[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 687 KB, 256x256, 8-cell-simple.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14698083 No.14698083 [Reply] [Original]

That's literally what's going on right? Each dimension can hold the dimensions below within it.
So our universe is just some thing existing in a 4th dimension. Possibly just a construct, or simulation of higher beings. Makes perfect sense right?
Even those biblically accurate angels everyone talks about is just exactly the way a 4th dimensional being would look in 3 dimensions.
Easy shit.
I'm way more interested in what's going on in the 4th dimension than this one. Because this one is just an infrastructure to contain life. I don't want to be a monkey studying his fucking enclosure. I want to know what exists beyond the enclosure and who put me here and why.
If a being existed in 4th dimension, it would see every face of a shape all at once. So they are literally just feely noclipping and scrolling thru space and time.
What do you guys think about a higher dimension where our universe is just a construct within it? It would be like playing a video game and flying outside of the skybox. Beyond the skybox is an infinite white void. To characters in the game, congratulations you are looking beyond your observable universe. But to us, their entire observable and unobservable universe is contained in a little Macbook Pro that exists in another expansive, far more intricate, three dimensional fucking universe.
That's probably how we are to the dimension above.
What are the best resources that talk about this? Because it makes most sense to me by far. It explains so many things.

>> No.14698120

The contruct of time is the 4th dimension and so the 5th dimension is just knowing all things independent of time, which is emulated in our world through the concept of computer software or more specifically video games. It's actually analogous in any variety of formats of communicable knowledge, but basically everything is "past tense" in the 5th dimension. Like you write a book. You know the story. You know how it goes. You know what it will be. You publish the book.
Why does anyone buy the book.
Because anyone else doesn't know what you know about the story.
That's the assumption.

But the 4th dimension does know.
And the 5th dimension knows when it was knowable in the 4th dimension.

The videogames reference is dependent upon understanding how 3D graphics are generated in real time, and how that data interacts with computer memory.
Textures are flat, but wrapped around 3D objects to give surface appearance. From a moment of observability through a potential computer's point of view, each and every polygon or triangle it is computing to have the textured surface is first mathematically solved in 2D, straight on, orthographically, without perspective or angle. That is the analog here, in which a function exists of knowing all sides of a shape, though through the computer it is still only emulated in 4D and so takes time and isn't necessarily doing all that math for each surface instantaneously in a single breadth. That is where it is known in 5D. 5D already knows each and every 3D event that occurs in 4D time.
Imaginiatively, A 5D computer already has everyone's lifetime of observation already "pre-rendered", the story already written, the math already completed. It is static and not dynamic at all.

>> No.14698132

>>14698120
Isn't "pre-rendered" a perfectly accurate description of this universe? Type in some code, click execute. [Big bang] then causality, forever.

>> No.14698203

>>14698083
Physically, we don't see macro 2d or 1d objects in our macro 3d universe. There's no reason to suspect we exist as a 3d object in a 4d universe.

>> No.14698227
File: 404 KB, 846x500, image_2022-07-25_162536488.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14698227

>>14698083
there is no esoteric mystical knowledge about the 4th dimension maybe except the fact that the klein bottle is not self intersecting. It's just another degree of freedom with negative sign in its minkowski metric signature.

>> No.14698243

Chewed up schizo subject, that's why para math is there for this question.

The reason for pure math rather than theoretical physics is left for the reader as an exercise