[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 128 KB, 1x1, MPS.pdf [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14589856 No.14589856 [Reply] [Original]

I am literally being hated now for my discovery. I am censored on every single forum and will likely be here as well because history is being made and the person making it must suffer hatred, and banishment. Is there any other way than dying a hated pauper before the message can get through!
http://www.baur-research.com/Physics
pls no bully

>> No.14589867

>>14589856
>>>/x/

>> No.14589875

>>14589867
Found him here
>>>/his/13507430
Faggot said he wouldn't post here, so I did it for him.

>> No.14589885

>>14589867
more like /b/
>>14589875
Why though?

>> No.14589892

>>14589856
This post is off topic. Please go to /x/ where you belong.

>> No.14589907

>>14589856
You're using linear kinetic energy to make conclusions about angular momentum and coming up with bullshit. Learn about angular kinetic energy, there is no paradox if you do the math correctly.

>> No.14589988 [DELETED] 

> Why though?
Ah, I see, to copy+paste him >>14589907
post the link to that thread I want to see how he reacts
t. >>14589885

>> No.14590044

>>14589856

It's just friction. Seriously. It's okay to be wrong about this. But it's true that it's not okay to be bullied about it either.

>> No.14590058

>>14589856

Who would waste their time bullying you about something so silly? I mean, you're wrong. It's friction. But are there people who bully you on Facebook or something? How lame

>> No.14590068

>>14589856
In the "ball on a string" example, kinetic energy is NOT conserved. It requires work to pull the ball to closer radius.

>>14589907
If the ball is treated as a point particle (that is, the radius of the ball is much smaller than the radius of the sting) the rotational energy is negligible.