[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 267 KB, 972x2945, ciHuxCXszGOo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14571086 No.14571086 [Reply] [Original]

Why is medical science so enthusiastic about murdering babies? Is the sadistic thrill of committing legally sanctioned murder really all that great?

>> No.14571120

>>14571086
women only enjoy the most demonic rituals.

>> No.14571129

>>14571086
I mean, fetal cells aren't human, abortion isn't murder.

>> No.14571154

>>14571129
>I mean, fetal cells aren't human, abortion isn't murder, adult cells aren't human, murder isn't murder.

I am ALL for that! Time for abortions up to age 99. You get a pass if you dodge an abortion and make it to 100+

>> No.14571156

They ate dead babies , it's clear now

>> No.14571169

>>14571086
>kids in this economy/society
They'll wish you aborted them by the time they're 14.

>> No.14571211

>>14571129
you are just cells, so its ok if i murder you because cells arent human

>> No.14571226

>>14571086
scientists and doctors are evil. that is why.

>> No.14571233

>>14571086
that's fetuses, not babies.
It's GOP that likes to shoot babies.

>> No.14571234

>>14571211
If I chopped off my hand, that hand is not a human. If I removed my foot, that foot is not human. If a coma patient is braindead, 0 ability to regain consciousness, then they are not alive, they are dead. Fetal cells are not alive, they are a human precursor, no inherent consciousness. I don't even think babies gain consciousness until at least a year, actually.

>> No.14571241 [DELETED] 

>>14571234
idiot, the cutoff point is a 3-4 month old fetis

>> No.14571242

>>14571234
idiot, the cutoff point is a 3-4 month old fetus

>> No.14571358 [DELETED] 

>>14571234
the entirety of you is just a clump of cells, nobody would care if you were dead. unborn child are invaluable, babies are all cute and fun and we need a steady supply of them to replace all the unwanted failures who kys

>> No.14571396

>>14571358
I suppose if you're working to replace yourself by voting against abortion, then you can kys if you want. For me, the more abortions which happen, the more valuable my life is, the less I can be replaced.

>> No.14571423

>>14571234
>Fetal cells are not alive, they are a human precursor, no inherent consciousness.
Says you

>> No.14571526

>>14571423
>t. fecal cell

>> No.14571541 [DELETED] 

>>14571396
>the less I can be replaced.
you don't do anything other than waste oxygen, you could be replaced with a two stroke engine

>> No.14571555

science likes to make baby murdering a norm because then it removes the burden for medicine to actually come up to solutions.
if you have a great number of ill people in the world someone *gasp* might have to find a way to cure them.
instead they just kill the bastard and focus on making AIDS inducing vaccines

>> No.14571820

>>14571234
you didnt reply to his argument
>>14571233
what is GOP?

>> No.14571834

>>14571234
>hahaha those cells are not human let's kill them
<Nooo you cannot kill the animalinos they are sentient beings noooo

>> No.14572006

>>14571211
It would be ok, yeah, if he couldn't react to it.
But anon can react to it, you stupid fuck. Do you think it would be unethical to kill a literal vegetable who can't even blink on their own?

>> No.14572013

>>14571526
kekkeroni

>> No.14572035
File: 1.70 MB, 320x568, 1655219717399.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14572035

Just look at this webm. These are future doctors. I guess that answers OP's question.

>> No.14573463 [DELETED] 

>>14572035
verminous degenerates

>> No.14573494

>>14572006
Easy, i drug him and i eat him while he laughs
A vegetable?
I just have to stalk him, pay a prostitute and turn him into a vegetable
>>14571234
It's called development, by your logic black people, babies and angry women aren't human

>> No.14573959

Yessssss
You need to have abortionssss to give you two yearssss more lifetime. Even if you remain childlessssss whitey.

>> No.14573965

>>14571086
>we have someone we know is alive and will live if we do something
or
>we have someone who is alive and another who possibly will be alive but the situation of saving 1 could kill both

>> No.14574833

why is science so evil?

>> No.14574878

>>14571086
What is the babbyIQ? Probably like 85.
>>14571129
Fetal cells are human but there's really nothing of value there if you don't believe people to be clumps of flesh possessed by immortal ghosts that go to an eternal torture chamber if they die before getting dunked in holy water.

>> No.14574885

>>14571154
Murder is inconvenient for a functioning economy. Murder of kids less so, but if they are born already they represent a significant sunk cost for the family and society as a whole. Particularly in times when death in childbirth is likely.

Babies aren't very valuable if childbirth is safe - they can be easily replaced - but birth presents a convenient place to draw the legal distinction between "clump of cells" and "member of society with legal protection".

There. No chr*stcuck morality with caveats required, no slippery slopes.

>> No.14575093
File: 86 KB, 407x534, 420diareaäfanatics.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14575093

>>14574878

>> No.14575191

>>14574885
>but birth presents a convenient place to draw the legal distinction between "clump of cells" and "member of society with legal protection".
Do you have a source for this? Some scientific citations?

>> No.14575199

>>14574878
>really nothing of value there
Source?

>> No.14575204

>>14574885
The highest cost is the murder of teenage girls. At such point moms are too old to give birth and have spent a good 15 years of effort

>> No.14575209

>>14571555
Science already came up with the solution, the greatest answer: yank the fetus out and use it to make medicine.

>> No.14575461

>>14571086
If we don't sacrifice babies how do you expect us to power the Soul Engine when the Day of Convergence comes?

>> No.14576871

>>14571234
We shouldn't name children till they're at least a year old, and they should not be entitled to legal protection prior to gaining a name, in order that they can be easily disposed of if necessary.
Embrace tradition.