Sea Levels Rising

[Anonymous No.14686131]

Can any scientifically approved fact checkers here explain how sea levels are rising even if sea levels don't seem to look like they're rising for the past 100 years?

[Anonymous No.14686136]

no

[Anonymous No.14686142]

>>14686131
How fast can you see things moving? In like millimeters per hour?

[Anonymous No.14686143]

Due to global warming all the fish are going extinct. Less fish means lower sea level. But the sea level stayed the same. Hence, if the fish were still alive the sea level would be significantly higher.

[Anonymous No.14686175]

The measurements show increasing average sea levels. You can't really show the difference with photos because sea levels are not static during the day. There's no way to make a fair comparison without knowing the average in the first place.

[Anonymous No.14686238]

It's an optical illusion like flat earth, it looks flat but really it rises in the middle of the ocean

[Anonymous No.14686251]

>/pol/tard learns that water isnt static

[Anonymous No.14686262]

>>14686142
> he considers it a sophisticated argument
Drown already, so we can fight some actual problems instead of your nothingburger pushed down our throats by corrupt politicians.

[Anonymous No.14686283]

>>14686131
tides are not simple
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSJRymZ5bJs

also, part of the rise goes underground, causing salinity problems

[Anonymous No.14686293]

>>14686175
>sea levels
Hear that globe tards? LEVELS

[Anonymous No.14686338]

>>14686143

[Anonymous No.14686351]

>>14686131
just trust me goy

[Anonymous No.14686361]

>>14686131
They are rising. You can't tell this from old photos because they could be taken at high or low tide.

https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/sealevel.html

[Anonymous No.14686362]

>>14686351
>le free thinker illiterate retard

[Anonymous No.14686375]

>>14686362
do you believe me or your eyes goyim?

[Anonymous No.14686385]

>>14686375
NTA but it seems like the only intelligence test midwits believe in is how much you're willing to ignore common sense, intuition and direct experience in favor of theoretical wank.

[Anonymous No.14686391]

>>14686143
Only answer ITT that makes sense

[Anonymous No.14686414]

402 years. Still not under water.

[Anonymous No.14686420]

>>14686414
This is clearly fake. They didn't have printers in 1620.

[Anonymous No.14686449]

>>14686385
theoretical wank like climate change?

[Anonymous No.14686455]

>>14686449
No. That retarded scam doesn't even hold up in theory.

[Anonymous No.14686480]

>>14686361
So bring me a photo of the tide so low they don't get that low today.
Or fuck off and don't cloud the actual issues with your irrelevant and dubious crap.

[Anonymous No.14686602]

In any given coast there are a lot of factors that influence local sea level. Tectonic uplift, coastal erosion, tidal range and others. That's why secular sea level rise os calculated from satellite data.

[Anonymous No.14686606]

>>14686480
>bro bring me the data from times before said data was measured

[Anonymous No.14686612]

>>14686143
Stop you are going to be giving them ideals

[Anonymous No.14686621]

>>14686414
how long until some blm chimps decide to destroy that rock because it symbolizes colonialism

[Anonymous No.14686632]

>>14686606
>bro i can't bring you the data because it wasn't measured so my hallucination of unmeasured data is better than yours xD

[Anonymous No.14686640]

>>14686632
you want photos, and photos of shorelines purposefully taken exactly at the lowest tide just don't exist.
we have plenty of numerical measurements but you will say "oh they just made it up they are just numbers I want MUH PHOTOS"

[Anonymous No.14686660]

>>14686640
cameras didn't exist in 1620 fyi

[Anonymous No.14686704]

>>14686640
> photos of shorelines purposefully taken exactly at the lowest tide just don't exist.
How would you know that? You couldn't know that. So you just exposed yourself as someone who doesn't mind to be speaking out of his ass to prove his baseless assumption.
>>14686660
Hundred years ago was 1920 fyi.

[Anonymous No.14686710]

>>14686704
>You couldn't know that
that's exactly the point and you're too retarded to get it

[Anonymous No.14686736]

>>14686710
I can know that the chances of not a single photograph being taken hundred years ago near low tide are null.

[Anonymous No.14686741]

>>14686704
learn to read pictures, bot, fyi >>14686414

[Anonymous No.14686747]

>>14686736
if they exist and you can't discern if it's the minimum tide then they mean nothing. you can't deduce something is a minimum point without seeing the before and after

[Anonymous No.14686794]

>>14686747
Well, I can see the minimum point today, can't I?
So a single authentic photograph of it being lower would do.

[Anonymous No.14687145]

[Anonymous No.14687158]

>>14686131
I need only the anthropic principle to prove that we will ALL be annihilated, soon.

[Anonymous No.14687173]

wh- what's happening sea level bros??

[Anonymous No.14687176]

>>14687173
Global warming making the sea evaporate.

[Anonymous No.14687182]

My favourite when is they use photos of erosion and subsidence and say LOOK OMG CATASTROPHIC SEA LEVEL RISES. lmao.

[Anonymous No.14687185]

>>14687145
>>14687173
This might confuse you, but just because two photos (or a fucking painting) look like they're taken around the same time, does not mean the tide is at the same position.
The moon does not confirm perfectly to earth days. People used to build big complicated machines just to try and predict the tides for seafaring, it's not so simple as "look two picture same time!".

[Anonymous No.14687192]

>>14687185
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tide-predicting_machine

[Anonymous No.14687195]

>>14687185
lmao "the moon"?? and "the tides!" AHAHHAHAHA! are you serious???

you might as well tell us you're a Sagittarius if you're going to start blaming the fucking MOON for your problems! Maybe you should get down on your knees and pray to the Sun God while you're at it!!! LMAOOOO

[Anonymous No.14687207]

>>14687195
Tides aren't real??

[Anonymous No.14687209]

>>14687173
beautiful place

[Anonymous No.14687213]

>>14687207
I'm sure the moon brings out the werewolves too! what year is it again, where people are believing in such superstition?? lmaooo