/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.14756770]

If the popular consensus is that all races have the same IQ, why does AI say otherwise?

[Anonymous No.14757019]

>>14756770

[Anonymous No.14757050]

>>14756770
Doesn't matter what a program built by some nerd says, black men are fucking white girls and white men can do nothing about it except seethe or jerk off

[Anonymous No.14757174]

>>14757019
that second line makes me wonder if they programmed in something by hand

[Anonymous No.14758558]

>>14757174
are you literally retarded????????

[Anonymous No.14758679]

>>14758558
Not to be rude but people like you could die choking on your own vomit.

[Anonymous No.14760104]

>>14756770
>If the popular consensus is that all races have the same IQ
Literally no one believes this.

[Anonymous No.14760129]

>>14760104
I believe it but I'm a retard.

[Anonymous No.14760368]

>>14760104
Then why did James Watson get cancelled for going against it?

[Anonymous No.14760452]

>>14756770
>false leading assumptions
1. IQ difference is an open secret
2. AI are glorified internet comment dataminers. Zero credibility on what it spits out.

[Anonymous No.14760468]

>>14760368
To be precise, the race difference in IQ isn't contested. It's that the difference is caused by underlying genetic differences that is rejected by most of mainstream science.

[Anonymous No.14760470]

>>14757174
quintessential -10 IQ post

[Anonymous No.14761442]

>>14760468
I have seen those articles and they don't really delve into it like other neuroscience topics, the main point is that all races have the exact genetic makeup. the thing is that small percentage of genetic variation is a pretty big deal right? I'm not a biologist but I think that small percentage has a role and not just socio-economic conditions also

[Anonymous No.14761538]

>>14756770
Garbage in, garbage out.

If the data they gathered for this said "2+2 = 5", then that's what it's gonna say when you put "2+2 = ". And you're a low IQ moron if you don't understand this about ML.

[Anonymous No.14761583]

>>14760368
Because censorship is the only way to defend an objectively incorrect position.

[Anonymous No.14761605]

>>14761583
>religious rightoids try to persecute scientist
4 centuries and nothing has changed.

[Anonymous No.14761608]

>>14760468
>the difference is caused by underlying genetic differences that is rejected by most of mainstream science.
Correct. This is why after adjusting for SES the whit-black IQ gap vanishes. Oh wait.

[Anonymous No.14761624]

>>14761605
>doomsday cult
>puritanical censorship
>obsession with afterlife (muh Right Side Of History)
>faith-based ideological system frequently contradicted by plainly observable reality or logic
>crusade to impose their belief system on heretics, with violence if necessary
>religious garments deemed to have magical powers
There are religious extremists in this country, but the vast majority of them ain't on the right.

[Anonymous No.14761637]

>>14761624
>describes the right
>"but they're not rightoids"
Why are rightoids like this?

[Anonymous No.14761642]

>>14761637
>n...no u

[Anonymous No.14761649]

>>14760104
I don't believe that but I won't admit it in public :)

[Anonymous No.14761653]

>>14761642
>>14761624

[Anonymous No.14761664]

>>14761653
He's right though.

[Anonymous No.14761668]

>>14761653
>(((a right winger))) used the term once therefore it's a right wing thing
k

[Anonymous No.14761673]

>>14760104
Yeah, the mainstream narrative is that different races do have different IQs but it's because of non-genetic factors, and/or racist tests, and/or it doesn't matter goyim why do you even want to know this you aren't racist are you?

[Anonymous No.14761682]

>>14761668
>no TRUE rightoid

>>14761664
Yes, that's what I said, you're rightoids.

[Anonymous No.14761686]

>>14761673
If Jews control everything, doesn't that make them the superior race?

[Anonymous No.14761690]

>>14756770
Leftists and liberals will never admit IQ is genetic because it means that inferior races (Negroids, Aboriginals, etc.) are inherently irredeemable and unaidable.

[Anonymous No.14761698]

>>14761583
galileo used arguments that could ne be proven
>>14761605
the church was literally the only institution that funded science back then including galileos reseaches

[Anonymous No.14761710]

>>14761698
And they opposed him because "muh religion".

[Anonymous No.14761718]

>>14761710
They did not my retarded muttoid friend, the creed of the catholic church was always that science and religion can not be at odds.
I know that might sound weird considering you are used to retarded protestants but the catholic church was basically the only institution had an interest in science for over 1000 years.

[Anonymous No.14761719]

>>14760468
>It's that the difference is caused by underlying genetic differences that is rejected by most of mainstream science.
It's rejected by mainstream media, but not actual scientists. The majority of molecular biologists acknowledge and accept it, but don't talk about it because doing so would jeopardize their careers. Easier not to rock the boat.

[Anonymous No.14761721]

>>14761710
>fundies who control the money and who decide what beliefs are socially acceptable cut off funding and ruin the career of a scientist whose research contradicted their ideology
many such cases

[Anonymous No.14761760]

>>14761721
name a couple non-muttoid ones

[Anonymous No.14761765]

>>14761760
>name anyone who was killed in the Crusades outside of Jerusalem

[Anonymous No.14761767]

>>14761765
>brings up a completely different topic
kek tranny has lost its mind

[Anonymous No.14761770]

>>14761767
>name any jews Hitler killed outside of Europe

[Anonymous No.14761772]

>>14761770
are you okay?

[Anonymous No.14761773]

>>14761760
Susan Crockford. Prof at U Vic in BC fired for (correctly) stating that polar bears are thriving and not in danger of extinction.

[Anonymous No.14761786]

>>14761770
Uh oh, the bots broken.

>>14761682
Recompile your software.

[Anonymous No.14761789]

>>14760468
>uncomfortable result is dismissed by increasingly unquantifiable hand-waving
Yep, sounds like Science™ to me. Meanwhile, the actual science is still out on the matter because no one wants to do research that is objectively racist.

[Anonymous No.14761811]

>>14761760
>non-muttoid
The west is the only place where this shit exists, of course no one in China or India is getting fired for pronoun violations or questioning climate change.

[Anonymous No.14761998]

>>14760468
Saw a thread about this earlier. If you want to settle the debate, retest countries today and see how things have changed with development. I’d be interested in knowing how much India’s average IQ improves by 2030 since it’s one of the major countries that’s developed significantly since then.