Pseudo pop-science takes that piss you off?

[Anonymous No.12720502]

I'll start.

>"dude quantum computing is the future, did you see how there's already quantum supremacy?"
>"In like 25-30 years we'll have home quantum computers like the jump from the 50s to the 80s!"
>*Has read 3 articles which are 90% theory without looking at counter-research*

[Anonymous No.12720515]

Quantum supremacy has been achieved for some niche problems. This isn't pop science. It has been demonstrated by multiple countries.

[Anonymous No.12720574]

>>12720515
>missing the point of the post
I was trying to emphasize the fact that people think quantum computing is going to replace regular computers without reading counterarguments.

[Anonymous No.12720651]

>>12720502
Based

[Anonymous No.12720999]

>>12720651
related-https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.02499