[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 227 KB, 650x340, climate-change-backgrounder.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14677532 No.14677532 [Reply] [Original]

What's the % of top climatologists and other related scientists who are climate alarmists, and what's the % of skeptics who don't think mankind is the main culprit for climate change.

>> No.14677539

There's some dudes over on youtube, I don't know their credentials but I believe them.

>> No.14677543

>>14677532
I don't know. How can I know? Do I trust the alarmist sources to tell me that the science is settled and everyone agrees with AGW? Their opposition telling me that loads of scientists question it? Do I go and interview all climate scientists myself? Suppose I choose to do that last thing. How do I pick my scientists? Do I go for the ones who make it to top level positions in government-run institutions? Do I go for the ones who are barred from such positions on account of their being supposed cranks? You people need to get a grip on your mediated reality.

>> No.14677561

>>14677543
Pick the ones who look hot. They're more trustworthy.

>> No.14677563
File: 335 KB, 1707x973, proto-greta.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14677563

>>14677532
no one cares about scientists or climatologists. they get all their climate information from child actors

>> No.14677632

>>14677532
Define alarmist. Anyone who writes things you don't like? Then it's about 97-99%

>> No.14677674

>>14677632
>Define alarmist. Anyone who writes things you don't like?
Now define "denier". :^)

Either way, see>>14677543

>> No.14677693

>>14677674
I didn't use that word, so I'm not going to define it for you.

>> No.14677706

>>14677532
>>14677668

>> No.14677778

>>14677693
>I didn't use that word
Not even in all the other AGW shill threads you participate in? :^)

>> No.14677813

>>14677532
https://youtu.be/cRWEqbl1wmk?t=21m40s

>> No.14677819

>>14677778
Why don't you kill yourself if the reality is so hard to accept?

>> No.14677842
File: 220 KB, 700x826, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14677842

>>14677813
It's been well documented that Exxon already knew about anthropogenic warming since the late 70s. Even their climate model from the 80's is decently accurate.
Once they knew this, they lobbied and paid for disinformation to deny it.

>> No.14677843
File: 863 KB, 1190x1032, Screen Shot 2022-07-19 at 11.59.28 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14677843

>>14677842

>> No.14677852

>>14677819
So do you or do you not use that word? :^)

>> No.14677853

>>14677842
>>14677843
That's frighteningly accurate. We're at 420ppm and +1°C

>> No.14677860

>>14677842
>>14677843
What I don't get is how deniers like OP claim that the governments fabricate this picture, yet for the past 45 years they have been doing everything they could to ignore the scientists' advice. Why would they do that? Wouldn't it make much more sense if they exploited whatever they fabricated?

>> No.14677863

>>14677853
+1.25C
https://climateclock.net/

>> No.14677870
File: 25 KB, 404x360, E0613A94-220D-4F3C-8A5C-A9B89A59C663.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14677870

>>14677863

>> No.14678001

What's the most compelling evidence of whatever side

>> No.14678612

>>14678001
What

>> No.14678627
File: 111 KB, 716x1024, burp'd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14678627

global warming is fake

>> No.14678630
File: 6 KB, 225x225, 32524.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14678630

>>14677860
>What I don't get is how deniers like OP claim that the governments fabricate this picture, yet for the past 45 years they have been doing everything they could to ignore the scientists' advice. Why would they do that? Wouldn't it make much more sense if they exploited whatever they fabricated?
Mental illness is a must for writing the post you wrote.

>> No.14679010

>>14678630
What's that expression trying to convey

>> No.14679040
File: 86 KB, 1088x1105, speilmann2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14679040

>>14677632
IPCC

>> No.14679675

>>14677532
https://youtu.be/jWoCXLuTIkI
doesn't really matter, current change needs to be stopped or massive famine, extinctions, generally shitty life for the next gen.

>> No.14681972

>>14677532
No real scientists believe in the big climate hoax.

>> No.14681998

>>14679040
Let me guess, you read that as if the countries will be gone by 2000, but that's not what's written there. And actually, Palau and Nauru are basically a lost cause.

>> No.14682035

>>14681998
Oh yeah, when they said 'entire nations' they meant irrelevant micronations, of course.

Also nobody has responded to OP. What's the % distribution beetween alarmists and skeptics amongst top scientists.

>> No.14682060

>>14682035
What are "top scientists"? If you define it as scientists who've had a canonical impact on the history of science, they're mostly anti-alarmists. If you define it as the most-published and most-cited scientists doing climate science, they're mostly alarmists.

>> No.14682061

>>14681998
>this level of mental gymnastics
People like YOU are why nobody trusts scientists