/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.12786975]

Did this crazy son of a bitch just break RSA, and with it, the entire political and economical status quo?

[Anonymous No.12787034]

??????

[Anonymous No.12787040]

>>12787034
Schnorr juts killed RSA. He has a paper out now.

[Anonymous No.12787091]

>>12786975

>hasn't adopted YAK yet

[Anonymous No.12787336]

>>12786975
Where’s his proof at my dude?

[Anonymous No.12787360]

>>12787336

[Anonymous No.12787490]

Biz here, came here to post the same than OP. For now there's only a woman thread on twitter not disproving it but saying it is not proofread etc etc.

Yesterday when it was shared by important defi devs, it was thought it could be some trolling. Then the paper was revised by authors request to show it was no mistake or trolling.

WE NEED AUTISTS ON THIS

https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/232

[Anonymous No.12787496]

The thread, for reference:
https://twitter.com/SchmiegSophie/status/1367197193057181703

[Anonymous No.12787497]

>>12787360

Also this Schnorr guy isn't a nobody. He has been a pioneer in cryptography, active since the 70's/80's. But I suppose we'll have to wait for other academics, or an outright hack, to confirm since /sci/ is just a bunch of brainlets.

>meh rockets

[Anonymous No.12787505]

This is a NUKE on all things, if proved

[Anonymous No.12787512]

Someone put this guy in a retirement home.

[Anonymous No.12787524]

>>12787360
link to paper? The frankfurt university paper doesn't even contain a mention of RSA.
https://www.math.uni-frankfurt.de/~dmst/teaching/WS2019/SVP9.pdf

[Anonymous No.12787532]

>>12787524
https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/232.pdf

[Anonymous No.12787545]

>>12787360
This kills the RSA

[Anonymous No.12787550]

Factors of RSA-X or GTFO

[Anonymous No.12787554]

>>12787497
Yeah, and Atiyah solved the Riemann hypothesis.

[Anonymous No.12787555]

>>12787360
Just write out some C code fuck all this shitty discrete math jargon
My penis is a real element in the matrix of your asshole mr snoresbore
Fuckin terse wanker

A bit of code makes more sense and that is the application
This tard speak shit is antiquated nonsense I’m not opening my college textbook from 20 years ago to review and translate this

God I hate academics so much

[Anonymous No.12787565]

>>12787555
>mathematics are antiquated, I want ancient language code
Found the /g/ troll shitting the thread

[Anonymous No.12787569]

>>12787555
It's an academic article for other academics. Not a pop-sci article for idiots.

[Anonymous No.12787571]

>>12786975
nothing-burger. They make an error using n choose 2 instead of n! somewhere.

Was cool for a sec.

[Anonymous No.12787574]

>>12787555
Reading these abstracts are so gay
I bet he’ll write it ultimately in MATLAB or something equally as homosexual
Even then I bet his C is like some 1970s horseshit
I don’t care if this helps factor prime numbers more quickly and breaks SSL
I just want proof this egghead can actually write some code that would be used in production and not completely bodyslammed in a review

This dude can lick my taint

[Anonymous No.12787576]

>>12787565
>>12787569
Call me when you graduate and still work somewhere with a nametag
/g/ sucks donkey cocks also

[Anonymous No.12787589]

/sci/ is also dumber than the wrestling fans on /xs/
I wrote a paper and used formal math syntax in the abstract for you fat cunts
Kill yourselves you cumbuckets
God I hate this website

[Anonymous No.12787602]

Fuck you guys seriously
Blow me
Later faggots I’m not reading your fat fingered shitbutt replies either you nincompoopers

[Anonymous No.12787605]

>>12787589
>>12787602
Meds.

[Anonymous No.12787619]

Can we post this to mathoverflow where it might be someone that isn't a monkey strawmanning

[Anonymous No.12787621]

>>12787576
Cope+sneethe&dilate

[El Arcón No.12787661]

triplet fac-relation {
-INF_HAT+x1
x2
INF_HAT-x3
}
with pic lattice vector Rn solver. Also, use notation to phase out the INF_HAT

[Anonymous No.12787687]

>>12787661
why hasn't this pseud retard been banned yet?
such a fucking annoyance
please kill yourself.

[Anonymous No.12787762]

So do we have a mathoverflow post or not

[Anonymous No.12787836]

>>12787496
Well assuming what the tweet author says is correct, how did this paper make its way past the review committee?

[Anonymous No.12787849]

>>12787836
What review committee?

[Anonymous No.12787864]

>>12787849
I meant the peer review. sorry.

[Anonymous No.12787893]

>>12787864
It's self-published, not in a journal.

[Anonymous No.12787899]

>>12786975
For the love of God, is there anyone on this site with the IQ and specialist knowledge to test this thing out in code? I thought this was a science and math board?

[Anonymous No.12787995]

>>12786975
If this has any teeth, the intelligence community would’ve got their hands on it weeks before it was published. But bump for interest

[Anonymous No.12788060]

>>12786975
uh...kind of shook
There was a thread the other week about an anon who said they broke RSA too.
Had all the markers of a troll, but in light of this info...

[Anonymous No.12788120]

>>12787687
Shut the fuck up, he is one of the only interesting people on this board

[El Arcón No.12788132]

>>12788120
no, anon is right, I am an annoying pseud retard who should get banned them kms

[Anonymous No.12788201]

>>12787687
Shut the fuck up. Tooker is our king, it is a honor to share this board with him.

[Anonymous No.12788217]

>>12788132
Please dont say that

[Anonymous No.12788249]

>>12787360
>This holds RSA down and rapes it in the ass and mouth while it's crying before shooting it dead.
What the fuck is this guys problem??

[Anonymous No.12788254]

>>12787555
BASED

[Anonymous No.12788259]

>>12787899
You were wrong. Also the joke is that the sign says SNEED which djdjekejdudejjeejjdjd

[Anonymous No.12788265]

>>12788060
oh damn... wtf

[Anonymous No.12788378]

>>12787040
Yeah, I remember that one.
Guy sounded like a glownigger after a while tbqh.

[Anonymous No.12788407]

>>12788249
Too much BDSM internet-porno, huh?

[Anonymous No.12788419]

>>12787661
>>El Arcón
Is there a way to mute this retard so I don't have to be exposed to his schizo ramblings over and over again?

[Anonymous No.12788427]

>>12787571
This anon is right, this is most probably a nothingburger. Several mistakes found in the paper, implementations fail to deliver prime factorisations with claimed magnitudes of speed.
https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/88582/does-schnorrs-2021-factoring-method-show-that-the-rsa-cryptosystem-is-not-secur

[El Arcón No.12788531]

pee pee poo poo

[Anonymous No.12788679]

>>12788427
I saw this but when looking at the actual paper, he bounds the vector by O(det(R)^(2/(n+1))) where he mistakes the det(R) for N^(n+1)*((n*(n+1))/2)*ln(N), giving a bound of O(N^2*(n^(4/n+1))*ln(N)^(2/(n+1))). But correcting this determinant calculation gives a bound of O(N^2*((n/e)^(2n/(n+1)))*ln(N)^(2/(n+1))) where N is significantly massive (2^800 in one example) and n is relatively small (95 in the same example). Meaning I'm practice this changes the number of operations from something like 2^1610 to 2^1600 in his example. It's a factor of 1000 but relatively why does that make a difference? Any help please?

[Anonymous No.12789105]

>>12788407
n...no, I was just trying to think of the most fucked up thing to say.
I swear that I'm pure, holy, and pretty much vanilla anon, I can't account for my imagination tho.

[Anonymous No.12789114]

So what happens when someone breaks elliptical curves?

[Anonymous No.12789161]

>>12789114
We switch to non broken curves?

[Anonymous No.12789178]

>>12787569
Idiot here. Can you break this down in a pop-sci manner for me?

[Anonymous No.12789226]

>>12789178
if what schnorr says is true
>a fuckton of the world’s computer security just broke
>mega happening
if wrong
>one of the most reputable cryptographers is no longer reputable

[Anonymous No.12789290]

>Schnorr-Hörner pruning strategy

[El Arcón No.12789452]

Due to time travel, all of your crypto has been broken all along. People don't like to realize in a dream that they are at school naked but, to my good fortune, they were IRL naked the whole time.

[Anonymous No.12789459]

>>12789452
Tooker you need to see someone. You’re a textbook schizophrenic.

[Anonymous No.12789515]

>>12789459
Tooker is nothing but an average /sci/-tard, with the added bonus that somehow he figgered out to typeset his crap.

[Anonymous No.12789522]

>>12788419
Just download that 4chan extension everyone uses, 4chanx I think, pretty sure it has a feature to block trip/namefags and even flags.

[Anonymous No.12789527]

Anyways, global reset soon, told u.

[Anonymous No.12789552]

>>12789452
If you were telling the truth here you'd have written something to steal all crypto from wallets and been rich by now. Can we talk about real math now?

>>12788679
>>12788679

[Anonymous No.12790672]

>>12789114
We take the next step to parabolic curves

[Anonymous No.12790684]

>>12787496
>@SchmiegSophie
>Sophie, an extremely serious person
>Leading Cryptography (ISE) at Google. Algebraic Geometer. Woman in Tech. Cypherpunk. All opinions are my own.
This bitch needs to be spanked.

[Anonymous No.12790695]

>>12788419
Like >>12789522 said, 4chanx
you can make filters for whatever you want