Let's settle this once and for all

[Anonymous No.12804114]

Who was smarter and why?

[Anonymous No.12804122]

>>12804114
The Jew obviously, because he was a Jew.

[Anonymous No.12804124]

>>12804114
>Von Nu-Male
>(((Einstein)))
Gee I don't know. That's like asking which tastes better: cow shit or dog shit.

[Anonymous No.12804125]

>>12804114
Let’s imagine we have just determined which one of the two was “smarter”.
Ok, how has the world changed? Literally what the fuck have we achieved after this discussion? Fucking nothing, it’s useless gossip for faggots like you to justify having a keyboard

[Anonymous No.12804130]

>>12804114
Newton

[Anonymous No.12804133]

>>12804125
You're thinking too narrowly.
Solving this issue will give us a better understanding on how to qualify and/or quantify intelligence.

[Anonymous No.12804137]

>>12804125
Because the smarter one is more right and should be promoted over all others.

[Anonymous No.12804144]

Bohr and Zuse were both smarter

[Anonymous No.12804147]

>Because the smarter one is more right

[Anonymous No.12804148]

>>12804137
>promoted
What the fuck does this mean? Can you stop using empty words? They both invented shit and we are using their results to invent new shit today. There is no “promotion” needed

[Anonymous No.12804167]

>>12804133
>Solving this issue will give us a better understanding on how to qualify and/or quantify intelligence.
No it doesn’t lol it’s just a virtual show of hands that you believe has some merit

[Anonymous No.12804325]

>>12804124
Seethe and cope brainlet.

[Anonymous No.12804378]

Einstein because newman was just good at formal logic where einstein had to think outside the box about the nature of space and time

[Anonymous No.12804413]

>>12804148
In this sense I obviously meant studied. Can you take that stick out of your ass for a quick second and ram it in your thick skull?
>They both invented shit and we are using their results to invent new shit today.
Okay cool but one is definitely smarter than the other. Neumann's ideas are more worthy of expanding upon. That's all it means.
>both, their
Stop using joint ownership of nouns when they clearly aren't equal.

[Anonymous No.12804415]

>>12804325
Okay retard

[Anonymous No.12804434]

>>12804122

Which one?

[Anonymous No.12804443]

>>12804378

>Einstein had to think outside the box

Correct me if I'm wrong but weren't his findings ultimately derived from the Michelson-Morley experiment?

[Anonymous No.12804692]

>>12804114
von Neumann is everywhere

[Anonymous No.12804713]

>>12804114
Von Neumann

[Anonymous No.12804745]

>>12804443
he had to come up with a frame work of rules that could describe the world while holding the conditions in that experiment consistent. Because his work revolves around space and time, abstract concepts whose true nature is probably the predecessor to formal logic itself, he had to have an intuitive understanding of the least intuitive thing out there.

Von Newman followed basic logic to its natural conclusion. Impressive but not mind blowing. Many did it before him that just did not have access to electricity to be able to build a real computer.

[Anonymous No.12804752]

[Anonymous No.12804783]

Neumann because had his office near Einstein, and would blast music disrupting Einstein's focus. Neumann was an absolute Chad.