[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 89 KB, 818x525, england.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14677268 No.14677268 [Reply] [Original]

>40 degrees in England was not expected to happen until around 2050
It's been nice knowing you guys

>> No.14677272
File: 16 KB, 405x362, w8bdtivknnm71.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14677272

>>14677268

>> No.14677277
File: 739 KB, 750x500, Climate_told_ya!.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14677277

so, to be clear... the climate models were wrong? why should i take them seriously?

>> No.14677280

>>14677277
>Anon, I'm afraid you'll die in 2 years. Next year you won't be able to walk anymore
>Anon, who is unable to walk after just 6 months: Topkek retard you know nothing, I'm immortal

>> No.14677281
File: 979 KB, 1364x768, A_Super_Inconvenient_Graph.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14677281

>>14677280
i'm shaking.

>> No.14677288
File: 295 KB, 500x371, hmmm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14677288

>>14677280
let's assume your analogy is correct. then
1) climate models are correct
2) we're approaching d-day much more quickly than anticipated
3) temperatures predicted to occur in 2050 occurred in 2022
fantastic. what else was predicted to occur in 2050 that is occurring today? after all... the climate models show temperature is correlated with a number of climatological problems. and if temperature today is what climate models predicted to occur in 2050, then surely we should see the other things temperature cause to be co-occurring today, right? well... i'm waiting.

>> No.14677293
File: 484 KB, 1125x1638, 7A18A1D0-D044-4A55-A240-831D3E2DAF6D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14677293

>>14677288
>what else was predicted to occur in 2050 that is occurring today?
Not necessarily today today, but...

>> No.14677305
File: 204 KB, 2176x1098, Climate Narratives.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14677305

>>14677293
>70 years earlier
hold up. temperature is rising 30 years earlier than predicted... arctic permafrost is thawing 70 years earlier? sounds like climatologists don't actually understand how the two are correlated, and their modeling is so inaccurate as to be ignorable. what's the sea level rise?

>> No.14677749

>I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline.

>> No.14677799

>>14677268
What is HAARP?

>> No.14677806

But this is cooler than the heatwave we had in 1995?
The tarmac was literally melting back then.

>> No.14677833

>>14677268
>Our predictions were wrong so you should believe our other predictions.
Amazing.

>> No.14677835

>>14677305
>and their modeling is so inaccurate as to be ignorable
Yeah right, nothing bad will happen. Let's burn some liquid dinosaurs.

>> No.14677839
File: 75 KB, 1024x576, 37646959695_3a7912e3e1_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14677839

>>14677268
>40 C at Heathrow
>Heat Throw

>> No.14677887

>>14677293
ahhhhh I'm going insane because of this thing humans are dong that never happened before! ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh the sky is falling!

These are the people who have the gall to talk shit about religitards. TOP KEK

>> No.14677888

>>14677288
>then surely we should see the other things temperature cause to be co-occurring today
1. We're talking about climate, not temperature. The fact that you do not seem to be aware of the difference means all discussion is useless until you look up what those words mean in a dictionary.
2. You don't have to wait, you can just open up a newspaper and read.

>> No.14677893
File: 220 KB, 1011x625, palm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14677893

>>14677293
oops forgot pic

>> No.14677897

>>14677305
>rising 30 years earlier than predicted... arctic permafrost is thawing 70 years earlier?
Lol imagine thinking the climate with its millions of variables works like this

>> No.14677906

>>14677897
I mean, there are current best guesses with corresponding uncertainties.

>> No.14677921

>>14677893
What do you want to tell us schizo? If you want to talk about the Paleocene-Eocene thermal Maximum? As a proof for what? That carbon addition can heat the planet?

>> No.14677942
File: 217 KB, 680x810, 189.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14677942

OOOOAHHHHHHH IM WOOOOORMNG AND IM TROOOOSTING. I FOOOOOKING LOOOOVE SCIENCE

>> No.14677943

>>14677268
Show me a picture of the meterology equipment and all of the documentation related to its service

>> No.14677953

>>14677943
>Show me a picture of the meterology equipment and all of the documentation related to its service

"Hey, let's just install this near this exhaust output, that way we can service the weather meter when we service the exhaust output!"

Given the degree of lying that GloboHomo Inc is capable of, they will gaslight people about how "men are women," lying about the temperature and giving suggestible ppl heatstroke seems almost old-fashioned.

"You peasants, you prayed wrongly and God is bringing a flood!"