Richard Feynman

[Anonymous No.12515261]

Is this man possibly the most based a scientist has ever been?

Who can rival him?

[Anonymous No.12515266]

>>12515261
Anybody who's not an immoral narcissist?

[Anonymous No.12515279]

>>12515266
>Anybody who's not an immoral narcissist?
What does that have to do with anything you woman?

[Anonymous No.12515284]

Bill Nye

[Anonymous No.12515291]

>>12515261
he's a little overrated, but he was a genius and an excellent lecturer

[Anonymous No.12515327]

>>12515266
OP here. To call a scientist, especially a physicist, "immoral" is retarded.

Like diplomatic immunity, those who seek the truth have scientific immunity.

Everybody is narcissistic

[Anonymous No.12515435]

>>12515327
>Like diplomatic immunity, those who seek the truth have scientific immunity.
dare I say based?

[Anonymous No.12515437]

>>12515284
w e w

[Anonymous No.12515459]

>>12515261
Yeah, I'm thinking based: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPapE-3FRw

[Anonymous No.12515468]

>>12515261
Me

[Anonymous No.12515477]

>>12515261
Einstein.

[Anonymous No.12515509]

>>12515266
>immoral narcissist
Nothing wrong with this.

[Anonymous No.12515522]

>>12515459
> be me
> watch video
> scroll down to comments
> Read comment:
> DesertstormPT
> 7 years ago (edited)
> "If it disagrees with experiment - it's WRONG! - That's all there is to it!"
>
> Many people still need to put this in their heads.
> Pretty based, read replies.
> Most people agree with him, as they should.
> Some faggot named Social Justice Warrior writes:
> well, Feynman might have been a great physicist, but this sentence is bs from a philosophy of science perspective
> says Popper's theory of falsification is outdated
Is this what people unironically believe? When has Popper's theory of Falsification become outdated?
Is this what people in s*ciologist and the like believe in to cope with being pseuds?

[Anonymous No.12515566]

>>12515522
I think it has something to do with Popper BTFO Marxists who insist on calling themselves scientific.
I like his philosophy of science stuff but his "Open Society", "Do not tolerate intolerance" stuff seems pretty Jewy, pic related.

[Anonymous No.12515569]

>>12515327
>>12515435
>>12515509

[Anonymous No.12515570]

>>12515261
Pascual Jordan
Kary Mullis (probably the most based scientist of all time)

[Anonymous No.12515584]

this nigga rivals Feynman big tiem

[Anonymous No.12515592]

>>12515570
>Kary Mullis (probably the most based scientist of all time)
this statement has definite potential
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfhhG0DJt6M&t=4s

[Anonymous No.12515947]

>>12515266
What's based about cucks who aren't immoral narcissists?

[Anonymous No.12516510]

>>12515266
Then they're not based.

[Anonymous No.12516516]

>>12515261
I'm somewhat fascinated by how hard this man would be #MeToo'd, were he still alive today.

[Anonymous No.12516525]

>>12515522
>Is this what people unironically believe?
There are people who unironically believe 5G radio is a mind control conspiracy, that climate change or vaccinating your kids are attempts to oppress people under the boot of certain political parties, that a certain ongoing pandemic is an elaborately orchestrated hoax to stifle everyone's freedoms, and that various world leaders are secretly lizard people. Gtfo of here with your baby shit.

[Anonymous No.12516529]

>>12515584
>He is best known for his work on children's television programs in North America and Australia.
no, he isn't based

[Anonymous No.12516532]

>>12515584
>Miller was intolerant of misspelled words and misplaced punctuation
i did't even see this at first, he's a retard

[Anonymous No.12516534]

>>12515327
>Like diplomatic immunity, those who seek the truth have scientific immunity.
Even if we give him immunity for his Manhatten project work, sleeping with the wifes of other men (including his PhD students) willnot fall under this immunity
>inb4 wow a smart man who fucks, basado

>>12515327
Not everybody writes several autobiographies about how he always outsmarts people

[Anonymous No.12516535]

>>12515327
>Like diplomatic immunity, those who seek the truth have scientific immunity.
Even if we give him immunity for his Manhatten project work, sleeping with the wifes of other men (including his PhD students) willnot fall under this immunity
>inb4 wow a smart man who fucks, basado

>Everybody is narcissistic
Not everybody writes several autobiographies about how smart he is

[Anonymous No.12516537]

>>12516534
>sleeping with the wifes of other men (including his PhD students) willnot fall under this immunity
Yes it does.
>inb4 wow a smart man who fucks, basado
Uh, yeah actually, it is.
>Not everybody writes several autobiographies about how he always outsmarts people
Not everybody writes autobiographies in the first place.

[Anonymous No.12516539]

>>12516535
>writes several autobiographies about how smart he is
even more based

[Anonymous No.12516546]

>>12515522
>be OP
>read same comments
>Yoochan Shin
>7 months ago
>@Social Justice Warrior Wow, philosophy of science is pretty interesting
retards

[Anonymous No.12516548]

>>12515509
based stirnerposter

[Anonymous No.12516550]

>>12516535
he slept with peoples' wives? where did you read that? that sounds like a really fun read

[Anonymous No.12516552]

>>12516535
>Not everybody writes several autobiographies about how smart he is
sure, but consider his were best-selling

[Anonymous No.12516644]

>>12515266
How is he an immoral narcissist? He was the only one to not let them away with the Challenger mass murder.

[Anonymous No.12516651]

>>12515266
How is he an immoral narcissist? He was the only one to not let them get away with the Challenger murders.

[Anonymous No.12516661]

>>12515522
Don't expect universal agreement or cooperation. Life is struggle

[Anonymous No.12516677]

>>12515261
WHY do you ask that?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36GT2zI8lVA&ab_channel=firewalker