/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.1330972]

will quantum computing revolutionize AI-technology?

[Anonymous No.1330975]

No.

[Anonymous No.1330982]

>>1330975
why not?

[Anonymous No.1330985]

>>1330982
Why should it?

[Anonymous No.1330991]

>>1330985
You stated that it wouldn't so you'll need to provide explanation why so.

[Anonymous No.1330993]

>>1330985
because unlike digital technology with discrete levels of voltages being manipulated, quantum computation will emulate a system that incorporates quantum mechanics acting on chemicals?

[Anonymous No.1330994]

>>1330985
Because they are both cool sounding, and something cool + something else cool = something really cool.

[Anonymous No.1330998]

>>1330991
Wut? That's like me asking if my teapot will affect the time taken for the sun to turn into a red giant, and then me asking for a proof as to why it won't. There's no reason to believe there is any link, how am I to prove otherwise?

[Anonymous No.1330999]

>>1330991
We don't have any quantum based algorithms. Currently there are like 2 exponential speedups the quantum algorthms can do.

Some people claim conciousness is a quantum event. If so, yes it may be possible to have efficient ai on a quantum computer.

[Anonymous No.1331023]

Quantum computing is a pipe dream. It's not going to happen.

[Anonymous No.1331025]

>>1330999
wut
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_algorithm

[Anonymous No.1331037]

>>1331025
>2 exponental speedups
>shor's and grover's
I meant non exist for ai

[Anonymous No.1331039]

>>1331023
So was the concept of personal computers

[Anonymous No.1331044]

>>1331023
and only angels can fly.

[Anonymous No.1331115]

>>1331044
>>1331039
ITT teenagers who have read too many bad sci-fi novels and grossly overestimate the actual state of quantum "computing" and its real capabilities

[Anonymous No.1331562]

>>1331115
ITT: pessimistic asshole who has nothing better to do than to deny everything and motivate it with people being "to stupid to understand why (not)"