Lorentzian manifold embedding in a higher dimensional euclidean space

[Anonymous No.14692539]

Is this possible?

[Anonymous No.14692546]

>>14692539
>Is this possible?
Cute chicken, but no if you mean isometric embedding

[Anonymous No.14692554]

A higher dimensional euclidean space is minkowski space. That's regular space, like where the landscape or building that you're reading this post is in.

[Anonymous No.14692557]

>>14692546
Why not? Is there a proof for this?

[Anonymous No.14692568]

>>14692557
Tangent vectors on a lorentzian manifold can have both positive and negative norms whereas tangent vectors in a euclidean space can only have positive norms. As isometric embeddings are supposed to preserve these norms, such an embedding is not possible in this case

[Anonymous No.14692591]

>>14692539
That webm really makes it obvious that birds are literally just modern dinosaurs.

[Anonymous No.14692660]

>>14692568
>>14692554
I guess thats true. Many 4-vectors in Minkoswky space have 0 norm, it would be unthinkable in euclidean space

[Anonymous No.14692898]

>>14692539
just switch variables around bro
s^2 = -(ct)^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2
(ct)^2 = s^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2
https://www.euclideanrelativity.com/