[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 26 KB, 500x419, thatfeel_4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12458373 No.12458373 [Reply] [Original]

Can someone fill me in on the vaccine thing with nerve damage?
I read that a few people who got the vaccine got bell's palsy, but no one in the control group did. Is that just for Pfizer's?
And how would mRNA creating an antigen even do that?
And why do I keep hearing about infertility? I can't find anything about infertility in any of the studies, except erectile dysfunction from the virus itself. I don't get why so many people bring up the possibility of infertility "happening years down the line." Has any vaccine ever caused infertility in anyone? And again, how would mRNA creating a spike protein antigen even affect anything that affects fertility?

>> No.12458387
File: 349 KB, 598x711, 88C8BAD7-4225-4705-965E-998933F425AE.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12458387

>>12458373
DONT ASK QUESTIONS. JUST TAKE THE VACCINE, CHUD. DONT YOU CARE AVOUT SAVING LIVES???

>> No.12458411

The whole infertility thing is a hoax. As far as the Bell's palsy goes, the number of participants who developed palsy is roughly the rate that you would expect from a random sampling of the population. There's no reason to assume it was because of the vaccine.

>> No.12458438

>>12458373
/sci/ isn't the place to ask this. It's filled with /pol/tards who filled the board with their garbage "statistics" that "proved" election fraud when Trump lost.

>> No.12458441

>>12458438
I don't understand why we let them back in after deleting /new/

>> No.12458460

>>12458387
How many of these do you have saved anyway

>> No.12458469

>>12458441
lazy jannies. I think /sci/ is only behind /fit/ in terms of how much off-topic jannies can tolerate.

>> No.12458779

>>12458469
Worst part is that they'd see deleting stuff like >>12458387 as "censoring their views"

>> No.12459287

>>12458411
>As far as the Bell's palsy goes, the number of participants who developed palsy is roughly the rate that you would expect from a random sampling of the population. There's no reason to assume it was because of the vaccine.
So if you take a sample of the population, and use them as the control group, all of a sudden they will develop Bell's Palsy? No sir, I don't think so. If this were happening, then every drug trial everywhere would be getting people with Bell's Palsy because hey, that's a normal random sample.

>> No.12459378

>>12459287
If you take a sample of the population, you'd find a rate of bell's palsy similar to the rate found in this vaccine trial sample. This is because the vaccine sample correlates to the general population.

>> No.12459384

>>12458373
>I read
Do not read, think !

>> No.12459394

>>12459378
Didn't they have 4 people develop Bell's Palsy? Wouldn't that require a sample size of 30,000 to match the rate in the general population?

>> No.12459413

>>12458373
I'm also curious about supposed nerve damage from it. No idea how the mechanism will work.
The infertility thing comes from two quacks named Wodarg and Yeadon, who are irrelevant and need attention again. The mechanism they proposed would cause infertility in women has been shown to be wrong.
The virus itself causes infertility in males by the way. Sperm count dropping to only millions in many cases. We don't know if it's reversible.

>> No.12459440

my gf is a surgeon and says its a nothing burger