunately I've boxed myself in with my elitist take.

[Anonymous No.14808884]

>>14808857
>Hey, IQlets, instead of doing Internet FSIQ tests of dubious quality, go do the WAIS-IV under clinical conditions.
But that would defeat the purpose of inflating my ego.

[Anonymous No.14808901]

take this test bros
https://cait-fw.netlify.app/
Report your score honestly thanks

[Anonymous No.14808926]

>>14808901
Basically gave up around question 20.

[Anonymous No.14808936]

>>14808901
>>14808926
BTW, is a pen and paper allowed? The toughest part was holding the information in my working memory, which is not my strength.

[Anonymous No.14808939]

>>14808901
how do the number things scale? a 24/26 said the scaled score was 21 lol

[Gwaihir No.14808947]

>>14797197
Mensa will, generally speaking, cap the results of your cummulative IQ at 139, so they can force you to come in and take the more exhaustive test, in person, at a price, before giving you lifetime JSTOR access and free lifetime membership to MENSA

>T. 147 confirmed IQ in GATE assessments in the late-80s, confirmed again in 2012. They made me come in to take the test in person in 2012 and dismissed the fact I had technically already qualified for MENSA when I was 8 years old.

[Anonymous No.14808949]

>>14808936
No, the point is to solve them in your head.
>>14808939
Norms: https://pdfhost.io/v/vXxFHNDV5_CAIT_Copy
There are also other subtests there

[Anonymous No.14809039]

>>14807490
Definitely. Contrary to what 99% of normies and /sci/ believe, your intelligence can go up (or down) over the course of your life. It just takes considerably longer to train or decay. I think at around 12 years old I was at around 120-130 general IQ, and my spatial IQ > verbal IQ. Nowadays it's around 135-145, and my verbal has improved drastically. I did piano between ages 9-18, studied Japanese since age 18, and studied Calculus, Algebra and Physics during college. Using your brain makes you smarter (as common sense would dictate).

[Gwaihir No.14809184]

>>14809039
It's not that your IQ "changed". Iq is an assessment of your ability to learn, pattern recognition, comparative to the general population.

The older you are the larger your knowledge-base should outpace the average, therefore they have a larger test sample of expected knowledge base over time to sample against in determining your IQ.

That is: until your brain starts to degenerate.

[Anonymous No.14809219]

>>14806658
Sure thing paco. Now, mown my lawn. This an Anglo board.

[Anonymous No.14811325]

>>14809184
>Iq is an assessment of your ability to learn, pattern recognition, comparative to the general population.
No, that's gf. IQ tests test for G which is general intelligence. General intelligence is composed of general fluid reasoning and general crystallized intelligence.

[Anonymous No.14811665]

>>14797197
The number is never high enough

[Anonymous No.14811675]

>>14811665
just like the numbers in my bank account

[Anonymous No.14813444]

>>14797197
today I've found out losers online argue about "space rotators" versus "wordcels". Like some silly political shitflinging. Seems pointless.

[Anonymous No.14813718]

>>14813444
trips of truth
i'm ashamed to have made this thread

[Anonymous No.14815253]

>>14813444
The wordcel/shape rotator divide is discussed by people far more intelligent and successful than you, because those are the people most interested in intelligence. Losers are the people who question definitions and relevance of intelligence at every opportunity.

[Anonymous No.14815314]

How do I cope bros? To be fair, I'm ESL

[Anonymous No.14816420]

>>14815314
this test is for english speakers. your iq is much higher than that.

[Anonymous No.14816749]

>>14815314
i got 9/27 on anagrams and i am a native speaker

[Anonymous No.14816785]

>>14798175
Sorry but life is nature AND nurture, not one or the other kid. Its why you cant teach a dog or a nigger how to speak properly

[Anonymous No.14817246]

>>14808901
am tarded
RAW 18
SCALED SCORE 15

[Anonymous No.14817259]

>>14797197
Native speaker - hate verbal

[Anonymous No.14817712]

this test sucks because verbal reasoning is not the ability to remember or mishmash words, but rather the ability to extricate concepts and enframe them more generally. but I can't expect such subtlety from sub-taleb niggers

[Anonymous No.14818677]

>>14817712
>this test sucks
So does your reading comprehension.

[Anonymous No.14818748]

>>14797197
Timing is important. In actual IQ tests, you are tested for it. You can't just leisurely "puzzle" over the assignments like it's some sudoku. Some exercises like "write down all permutations of this graph" are even completely about speed, as even a dog will eventually have all permutations noted down.
I guess you took more than 1 hour for that test, which is excessive. With that time, anyone can get 130+ IQ.

[Anonymous No.14818785]

I did this is roughly 8 minutes. I got a 114 but honestly all these sections have no relation to actual intelligence. Try discussing a complex concept to someone and watch them checkout. They can rotate shapes well but they cannot keep up with various layers of abstraction. I've done really well in my life and have rubbed shoulders with many who are much more intelligent then myself yet I have gone much further, faster. Are my methodologies to said progress unrelated to intelligence? I think not. I see SWE's constantly think they're geniuses however, I have managed to out perform them and as a consequence, out earn via productivity and social game. They are the true midwits on this board coping with their IQ scores. Its funny how this is all relevant and subjective. Everyone looks at me for the answers and I'm the dumb one. Your IQ tests are bullshit at best and only translate to parameterized ideals of intellect. This board will cope by pointing out my grammar or use of vocabulary, that's the cope. HAHAHAHAHAHH

>25
>lead SWE
>F15 Bank
>wfh @ $280k yr

[Anonymous No.14818790]

>>14808857
I tested 154 on Wais-Iv, ezpz

[Anonymous No.14818796]

>>14818785
Forgot to mention I live in NC in a rural area. COL is 0.

[Anonymous No.14818905]

I took a crack at it. I would say 123 is a slightly deflated score for me, if I compare this to other online IQ tests I've taken. My scores are usually in the upper 120s. I'm not saying this test is totally bunk. Not by any means. It's probably a pretty good estimate in most cases. But it is intentionally designed to be very short, and I didn't feel the areas tested were broad enough. Call that cope if you want.

In my opinion, the best online IQ test is the American Mensa official practice test. It's 80 timed questions. (Note, you have to pay one dollar or something to take it, I forget.) Of all the tests I've taken, I felt it was the broadest, and most fairly weighted between the different skills. It gave me an estimate of 128, and barring a proper test from a psychologist, I guess I consider that to be my IQ for all intents and purposes. (Not that that's all that amazing, but I still think 123 here is a little deflated and inaccurate. Just my opinion.)

[Anonymous No.14818914]

>>14818905
For reference, I got a raw score of 73/100 on the Miller Analogies Test, which is a *super* high score, and puts me around the 99th percentile of verbal IQ. Mensa stopped accepting the Miller Analogies Test for entrance a few years ago, but a score of 73/100 would have admitted me comfortably (cut off was raw score 64/100 when they accepted it).

So I find it weird that I scored 124 verbal on this test. And again, I'm not saying the test is bunk. Just that I think it's not long enough or broad enough.

[Anonymous No.14818956]

>>14808901
Scored picrelated.

These posts were also from me
>>14818905
>>14818914

Similar range, I guess.

[Anonymous No.14818963]

>>14818905
>wordcell cuck taking pride in his verbal scores
Dumb rat, you got 11 out 17 right in mr, which is the only score that matters. You are a retard.

[Anonymous No.14819042]

Spatial savant reporting in.
I always knew memory was my weakest point
also, dyslexia destroyed me in the anagram search

[Anonymous No.14819103]

Full scale IQ of 126 , with 140 memory ? Cant say ive ever thought that I had a decent memory. I imagine my true IQ would be decently less then what I just tested at. Oh well , how I wish I could break through just being average - its quite disheartening

[Anonymous No.14819118]

>>14818905
Hello? IS this Mr Copey McCope? But seriously, IQ is fucking useless as a metric, stop using it

[Anonymous No.14819127]

>>14819118
>But seriously, IQ is fucking useless as a metric, stop using it
Uhhh, hello, cope department?

[Anonymous No.14819253]

>intuitively mistake making the center as equidistant from all points instead of making the average sum of distances as small as possible.

was it only me?

[Anonymous No.14819261]

>>14819253
>unable to infer why the correct answers differed from yours

[Anonymous No.14819272]

>>14797197
>should I hire a psychologist to give me a WAIS-IV?
Yes

[Anonymous No.14819280]

>>14819261
I mean I did after a wildly incorrect prediction

[Anonymous No.14819314]

>>14819253
they say you can't train for these tests. and it's bs. I'd say I'm about 140 but yeah I sometimes think it's unclear what they want you to do. I've gotten anywhere from 120 to 170 on iq tests. Still not even sure about the one you are referring to lol like idk wtf is even the difference in what you said lmao

[Anonymous No.14819613]

>>14818748
Bitch I did this shit in 25-30 min like the test told me to. Get fucked. Anyways the only part of the test where you aren't explicitly timed by the test itself is the spacial IQ test and that was my weakest area. The memory and verbal scores (sans the similar words test, but time makes no difference there) are automatically timed by the test itself. You can't game it through rumination.

[Anonymous No.14819622]

>>14819253
op here
yeah I did that more than a couple times
pretty sure it deflated my scores

[Anonymous No.14819711]

>>14818785
well if youre trying to say that hard work and education are more important than IQ when it comes to financial success I agree

[Anonymous No.14819999]

>>14818785
You're using blind industriousness as an excuse to cover up the fact that you clambered up through connections or selling your body. It's pathetic, really, that you can't grasp the difference between status and intelligence.

[Anonymous No.14820393]

does this mean im a genius?

[Anonymous No.14820450]

>>14818785
Lead Society of Women Engineers ?That looks like a nice glass of pure copium femoid

[Anonymous No.14820875]

>>14820393
You forgot to tip your fedora, so no.

[Anonymous No.14822180]

IQ tests are bullshit

[Anonymous No.14822453]

>>14818785
>I did this is roughly 8 minutes.
Just... no. I am literally incapable of reading text with grammatical errors. Please fix the mistakes and re-submit your post.

[Anonymous No.14822460]

>>14820393
Uh oh, based department bros???

[Anonymous No.14822466]

>>14822180
How the fuck do people have such good short term memories?

[Anonymous No.14822794]

ESL department reporting.
The word unscramble kicked my teeth in and I took my time on the dot distance thing.

[Anonymous No.14822798]

>>14797197
>/sci/
>/not psy/
When will you STEMcucks stop using a soft science woo woo like psychology?

[Anonymous No.14822852]

This is coming from a PhD drop out so you know my career move out of academia was a good idea.

[Anonymous No.14823366]

>>14822466
My short-term memory is horrible if I'm not actively trying to remember

[Anonymous No.14823367]

>>14822466
Not the guy you're replying to but without training for 240 days on the dual-n back I would not have been able to get the memory score I got

[Anonymous No.14823485]

>>14823367
I'm lvl 9-10 in DnB and all I got was a fucking 120 that felt like a struggle.

[Anonymous No.14823505]

>>14823485
I've reached level 20 briefly but now I'm at 14. It takes a long time. How long have you been training?

[Anonymous No.14823516]

>>14823505
Like, on and off I've probably done like 8 months, but the longest consecutive was maybe like 80 days. No way you're at 20 though, are you just chunking them?

[Anonymous No.14823554]

>>14823516
No no no, I'm not at 20, I briefly touched twenty held it for a few rounds and then my scores crashed back down to between 10-12. Idk how it is for other people but for me the DnB is totally non-linear but just slowly trends upward. That wasn't through chunking it was through simultaneous sub-vocalization of the letters and visualization of the square's locations. That was months ago and I have only just recently gotten to 14-15 without crashing back down to 10-12 due to exhaustion. When you say consecutive what do you mean? You're taking the weekends off right?

[Anonymous No.14823594]

>>14823554
Nah, I just did it every day for a while at like 20-30 minutes a day.

[Anonymous No.14823597]

>>14823505
How the fuck do you get to 20 in DnB? Are you using mnemonics?

[Anonymous No.14823619]

>>14823597
read
>>14823554

>>14823594
I would recommend doing 20 rounds a day mon-thu or mon-fri and taking the weekends off. That's what I do and it makes logical sense for your brain to get a rest. Furthermore when the DnB was studied by Johns Hopkins the participants were given the weekends off.

[Anonymous No.14824251]

I took this test just for fun and got my friend to take it too and he got a score of 92 I don’t think this is totally accurate because my friend did better than me in high school still interesting though

[Anonymous No.14824419]

>>14823619
Even 10 is very high. What benefits have you noticed?

[Anonymous No.14824440]

>>14824419
I'm at 10. No benefits. Puny 121 IQ for memory. It's over for workingmemorycels.

[Anonymous No.14824483]

>>14824440
Yeah, I'm unsure on n-back. A lot of people have given it a go, and the results range from significant improvement to memory and abstract thinking, to not benefit at all. I've tried to test it myself but always quit within a few weeks. It just feels like a poor use of time.

[Anonymous No.14824492]

this test is bretty gud :DDD

[Anonymous No.14824658]

>>14824419
>What benefits have you noticed?
Well, I'm OP so obviously it had massive effects on my WMI. There was no way I could have scored a 142 on memory without having trained. After training for so long I feel like my perceptions are clearer and more defined, like I'm looking at reality through an ultra hd lens or something. I also have permanent PNSE or ASMR feelings in my scalp. Also its waaaaaay easier to focus in general for hours at a time and my digit span went up from 9-10 to 12-13 (without mnemonics). I'm sure that my method of loci training, exercise regiment, and meditation/yoga regiment contributed to all of the above sensations as well.