/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.14774029]

Global warming being fake again

[Anonymous No.14774032]

>>14774029
>single day anomaly
Sweet bait post OP

[Anonymous No.14774063]

>>14774029
pretty sure 0.1 C is measurable.
it doesn't even matter, because it's around 1 C warmer than the pre-industrial period.

[Anonymous No.14774078]

>>14774029
>weather

[Anonymous No.14774080]

>>14774029
> not measurable
Then how does he know?

[Anonymous No.14774165]

>>14774063
>it's around 1 C warmer than the pre-industrial period
The preindustrial period didn't have industrial solutions either dumb nigger

[Anonymous No.14774168]

>>14774029
weather =/= climate
GW is about the average of the last 30 years moving up

[Anonymous No.14774196]

>>14774063
The Medieval Warm Period was 5C warmer than modern times. GTFO.

[Anonymous No.14774197]

>>14774168
In another 30 years it will move down again. Big whoop.

[Anonymous No.14774203]

>>14774196
That is false, why do you keep saying that over and over again?

[Anonymous No.14774213]

>>14774196
>Medieval Warm Period
lol

[Anonymous No.14774216]

>>14774197
>source: my ass

[Anonymous No.14774222]

>>14774213
Those stats are fraudulent and based solely on 1 tree ring data-point.

[Anonymous No.14774250]

>>14774222
>tree ring data-point.
don't make shit up

[Anonymous No.14774256]

>>14774250
Wait a minute and he'll present his one ice core that's warmer during the MWP than in 1935 just to prove that global warming is fake.

[Anonymous No.14774271]

>>14774250
There is no denial of the Medieval Warm Period without fraud.
https://www.asc.ohio-state.edu/mcculloch.2/AGW/Loehle/Loehle_McC_E&E_2008.pdf

[Anonymous No.14774286]

>>14774271
No one denies the medieval warm period, brainier.
>That Loehle plot up to 1935
Like a clockwork.

[Anonymous No.14774289]

>>14774271
>https://www.asc.ohio-state.edu/mcculloch.2/AGW/Loehle/Loehle_McC_E&E_2008.pdf
> if I remove the data points that I don't like the data will point to what I like
I wonder who's the fraud
you also lied about where the data comes from claiming it comes from a single tree.

[Anonymous No.14774293]

>>14774271
If you add the recent measurements to your plot that ends in 1935, you see that it's not colder than during the MWP.

[Anonymous No.14774299]

>>14774293
And if you compare many reconstructions, it seems like Loehle is somewhat off. But that's okay, look at his uncertainty bands. He never claimed more accuracy than he had.

[Anonymous No.14774300]

>>14774271
>>14774196
There is no claim that the Medieval Warm Period was 5°C warmer than modern times without fraud.

[Anonymous No.14774311]

>>14774063
Nobody measured global temperatures before 1960. Even today its a feat to do measurements of the entire earth.
Things like tree rings of some european forest are just not accurate. You just can't know the temperature of the earth in the past.
Why? Because of the scientific method. You can't do controlled experiments to test the claims of accurate measurements. These claims are like the claims of the big bang and the age of the universe, maybe the hypothesis sounds very logical but you just can't test it therefore its not science.

[Anonymous No.14774314]

>>14774250
>tree 415 data points

[Anonymous No.14774330]

>>14774314
415 > 1

[Anonymous No.14774334]

>>14774314
>415 trees = 1 tree
Look at my Christmas tree

[Anonymous No.14774338]

>>14774299
Loehle's graph also ends in 1935

[Anonymous No.14774342]

>>14774338
?

[Anonymous No.14774357]

>>14774300
DEBOONKED lmao

Go back to /r/science

[Anonymous No.14774359]

>>14774293
Recent measurements are fraudulently increased in temp using a constant value adjustment so unless you use raw, unadjusted data and do the modeling yourself (which this graph doesn't) you'll always get the fake hockey stick.

[Anonymous No.14774360]

>>14774357
I see, you gave up lying and went directly to personal attacks :^)

[Anonymous No.14774362]

>>14774359
>source: my ass

[Anonymous No.14774363]

>>14774360
How can I argue against DEBOONKing? Obviously your brain is gigantic to go from one fraudulent source to another without even double-checking their data.

[Anonymous No.14774377]

>>14774363
Is this your new strategy? https://youtu.be/f4cqeUsvcxU

[Anonymous No.14774909]

[Anonymous No.14774913]

>>14774029

/pol/

[Anonymous No.14774918]

>>14774913
"reeeee /pol/" will never be an argument

[Anonymous No.14774919]

>>14774363
Fuck off to your containment board, tourist

[Anonymous No.14774921]

>>14774029

that blue cold area in South America was freak weather affecting South America this week
If he took global data from the last few days, it may not have been a very typical week for a comparison

[Anonymous No.14774923]

>>14774918
Bair harder, tourist

[Anonymous No.14774925]

>>14774923
>>14774919
>>14774913
>all exactly one minute apart
I wonder who will he seethe at in the next one?

[Anonymous No.14774930]

>>14774925
>seethe

/pol/

[Anonymous No.14774943]

>>14774930
But you've been seething about /pol/ this entire thread. And you've probably got ten other tabs open where you've been seething about /pol/ in other threads for hours.

[Anonymous No.14774947]

>>14774943
Touch grass

[Anonymous No.14775096]

>>14774213
If 90% of your weather stations are at an airport you're bound to pick up more heat+CO2.

[Anonymous No.14775105]

>>14775096
This graph doesn't show CO2. Airports didn't exist for most of this graph. Take your meds.

[Anonymous No.14775126]

>>14774925
Cope and seethe

[Anonymous No.14775157]

>>14775096
Amplification of temperature changes over land
is not a symptom of urban warming, as it is reproduced in climate model experiments in which urban heat islands are not represented.

http://danida.vnu.edu.vn/cpis/files/Papers_on_CC/CC/Urban%20heat%20island%20effects%20on%20estimates%20of%20observed%20climate%20change.pdf

[Anonymous No.14775635]

>>14774029
>global warming is warmer than
>0.1°C not even measurable
Who is this retard?

[Anonymous No.14775641]

>>14774029
>one day
Cmon, he's not even trying at this point.