/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.12635962]

Why time isn't considered a fundamental interaction? I think gravity is more similar to time than it is to other fundamental interactions

[Anonymous No.12635971]

Define time in the context of your question.
>>12635962

[Anonymous No.12635973]

>>12635962
How does this even make sense? Interactions requires at least two things to, you know, influence each other. You can say gluons self interact, but you still need two or more gluons for that. With what do you propose time interacts?

[Anonymous No.12635997]

>>12635971
Strings moving / changing their position in the universe.
>>12635973
Time interacts with all the strings in the universe.

[Anonymous No.12636011]

>>12635997
whelp, there's your problem, you got bad definitions. Time is an emergent phenomenon. It can't be a fundamental anything if it depends on other shit interacting to exist.

[Anonymous No.12636020]

>>12635997
>He believes in string theory

[Anonymous No.12636028]

>>12636011
>it depends on other shit interacting to exist.
You mean like gravity does?

[Anonymous No.12636068]

>>12636028
no, I meant like time does. Time literally doesn't exist outside of a sequences of interactions. It emerges as a result of interactions occurring.

Gravity is a whole other bag of worms... wouldn't really get to invested in any "understandings" of gravity till we sort out dark matter, higgs fields, etc... Just cuz we have a model that works in most cases doesn't mean we know all there is to know about gravity. Hell, one could even argue gravity is present regardless of if there's mass present to act on... it's not like you can prove otherwise.

[Anonymous No.12636077]

read carlo rovellis order of time and youll have the answer to your question. its a bit pop sci-y, but im a math grad and have no background in qm/physics and it gave me a sense of an intuitive understanding for time as good as you can expect with a 200 page book. the answer to your question is time is emergent from space-time and only makes sense relationally within this space-time framework.

[Anonymous No.12636151]

>>12636077
>200 pages to understand time
Bro... Time is simple to understand if you understand space. Space is merely a mathematical interval we define to describe displacements of objects. In principle, only relative positions (cf. displacements) are physical. Time is the same thing. Mathematical interval we define to describe evolution of objects. Just like with space, time only makes sense physically via differences.

[Anonymous No.12636328]

>>12636151
No ur wrong. Equating the relativity of time and space is not at all fair but I'm not gonna explain why

[Anonymous No.12636340]

>>12636328
My comment has nothing to do with the relativity of time. That's time dilation. My comment speaks only about the definition of time and of space.

[Anonymous No.12636376]

>>12636340
Yes but the whole point is understanding space does not allow one to understand time because time is imbued with relativity which space is not.

[Anonymous No.12636380]

>>12636340
Ur also wrong because time is not an interval during which things evolve.

[Anonymous No.12637040]

>>12636068
>Time literally doesn't exist outside of a sequences of interactions. It emerges as a result of interactions occurring.
You can say the same about Gravity.
>one could even argue gravity is present regardless of if there's mass present to act on
You can say the same about Time.

[Anonymous No.12637267]

>>12637040
you could indeed say the same about time... you'd just be wrong, and stupid.

[Anonymous No.12637294]

>>12636068
sorry, stumbled across this..
can you explain the difference between these two statements?
>time emerges as a result of interactions occurring.
>interactions are a result of time existing..

[Anonymous No.12637459]

>>12637294
>your house collapsing emerges as a result of termites eating it's wooden frame work.
>termites are a result of your house collapsing.

I'm hoping a laymen's analogy will suffice to point out the flaw in causality regarding your question. If not, let me know >_>

[Anonymous No.12637464]

>>12635962
>time
doesn't exist

[Anonymous No.12637498]

>>12637459
How do termites move if there is no time?
Does time magically exist because termites can move if time did exist?
So time emerges to facilitate the termites moving?
Is this your explanation of how causality works?

This is a chicken or the egg question.
How could the chicken cross the road?
Did the Road "emerge" because the chicken "could" cross it?
Can you explain in a non-laymen way that makes sense?

[Anonymous No.12637521]

>>12637464
>doesn't exist
4th Dimension does not exist?
What about higher dimensions?

[Anonymous No.12637640]

>>12637498 >>12637521
yeh man, its cause time is not a variable in quantum mechanics, dude; everything is instant so that means it aint real!!!!!!

Never mind Physicists struggling to unify quantum mechanics and Einstein's general theory of relativity and the lack of quantum-gravity, that don't matter....

Scientists have universally decided that both time-travel and God is not possible so instead of re-iterating that "Time is a dimension of space", they simply say space is cool, but we'll all stop that shit right there, ok?

Now get on board & sing hallelujah "Space is neutered"!!!!!
also, don't ask any questions about higher-dimensions cause it might put us in an awkward situation with other physicists, ok!!

[Anonymous No.12638259]

>>12637498
Alright, let's try this one more time. I'll put it as clear as I can
>time(your house collapsing) emerges as a result of interactions occuring(termites eating it's wooden frame work) - a meaningful and useful inference that can allow for predictions

>interactions(termites) are a result of time existing(your house collapsing) - an incoherent statement that requires illogical assumptions

I literally framed the analogy to match your propositions. I even did so in a way as to match you at your perceived level of understanding. This isn't a chicken or egg debate of definitions or a question regarding the teleological nature of the road. It's as simple as explaining the difference between your two offered statements.
Sorry if you're at this point still lost, as it implies you're an idiot and can't be helped :l

[Anonymous No.12638314]

>>12638259
>I suck on quantum cock.
fuck off back to pansy land.
no one cares for your retarded horse-shit.
Fuck-OFF.

[Anonymous No.12638404]

>>12638314
Pease, elaborate on what part is "retarded horse-shit". I'm pretty curious what part of this you're not understanding since I'm not very good at simulating the perspective of an idiot.

[Anonymous No.12638441]

>>12638404
>desperate to win
>must claw my way back from irrelevance
>keep up megacock projection
>I have no other friends to spend time with

[Anonymous No.12638662]

>>12638441
ahh wait, I get it now.

[Anonymous No.12638706]

>>12638662
>scitard has comic-con jammies
poofter

[Anonymous No.12639384]

>>12638706
got anything else you wanna ask? Or is this now a sexual preference projection session?

[Anonymous No.12639453]

>>12639384
>reinforce sex direction
>this desperate for sex
>must lose virginity before I die
>careful, this is the closest I've been
>I hope this works
>I'll take anything
you're not my type faggot.
fuck off loser

[Anonymous No.12639566]

>>12639453
Unfortunately, you're wrong yet again... on two counts even. I am indeed a man mr. poofter. Also, I am indeed the winner here. For you see, I don't get to russle jimmies this heartily very often and it has been my pleasure.

As a matter of fact, I suspect this won't be our last interaction as you'll undoubtedly feel the need to respond (being the dumb source of entertainment that you are).

[Anonymous No.12639606]

>>12639566
yeh, I know you're writing style for sure...
I've pissed all over you're retarded spazzoid shit many times.
can't win a debate so its straight into the "you're an idiot and can't be helped :l".

you're an utter fuckn loser who needs anime to get his rocks off cause woman laugh at you.

[Anonymous No.12639655]

>>12639606
Well, did you get the point with the bumper rail equivalent parenthesis added in? Or did it shame you so that you became intellectually crippled into belligerence?

I wasn't even aware we were debating desu, you seemed to be honestly confused and in need of assistance.

I'll have you know that your projections are becoming progressively more telling into your personal shortcoming btw.

[Anonymous No.12639672]

>>12639655
>blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
>NOOOOOOO!!!! I WAS JUST BEING HELPFUL!!
>IT WAS YOU IT WAS YOU IT WAS YOU I TELLS YA!!
>ALL MUST FALL BEFORE MY EMINENCE!!!
lmao, Fuckn Loser

[Anonymous No.12639679]

>>12639655
>>12639566
>>12638259
So is time a higher dimension or not?

[Anonymous No.12639720]

>>12639679
If you'd agree that a dimension is just a specific measurement type, and that relativity holds true regarding time experienced by materials at relativistic speeds (which we have evidence of on multiple accounts via orbital clock experiments and LHC readings)
Then I think it would be fair to argue that time is a dependent dimension that requires inputs from other dimensions in order to be coherent.
That being said, I wouldn't say it's a higher dimension... maybe a meta-dimension or an organizational dimension with special properties?

[Anonymous No.12639732]

>other dimensions
a dimension of space?

>dumbest AI in the universe

[Anonymous No.12639744]

>>12639672
>shh
>you can't be helped either way
>you're the one continuing to be belligerent
>yes
Winning is a pleasant sensation~

[Anonymous No.12639769]

>>12639744
>NOOOOO ITS YOU I TELLS YA, ITS YOU!!!
>NOOOOO I'M A WINNER A WINNER, I TELLS YA!!
>NOOOOO ITS YOU THE MEANIE YOU I TELLS YA!!!
>anime-I-jerk-off-to.jpg
fuckn hilarious!!

[Anonymous No.12639786]

>>12635962
Time isn't considered a fundamental interaction in physics , so it can be called a single-coherent interaction. This is because, unlike many interactions, there is no single central event that determines the behavior of a system.
In other words, the interactions of the system are the only interactions that determine how it should behave, not the system itself, or a single event.
The relationship between time and gravity has been studied for a long time in theoretical physics, but this relationship is less well understood for cosmology and cosmological theory. In cosmology, the relation between time and gravity is considered a cosmological dependence. It can be interpreted as a set of relations between the observer and the system.

[Anonymous No.12639790]

>>12639732
Yes, didn't you know space is both real & meta depending on technology breakthrus you fail at.
We in the industry call it AI-cope.

[Anonymous No.12639795]

>>12639786
yes yes, but does this mean time-travel is not possible?

[Anonymous No.12639800]

>>12639790
but how do you break space apart?
how can left-right be separated from up-down?
what about the 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th......11th dimension?

is there a higher plane of existence?

[Anonymous No.12639807]

>>12639795
To the future, yes.
To the past, no, unless you can somehow come up with a way of traveling backwards in space

[Anonymous No.12639816]

>>12639769
>yes
>yeah
>yep
>projection?
You have no idea how funny the salt is from my perspective.

[Anonymous No.12639822]

>>12639807
>traveling backwards in space
surely time is not a dimension of space!!!
*sorry, just need it in writing.

[Anonymous No.12639823]

>>12639800
you mean like the 2nd floor of your apartment building?

[Anonymous No.12639846]

>>12639816
>YES I TELLS YA, YES YES YES YOU HEAR ME!!
>YEAH I TELLS YA, YEAH YEAH YEAH YEAH YA HEAR ME!!
>YEP I TELLS YA, YEP YEP YEAH YEP YA HEAR ME!!
>IS IT PROJECTION I ASKS YA PROJECTION PROJECTION ISIT!!!
You have no idea how funny archive readers in the future will scoff at your poor guesswork.

*sorry gotta ask, are related to the retarded German flag AI-program on /pol/ whom thinks himself an authority of all things God?

don't get me wrong, I would call you human but humans aren't that stupid; and it would insulting to the rest of us.

[Anonymous No.12639851]

>>12639823
I mean more like something that is connected to the exact same origin-point as all the other parts of itself.

[Anonymous No.12639867]

>>12635962
LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS LOL CHRONONS

[Anonymous No.12639870]

>>12639851
well then by means of understanding the definition of a dimension, you categorically remove that possibility by calling it a dimension.

[El Arcón No.12639879]

>Why aren't cookies considered dinner? I think cookies are more like bread than they are to other desserts.

[Anonymous No.12639894]

>>12639846
Seems like I've brow beat you sufficiently into concurrence on our positions in this conversation. Good.

*no, I'm just some rando nuclear engineer who likes to dabble in shit I had to pass by to get to my current position. only ever lurked /pol/

I'd wager that as far as humans go, you're well below the average...

[Anonymous No.12639902]

dimension
noun: dimension; plural noun: dimension
1. a measurable extent of a particular kind, such as length, breadth, depth, or height.
measurements
extent
size
length
width
breadth
depth
area
volume
capacity
footage
acreage
a mode of linear extension of which there are three in space and two on a flat surface, which corresponds to one of a set of coordinates specifying the position of a point.

Physics
an expression for a derived physical quantity in terms of fundamental quantities such as mass, length, or time, raised to the appropriate power (acceleration, for example, having the dimension of length × time −2).

2. an aspect or feature of a situation.
"we must focus on the cultural dimensions of the problem"
Similar:
aspect
feature
element
facet
side

verb
verb: dimension; 3rd person present: dimensions; past tense: dimensioned; past participle: dimensioned; gerund or present participle: dimensioning

form or shape (something) to particular measurements.
"the seats and backrests are dimensioned to withstand high loads from items such as unsecured luggage"
>>12639870
>well then by means of understanding the definition of a dimension, you categorically remove that possibility by calling it a dimension.
please elaborate.

[Anonymous No.12639918]

>>12639894
>Seems like I've brow beat you sufficiently into concurrence
nah, I'm just convinced you're too embarrassingly retarded to an actual human.

I really must get the shit kicked out of you every time you go clubbing.

[Anonymous No.12639934]

>>12639902
>something that is connected to the exact same origin-point as all the other parts of itself

You're describing something I would interpret as a singularity or a monad. If you can't differentiate (dis-connect from the origin point) it wouldn't be very useful a dimension. That's like calling color a dimension but in a world where only 1 color exists.

[Anonymous No.12639936]

>>12639894
>Seems like I've brow beat you sufficiently into concurrence
nah, I'm just convinced you're too embarrassingly retarded to be an actual human.

You really must get the shit kicked out of you every time you go clubbing.
If you ever had a daughter, she'd become a punk lezzo just stick it to you.
you're clearly obsessed with anime, so you're a loner with no friends and fantasize about what you'll never be..
you are classic escapism.

[Anonymous No.12639945]

>>12639918
You know, you coming to the wrong conclusion is very in character at this point. I'll buy it.

>I really must get the shit kicked out of...
>I

If that's not a Freudian slip, I don't know what is! Bwahahahahhaha

[Anonymous No.12639965]

>>12639934
>You're describing something I would interpret as a singularity or a monad.
If you can't differentiate (dis-connect from the origin point) it wouldn't be very useful a dimension.
its ALLLLLL space with the same origin..
its multi-dimensional because you can travel along multiple axis.
breaking anything away from itself is not even a thing.

>That's like calling color a dimension but in a world where only 1 color exists.
wouldn't color white be 'space' and the colors that make up color white ROYGBIV be 'dimensions'

[Anonymous No.12639967]

>>12639945
for reference

[Anonymous No.12639971]

>>12639945
thats a hot cartoon.
bet she's the best sex you've had.

[Anonymous No.12639977]

>>12639967
>kids font
bet you've got a neat tree house.

[Anonymous No.12640012]

>>12639965
Gonna preface this with the statement that I don't think anyone really knows the hard details on this specific concept (the exact nature of space) and that we're going into conjecture here.

That being said I don't think space isn't really anything unless it's occupied by something of interest (I mean this as in the literal statement that you can move in any given direction and never hit a dead end regardless of the speed you head there at)

regarding the breaking anything away from itself: those are called sets, you can use sets to organize information regarding various interactions. for ex: you're not gonna say that a particle collision resulted in all possible energy levels for the relevant incident particles -> you'd define a set of energies the collisions typically result in.

If ROYGBIV existed in tandem then there'd be more than one color present which would preclude white from existing in a world where only one color could exist...

[Anonymous No.12640025]

>>12639971
>that's a hot cartoon
for you maybe
>>12639977
>bet you've got a neat tree house
nah, previous home owner cleared the backyard to install a saltwater pool
I think this thread will cap prior to your salt levels subsiding.

[Anonymous No.12640056]

>>12640012
>Gonna preface this with the statement that I don't think anyone really knows the hard details on this specific concept (the exact nature of space) and that we're going into conjecture here.
OMG!!! YOU MEAN YOU COULD BEEEEE WRONG!! OMG!!
>That being said I don't think space isn't really anything unless it's occupied by something of interest (I mean this as in the literal statement that you can move in any given direction and never hit a dead end regardless of the speed you head there at)
because you've personally built a detector capable of scanning all higher-dimensions and verified its ALL empty therefore it does not exist or it is purely abstract.
>regarding the breaking anything away from itself: those are called sets, you can use sets to organize information regarding various interactions. for ex: you're not gonna say that a particle collision resulted in all possible energy levels for the relevant incident particles -> you'd define a set of energies the collisions typically result in.
>sets?
abstract, right?
>If ROYGBIV existed in tandem then there'd be more than one color present which would preclude white from existing in a world where only one color could exist...
what does "if blah blah TANDEM" got to do with this discussion?
you likened space to color, I attempted clarify that color is composed of other stuff (colors).
AND SPACE IS COMPOSED OF MANY DIMENSIONS.
SPACE IS MULTI-DIMENSIONAL, SPACE IS A SINGLE THING.

[Anonymous No.12640061]

>>12640056
is this where people get the term schizzo poster from? or are you legit trying to derail someone else's attempt at discussion?

[Anonymous No.12640064]

>>12640025
>for you maybe
I don't collect them on computer.
you obviously have a personal relationship with all of them.
>>12640025
>nah, previous home owner cleared the backyard to install a saltwater pool
>I think this thread will cap prior to your salt levels subsiding.
I think you'll die a virgin
sex with anime doesn't count.

[Anonymous No.12640072]

>>12640061
>someone else's attempt at discussion?
Does your head-canon always need you to change subject so as to not answer topic questions when asked?

[Anonymous No.12640075]

>>12640064
>I don't collect them on computer
me neither
>I think you'll die a virgin
3 kids too late for that
>sex with anime doesn't count
yet
this is speeding up, did you decide to 100% this endeavour?

[Anonymous No.12640093]

>>12640075
>me neither
ok, cartoon poster.
>>I think you'll die a virgin
>3 kids too late for that
>>sex with anime doesn't count
>yet
yet?
so you are lying about your kids and yearn fantasy.
this explains for fantasy science.

>this is speeding up, did you decide to 100% this endeavour?
keep changing subjects.
SPACE is a single thing.
SPACE is multi-dimensional.

[Anonymous No.12640123]

>>12640093
>ok, cartoon poster.
has it occurred to you that the images I'm posting are fueling your autistic whining and it's a low effort high return form of entertainment to see you seethe over them?
>yet?
I'm cognizant of pretty large and growing swathes of people actively developing all the crap one would need to fuck some robo iteration of their waifu. Combine with artificial womb tech and the idea of "yet" becomes plausible.

Real question for you here though, are you OP?

[Anonymous No.12640152]

>>12640123
>has it occurred to you that the images I'm posting are fueling your autistic whining and it's a low effort high return form of entertainment to see you seethe over them?
piss week deflection, bruh!!
>>yet?
>I'm cognizant of pretty large and growing swathes of people actively developing all the crap one would need to fuck some robo iteration of their waifu. Combine with artificial womb tech and the idea of "yet" becomes plausible.
>I'm cognizant of.....
you're definitely one of THEM.
you're as retarded as a teenager.
or
sicko fuck just waiting fuck a bit of plastic cause you really don't need much convincing its real.

you're detached from the real world and have "issues".

[Anonymous No.12640161]

>>12640123
>Real question for you here though, are you OP?
no

real question right back at you, do you have a sex dungeon and own a collection of vacuum dick pumps?

[Anonymous No.12640600]

>>12640161
coulda fooled me you fuckin faggot!

[Anonymous No.12640682]

keep fighting the good fight, based anime posting engineer.
we always need more milk from the lolcows.

[Anonymous No.12640700]

>>12640600
>struck a nerve!!!
>REEEEEEEEE goes the sex fiend!!
wow bruh, how many sex-dolls ya got?
what about whips?
do you use aromatic-oils, or just shit straight from ya car?
bet ya already got a dozen sex-bot, even programmed them to tell ya how awesome you are, right? yeh, dumbcunt losers like you needs all the reinforcement you can get!!!

nope, not OP
tough luck, sick fuck!!!

[Anonymous No.12640729]

>>12635973
Time interacts with anti-Time to create matter you unkeyed retard

[Anonymous No.12642385]

>>12640682
They ended up finding an hotel room.

[Anonymous No.12643269]

>>12635962
Time is a category of the mind. It is an artifact of how our minds represent phenomena. The observations associated with the concept of gravity are objectifications of the Will.

[Anonymous No.12643287]

>>12642385
lmao, anime posters are all virgins for life.

[Anonymous No.12643313]

>>12635962
because time is influence by gravity and thermodynamics.

[Anonymous No.12643505]

>>12643269
>Time is a category of the mind. It is an artifact of how our minds represent phenomena.
>Wind is a category of the mind. It is an artifact of how our minds represent phenomena.
>Color is a category of the mind. It is an artifact of how our minds represent phenomena.

[Anonymous No.12643791]

>>12635962
>stops at 3rd, 4th is an artifact
what about even higher dimensions?
are there even higher planes of existence?

[Anonymous No.12644000]

>>12643505
Wrong. Wind and color are phenomena of sensory experience. There are no sense organs to detect time (or space).

[Anonymous No.12644020]

>>12635962
>Why time isn't considered a fundamental interaction?
SPACE is a single thing.
SPACE is multi-dimensional.
>>12643791
YES of course, all dimensions of space share a common origin point.
in the beginning big-bang singularity was the single-common-origin-point of all the multiple dimensions of space.

Turning back time & contracting space backwards to the big-bang means all those electron/positron pair-production locations located every Planck distance were all at the exact same 0.0 location.

Big-Bang is all those gazillions of gazillions electron/positron pair-production locations now at the same location erupting forth with unfathomable amounts electrons & positrons >>12637441 >>12638239.

This universe is only the first 4-dimensions of what sprang forth from that big-bang common-origin location, so obviously the source of those electron/positron pairs was not from this universe but bled into our universe from higher-dimensions from that common-origin location-point.

>so where is this 0.0 common-location-origin of all the dimensions of space, now?
That single location broke up into gazillions upon gazillions of separate electron/positron particle-pair locations >>12637441.
The universe inflated so now, the common-origin of all the many dimensions of space is those electron/positron particle-pair production locations spaced every Planck distance

electrons and positrons continue to bleed into this universe from those higher-dimensions-of-space from this common-origin (universe is scar-material between particle-pair locations distancing) and its antimatter annihilation explosive force is the Dark-energy that is the cosmological-constant >>12640338 >>12640403

Scientists whom insist this cosmological-constant is a phenomena of only this universe have us believe the cause of universal-inflation is a free lunch. universe-inflation is work being done but we'll just call this a "constant" and leave out words like "free-energy" and "over-unity" out of it.

[Anonymous No.12644021]

>>12644000
Wind can't exist without time, everytime you detect wind you also detect time.

[Anonymous No.12644048]

>>12644021
Wrong. Wind cannot enter into understanding without time. Every human concept is conditioned by the categories of time and space inherent to our minds. We cannot say that time and space exist "out there" because they are a function of understanding in general.

[Anonymous No.12644152]

>>12637267
What is wrong about his statement?

[Anonymous No.12644154]

>>12643269
>>12644048
Learn about relativity, brainlet. Time is a force.

Imagine 2 twins. Twin B enters in a spaceship and travel around the universe at 99.99 of the speed of light. The spaceship returns 20 years later and Twin A is 20 years older while Twin B is less than 1 day older.

[Anonymous No.12644171]

>>12637640
Explain the time evolution of a wave function without using time as a variable (of course you can simply say that its just a phase factor, but the fact remains that there is a change that is not always separable (see relativistic effects on a system))

[Anonymous No.12644218]

>>12644154
*diff anon
sorry for butting in
>Time is a force.
I've never conceived of such eloquence.
>Time is the force that is the pressure forcing forward all quantum, nuclear & chemical processes and reactions.
>sublime<

>>12644171
bro, I'm BOTH posters >>12637498 >>12637521 and was just trolling the samefag poster of >>12637464 >>12637459 >>12636068 whom has a number of same stance posts in this thread.

The whole thing was sarcasm.

[Anonymous No.12644228]

>>12644154
Einstein's favorite philosopher was Schopenhauer, whose philosophy depends on Kantian metaphysics (Categories of the Faculty of Understanding). The success of the theory of relativity actually confirms Kant's view that time is not an object of perception.

[Anonymous No.12644254]

>>12644154
*diff anon
sorry for butting in
>Time is a force.
I've never conceived of such eloquence.
>Time is the force that is the pressure forcing forward all quantum, nuclear & chemical processes and reactions.
>utterly-sublime<

>>12644171
bro, I'm BOTH posters >>12637498 >>12637521 and was just trolling the samefag poster of >>12637464 >>12637459 >>12636068 whom has a number of same stance posts in this thread.

The whole thing was sarcasm.

[Anonymous No.12644290]

>>12640072
Man not even him but shut up IoI

[Anonymous No.12644302]

>>12644290
>not even him
ok then, you must the anon sucking his cock >>12640682.

[Anonymous No.12644315]

>>12644290
>not even him
ok then, you must be the anon sucking his cock >>12640682.
bet robotics is also your only chance to lose your virginity before death!!!
top kek!!

[Anonymous No.12645503]

>>12635962
Just consider time as the sum of all irreversable processes in the universe bro

[Anonymous No.12647233]

>>12635962
Time isn't interaction. It's rate of interaction.

[Anonymous No.12647242]

>>12635962
Do you understand what time is? Isn't it the difference between observed speed(distance) and actual speed?