/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.12685148]

*BTFOs your schizo delusions*

[Anonymous No.12685149]

>>12685148
2/2

[Anonymous No.12685154]

>>12685148
what does this even mean

[Anonymous No.12685156]

>>12685154
https://arstechnica.com/science/2016/02/large-scale-conspiracies-are-mathematically-impossible-to-keep-quiet/

[Anonymous No.12685160]

>>12685156
This is so reddit, colpetely surface level naive analysis.

[Anonymous No.12685187]

>>12685156
>we used math
>therefore
>you are mathematically impossible
>how does that feel huh?
>this information will make you join my side now

[Anonymous No.12685194]

>>12685149
What about all the conspiracies that didn't fail like MK Ultra, Tuskegee, and everything else on this list and others?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States

[Anonymous No.12685203]

>>12685156
>sample size of three large scale proven conspiracies
>ignoring others like MKULTRA, MKNAOMI or operation mockingbird
cringe
In fact the length of time without leaks for all multi person top secret projects should be considered.
Also it will be attacked because climategate already happened.
3/10 you tried

[Anonymous No.12685209]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Q7qKxtIAbk0
>b-but y-you could never keep it a secret
>somebody would come forward and everybody would know the truth!
Gotta love that golem cope.

[Sage No.12685247]

>>12685156
>Not posting the actual study
>https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0147905

[Anonymous No.12685256]

>>12685203
What about conspiracies so successfully covered up they're completely unknown

[Anonymous No.12685276]

>>12685256
Like what schizo? Da Joos?

[Anonymous No.12685280]

>>12685276
Like Epstein getting whacked, or JFK/MLK being whacked by government agencies.

[Anonymous No.12685281]

>>12685276
>what if there are ones that are unknown
>oy gevalt imply he's an anti-semite
Really makes one ponder

[Anonymous No.12685289]

>>12685276
Boxing fights could be rigged. Other sports games could be fixed with players paid off. Draft lotteries can be rigged for NBA, etc.

[Anonymous No.12685302]

>>12685276
Is that implying everybody at the organisation is in on it

[Anonymous No.12685361]

>>12685276
Shadownet

[Anonymous No.12685416]

>>12685148
You'll never be able to rationalize someone out of their delusions regardless of how strong your arguments are. We need a specific group of people in society specialized in unraveling delusions in individuals who are not yet psychiatrically ill. Some people are too primitive to update their knowledge base and honestly are no better than overstimulated chimps.

[Anonymous No.12685429]

>>12685416
>We need a specific group of people in society specialized in unraveling delusions in individuals who are not yet psychiatrically ill.
We have people that tried to do that, they end up being the most redpilled, though.

[Anonymous No.12685439]

>>12685194
If they didn't fail, how do you know about them?

[Anonymous No.12685445]

>>12685439
They were successfully proven to be true.

[Anonymous No.12685446]

>>12685276
>everyone employed must be in on it.
Very fallacious / disingenuous reasoning, just look at the Manhattan Project for comparison.

[Anonymous No.12685447]

>>12685439
Government chose to declassify the documents within regulatory guidelines. While the information was classified, all the people who attempted to whistleblow were branded as crazy. Only decades later after the government admitted they did all those things were these loonies validated. But by then it was too late, and the government succeeded in covering it all up.

[Anonymous No.12685448]

>>12685203
>>sample size of three large scale proven conspiracies
Not a sample size and not proven.

>Also it will be attacked because climategate already happened.
It's a nothingburger. Just dumb schizos like you taking quotes out of context and misinterpreting them.

[Anonymous No.12685451]

>>12685445
Then they failed. Do you even understand what this thread is about?

[Anonymous No.12685455]

>>12685194
Does not take into account if only a small amount of people know about it

[Anonymous No.12685458]

>>12685451
No, a validated theory is a successful hypothesis, not a failed one.

[Anonymous No.12685460]

>>12685451
>Then they failed
no, they were successfully able to conduct their operations at the time when they were relevant
if they get brought up decades later when no one will be held accountable for immoral actions it doesnt matter

[Anonymous No.12685461]

>>12685446
The Manhattan project only existed for three years.

[Anonymous No.12685462]

>>12685455
An incredibly large amount of people from all over the world were part of those MK experiments, but they were highly compartmentalized.

[Anonymous No.12685473]

>>12685447
>Government chose to declassify the documents within regulatory guidelines.
No, it was testimony from participants during the Church committee. Stop lying.

[Anonymous No.12685480]

>>12685458
Failure doesn't refer to the theory failing a test, it refers to the conspiracy failing to maintain secrecy. Learn how to read.

[Anonymous No.12685484]

>>12685460
>no, they were successfully able to conduct their operations at the time
That has nothing to do with what this thread is about.

>if they get brought up decades later
It depends on the conspiracy.

[Anonymous No.12685487]

>12685247
>12685156 #
>>Not posting the actual study
>>https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0147905