[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 42 KB, 640x640, 1606554058242.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12422074 No.12422074 [Reply] [Original]

Also statsfags how do I into?
I'm going to ask a series of questions, if you can't answer them or reason them you fail.
ready?:
What is science?

>> No.12422083

>>12422074
>What is science?
Something that smart niggas do.

>> No.12422163

Quantified philosophy
Messing around but keeping records

>> No.12422235

>>12422163
define philosophy

>> No.12422341

>>12422235
The art of asking questions that never ends.

>> No.12422515

>>12422074
Consistency

>> No.12423733

>>12422341
How do they find the answers to the questions?
>>12422515
so there is no reproducibility crisis and physics i sonly accurate for observed experimental evidence?

>> No.12423991

>>12423733
>How do they find the answers to the questions?
Anything goes.

>> No.12424002

>>12422074
I'm tired as fuck OP but I'll play your game.
Science is a methodology for understanding the world around us, and discovering more about it.
The most basic tenants are rooted in reproducibility and precision.
As such, meticulous record keeping is used (at least when the science is good), to ensure that the experiment is reproducible by others.

>> No.12424348

>>12424002
Science and Philosophy are the same thing until the reniassance placed a divide claiming philosophy is for abstract and science is for emphirical

While they are not wrong, it's very misleading to think that they are different fields with different methodology

>> No.12424359

>>12424002
Define every word that you just used.

>> No.12424391

>>12424002
Not even the standard of reliable and valid. But following your definitions stuff that has no experiments or realistic experiments falls out the window so string theory isn’t science according to your definition.
>>12424359
You have to define the word define first.

>> No.12424399

>>12423991
so in science anything goes?
>>12424002
is science true?
>>12424348
so science is based on purely verifiable observation?
>>12424359
define define.

>> No.12424808

>>12424399
>so in science anything goes?
According to the guy I referenced yes. He is called Paul Feyerabend and specifically his book „Against the Method“. Most don’t know it, but that what many, if not most ordinary scientists espouse (Falsificationism) has been proven indefensible to those in the know, but there the agreements end.

>> No.12425026

>>12424808
Is science true or false?

>> No.12425070

>>12424808
Are you convinced of this, or know it to be true?

>> No.12425091

>>12422083
Fpbp no need to answer anymore of OPs retarded questions.

>> No.12425101
File: 93 KB, 512x455, Witty.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12425101

>>12424359
> t. brainlet
Read Wittgenstein.

>> No.12425112

>>12425101
And is he supposed to be convincing or something?

>> No.12425120

>>12425112
He's supposed to tell you why that request was absolutely pointless.

>> No.12425128

>>12425120
So he's convincing me to not care whether I'm convinced or not?

>> No.12425134

>>12425101
Define what you mean by "reading"

>> No.12425135

>>12425120
define pointless

>> No.12425140

>>12422074
How am I supposed to take you seriously if you start with a retarded question? Take your questions to /pol and don't return.
Science is the use of scientific method

>> No.12425147

>>12425140
what is the scientific method?

>> No.12425149

>>12422074
>What is science?
Baby don't test me!

>> No.12425238

>>12424002
>tenants
You fail.

>> No.12425290

>>12425149
you sounds like an obese black woman.
also yes this is a test. answer the question.

>> No.12425382

>>12425290
It's a What is Love? reference but kek I grew up with those ladies, pretty cool tbqh.

>> No.12425388

>>12425382
To clarify I am not the guy you were replying to.

>> No.12425391

>>12424359
Oxford dictionary has the appropriate definitions

>> No.12425395

>>12425026
>>12424399
>is science true
Ill-posed question. Is an apple true?

>> No.12425676

>>12425391
So everything depends on Oxford dictionary? the dictionary is the codex of life?
>>12425395
Is Science true or false?

>> No.12425797

>>12422074
i discovered a type of fibration, science is a search for the absolute truth

>> No.12425821

>>12425676
>So everything depends on Oxford dictionary? the dictionary is the codex of life?
No, but our discussion does. You asked me to define my terms. These definitions are ultimately arbitrary, but I choose to use those that are generally agreed upon.

>Is Science true or false?
Is Apple true or false?

>> No.12425850

>>12422074
>What is science?
Baby don't hurt me.

>> No.12425884

>>12425821
>Is Apple true or false?
Is science true or false?
>These definitions are ultimately arbitrary
so they aren't consistent?

>> No.12425887

>>12425850
BAM
that's me hurting you.