/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.14750582]

Trust the experts

[Anonymous No.14750587]

>>14750582
Never get any medical treatment ever because people lobotomized once, got it

[Anonymous No.14750628]

>>14750587
That’s the only reasonable decision anon. For the very same reason I don’t shower because millions of Jews were killed because they trusted (((big shower)))

[Anonymous No.14750636]

>>14750628
real btw

[Anonymous No.14750638]

>>14750628

[Anonymous No.14750647]

>>14750628
They lied about that dog, so all space missions are fake

[Anonymous No.14750649]

>>14750638
What a trustworthy Nazi, I bet he's telling the truth

[Anonymous No.14750650]

>>14750587
>once
100k people got lobotomized worldwide
10j died

[Anonymous No.14750653]

>>14750650
seems like an incredibly save procedure then

[Anonymous No.14750672]

>>14750638
Oh so they were ordered to lose at the eastern front? Interesting

[Anonymous No.14750677]

>>14750582
Tell me one (1) thing wrong with lobotomies.

[Anonymous No.14750693]

>>14750582
woah.....damn......u right bro...eally makes you think.

[Anonymous No.14750695]

>>14750582
trust government

[Anonymous No.14750697]

>>14750582
What's up with the recent surge of people unironically pushing that 'Trust the science' shit? It doesn't take a genius to note that medicine only helps you insofar as it is profitable for them to do so.

[Anonymous No.14750732]

>>14750697
Correct, the people thinking that medicine only benefits the people who offer it and not the patients, are not geniuses.

[Anonymous No.14750749]

Cars made generations dumb with lead. Take the train

[Anonymous No.14750762]

>>14750582
Government and doctors say lobotomy is bad, spooky textbooks which are fake and written by the winners anyways tell you some bullshit horror story about it. Tell me one good reason I shouldn't get lobotomized right now. It probably activates your pineal gland or something, that's why it gets repressed so hard.

[Anonymous No.14750778]

>>14750762
Go get it done anon. It either lifts you above us sheeple or it effectively removes you from the gene pool. I can't see it as anything other than a win-win.

[Anonymous No.14750797]

>>14750582
The interesting thing with science is that it's constantly evolving, so we all learn from the errors of the past.
Meanwhile some modern priests are still trying to cure "demonic possessions". With their 'treatment' sometimes resulting in death.
If science acted like that we'd still be trying to heal everything with bloodletting and purging.

[Anonymous No.14750804]

>>14750587
lobotomy was considered a nobelprice-worthy invention

[Anonymous No.14750810]

>>14750804
And stuff that won where penicillin, the discovery of blood types, dna, the polio vaccine etc etc

[Anonymous No.14750812]

>>14750797
>The interesting thing with science is that it's constantly evolving, so we all learn from the errors of the past.
Yes, I see how it's involving. That's why the Covid-19 vaccine program continues on despite breaking the Nuremberg code. That's why Pfizer has first tested their experimental mRNA 'vaccine' on Polish orphans in 2020. That's why people can still be forcibly committed to asylums and pumped up with psychotropic substances against their will. Sure, science 'continues on' but at what rate and for what price? Did not some guy here even point out that academic productivity has collapsed over the last 50 years by a factor of 30?

[Anonymous No.14750814]

>>14750812
take your meds

[Anonymous No.14750819]

>>14750778
But I literally can't, doctors and government won't allow it. What happened to "my body my choice"?

[Anonymous No.14750821]

>>14750649
why would he lie?
Killing millions of jews would be a badge of honor for an antisemite.

[Anonymous No.14750828]

>>14750812
>Pfizer has first tested their experimental mRNA 'vaccine' on Polish orphans in 2020
I couldn’t even find a schizo video on bitchute talking about this, take your meds dude
>much Nuremberg code
If it has a license, it’s not experimental. Simple as.

[Anonymous No.14750830]

>>14750819
Sorry tranny, that died with abortion rights. Your body belongs to the state now

[Anonymous No.14750834]

>>14750819
Why do you want them to do it when you've already expressed your distrust in them?

[Anonymous No.14750836]

>>14750830
Me getting a lobotomy only affects me, it has nothing to do with abortion
>tranny
projection much

[Anonymous No.14750844]

>>14750821
Not in 1987, retard. After they got their asses kicked on all fronts it was suddenly "d-dindu nuffin!"

[Anonymous No.14750846]

>>14750836
My body my choice? The fetus can have its body. Can do whatever it wants with it. Oh it can’t survive without being a welfare queen, leeching off of my body? Well too fucking bad, I’m anti gibs

[Anonymous No.14750848]

>>14750814
>>14750828
>take your meds
>I couldn’t even find a schizo video on bitchute talking about this, take your meds dude
You think they really don't illicitly test all kinds of shit on orphans? This is hardly a 'schizo-tier' conspiracy especially considering the fact that the government of the USA or Britain admitted to testing all kinds of chemical substances and drugs on orphans from the '20s up to the '70s. Obviously, it figures that if they already did it back then for such a long time with no one being bothered by it, they are likely doing the same shit right now as well.

[Anonymous No.14750850]

>>14750848
Notice how he didn’t post a source for his claim

[Anonymous No.14750852]

>>14750844
You literally didn't answer the question. Just "because he just would, okay!".

[Anonymous No.14750853]

>>14750850
>a source for his claim
sources?
In this day and age?

Good luck.

[Anonymous No.14750854]

>>14750848
>Obviously, it figures that if they already did it back then for such a long time with no one being bothered by it, they are likely doing the same shit right now as well.
No, that doesn't follow at all. Why would they even admit to it if they kept doing it?

[Anonymous No.14750855]

>>14750848
>This is hardly a 'schizo-tier' conspiracy especially considering the fact that the government of the USA or Britain admitted to testing all kinds of chemical substances and drugs on orphans from the '20s up to the '70s.
Ok now you convinced me that Pfizer tested their 2020 Covid-19 vaccine one polish orphans. Especially since you said they are polish, it seems much more believable.

[Anonymous No.14750857]

>>14750848
Your great-grandparents shat in the woods, that means you do the same.

[Anonymous No.14750860]

>>14750852
I did answer, here I'll break it down for severely mentally challenged:
>do terrible shit in name of retarded ideology
>retarded ideology fails and only brings suffering to you and your people
>ideology and it's crimes are widely despised after the war
>"a-actually we didn't do anything bad"

[Anonymous No.14750887]

>>14750857
>Your great-grandparents shat in the woods, that means you do the same.
Yes.

[Anonymous No.14751000]

>>14750587
>>14750628
I also stopped eating all food ever because I once ate something and felt bad in the stomach. )))Experts((( want you to think food is good but internet truth seekers know better.

[Anonymous No.14751011]

>>14750810
poor choice of words on my part...
lobotomy DID win a nobel price in 1949

[Anonymous No.14751017]

>>14751011
Doesn’t change the fact that a lot of inventions I wouldn’t live without also did
What is your point?

[Anonymous No.14751054]

>>14750582
Yes but uhhh science is self-correcting which means current year Science is right and could never be wrong like old science.

[Anonymous No.14751064]

>>14750582
Motherfucker. I'm watching jontron and see this thread at the same time.

Glitches in the simulation are spooky ngl

[Anonymous No.14751066]

>>14751017
my point is that "trust the experts" is not a valid argument when it comes to discussing science.

[Anonymous No.14751077]

>>14750749
Wrong, cars, thanks to lead gas is what made the third industrial revolution possible

[Anonymous No.14751170]

>>14751066
Yeah the appeal to authority fallacy has been known since antiquity. Automatically not trusting someone because of his authority is an ad hominem argument though and is considered just as false since antiquity

[Anonymous No.14751180]

To be fair it did work.

[Anonymous No.14751182]

>>14751170
>appeal to authority fallacy
>ad hominem
>been known since antiquity
There are no such "fallacies" and midwits like you really need to let go of this pseudo-rational LARPing of antiquity.

[Anonymous No.14751203]

>>14751182
Kek are you that one dude from yesterday that claimed that cognitive biases aren’t real?

[Anonymous No.14751216]

>>14750860
ywnbaw

[Anonymous No.14751239]

>>14751203
I don't know what you're on about, schizo. I'm just reminding you that no one ever actually makes these "fallacies" you're referencing.

[Anonymous No.14751261]

>>14751239
So there are multiple retards on this board that the deny the existence of basic errors in arguing that literally everyone learns in high school? Even funnier
Here’s a very easy to understand image for you that schools help you to get a degree. Maybe you won’t have to flip burgers anymore one day

[Anonymous No.14751271]

>>14751261
>my mind operates based on kindergarten-level pictures made for imbeciles

[Anonymous No.14751294]

>>14751271
Yes it is made especially for people like you that struggle with basic logic, like I said
I am very happy that my message seems to get through to you

[Anonymous No.14751306]

>>14751294
Can you give me a concrete example of your imaginary fallacies being committed? (Notice how your intellectual impotence is forcing you to look for ways to deflect right now)

[Anonymous No.14751312]

>>14751306
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-ray
If you want to discover N-rays enough, you might end up discovering them regardless of their actual existence.

[Anonymous No.14751320]

>>14751312
You sound psychotic. We were talking about >>14751182

[Anonymous No.14751325]

>>14751306
This is not me >>14751312
and you gave a perfect example yourself
>my point is that "trust the experts" is not a valid argument when it comes to discussing science.
you just weren’t calling it by it’s name

[Anonymous No.14751340]

>>14751325
>you gave a perfect example yourself
That was a different poster who is apparently a dimwit. To say that "trust the experts" is not a valid argument is a category error.

[Anonymous No.14751342]

>>14751340
>To say that "trust the experts" is not a valid argument is a category error.
It helps in everyday life. If my plumber tells me that my installation sucks and I kick him out because I don't "trust the experts", what are the odds that I'm going to have a bad time with my plumbing?

[Anonymous No.14751350]

>>14751342
>my plumber tells me that my installation sucks and I kick him out because I don't "trust the experts"
Notice how you are forced to invent retarded scenarios to conform to your imaginary fallacies because no one actually commits them.

[Anonymous No.14751354]

>>14751350
Ok, let's say that you're babbling about 12,000rpm and all physics experts tell you that you're wrong. What are the odds that every single one of them is wrong and you're right?

[Anonymous No.14751363]

>>14751354
I asked you for a concrete and realistic example of someone committing your "fallacies". Your post does not contain one. Notice how you are forced to repeatedly deflect or indulge in schizophrenic fantasies.

[Anonymous No.14751380]

>>14751363
These are also not me >>14751354
>>14751342
and I am just as annoyed as you are with people not knowing basic etiquette
However, the example given was exactly what is defined as an argument from authority fallacy and it doesn’t matter if you call them category errors because they mean the exact same thing.
Another good example is the strawmen fallacy since almost no one on this godforsaken earth is able to argue against the actual arguments the opponent makes, especially in political discourse

[Anonymous No.14751387]

>>14751380
>the example given was exactly what is defined as an argument from authority fallacy
You appear to be fully psychotic. Quote your "example" again to confirm this.

[Anonymous No.14751422]

>>14751387
You’re either trolling or a fool so i won’t waste any more time on you after this reply
„Trust the science“ is a perfect example of appeal to authority. It is therefore invalid as an argument. It is also very commonly used, disproving your claim of „nobody commits fallacies“

[Anonymous No.14751427]

>>14751422
>„Trust the science“ is a perfect example of appeal to authority.
No, it isn't, and I've already pointed out that your claiming so is a category error. "Trust the science" is a prescription or an expression of values. It's neither a valid nor an invalid argument because it doesn't express a logical proposition at all.