[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 40 KB, 560x530, Reloj.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12713650 No.12713650 [Reply] [Original]

You are the job creator. Only you understand how matter and energy works. Only you understand technology. Only you know how to turn the raw materials from the soil into valuable products. The normie masses are just another raw material that came with the earth, they expect you to organize them and lead them like a captain and tell them what motions to do so they can partake in wealth creation without really knowing what they are doing.
As for the already rich, unless they are scientists themselves they still need you to tell them what to do.

>> No.12713656
File: 3 KB, 111x125, 1611345246989s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12713656

>>12713650
Unfortunately, nowadays scientists are whores who sell themselves to the highest bidder.
What happened to science?

>> No.12713666

>>12713650
another retard it seems

>> No.12713670
File: 40 KB, 800x450, frogorig.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12713670

Actually I'm unemployed with benefits. I have a wild theory about true nature of magnetism and my working-his-ass-off PhD pal looks "when he has time from work".

Ugh. Nobel price in front of his eyes and he decides to work.

>> No.12713690

>>12713670
Its youth naivety, the scientific community always had a communistic worldview of publishing your research for the common good, so young scientists think they live in a machine system where they must do their share while the MBAs do their job and together the machine marches forward. If scientists went in strike panic would ensue.

>> No.12713718

>>12713656
It's less political now than it has ever been you simpering popsci faggot. Get the fuck off /sci/

>> No.12713731

>>12713718
When was science political?
I mean scientific communities used to have a culture of sorts defined by: Sharing, communism, independent verification and free speech and progress. Free speech used to be a big deal, remember Galileo? Remember 100 authors against Einstein?

>> No.12713736

>>12713731
I want to be the 101th and completly ruin him. t frog from upper.

You see, the einsteins train is a lie. The laser is in small angle. Not 90 degree exact.


Also, the lorentz transformation is a lie. Its just bijection so we do not need transformation.

>> No.12713742
File: 36 KB, 500x455, 1583600461554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12713742

>>12713731
>When was science political?
Aristotle fucked things up for a very long time. His lingering influence fucked the science culture for centuries. It was hard to break the mold, you were ostracized or buried. These days you have an internet, so the politics are weak.

>communities used to have a culture of sorts defined by: Sharing, communism, independent verification and free speech and progress
This is a myth you've bought into. The attitude was more or less invented by Pauli, Einstein, and friends in the early 20th century

>> No.12713779

>>12713650
Actually, is not nature or natural laws the ones paying your. Rather is other people and what they want is a way to have bigger erections not a new paradigm in astrobiology.

>> No.12713805

>>12713742
I thought the sharing attitude was invented in medieval Italy. It was there that scientists transitioned from "I must keep my formula secret at any cost" to "I must be the first to publish for the merit"

>> No.12713812

>>12713779
But only scientists know how to do anything. Whether erections or TVs or cars or houses, only scientists know how to do anything. It isnt about new discoveries, just knowing what is already discovered is light years above the non-scientists.

>> No.12713813
File: 72 KB, 960x539, 1583367821958.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12713813

>>12713736
>I want to be the 101th and completly ruin him
I don't want to discourage your enthusiasm but Jacob Barnett took up the mantle of the 101st* when he was 12 years old.

>> No.12713829

>>12713812
>But only scientists know how to do anything. Whether erections or TVs or cars or houses, only scientists know how to do anything
You are reading POPSCI JOURNALISTS and RETARDED PROPAGANDISTS, not SCIENTISTS you fucking idiot.

>It isnt about new discoveries, just knowing what is already discovered is light years above the non-scientists.
OH MY GOD. You pretend to talk about physics without knowing ANYTHING. It takes a long time for new things to get accepted, especially things that challenge the dogma. Before the internet these things were politically repressed and inaccessible, that's why you're wrong about the politics, because now I can go on /sci/ and tell all the brainlets of the world about my new theory, and they can tell me why it's wrong. But you anon are getting upset because you faggy journalist headlines are retarded. They've always been retarded. Please leave, dude, do you even do science or math?

>> No.12713830

>>12713670
if youre right youre goin to be stalked and forced to produce research for old white meb from skull and bones

>> No.12713832

>>12713829
>You pretend to talk about physics
meant to say science

>> No.12715602

>>12713829
What are you even saying? INew paradigm? I specifically said that just knowing what has already been discovered puts you way ahead of the masses. Like understaqnding how a lead acid battery works or how to make iron. The masses dont know how to do anything except mixing up cake mix with eggs and shoving into the oven, only scientists know how to make anything, this has nothing to do with new discoveries.

>> No.12715606

>>12713650
>as a scientist
ERROR
SCRIPT NO FOUND
A scientist of what?
You sound more like the Entity who rules civilozation desu

>> No.12715607

>>12713650
Well yeah, no shit. You get paid to think, not to work.

>> No.12715621

>>12715607
More like to lead. The scientist is the source of all commands, the masses gather around scientists and cry "just tell us what to do!"

>> No.12715625

>>12715621
cute. it seems scientists went extinct.

>> No.12715637

>>12715625
Not true, there are more scientists than ever, however they are naive and socially indoctrinated into being communist, quiet and passive and docile. They basically have to whisper to CEOs and politicians what to do, while taking none of the credit.

>> No.12715652

>>12715637
comsidering
>The scientist is the source of all commands, the masses gather around scientists and cry "just tell us what to do!"
yes, it has been scientifically proved that they went extinct.