[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 22 KB, 500x375, 500x_100707131359-large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1380015 No.1380015 [Reply] [Original]

A black hole only slightly heavier than our Sun is emitting the most powerful jets of energy ever seen, rivaling that of quasars a million times larger, and creating a bubble of hot gas and fast-moving particles 1000 light-years across.

When black holes devour matter, they release massive amounts of energy. Physicists had thought this energy mostly took the form of radiation, primarily X-rays. However, as this newly discovered black hole so dramatically illustrates, at least as much energy, if not a great deal more, is released as jets of fast moving particles. These streams of particles smash headlong into the interstellar gas nearby, which heats up the gas and causing rapid expansion. The resulting bubble is a mix of the hot gas and the particles from the black hole.

The bubble has a diameter of 1000 light-years and is expanding at about a million kilometers per hour. The black hole, located 12 million light-years away in the outer spiral of galaxy NGC 7793, has been blowing the bubble for about 200,000 years. Pretty much everything about this black hole and its bubble boggles comprehension, as codiscoverer Robert Soria notes:

"The length of the jets in NGC 7793 is amazing, compared to the size of the black hole from which they are launched. If the black hole were shrunk to the size of a soccer ball, each jet would extend from the Earth to beyond the orbit of Pluto."
This discovery will help astronomers better understand the relationship between black holes like this one, which formed from collapsed stars, and the supermassive black holes at the center of galaxies. It was thought that these particle jets were primarily a feature of these more gigantic black holes, but now astronomers suspect they had just missed them in the smaller black holes. If nothing else, a massive gas bubble 1000 light-years wide should provide a pretty good target to search for.

What say you /sci/?

>> No.1380021

Peer-reviewed source or GTFO

>> No.1380028

>>1380015

>[citation needed]

>> No.1380038

>>1380028
>>1380021
just fucking google god damn your lazy /sci/

>> No.1380042
File: 11 KB, 320x240, lisa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1380042

>> No.1380052
File: 14 KB, 298x440, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1380052

>>1380015
wat is this i don't even

>> No.1380067

>>1380052
>>1380042
hmmm these are unusaully similar

>> No.1380075

>>1380067
lol

>> No.1380087
File: 58 KB, 300x429, drunk_guy_derp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1380087

>>1380067
>unusaully

>> No.1380097
File: 52 KB, 400x344, Derp%20TV%20guy%20copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1380097

>>1380067
>unusaully  

>> No.1380102

>>1380087
>>1380097

FAMESAG

>> No.1380106
File: 307 KB, 1054x1498, who cares.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1380106

>>1380087
>>1380097
>Samefag

>> No.1380177

op here wow /sci/ i am dissapoint could be a major discovery and no one cares

>> No.1380207

>>1380177
>major discovery
>lol no

>> No.1380219

>A black hole only slightly heavier than our Sun
wait a minute
A black hole needs at least 3 solar masses

>> No.1380246

>>1380219
No, black holes aren't limited by a minimum mass other than the Planck Mass.

>> No.1380256

its a rare white hole which allows light to escape

http://en.wikipedia org/wiki/White_hole

>> No.1380271

>>1380246
there is no known mechanism for a black hole to come into existence expect a collapsing star
a collapsing star needs at least 3 solar masses to become a black hole
therefore all black holes are heavier than 3 solar masses
OP didn't give a source, so it's most likely bullshit

>> No.1380292

http://io9.com/5582028/black-hole-emitting-a-giant-gas-bubble-1000-light+years-wide

>> No.1380329

>>1380271
Google is, as always, your friend

>> No.1380349

>>1380271
>we don't know of a mechanism, therefore it is impossible
>implying there couldn't be back holes remaining from the early universe

>> No.1380351

>>1380271
a blach whole can be any size

>> No.1380361

>>1380349
>>1380351
If, in fact, they would have found a black hole with less than 3 solar masses, that would be the news, not some shit about a bubble.
A black hole CAN be of any size, but we never observed one lighter than 3 solar masses.
Remember Russel's teapot?
We never observed it, therefore we assume non-existence, until we find evidence to the contrary.

>> No.1380393

>>1380361

That isn't how it works.

We assume there is no lower limit unless we find evidence to the contrary. This just means we found a smaller one.