Are time and space continuous or discrete?

[Anonymous No.12571035]

[Anonymous No.12571040]

>>12571035
Zesty

[Anonymous No.12571131]

>>12571035
It’s continuous.
It can’t possibly not exist.

The abstract before time and nothing and things... is so abstract that it requires existence merely to exist

Ying and yang

The lack of existence requires existence

[Anonymous No.12571135]

continuous

[Anonymous No.12571435]

>>12571135
why

[Anonymous No.12571499]

>>12571131
you don't understand what continuous and discrete are, what you wrote has literally nothing to do with it

[Anonymous No.12571507]

>>12571131

[Anonymous No.12571556]

>>12571131
Reddit spacing gtfo. Also check em. Bye.

[Anonymous No.12571687]

>>12571499
>what you wrote has literally nothing to do with it
but it makes sense

[Anonymous No.12571692]

>>12571507
It's not true, I can poop without peeing just fine.

[Anonymous No.12571707]

>>12571035
Why the fuck is science so interested in us anyway, Little Sister? I am Big Brother Time, she is Little Sister Space. Respective God's thereof by virtue of rite, ritual, routine, and respect.

We are continuous with each other and discrete when others get ashamed or embarrassed by the failings of their proximity to solutions or ability to attain proximity to problem solving means.

>Space Time Continuum, for a reason. All converges into Space & Time at their individual and personal discretion.

[Anonymous No.12571708]

>>12571131
Yes, lots of holes need to be filled and there are only so many poles.

Male is discrete and female is continuous. Union is per instance.

[Anonymous No.12571713]

>>12571499
Discrete is integration by parts, continuous is the integral.

[Anonymous No.12571916]

>space is an infinite collection of points of indeterminate cardinalty

[Anonymous No.12572239]

>>12571916
It isn't but it's also not discrete

[Anonymous No.12572273]

[math]\aleph_{0}<|time|=|space|<{\mathfrak {c}}[/math]

[Anonymous No.12572497]

>>12571035
Let's find a middle ground on this contentious issue. It's concrete.

[Anonymous No.12572581]

there's a smallest unit of time and space, therefore both are discrete

[Anonymous No.12572877]

neither

[Anonymous No.12572988]

>>12572581
As you approach Planck length I don't believe the measurement error follows a step function. Also things aren't aligned to a grid.

[Anonymous No.12572996]

>>12572581
>there's a smallest unit of time and space
No there isn't. The planck length is not "the smallest unit of spacetime"

[Anonymous No.12573004]

>>12572988
>Also things aren't aligned to a grid.
how do you know they aren't aligned to a grid of [math]1l_{P}^{2}[/math]

>>12572996
>According to our current understanding of physics, the planck length is the shortest unit of length possible in spacetime

[Anonymous No.12573028]

>>12573004
>how do you know they aren't aligned to a grid of 1l2P
Really both of my points are the same. Discrete doesn't have fuzzy boundaries, and a perfect boundary would actually violate the phenomena the Plank length/time/energy/popsicle is describing anyway.

[Anonymous No.12573052]

>>12571035
We can continue to make smaller and smaller units of time so it's continuous but maybe not space
You could argue that there's a smallest unit of space possible, like an atom, and therefore it's discreet

[Anonymous No.12574713]

>>12571035
Continuity is not real. It was invented so you can easily divide a bag of rice without caring about the smallest, true scale, a single rice. We already know there are ton of paradox caused by continuity.