[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 44 KB, 444x544, 1278788389103.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1405592 No.1405592 [Reply] [Original]

Question:

If the weather outside is 0 degrees, and the weather forecast says it will be "twice as cold" tomorrow, what will tomorrow's temperature be?

>> No.1405598

64 degrees Fahrenheit

>> No.1405607

herpity derpity herp derp derp

>> No.1405610

you cant multiply absense of energy

>> No.1405615

273.25 Celsius

>> No.1405661

twice can be used as a figurative term

>> No.1405705

Would depend on the hottest and coldest possible temperatures in the universe. or at least, on Earth.

If you're a faggot, you could also say it would be 0.

>> No.1405708

Is 0 degrees Farenheit or Celsius?

>> No.1405717

JUST CONVERT TO KELVIN DOULB EHT NUMBER AND CONVERT BACK

>> No.1405726

It depends, is it a full moon?

>> No.1405727

0 Celsius is 273 Kelvin
So it would be 136.5 Kelvin or -136.5 Celsius
Meaning you dead

>> No.1405767

Room temperature is about 21 degrees. Therefore twice as cold as 0 degrees would be -21 degrees.

>> No.1405777

>>1405592
What temperature scale?

>> No.1405779
File: 4 KB, 121x135, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1405779

>>1405767

>> No.1405794

It could mean it will be 0 tomorrow, since it will be the second day at zero, it is twice as cold (in duration, not amplitude)

>> No.1405795

It can't be colder than 0. You can't divide by 0.

>> No.1405832

depends on if yer talkin 0 celcius or ferenheit

>> No.1405959

>>1405795

Magnitudes of temperature are immune to the laws of algebra

>> No.1405990

Depends on what the temperature was beforehand.

>> No.1405986

Maybe it would be -70 degrees, assuming 70 is the standard "comfortable" temperature, and the temp would be twice as far from that.

>> No.1405998

Tomorrow's temperature will be half as warm as it was yesterday.
idiots

>> No.1406005

Weather man is a faggot and lied

>> No.1406010
File: 18 KB, 249x242, acceleratorfacepalm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1406010

>This thread

>> No.1406019

>>1406005
SAGE GOES IN THE EMAIL FIELD DIPSHIT

>> No.1406022

0 ºF = 255.222 K
/2 = 127.611 K
127.611 K = -229.700 ºF
It will be -229.700 Fahrenheit
Or if in Celsius
>>1405727

>> No.1406026

>>1406022
this

>> No.1406027

Well what was the fucking temperature the day before?

>> No.1406031

>>1406027
a non retarded question?

GTFO OUT OF MI /sci/

>> No.1406034

>>1406027
Irrelevant, twice as cold as 0 F/C is
>>1405727
>>1406022

>> No.1406068
File: 124 KB, 560x561, fffffffff.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1406068

srsly gtfo sci

>> No.1406100

>>1406068
The OP (troll), me (who responded with the math), or the idiots who had no idea wtf?

>> No.1406119

>Convert temperature to Kelvin
>Do math.
~136.5 oC

>> No.1406128

>>1406119
Already done for Celsius and Kelvin
>>1405727
>>1406022

>> No.1406131

>>1406128
Celsius and *Fahrenheit

>> No.1406161

temperature = interval level of measurement.

/thread

>> No.1406194

>>1405794

This and

>>1405727

This

>> No.1406357

Doesn't fucking matter C or F.

Also it's never going to be 0 kelvin outside.