First JWST pic

File: 2.75 MB, 1532x1574, Screen Shot 2022-07-11 at 6.26.59 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

First JWST pic Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:27:31 2022 No.14646821 [Reply] [Original]

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:30:19 2022 No.14646879 I’ve been to all of those galaxies. They are nothing special.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:32:36 2022 No.14646914 >>14646879 that one over there has space blackjack and blue hookers

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:33:07 2022 No.14646923 farts

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:33:34 2022 No.14646934 Space has galaxies in it. Who knew?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:34:21 2022 No.14646949 >>14646914 raises you 100 dark matter chips

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:34:53 2022 No.14646954 So what did we learn by those pictures? How far back are we looking and are there any surprises?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:34:55 2022 No.14646955 >>14646821 Some light seems warped, is that just an effect f it traveling so far? or the telescope itself?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:35:02 2022 No.14646958 how is this any different than literally every other space pic we've taken

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:35:05 2022 No.14646961 is that a quasar in the center? i’m pogging rn

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:35:29 2022 No.14646968 >>14646879 Andromeda has some pretty good barbeque places

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:36:27 2022 No.14646982 >>14646923 Lol. Funny contrast. 60+ billion, lots of time and effort. farts to the result.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:36:41 2022 No.14646988 Why can’t the point it at a cool looking planet or something?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:37:26 2022 No.14647005 File: 276 KB, 1000x563, intro-1605727291.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14646949 pass the guac

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:37:54 2022 No.14647014 File: 1.95 MB, 4537x4630, 1657579034038.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >2.9MiB lower quality pic wtf?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:38:04 2022 No.14647016 >>14646821 Is this considered "dense" at this early in the universe?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:38:33 2022 No.14647027 >>14646955 The centre galaxies gravity is wrapping light. Some of those blurred galaxies at the edges might actually be behind it and way more distant.

Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:38:40 2022 No.14647029

>>FULL RESOLUTION
https://stsci-opo.org/STScI-01G7JJADTH90FR98AKKJFKSS0B.png

This image shows many overlapping objects at various distances. They include foreground stars, galaxies
in a galaxy cluster, and distorted background galaxies behind the galaxy cluster.
The background of space is black. Thousands of small galaxies appear across the image. Their colors
vary. Some are shades of orange, others are white. Most appear as fuzzy ovals, but a few have
distinctive spiral arms.
In front of the galaxies are several foreground stars. Most appear blue with diffraction spikes, forming
eight-pointed star shapes. Some look as large as the galaxies that appear next to them.
A very bright star is slightly off center. It has eight blue, long diffraction spikes. In the center of the
image, between 4 o’clock and 6 o’clock in the bright star’s spikes, are several bright, white galaxies.
These are members of the galaxy cluster.
There are also many thin, long, orange arcs. They follow invisible concentric circles that curve around
the center of the image. These are images of background galaxies that have been stretched and
distorted by the foreground galaxy cluster.

https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/038/01G7JGTH21B5GN9VCYAHBXKSD1

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:39:13 2022 No.14647036 >>14646821 What is in this picture? Anything cool? Can we zoom in to those blobs of light or is this the highest resolution?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:39:52 2022 No.14647047 >>14647014 phone posters are retards who screenshot shit to save it

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:40:24 2022 No.14647058 File: 115 KB, 431x441, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647014 what the fuck is going on here? it looks like a square image was photoshopped in

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:40:36 2022 No.14647062 >>14647027 Thank you.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:41:24 2022 No.14647081 >>14646821 which galaxy has the hottest babes

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:41:25 2022 No.14647082 >>14646821 Call me crazy but why is it look so artificial?

Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:41:32 2022 No.14647084

>>14647029
NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope has produced the deepest and sharpest infrared image of the distant universe to date. Known as Webb’s First Deep Field, this image of galaxy cluster SMACS 0723 is overflowing with detail.

Thousands of galaxies – including the faintest objects ever observed in the infrared – have appeared in Webb’s view for the first time. This slice of the vast universe is approximately the size of a grain of sand held at arm’s length by someone on the ground.

This deep field, taken by Webb’s Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam), is a composite made from images at different wavelengths, totaling 12.5 hours – achieving depths at infrared wavelengths beyond the Hubble Space Telescope’s deepest fields, which took weeks.

The image shows the galaxy cluster SMACS 0723 as it appeared 4.6 billion years ago. The combined mass of this galaxy cluster acts as a gravitational lens, magnifying much more distant galaxies behind it. Webb’s NIRCam has brought those distant galaxies into sharp focus – they have tiny, faint structures that have never been seen before, including star clusters and diffuse features. Researchers will soon begin to learn more about the galaxies’ masses, ages, histories, and compositions, as Webb seeks the earliest galaxies in the universe.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:42:04 2022 No.14647092 >JWST FUCK MY SHIT UP

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:42:54 2022 No.14647102 >>14647005 Are those from Milliways? Very nice!

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:43:38 2022 No.14647108 >>14647082 Not enough trees

Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:43:38 2022 No.14647109

>>14647014
>Thousands of galaxies – including the faintest objects ever observed in the infrared – have appeared in Webb’s view for the first time. This slice of the vast universe is approximately the size of a grain of sand held at arm’s length by someone on the ground.

exactly how many galaxies are in that image? i can't count beyond my fingers and toes.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:44:49 2022 No.14647127 >>14647014 me in the lower left

Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:44:57 2022 No.14647128

>>14647082
see >>14647084
>This deep field, taken by Webb’s Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam), is a composite made from images at different wavelengths, totaling 12.5 hours – achieving depths at infrared wavelengths beyond the Hubble Space Telescope’s deepest fields, which took weeks.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:47:23 2022 No.14647156 >>14647058 Distortion from gravitational lensing from a massive object at the center of the image I believe

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:48:17 2022 No.14647164 >>14647092 how long were you waiting to use that?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:48:40 2022 No.14647168 File: 1.57 MB, 4537x4630, STScI-01G7JJADTH90FR98AKKJFKSS0B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647082 It's a shit image. This one is better.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:48:54 2022 No.14647169 File: 13 KB, 418x282, cap.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >im drunk nigga

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:49:06 2022 No.14647170 Remember to ignore tourist bait threads

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:49:41 2022 No.14647177 >>14647168 HOLD THE FUCKING PHONE...

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:50:10 2022 No.14647181 When do we get the other photos, and what can we expect to see in those

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:50:57 2022 No.14647187 >>14647181 tomorrowstan

Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:51:19 2022 No.14647192
File: 36 KB, 860x603, 496-4964447_apu-pepe-png-download-pepe-thinking-png-transparent[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

So what is the oldest thing in these photos? Is there anything like a primordial galaxy formation that we can see now?

Also, all PR photo ops aside, has this image (and others) shed any light on things like the shape/age of the universe and how it was originally formed? Or is that analysis coming later

Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:52:12 2022 No.14647199

>>14647181
Update: On Friday, July 8th, NASA released the targets for Webb's first wave of full-color scientific images that mark the official beginning of Webb’s operations. They were selected by an international committee of representatives from NASA, ESA, CSA, and the Space Telescope Science Institute.

Targets are listed below, courtesy of NASA.

Carina Nebula. The Carina Nebula is one of the largest and brightest nebulae in the sky, located approximately 7,600 light-years away in the southern constellation Carina. Nebulae are stellar nurseries where stars form. The Carina Nebula is home to many massive stars, several times larger than the Sun.

WASP-96 b (spectrum). WASP-96 b is a giant planet outside our solar system, composed mainly of gas. The planet, located nearly 1,150 light-years from Earth, orbits its star every 3.4 days. It has about half the mass of Jupiter, and its discovery was announced in 2014.

Southern Ring Nebula. The Southern Ring, or “Eight-Burst” nebula, is a planetary nebula – an expanding cloud of gas, surrounding a dying star. It is nearly half a light-year in diameter and is located approximately 2,000 light-years away from Earth.

Stephan’s Quintet: About 290 million light-years away, Stephan’s Quintet is located in the constellation Pegasus. It is notable for being the first compact galaxy group ever discovered in 1877. Four of the five galaxies within the quintet are locked in a cosmic dance of repeated close encounters.

SMACS 0723: Massive foreground galaxy clusters magnify and distort the light of objects behind them, permitting a deep field view into both the extremely distant and intrinsically faint galaxy populations. Update: On Sunday, NASA announced that the White House would reveal one of the images early on Monday afternoon July 11th at 5:00 PM ET. The event will be streamed live.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:52:21 2022 No.14647203 File: 44 KB, 800x450, pepes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Looks exactly the same as the hubble deep field pic.....

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:52:40 2022 No.14647208 >>14647192 Me.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:52:42 2022 No.14647209 File: 630 KB, 864x778, 1634173093140.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Prettiest one.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:52:59 2022 No.14647211 I wonder who leaked it

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:53:44 2022 No.14647218 Are they ever going to point this thing in the direction of a supervoid? Would that full anyway?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:54:04 2022 No.14647223 >>14647181 July 12 they are releasing the others.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:54:07 2022 No.14647225 >>14647211 Came straight from Hunter's phone

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:54:37 2022 No.14647228 >>14647192 The image is from galaxies roughly 100 million years after the big bang

Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:54:51 2022 No.14647232
File: 3.81 MB, 3800x3800, hubble.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

same location but from Hubble

idk how to scale down 23mb PNGs, if you want full res:

https://archive.stsci.edu/missions/hlsp/relics/smacs0723-73/color_images/hlsp_relics_hst_acs-wfc3ir_smacs0723-73_multi_v1_color.png

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:55:13 2022 No.14647239 don't mind me just here to remind you that inflation is retarded mental gymnastics and penrose is right

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:55:59 2022 No.14647245 >>14647239 same with dark matter. If Dark Matter was real all the galaxies would be jumbled up together.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:56:09 2022 No.14647246 File: 6 KB, 91x53, 1628324723203.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] What is this? It's so red, point of creation? Hand of God?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:57:00 2022 No.14647249 >>14647246 a very far away galaxy

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:57:08 2022 No.14647251 >>14646821 how many souls do you think were captured in this image

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:57:19 2022 No.14647255 File: 297 KB, 1280x1280, 1657579388057.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Hubble did this in 1995 This is lame

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 22:58:54 2022 No.14647265 >>14647255 I mean besides higher magnification what are we expecting? Note that the targets to be released soon are mostly in the Milky Way hopefully those turn out well.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:00:23 2022 No.14647276 >>14647255 Why is there some much lensing in the jwst photo but almost none in hubble's image?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:00:26 2022 No.14647277 >>14647209 looks so good it almost seems fake

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:01:24 2022 No.14647285 >>14647168 Thanks!

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:02:10 2022 No.14647290 >>14647276 They had decades to scope out a better place to look?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:02:10 2022 No.14647291 File: 2.56 MB, 1992x1086, 92E7Avq.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647255 You can see the real power of Webb when you compare the Webb image with the same patch of sky imaged by Hubble. The difference is night and day

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:03:18 2022 No.14647301 >>14647291 Look at the galaxy that is heavily distorted by gravitational lensing for a really nice comparison of how much better Webb is.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:04:10 2022 No.14647304 >>14647291 wonder what the capture time is for both images

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:04:11 2022 No.14647306 >>14647291 idk man they kinda look the same honestly

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:04:15 2022 No.14647307 >>14646821 10 billion dollars for this we could be extending lifespans with that money

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:04:18 2022 No.14647308 File: 84 KB, 244x173, 1628912832271.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Are the dots you can see in the centre galaxies or noise?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:04:36 2022 No.14647310 >>14647014 scaled and rotated the old hubble picture for comparison brehs, they added new galaxies

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:05:01 2022 No.14647311 >>14647291 They hired JJ Abrams for more lens flares

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:05:33 2022 No.14647318 File: 2.56 MB, 1992x1086, comparison.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647306 Compare these 2 spots

Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:05:39 2022 No.14647320

>>14647304
"This deep field, taken by Webb’s Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam), is a composite made from images at different wavelengths, totaling 12.5 hours – achieving depths at infrared wavelengths beyond the Hubble Space Telescope’s deepest fields, which took weeks."
https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/038/01G7JGTH21B5GN9VCYAHBXKSD1

Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:05:40 2022 No.14647322
File: 216 KB, 1080x1350, 1585541750078.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14647169
>there exists an angle visible to intelligent life capable of creating telescopes that has our own Milky Way Galaxy getting warped by the gravitational lensing from a star nearby to them

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:05:42 2022 No.14647323 File: 2.32 MB, 4537x4630, hubblepic.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647014 >>14647310

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:05:50 2022 No.14647324 File: 257 KB, 3024x1634, webb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] cant wait to see what the release over the next >2 weeks

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:06:38 2022 No.14647329 >>14647276 they pointed this one at a known massive galaxy

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:07:10 2022 No.14647335 that exoplanet image better knock my socks off

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:07:56 2022 No.14647343 Imagine how many qt alien girls there are in this single image...

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:08:16 2022 No.14647346 >>14647276 If you look at the comparison images you can see there is lensing in Hubble too, Hubble just has lower light gathering power so it's not as obvious. In the Hubble image you can see the lensing as faint red lines >>14647291

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:08:47 2022 No.14647351 >>14647318 this is barely a jump from 360p to 480p quality

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:09:00 2022 No.14647352 >>14647343 Read Genesis There are no aliens, God didn't create them

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:09:10 2022 No.14647357 >>14647246 A very redshifted galaxy, so extremely distant and probably among the first galaxies to be created. It's theorized that primitive galaxies are mostly composed of hydrogen and helium.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:09:27 2022 No.14647361 File: 2.07 MB, 4537x4630, JWT_vs_Hubble_deep_field.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] quick and dirty comparison overlay

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:09:50 2022 No.14647362 >>14647323 wow Hubble looks like shit in comparison >>14647351 retard

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:10:26 2022 No.14647366 >>14647291 i was kind of disappointed initially but this is pretty impressive if you compare it like this. also hubble took weeks to take its deep field image while webb took 12.5 for this. can't wait to see what else it can do.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:10:34 2022 No.14647367 >>14647352 Hmmm no thanks I'll pass on the old book thingy.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:10:46 2022 No.14647369 Can we see the dinosaurs?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:11:59 2022 No.14647373 can we see the cum?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:12:48 2022 No.14647376 Thank Biden we finally have James Webb!

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:13:00 2022 No.14647377 >>14647366 I wish they had someone at the briefing actually explain and contextualize the image. And zoom in on some galaxies.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:13:25 2022 No.14647378 File: 91 KB, 500x666, 1609494900385.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647362 hey man you cant talk to her like that

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:14:18 2022 No.14647384 >>14647058 it's a sprial bar galaxy on viewed a few degrees on edge

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:14:21 2022 No.14647387 >>14647291 It is a bigger upgrade than I originally thought, I'm having hope for these >>14647199 being awesome still.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:14:44 2022 No.14647389 >>14647255 >Hubble did this in 1995 No it didn't. That's the Ultra Deep Field, which was done with ACS. Which didn't exist in 1995.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:15:54 2022 No.14647393 >>14647291 Me when I go from a 6'' dob to a 12''

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:16:12 2022 No.14647394 So which is the structure creating all the gravitational pull in the centre, or is it a group?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:17:53 2022 No.14647399 >>14647394 The combined mass of the galaxy cluster creates the gravitational lens effect, magnifying and warping the much more distant galaxies behind it

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:19:35 2022 No.14647403 >>14647394 It's a galaxy cluster right in the middle there's a huge ass one and more smaller ones next to it all the diffuse white lights near the middle The bigger lights with rays are just nearby stars

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:20:43 2022 No.14647410 >>14647335 It's a grainy shadow in front of a star. Sorry to ruin the surprise.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:20:49 2022 No.14647412 >>14647399 Circle the galaxy cluster for me pls, like >>14647318

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:22:16 2022 No.14647416 >>14647209 cute

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:23:15 2022 No.14647418 Ultra high res version available here https://i.postimg.cc/dt5sTYYy/deepfield.png

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:24:50 2022 No.14647421 Retarded question but, how do they tell the difference between a really far away but massive star and closer but smaller star?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:25:34 2022 No.14647425 >>14647418 Don't download this, it broke my PS2.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:25:44 2022 No.14647427 File: 15 KB, 86x94, Screen Shot 2022-07-11 at 7.24.52 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >tfw this beautiful galaxy could hold my soul mate but it's to far to ever reach

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:25:55 2022 No.14647428 >>14647251 0. We're all there is.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:26:33 2022 No.14647431 >>14647421 for something this far away, redshift https://nsnsearch.com/faq/how-do-astronomers-use-redshift-to-determine-distances/

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:27:05 2022 No.14647436 >>14647399 >>14647403 So it's just a focal effect and not a physical one?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:27:29 2022 No.14647438 >>14647421 cepheids and supernovas

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:27:53 2022 No.14647440 File: 31 KB, 154x182, Screen Shot 2022-07-11 at 7.26.49 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I wonder whats happening in the hell galaxy

Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:28:21 2022 No.14647441

>>14647412
You can't really circle only the cluster, because the whole photo is capturing the cluster (SMACS 0723). The galaxies in the "foreground" are the clearer, sharper ones, and the ones in the background are the more warped, blurrier ones
>>14647436
Yes, but the focal effect is from the physical distortion of spacetime

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:28:25 2022 No.14647442 >>14647427 I checked bro, none of them are interested

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:28:30 2022 No.14647444 >>14647436 It is a physical one the light is really being bent because all the mass around the galaxy cluster literally bend space and light follows that bent path

Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:29:29 2022 No.14647448

>>14647436
The light is actually being "bent" by gravitational fields if that's what your asking. It's not just a trick of the telescopes lens. If you took a picture of the galaxies from the other side of the large stellar masses they would appear normal.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:31:08 2022 No.14647455 I'm going back to listening to schizos and crank theoirists, at least they're entertaining. Defund STEM, science is over.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:32:13 2022 No.14647461 >>14647455 <<<<<<<<<< >/pol/ is that way

Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:33:02 2022 No.14647465

>>14647421
Distance to stars up to a few hundred light years away can be directly measured using parallax (how these stars "move" in the sky as the Earth moves on its orbit). Just apply basig trigonometry and you get the distance. From these stars here you get a relationship between brightness and color, and you apply to stars further away. We can know their color, so we can estimate how bright they really are, and from there we can estimate how far away they are.
For shit REALLY far away (millions to billions of ly away) measurement of the doppler effect caused by the universe's expansion (known because it was measured precisely by measuring a specific type of supernova which always explodes with the same intensity) is used. The redder shifted it is, the further away it is. Galaxies too far away fall into infrared territory, this is why James Webb was fine tuned mostly to measure infrarred frequencies.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:34:22 2022 No.14647471 >>14647251 Zero. Only Humans have souls.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:34:22 2022 No.14647470 >>14646821 so did they fuck up the alignment or are we in wacky land?

Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:35:00 2022 No.14647475

The more interesting things in my opinion is the most faintest background galaxy dots, and their lack or not of homogeneity across the span of the picture.

Because some direction we take an image in will be towards the center of the universe, and some direction will be towards it's perimeter

Also any extreme anomalies are intersting.

Also exoplanets

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:35:01 2022 No.14647476 >>14647470 Gravitational lensing.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:36:47 2022 No.14647480 >>14646821 can we apply some ML to remove the gravitational distortion?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:37:02 2022 No.14647481 >>14647475 There's no center in the universe. It doesn't even make sense to talk about a "center". You could say it happened everywhere.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:38:00 2022 No.14647489 File: 171 KB, 318x243, JW_galaxy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] kneel.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:38:31 2022 No.14647495 File: 103 KB, 768x1024, 1646723266050.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14646821 Gravitational lensing :OOO

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:39:07 2022 No.14647499 i know no one here believes in astrology. but these pic are pure horror to me. i can only imagine the horrors going on in them galaxy's right now :(

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:39:14 2022 No.14647501 >>14647495 I look like that

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:40:51 2022 No.14647506 >>14646958 it's not the taxpayers got hoodwinked

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:41:01 2022 No.14647508 >>14647495 seriously? why the fuck would they spend 10 billion for a clown mirror? there must have been a better way.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:42:05 2022 No.14647515 >>14647499 there has to be billions upon billions of aliens having fucking in those galaxies...

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:42:38 2022 No.14647519 what the super bright ones? massive stars?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:43:34 2022 No.14647524 >>14647519 just nearby stars

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:43:45 2022 No.14647525 >>14647515 having what?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:43:58 2022 No.14647526 >>14647489 Is that a quasar?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:44:21 2022 No.14647529 >>14647519 Nah, probably normal very close stars inside our own galaxy.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:45:38 2022 No.14647535 >>14647526 no it's 2 galaxies billions of light years apart the red one is far away and the white one is closer by

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:46:21 2022 No.14647537 >>14647489 i was just going to ask WTF is that.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:49:06 2022 No.14647548 why can't machine learning remove the clown mirror effect

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:49:15 2022 No.14647549 "If you held a grain of sand on the tip of your finger at arms length, that is the part of the universe that you're seeing. Just one little speck of the universe," he said mind boggling

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:50:14 2022 No.14647553 how has someone not edited this to show the hunter leaks https://twitter.com/CNET/status/1546636937775153152

Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:50:53 2022 No.14647555

>>14647481
Where did all the parrots pick up this false statement?

Infinity means cannot exist at any given time.

Therefore there can not exist right now, or at any given time an infinite amount of galaxies.

Therefore the total quantity of galaxies are in an assembly in relation to one another, therefore they compose roughly some shape that like all shapes have a perimeter and center.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:51:00 2022 No.14647556 File: 57 KB, 786x719, peppy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14646821 looks like shit frankly.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:52:08 2022 No.14647561 File: 2.47 MB, 720x720, DASH_720.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:54:48 2022 No.14647569 >>14647561 why are you lying? it's not funny :(

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:55:17 2022 No.14647570 >>14647499 Think about all the alien music made with different materials in different densities of atmosphere. Think of all the different alien architecture, and sports, and fashion styles.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:55:41 2022 No.14647574 >>14646821 I can look up space wallpapers on google images and get tons of cool pics for free. These nerds spent billions of dollars to get just a few photos that don’t even look cool, what gives?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:56:37 2022 No.14647577 >>14647014 >>14646821 >that shiny one in the middle God confirmed?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:56:41 2022 No.14647578 oh wow it's fucking nothing

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:57:13 2022 No.14647583 >>14646821 wow, galaxies that no human or posthuman will ever interact with. show me exoplanets with alien babes to conquer in the milky way.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:58:49 2022 No.14647590 >>14647561 Pause at 6 or 7 seconds, are all those white dots really in the image? You can't see them without zooming?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:58:51 2022 No.14647592 >>14647431 >>14647438 >>14647465 Thanks anons. If I were rich I'd dedicate my life to astronomy. It's so fascinating.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 11 23:59:15 2022 No.14647595 >>14646821 So does this mean they can use this technology to zoom in on Proxima Centauri to see if there's fucking life already?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:00:58 2022 No.14647602 >>14647595 No. We'd need Earth sized telescopes to see that level of detail from this far away.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:01:43 2022 No.14647608 >>14647590 you need to zoom in on the full res image to see them https://stsci-opo.org/STScI-01G7JJADTH90FR98AKKJFKSS0B.png it's 28MB

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:02:03 2022 No.14647609

I’m too pea brain to understand colors.
Does nasa just go “hehe this galaxy will look good in blue” or are we actually able to know what the color of everything is. This is the thing that filters me most about space photos after learning it’s originally in black and white

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:04:55 2022 No.14647619 >>14647583 The point of these is to gain an understanding of the early stages of the universe

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:05:59 2022 No.14647623 >>14647602 >>14647595 Signs of advanced life like satelites around the planet (would this be detected if some planet had weird light reflections?) maybe? And also it hard to zoom into the planet without being blinded by its star?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:06:52 2022 No.14647627 >>14647609 I would also like to know this

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:07:49 2022 No.14647633 >>14647058 N

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:10:47 2022 No.14647642 >>14647352 Any books about qt humanoid alien girls?

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:10:53 2022 No.14647643

>>14647608
Has the most distant Galaxy out of all them been labeled yet or is that impossible to tell exact which is furthest?

Also the faintest, also intersting, the very point where 0 signal just barely barely barely goes beyond 0signal to say 'theres a galaxy here'

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:11:29 2022 No.14647645 >>14647561 fake shit from plebbit

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:12:38 2022 No.14647652 >>14647609 >>14647627 Someone more informed should comment, but I think they shift the wavelengths. Say you have infrared light from 1000 to 1500 nm. You can divide the wavelength by 2.5 and get a range of 400 to 600 nm. Which is in the visible range.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:12:49 2022 No.14647655

>>14647570
ok great? think all the fucked up experiments they have done to animals. maybe they have no morals like us. i hate the fucking place so much its nothing but hellish. we have morals and Russians used a entire town the full of people to test nukes on for like 40 years. just imagine the horrors all these faggots are doing. we kill 6 billion animals a year to feed our selfs just to make shitty music and movies and buildings

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:13:27 2022 No.14647662
File: 434 KB, 702x616, Ifuckinglovescience.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>LOOK AT LE DISTORTED GALAXY PIC FOR THE 100TH TIME
>WE WILL NEVER SHOW YOU AN ACTUAL PLANET OR THE EXTRATERRESTIAL MEGASTRUCTURE WE RECENTLY DISCOVERED THAT'S WAY CLOSER LOL

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:16:23 2022 No.14647675 File: 572 KB, 480x270, cartman.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647662 >NASA hiding evidence of type 3 civs Go post this on /x/ and watch the fireworks

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:18:30 2022 No.14647685 File: 137 KB, 431x441, 745674.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647058 I see a wizard sieg hieling

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:18:52 2022 No.14647690 >>14647685 anon...

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:18:53 2022 No.14647691

>>14647662
Seriously I'm sure theres an explanation but why aren't we looking at closer bodies to see them in the best detail possible.
Maybe it's because these scientists all know we are trapped in our solar system for another 10k-100k years if not forever due to having no feasible way to travel FtL.
By current tech we'd need multiple generations of people devoting their entire lives on one vessel just travel to alpha centauri, one way

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:20:35 2022 No.14647694 >>14647685 Grow up

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:22:04 2022 No.14647698 >>14647685 lol

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:22:12 2022 No.14647699

>casually joking and making memes about an imagine which would have caused your ancestors minds to literally drain out of their ears
>staring at a million galaxies and a trillion stars in high definition and not immediately weeping
>taking for granted what is likely one of the greatest scientific achievements of humanity to date
you all should be ASHAMED

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:22:21 2022 No.14647700 >>14647307 >we could be extending lifespans with that money no thanks

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:22:32 2022 No.14647701 >>14647685 That does look like persons face

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:24:03 2022 No.14647706 >>14647699 I won’t be satisfied until I get an alien gf from a galaxy on the other side of the observable universe

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:24:08 2022 No.14647707 >>14647685 That or a witch on a vacuum cleaner though that would be normie lame

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:24:41 2022 No.14647711 File: 754 KB, 400x171, obiwan.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647699 sir this is 4chan, look around

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:26:06 2022 No.14647716 >>14647699 lol someone has never seen the milky way at night with no moon.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:26:17 2022 No.14647717 >>14647699 Someone needs to shoop it into that guy stretching out his asshole

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:27:31 2022 No.14647724 File: 21 KB, 418x282, 1657579734954~2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647699 I CAN'T BREATHE

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:28:34 2022 No.14647727

>>14647291
I mean, it's not that different considering there are 30 plus years between the Hubble and JWST.

I'm glad it's actually working, but the Hubble was legit a game changer for astronomy and invoked a lot of wonder in the world. While these pictures are impressive, it doesn't have the expected punch.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:29:41 2022 No.14647729 >>14647699 I HECKIN LOVE SCIENCERINO!!

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:30:52 2022 No.14647735 File: 35 KB, 600x539, eeheehee.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647724

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:31:08 2022 No.14647737 >>14647291 something really fishy going on here way take the same picture from 30 years ago? thats dumb i want to see never before seen crazy shit not photoshooped bs.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:34:16 2022 No.14647747 >>14647246 its a recording light. we are being recorded,camera is ON

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:34:30 2022 No.14647749 >>14647737 70iq bros unite

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:34:40 2022 No.14647754

>>14647699
It's just not that impressive. I'm sorry. It's cool, but just not that impressive.

People don't care about the stars and the only reason ancients cared about them is because they thought they influenced behavior (in reality they just act as clocks).

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:35:07 2022 No.14647756 >>14647737 It's a test to show how much quicker and better it is compared to the old telescope

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:38:29 2022 No.14647772 File: 3.68 MB, 1920x1080, 01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Closer comparison 1

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:39:44 2022 No.14647779 >>14646821 so a 2.75MB 1532x1574 image is that it?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:39:52 2022 No.14647780 File: 3.17 MB, 1920x1080, 02.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647772 Closer comparison 2

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:40:56 2022 No.14647788 >>14647772 How cutting edge was this image and how much were they stretching the capabilities of the telescope when they took it?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:41:53 2022 No.14647796 >>14647772 >>14647780 yeah ok. now i know the new telescope does not even exist and it was just money a laundering scheme.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:42:03 2022 No.14647800 >>14647655 Doesn’t matter if you stepped on 1 bug or killed trillions of cows, it’s still death caused by our selfishness. Might as well take what’s ours

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:42:59 2022 No.14647806 >>14647209 Cousins? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NGC_4921

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:43:13 2022 No.14647807 >>14647724 kek

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:43:18 2022 No.14647808 >>14646821 Trillions of sentient beings are having sex in this pic

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:44:00 2022 No.14647814 I hate the hexagonal lense flare

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:44:13 2022 No.14647816 File: 709 KB, 1200x675, shitty.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647772 >>14647780 someone should make a webm

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:44:38 2022 No.14647818 Reminder that according to flat earthers all of these pics are photoshopped because we lack the tech to go into space, let alone tech being something you can physically go to

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:45:06 2022 No.14647821 >>14647800 the death is not the issue we do it in the most horrible ways possible to max out the suffering. its even way worse now that we have the ability to grow lab meat.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:45:21 2022 No.14647824 >>14647816 That red one in the top right is a technosignature

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:45:25 2022 No.14647825 >>14647814 indeed its pretty rough, but price you pay for such a large collection area

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:45:33 2022 No.14647826 >>14647685 I can't unsee it now.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:48:44 2022 No.14647838 >>14647821 ...Production which if halted immediately and reworked to be more “humane” (they aren’t even humans doofus) would starve millions because they don’t have access to other foods. We’re in too deep as it stands

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:51:15 2022 No.14647847 >>14647685 now yuo see...

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:53:38 2022 No.14647858

>>14647838
i really hope at your death you get a life review and you are forced to exp all the pain and suffering caused by factory farming in the last 60 years. then pinhead shows up and takes you hell and you exp pain and suffering that you can not even comprehend. fucking ignorant faggot.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:54:53 2022 No.14647868 File: 38 KB, 480x360, postit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647717

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:56:06 2022 No.14647873 File: 70 KB, 886x886, gluuuughheheheee.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647858 >I have never seen a farm before in my entire life

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:57:04 2022 No.14647879 >>14647858 And what are you doing that’s so productive for the cause? If the crimes being committed were so deplorable you’d surely do something about it, rather than arguing with some consumer schmuck who has nothing to do with the issue at large?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:58:38 2022 No.14647887 Are we only capable of seeing half of the universe? Like is our galaxy blocking the other side of the universe? And if we were on the other side of the milkyway would we even see very old galaxies like >>14647246 My brain is melting

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 00:59:41 2022 No.14647892 >>14647058 That's where Wakanda is

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:00:12 2022 No.14647894 >>14647873 come on are you trolling? do you know how chickens are raised?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:01:31 2022 No.14647902 >>14647879 that's the worst part is helplessness

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:02:54 2022 No.14647908 >>14647685 >sprinkles zyklon on a 6 point start

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:04:29 2022 No.14647919 Whats life like in the bendy galaxies?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:05:44 2022 No.14647925 File: 2.08 MB, 1920x1080, .webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647816

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:10:08 2022 No.14647945 File: 2.08 MB, 1920x1080, autism.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:17:43 2022 No.14647973 >>14647945 cool

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:23:33 2022 No.14647986 why is it so lensed

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:24:22 2022 No.14647991 >>14647986 wacky clown mirrors

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:25:38 2022 No.14647994 >>14647685 cannot unsee >>14647694 lol

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:32:49 2022 No.14648008

>>14647643
>Has the most distant Galaxy out of all them been labeled yet or is that impossible to tell exact which is furthest?
>Also the faintest, also intersting, the very point where 0 signal just barely barely barely goes beyond 0signal to say 'theres a galaxy here

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:36:29 2022 No.14648014 >>14647945 All this just to see the same dumb picture in HD, 1 billion dollars in tax payers money and 20 years of technology, just to see dumb pictures of known universe.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:36:30 2022 No.14648015 >>14647357 the origin of this red dot probably doesnt even exist anymore right?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:39:20 2022 No.14648024 File: 264 KB, 474x377, b81.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14646821 As painful as it can be sometimes, I'm really happy I exist, that I'm alive to witness and technically be apart of something so vast and beautiful.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:39:25 2022 No.14648026 >>14647324 >just 2 more weeks

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:39:26 2022 No.14648027 >tfw you are looking at thousands of not millions or billions of long forgotten and dead civilizations of countless different planets, stories, war, technology ....all long gone and lost never to be seen by a human eye. Kind of sad.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:42:08 2022 No.14648034 >>14647699 I hate these zoomers too anon. They view everything through a hyper-reductive, forced "lol so quirky" pseudoironic cynical lens.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:44:24 2022 No.14648038

>>14648027
don't be sad that its over, smile that it happened, that all those lifeforms roughly got to the same position of pondering that we can be at now, and there will be more to come.
>lost never to be seen by a human eye
they recessitated near- precambarian era cellular life the other day. anything's possible

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 01:55:36 2022 No.14648074 The image is cool, but >influx of retarded astrophysicist interpretations of red smudges is definitely gravitational lensing, black holes, [insert object from theoretical zoo here] >redditor sci-fi fantasies and nihilist boo-hooing because space big

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 02:05:56 2022 No.14648100 >>14647440 sinning and debauchery also, it may be hell

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 02:06:36 2022 No.14648102 >>14648014 Kill astronomers on site

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 02:16:20 2022 No.14648128 >>14646821 That's cool and all, but what has this done to advance us? Unless fueling more astronomer egos to post zany facts on reddit counts.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 02:28:44 2022 No.14648177 >>14647691 Resolution is limited by the size of the telescope aperture EHT but with optical interferometers when?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 02:36:13 2022 No.14648211 >>14647685 Nice. We'll call it the Nazi Magician Galaxy (M1488)

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 02:42:51 2022 No.14648237
File: 35 KB, 564x752, FXGGHvCXEAIec5t.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14648128
>what has this done to advance us?
You could ask the same question about any form of discovery, experiment, engineering feat, work of art. What do you mean by "advance us?" Increase the GDP? More Hot Pockets flavors? Hot Pockets wouldn't exist without the long history of food sciences, microwave technology, etc.

The rest of the internet is subconscious blackpilling -- a facade of happy fun life surrounding a world built on suffering and misery, designed to make you feel depressed and powerless. 4chan is just overt direct blackpilling: poisoning the well, abandoning all sense of wonder at this incredible world and universe that surrounds it. Reject it. Appreciate beauty. You don't have to believe in God to accept the possibility that there could be a God, and that there could be immeasurable beauty outside of the forced misery of the modern world. Shills and unhappy people want you to give up and to not experience joy. Fuck them

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 02:50:16 2022 No.14648265 >>14647352 >>14647367 >>14647642 In the Bible it says Elohim is plural, why?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 02:51:23 2022 No.14648266 >>14647470 how do the electral universe dudes explain gravitational lensing

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 03:03:15 2022 No.14648314 File: 34 KB, 500x500, 1603158230017.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647816 >that one galaxy completely disappearing in the IR

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 03:07:43 2022 No.14648331 >>14647357 >created By who?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 03:08:53 2022 No.14648334 >>14648314 And it's also so much bigger than almost all the other visible galaxies. Imagine how fucking massive it must be if it's so far away and appears so big

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 03:08:55 2022 No.14648335 >>14648266 Refraction.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 03:45:32 2022 No.14648446
File: 3.84 MB, 4537x4630, james webb first high resolution image STScI-01G7JJADTH90FR98AKKJFKSS0B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14647232
Reduced to 4mb.
Higher resolutions can be found here:

https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/038/01G7JGTH21B5GN9VCYAHBXKSD1

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 03:54:43 2022 No.14648467 Webb could easily make a video, at 24 pictures per second, right? It would be cool if they took a video of a pulsar, showing the nebulas/dust clouds around it lighting up with every rotation.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 03:57:32 2022 No.14648478 >>14648467 That's a good question actually - I know I read something a while back about time studies but I don't remember the exactly details.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 03:59:20 2022 No.14648485 >>14647887 in theory it shouldn't matter which way we look

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 04:00:37 2022 No.14648491

>>14646821
All this stuff is meaningless, even with a magic fast spaceship, it would the take the time the entire history of the human race x4000 for us to reach any of this.
Any astronomy past the solar system is a waste of time for at least the next 400 years

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 04:02:49 2022 No.14648498 >>14647029 >Most appear blue with diffraction spikes, forming >eight-pointed star shapes. What makes that happen, I thought than was a Lense effect

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 04:04:05 2022 No.14648501 File: 1.88 MB, 1500x7297, STScI-01G6933BG2JKATWE1MGT1TCPJ9.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14648498

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 04:09:27 2022 No.14648510 >>14648501 Thanks. Can’t they correct for that

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 04:09:30 2022 No.14648511 >>14647887 Not half of everything but a decent chunk of the visible wavelength https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zone_of_Avoidance

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 04:10:15 2022 No.14648515 File: 398 KB, 720x1600, Screenshot_20220712-000802_Chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647014 >>14647029 What's going on here?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 04:11:19 2022 No.14648517 File: 680 KB, 720x1600, Screenshot_20220712-000818_Chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14648515 Slightly more zoomed out

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 04:18:54 2022 No.14648528 >>14647209 i would

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 05:08:01 2022 No.14648610 >>14647724 well done, anon.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 05:11:17 2022 No.14648617 >>14647209 Why am I sexually aroused by this galaxy?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 05:20:11 2022 No.14648637 File: 175 KB, 974x960, amongalaxy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Found a faint red sus galaxy.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 05:25:34 2022 No.14648649 >>14646821 Absolutely mind blowing. All those galaxies, each one with billions or even trillions of stars, planets and who knows what else.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 05:29:20 2022 No.14648659 >>14646914 some alien shithead is fucking a blue goddess while we are stuck here, FUCK

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 05:31:17 2022 No.14648665 >>14648659 Just paint your gf blue anon.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 05:36:19 2022 No.14648676 >>14648665 I only pay them for an hour so I don't think there is enough time

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:15:07 2022 No.14648754 Just got off a long plane trip and this is the first thing I see when I finally get home and turn on 4chan. Awesome, no irony at all.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:19:36 2022 No.14648764 >>14647577 >>>/x/

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:20:47 2022 No.14648765 >>14648038 >they recessitated near- precambarian era cellular life the other day. link?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:22:22 2022 No.14648770 >>14647308 The sensors are so cold I'd imagine the noise floor is damn near zero. I wonder if it's possible to pick up integrated flux nebulosity noise in such a small field of view? But I'm just a big dummie so who knows.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:35:16 2022 No.14648794 >>14647029 It seems like the contrast is too high - you can see much more behind those fuzzy galaxies near the middle, than in the rest of the image. Does the image use the correct gamma correction?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:39:31 2022 No.14648801 >>14647561 >Soulless vs SOUL

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:48:51 2022 No.14648814

any reason why we cant use these telescopes (that are zooming in billions of lightyears away) on planets 10000000000x closer and have documented where they are, like any of the terrestrial we've found? I don't get why we don't just capture an upclose pic of these planets

>inb4 it's impossible to physically locate the planet
that's BS

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:50:27 2022 No.14648816 >>14647675 >NASA hiding evidence of type 3 civs A more exciting conspiracy to think about than /pol/schizos talking about how space isn't real and the earth is flat. Alien civilizations are exciting (and somewhat horrifying).

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:53:14 2022 No.14648820 >>14648814 They're too small and dim.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:57:15 2022 No.14648828 >>14647082 bc it's false color and made to look as if it were seen through conventional optics. almost all of the data is infrared but they also need to justify themselves to the public

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 06:59:56 2022 No.14648833 >>14647416 >>14648528 >>14648617 Get help

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:02:01 2022 No.14648836 >>14648335 Nope. Refraction is wavelength dependent, which lensing is not.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:02:17 2022 No.14648837 File: 3.10 MB, 498x426, 1633622284495.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14646821 that's it ? i was expecting something better >>14648014 >1 billion dollars in tax payers money more like 10

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:03:52 2022 No.14648840 >>14648814 Planets are too small and look underwhelming compared to deep spacecraft photos.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:09:55 2022 No.14648847
File: 232 KB, 432x389, fuck you nasa.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14647561
this zoom has a higher res compared to the 28 mb png https://stsci-opo.org/STScI-01G7JJADTH90FR98AKKJFKSS0B.png tf where can I get the high res version to zoom in like that

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:11:34 2022 No.14648849 File: 195 KB, 582x523, srsly fuck you.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14648847

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:41:45 2022 No.14648902 >>14647058 Nespresso galaxy

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:42:44 2022 No.14648904 >>14647304 >>14647320 The figure of two weeks is wrong, they're referring to the Ultra Deep Field. The exposure time of the Hubble image for this field is only 7.3 hours.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:47:55 2022 No.14648913

>>14647894
man fuck them chickens. god your so fucking insufferable. muh morals muh self rightousness. theres no fucking use crying and whining like a fat fucking man child. No shit reality sucks, boo fucking hoo. what are you going do about it meaning wise? cause crying and hassling this thread does fucking nothing. How bout you go fuck off and enjoy life you miserable fuck.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:53:39 2022 No.14648922 >>14648836 >lensing is not Still waiting for that explanation for why all Einstien rings are blue then

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:53:49 2022 No.14648923 ok lensing effect is cool and so on but do we know how to undo it (in a perfcet manner) to make an accurate picture?

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:54:50 2022 No.14648925

>>14647082
Because what you think is real is based on your own experiences even if those are fakes and what you see now is real. You basically associate how it should look from what you have gathered from video games or tv shows or even just how the sky looks during the night and then your brain hits you with the "this aint like the stuff we know chief" which makes you think it's not real. A lot of space stuff looks fake because of this effect, for instance all space photos look crispier than reality because there's no soft blur with distance due to air and shadows are sharp with no sky which makes them look unnatural. There's basically no real reason to be embarrassed, it's a trap most brainlets fall into.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:57:01 2022 No.14648930 >>14646821 Why is the lensing all over the place? Seems fake.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:57:08 2022 No.14648931 File: 292 KB, 811x814, 2869CD3E-4CF6-4414-B9DF-AD8436ECA484.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14647014 Is this a perfectly lensed primordial galaxy? Look at those globular clusters surrounding it. What amazing detail.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 07:59:50 2022 No.14648936
File: 176 KB, 759x652, 50A446F5-2900-4333-ADA3-C21D31065627.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14648931
Another similar galaxy, around the same distance along the edge of the lens. Are these in focus, gravitationally lensed primordial galaxies?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:01:50 2022 No.14648940 File: 149 KB, 1023x407, B79B573C-4B85-4536-87F5-639749CA737D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14648936

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:15:18 2022 No.14648953

>>14648922
Because most galaxies are starforming and blue. The best lenses are big massive red elliptical galaxies. Hence the rings look very blue in comparison.
Being wavelength dependent wouldn't cause a change in colour. It would mean that multiply lensed quasars would change position with wavelength, which is not observed. ALso the lensing around the Sun is the same in the visible and x-ray, no refractive process works over such a range in wavelength with no dependence.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:26:19 2022 No.14648968

>>14647691
>Seriously I'm sure theres an explanation but why aren't we looking at closer bodies to see them in the best detail possible.
They are. Next bunch of photos to be released will include stuff in our own galaxy. Later on it's supposed to be taking some closeups of Jupiter.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:38:07 2022 No.14648994
File: 346 KB, 1311x1024, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

https://hubblesite.org/contents/media/images/2019/17/4492-Image.html

For those who don't know, the 2019 Hubble Legacy Field is dozens of times larger than this and still jaw dropping, I can't wait to see what will be JWST's legacy field like, my PC struggles to even open the image

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:39:52 2022 No.14648996 >>14648847 I think that webm is machine learning enhanced

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:41:06 2022 No.14649000 >>14648814 Because even though the galaxies are billions and billions of light years away they are still billions and billions and billions of times bigger and brighter than any planet

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:41:28 2022 No.14649001

>>14648765
Didn't happen. They found some microbes trapped in fluid pockets in 830 million years old crystals. The discoverers argued that they could, in principle, still be alive and dormant, but they didn't actually revive them. They're still inside the crystal.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:42:11 2022 No.14649003 >>14648996 in such a short time? and where can I find it?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:45:38 2022 No.14649011 >>14649003 https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/vwwiip/zooming_into_a_128x_version_of_jwts_first_deep/

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:48:17 2022 No.14649015 >>14648814 Because then it would be obvious planets are flat. They're early with this lensing bullcrap before they look at closer things.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:48:23 2022 No.14649016

>>14648931
>>14648936
>>14648940
don't think so they're not redshifted enough

the oldest galaxies in the image are deep red in color

if you look at this >>14647945
you can actually see there's some very redshifted galaxies that hubble wasn't even able to pick up because they were all the way in the infrared

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:48:49 2022 No.14649018 >>14647181 July 26

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:49:06 2022 No.14649019 >>14649011 thx anon. while it is a nice approach it's a bummer that there isn't a real higher resolution image. of course reddit jannies already cleaned up that post.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 08:56:51 2022 No.14649028
File: 3 KB, 480x360, hqdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14647609
The thing is it's kinda meaningless to talk about "real" colors. Our eyes would not even be able to see most of this shit because it's shifted so far into the infrared that it's outside the spectrum of visible light. And the rest is so dim that our eyes can't pick up enough light to make out details.

If you could actually go in space and observe the brightest stuff it would mostly look like a fuzzy red/white haze. You wouldn't ever be able to actually see such details as you can from telescopes.

The best way to get a good idea of this is to get a good pair of binoculars and go out on a very dark night and look for the Andromeda galaxy. It will appear as a very diffuse patch of white light.

All the colors you see from telescope images do correspond to certain wavelengths though, so they are internally consistent and that's all that matters.

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 09:15:20 2022 No.14649048
File: 1.09 MB, 2799x2856, upud5pzg32b91 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Look at this absolute unit right here. I think it's the most redshifted of all the galaxies in the image and it's entirely invisible in the hubble field. It's literally one of the first galaxies.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 09:16:29 2022 No.14649050 File: 1.57 MB, 1508x1744, zoomr.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14649011 thx anon

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 09:21:45 2022 No.14649055 >>14649050 Is there a higher res of the deep field out there already?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 09:23:47 2022 No.14649057 >>14649055 no it is machine learning enhanced https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/vwwiip/zooming_into_a_128x_version_of_jwts_first_deep/ https://astrosleuth.web.app/

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 09:28:15 2022 No.14649062 >>14649048 It being so bright still implies that we're looking at an active quasar

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 09:28:41 2022 No.14649063 >>14649057 >https://astrosleuth.web.app/ Damn I just passed the 4mb image through it and this shit is magical, the image is way way sharper now

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 09:48:18 2022 No.14649077 >>14647724 Nig cyclops galaxy.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 09:56:06 2022 No.14649086 >>14649063 I feared this was going to happen.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:00:22 2022 No.14649094 >>14649086 >oh no no no my hard sciencerinos is descrated by artistic DL enhancements

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:18:58 2022 No.14649129 30 years and countless billions for slightly higher res pics? i dont get the hype.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:19:17 2022 No.14649132 >>14649129 wait 30 years

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:25:48 2022 No.14649267 >>14649132 whats the most exciting shit they could find?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:26:03 2022 No.14649269 >>14649267 ayy

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:29:08 2022 No.14649273 >>14649269 lmao

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:31:07 2022 No.14649277 AYY CAN'T BREATHE

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:44:46 2022 No.14649290 >>14648014 hey, at least it will lead to some new cool wallpapers

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 10:57:16 2022 No.14649315 >>14647209 what is that

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 11:05:19 2022 No.14649324 >>14649315 The promised Ethnogalaxy, no black holes allowed

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 11:29:49 2022 No.14649371 >>14647655 stop being a part of the problem and work towards a solution by offing yourself, doomer

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 11:49:19 2022 No.14649429 File: 3.91 MB, 1208x3204, JWHAS_v1.1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14649050

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:01:56 2022 No.14649452 >>14647461 Lol calm down spaz

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:50:17 2022 No.14649559

>>14649429
What is the advantage of this for scientists? Couldnt you enhance the pic from hubble with some AI stuff?

A few weeks ago I read that a NASA employee was crying because of the first photos of james webb. What the HELL, I was expecting something totally different......

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 12:53:34 2022 No.14649561 >>14647014 >png vs jpg yes, packed data takes less space

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:09:07 2022 No.14649586

>>14649559
there is no real advantage since it makes up data, it's just playing around

>I read that a NASA employee was crying because of the first photos of james webb
I mean it's cool and some people are really emotionally involved but I wouldn't cry

>I was expecting something totally different
first picture of years to come, get a rest

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 13:09:32 2022 No.14649587
File: 16 KB, 460x423, 1657158670451.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Are people just genuinely becoming more retarded?

>is this picture LE FAKE?

It's 12 hours exposure vs 5 weeks exposure from hubble. Good lord, I am honestly at this point happy that they want to force feed poor people crickets and microplastics.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:29:49 2022 No.14649800 why is the image quality so bad? did they use an android camera?

Anonymous Tue Jul 12 14:58:02 2022 No.14650198
File: 79 KB, 800x785, 1655484631068.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14647685
nice
>>14647699
faggot, is just a shity image, nothing more and nothing less, normal people don't care about this type of stuff and won't affect them, those stars and galaxies are so far away even with light speed it will take mankind millions of years to reach.
Is beautiful, but that's it, people will forget about it 2 weeks later
>>14647724
kek

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 12 16:37:22 2022 No.14651078 >>14647699 go back

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math