/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 66 KB, 361x550, Lebesgue.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Is measure theory a scam? Anonymous Sat Aug 27 22:03:19 2022 No.14797034 [Reply] [Original]

>Muh [math] \sigma [/math]-algebras
>Muh measures
>Muh non-measurable sets
>Muh Lebesque integral
>Muh [math] L^p [/math] spaces
All this just so mathfags can keep the axiom of choice and "real numbers".

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 27 22:13:26 2022 No.14797057 >>14797034 it gives you a way to uniformly sample matrix groups and other weird stuff which i think is cool and good

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 27 22:20:25 2022 No.14797073 Is this brainlet still getting filtered by axiom of choice?

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 27 22:32:21 2022 No.14797095 >>14797057 Explain >>14797073 Cope

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 27 22:46:55 2022 No.14797127 How exactly are non measurable sets a problem again, brainlet?

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 27 22:53:12 2022 No.14797142 >>14797127 >Want free material? Just rotate my set to get dubble the volume Absolutely delusional.

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 27 22:56:20 2022 No.14797150 >>14797142 Rotations conserve volume, brainlet.

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 27 22:57:29 2022 No.14797153 >>14797150 For mesurable sets yes

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 27 22:58:50 2022 No.14797157 >>14797153 And non measurable sets don't have a well defined volume. Your statement was wrong and retarded, brainlet.

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 27 23:00:03 2022 No.14797160 >>14797157 Which is my point, the fact that there are sets that don't have well defined volume proves real numbers and AOC are nonsense.

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 27 23:02:59 2022 No.14797166 >>14797160 For anyone with a high IQ it is intuitively obvious that there are sets which are sufficiently unphysical/ungeometric to have no well defined volume, brainlet.

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 27 23:07:55 2022 No.14797183 >>14797166 Yes, so the real numbers aren't an accurate description of our geometry.

Anonymous Sat Aug 27 23:22:51 2022 No.14797234

I had to study it a bit because of advanced probability and stochastics (not originally a mathematician). It definitely helped me get an abstract interpretation for a lot of that intuitive things of probability that we "just know" how they're supposed to go but can't deeice (without measure theory).

>>	Anonymous Sun Aug 28 12:01:39 2022 No.14798552 >>14797057 you mean Haar measures?

>>	Anonymous Sun Aug 28 13:21:53 2022 No.14798733 Lets hope you're just an engineer OP

>>	Anonymous Sun Aug 28 22:52:06 2022 No.14800411 File: 248 KB, 880x620, a6ut63j7gaq41.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14798733 >

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 29 12:34:40 2022 No.14803202 >>14797166 what is your opinion on the axiom of determinacy?

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 29 12:53:27 2022 No.14803449 >>14797183 Lmao the continuum IS our geometry you fucking moron. The naturals are our approximation.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 29 18:52:36 2022 No.14805069 >>14803449 >the continuum IS our geometry what makes you think so?

>>	frenanon Tue Aug 30 00:34:43 2022 No.14805997 File: 280 KB, 2088x1816, PlanarLines.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14797142 >>14797150 >Rotations conserve volume, brainlet. I don't exactly know what you mean, but I feel like that could either be True OR False

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]